Skip to content

Buccal Versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Third Trimester Induction of Labor

Buccal Versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Third Trimester Induction of Labor: Randomized Control Trial

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01519765
Enrollment
73
Registered
2012-01-27
Start date
2011-07-31
Completion date
2014-12-31
Last updated
2016-09-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pregnancy

Brief summary

Approximately 22% of term pregnancies are induced. Misoprostol, a prostaglandin E1 analogue, is a widely accepted induction agent, that has been proven safe and effective for induction of labor. It stimulates both cervical ripening and uterine contractions, thus making it an ideal induction agent for unfavorable cervices. Research has examined the pharmacokinetics of different administration routes and effects on uterine contractility, side effects, and safety. Vaginal misoprostol has been shown to be superior over oral administration however patients often prefer a more tolerable route. Buccal administration has already been shown to be as effective as vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction in both first trimester and second trimester abortions. There is minimal research comparing buccal versus vaginal for third trimester induction of labor. The investigators study is a prospective, double blinded, randomized control trial comparing vaginal misoprostol and buccal misoprostol in equal dosages of 25 mcg. The investigators seek to answer the question whether buccal misoprostol is as effective as vaginal misoprostol for third trimester induction of labor.

Detailed description

Design Overview This will be a prospective, double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial comparing buccal versus vaginal misoprostol in equal doses (25 mcg every 4 hours). Each participant will receive one buccal and one vaginal tablet, only one containing misoprostol. The administration will be repeated every four hours if contractions are inadequate (frequency less than every 5 minutes) until the cervix is favorable, spontaneous rupture of membranes occurs, or the patient is in active labor. Patient will be continued on intermittent fetal heart monitoring 1 hour after administration. Prior to discharge women in the study will be asked to complete a questionnaire as to their preferences of route of administration and side effects. 1. Recruitment, Consenting, and Confirming Eligibility: Women with obstetric, medical, or psychosocial indications of induction of labor at University of California, Los Angeles Ronald Reagan Medical Center will be evaluated for participation. Those who meet eligibility criteria will be invited to participate. The subject will be counseled about the study, and if interested, will undergo the consent process. Each potential subject will receive a thorough overview of the study protocol and will review the consent form with study staff. All questions will be answered. The subject will be advised that a decision not to participate in the study will not affect the quality or availability of medical services she will receive at the hospital. She will also be advised that she can stop participating in the study at any time, for any reason, and that this will not impact the services she receives. If the subject elects to participate, two copies of the consent will be signed by the subject and research staff. A signed consent, along with a copy of the Experimental Subjects Bill of Rights, will be given to the subject. The other consent will be filed in a locked file cabinet. A general medical and gynecological history and physical will be done as is standard of care. Routine obstetric labs and any other medically indicated labs will be sent as is standard of care. Patients will undergo a non-stress test and uterine contraction monitoring prior to induction of labor. Obstetrical ultrasound will be reviewed or performed if indicated per the physician. Assessment of the cervix and Bishop score, pelvis, fetal size, and presentation will be performed. An unfavorable cervix is defined as Bishop score of 6 or less (ACOG). Women with ruptured membranes will not be able to participate. Gestational age will be determined on the basis of last menstrual period, confirmed by earliest ultrasound, or a corrected estimated date of confinement by the earliest ultrasound. 2. Misoprostol Administration/ Evaluation: The subject will be randomized to either of two groups. Each participant will receive both a vaginal and buccal tablet, with one tablet containing misoprostol. Subjects will be instructed by a nurse regarding buccal placement and to swallow any residue remaining after 20 minutes. Intravaginal administration of pill will be performed by a resident Physician or midwife. The subject will remain recumbent for at least 30 minutes. The subject will undergo fetal heart rate (FHR) and uterine contraction monitoring for at least 1 hour after misoprostol administration. The subject may undergo further FHR and uterine contraction monitoring per physician discretion. If the subject does not have adequate uterine contractions (uterine contraction occurring at least every 5 minutes), the same dosage and route of administration regimen will be repeated to 6 maximum dosage (maximum of 150mcg). Cervical assessment of Bishop score will be performed with each treatment during vaginal administration. Treatment will continue until spontaneous rupture of membranes, active labor, or favorable cervix (Bishop \>6). Augmentation of labor using pitocin may start after 4 hours of last misoprostol dose according to routine protocol. Amniotomy may be performed at the discretion of the managing obstetrician. If labor is not achieved after receiving 150mcg of misoprostol, it will be categorized as a failed induction. At this time, the subject may be offered oxytocin induction, foley bulb mechanical dilation, or cesarean section, according to the fetal and participant condition. Terbutaline 0.25mg subcutaneous may be given for tachysystole (5 uterine contractions in 10 minutes) with FHR changes or FHR category II-III changes (minimal variability, prolonged deceleration, repetitive variables, sinusoidal pattern, repetitive late deceleration) that are not responsive to resuscitative measures ( oxygen supplementation, side positioning, intravenous fluids) according to physician's discretion. 3. Follow up: A short survey questionnaire assessing gastrointestinal side effects, experiences, and preferences of route of administration will be given prior to discharge.

