Skip to content

Post Stroke Motor Learning

Post-stroke Procedural Learning: From Neural Substrates to Therapeutic Modulation by Non-invasive Brain Stimulation

Status
Suspended
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01519843
Enrollment
100
Registered
2012-01-27
Start date
2010-09-30
Completion date
2030-12-31
Last updated
2023-05-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemiparesis, Stroke

Keywords

stroke

Brief summary

Noninvasive brain stimulations (NIBS) will be used in chronic stroke patients to improve motor learning. Functional magnetic resonance imaging will be used to evaluate the mechanisms underlying motor learning in healthy volunteers and in chronic stroke patients.

Detailed description

transcranial direct current stimulation will be used for NIBS

Interventions

tdcs (ELDITH, Neuroconn, Ilmenau, Germany)

DEVICEtranscranial magnetic stimulation TMS

TMS (The Magstim Company Ltd, UK) Magstim 200² with a figure-of-eight coil was used to determine the hot spot eliciting consistent movements in the contralateral hand

Sponsors

University Hospital of Mont-Godinne
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 95 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* stroke with at least slight deficit

Exclusion criteria

* epilepsy * contraindication to tDCS and/or to fMRI * presence of metal in the head * inability to understand / complete behavioral tasks * chronic intake of alcohol or recreational drugs * major health condition * presence of pacemaker (for the fMRI part only) * pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Motor learning improvement with tDCSImprovement on motor learning were recorded from baseline to 4 weeks after the interventionperformance on a motor skill learning task and on different commonly used task (Purdue Pegboard, hand dynamometer, pinch dynamometer, 9-HPT ,...) were measured to explore the impact of tDCS on these parameters

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Neuroimagingbefore motor learning, during motor learning and after (immediately, 30,60min) motor learning (with or without tDCS)Does cerebral mechanisms underlying motor learning differ from healthy subject to stroke patients?
Neurophysiological outcome measurestart of session 5min before motor learning, just at the end of the motor learning, after 30 min of motor learning, after 60 min of motor learning, Recall test at 1,2,3,4 weeks after the day of intervention (with or without tDCS)measure of brain excitability and connectivity with TMS (single and paired pulse)

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026