Interventions

Buccal rather than Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor

DRUGVaginal misoprostol

Vaginal rather than buccal misoprostol for induction of labor

Sponsors

University of California, Los Angeles
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Willingness to participate / consent in a placebo-controlled trial * Age 18 and older * Pregnancy between 34 and 42 years of gestation * Admitted for labor induction because of either medical, obstetric, or psychosocial indications * Live singleton fetus * Bishop score less than or equal to six * Cephalic presentation * Reactive non-stress test or Negative contraction test

Exclusion criteria

* Premature rupture of membranes * Multiparity \> 5 * Contraindication to vaginal or labor delivery * Suspected placental abruption * Significant hepatic, renal or cardiac disease * Known hypersensitivity to misoprostol or prostaglandin analogue * Recent prostaglandin administration for induction of labor * Multifetal pregnancy * Macrosomia \> 4500g estimated fetal weight by ultrasound or leopold

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Vaginal Delivery Within 24 Hours of Labor InductionWithin 24 hours of labor inductionPercentage of participants able to achieve vaginal delivery within 24 hours of labor induction.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Vaginal DeliveryStart of induction until vaginal deliveryTime from start of induction to vaginal delivery was computed in participants who achieved vaginal delivery.
Time to DeliveryUntil deliveryTime from induction to delivery. All participants were included.
Time to Active LaborUntil active laborTime from induction to active labor. Active labor defined as 4 cm and above. P-value computed by Kruskal-Wallis test.
Rates of Vaginal DeliveryUntil deliveryPercentage of participants who delivered vaginally
Cesarean Delivery RateUntil deliveryPercentage of participants who underwent a cesarean delivery was computed. P-value was computed using Fisher's exact test.
Number of Misoprostol DosesUntil deliveryNumber of misoprostol 25 mcg doses used during induction of labor.
Arrest of DilationUntil deliveryPercentage of participants who presented with arrest of dilation. Arrest of dilation was determined by the delivering physician. P-value was computed using Fisher exact test.
Failed Induction of LaborUntil deliveryPercentage of participants who were determined as a failed induction of labor. Failed induction was defined as no cervical change despite 24 hours of pitocin or 12 hours of pitocin after rupture of membranes. P value was computed by Fisher exact test.
PitocinUntil deliveryPercentage of patients that used pitocin during labor. P-values were computed using Fisher exact test.
Artificial Rupture of Membranes (AROM)Until deliveryPercentage of participants that required AROM
Abnormal Fetal Heart Tracing (FHT)Until 4 hours of last misoprostol doseFeta heart tracing was reviewed for every participant until 4 hours from last misoprostol dose. Percentage of participants who presented with abnormal fetal heart tracing was computed. Abnormal fetal heart tracing was defined as category 2 and 3 fetal heart tracing according to standard criteria. Abnormal fetal heart tracing included any of the following tachycardia, bradycardia without absent variability, minimal variability, absent variability with or without recurrent decelerations, marked variability, prolonged deceleration and recurrent late deceleration, sinusoidal pattern. P values were computed by Fisher exact test.
Tachysystole With Abnormal FHTUntil 4 hours after last misoprostol doseFeta heart tracing was reviewed for every participant until 4 hours from last misoprostol dose. Percentage of participants who presented with tachysystole and abnormal fetal heart tracing was computed. Abnormal fetal heart tracing was defined as category 2 and above. Tachysystole was defined as more than 5 uterine contractions within 10 minutes. P values were computed by Fisher exact test.
TachysystoleUntil 4 hours after last misoprostol doseFetal heart tracing was reviewed until 4 hours after last misoprostol dose. Percentage of participant with tachysystole were computed. Tachysystole was defined as more than five uterine contractions in 10 minutes. P value was computed using Fisher exact test
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) AdmissionUntil discharge from hospitalPercentage of participants whose baby was admitted to NICU was computed from time to delivery to time of hospital discharge. P-value was computed using Fisher Exact test.
MeconiumUntil deliveryPercentage of participants who developed meconium was computed. Presence of meconium was evaluated by the delivering physician. P-value was computed using Fisher exact test.
ChorioamnionitisUntil 48 hours after deliveryPercentage of participants affected with chorioamnionitis
APGARS5 minutes after deliveryMedian (APGAR) score at 5 minutes after delivery. APGAR: Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, Respiration Apgar scale is determine by evaluating a newborn on 5 categories on a scale from 0 to 2, then summing up the five values. Score range is 0 to 10. Score above 7 are generally normal. Score below 3 may indicated poor status.
Patient Satisfaction With Buccal Versus Vaginal Misoprostol Administration.Until 72 hours after deliveryAll patients were given a patient satisfaction survey. Patients were asked to use a Likert scale to rate their experience on the following: Likert sub-scale: 1 to 5 1=Not at all/ Never to 5= Very Much/ Always 1. Nausea and vomiting 1=better outcome 5=worse outcome 2. effectiveness of misoprostol 1=worse outcome 5=better outcome 3. concerns of misoprostol 1=better outcome 5=worse outcome 4. overall labor experience 1=worse outcome 5=better outcome Patients will be followed for the duration of their labor(usually up to 72hrs). The satisfaction survey will be conducted after delivery but will evaluate side effects that they recollect in labor.
Patient PreferenceUntil 72 hours after deliveryAll patients were given a patient satisfaction survey after delivery. They were asked to select their preference for misoprostol intervention type: buccal, vaginal, or either.
Foley BulbUntil deliveryPercentage of participants that required foley bulb use.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Buccal Misoprostol
Participants received misoprostol 25 mcg via buccal route and placebo pill via vaginal route. The same regimen was then repeated every four hours according to protocol.
34
Vaginal Misoprostol
Participants received misoprostol 25 mcg via vaginal route and placebo pill via buccal route. This same regimen was repeated every four hours according to protocol.
34
Total68

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event01
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy20
Overall StudyProtocol Violation10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBuccal MisoprostolVaginal MisoprostolTotal
Age, Continuous28.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.3
30 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.51
29.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.39
Bishop score3 scores on a scale3 scores on a scale3 scores on a scale
Fetal anomaly6 participants1 participants7 participants
Gestational age40.2 weeks40.8 weeks40.5 weeks
Induction indication
Cholestasis
2 participants2 participants4 participants
Induction indication
Diabetes
3 participants2 participants5 participants
Induction indication
Elective
7 participants3 participants10 participants
Induction indication
Hypertensive disorder
4 participants7 participants11 participants
Induction indication
Oligohydramnios
1 participants3 participants4 participants
Induction indication
Other
2 participants1 participants3 participants
Induction indication
Post dates
15 participants16 participants31 participants
Parity
Multiparous
9 participants9 participants18 participants
Parity
Nulliparous
25 participants25 participants50 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
34 participants34 participants68 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
34 Participants34 Participants68 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 370 / 36
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 370 / 36

Outcome results

Primary

Vaginal Delivery Within 24 Hours of Labor Induction

Percentage of participants able to achieve vaginal delivery within 24 hours of labor induction.

Time frame: Within 24 hours of labor induction

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Buccal MisoprostolVaginal Delivery Within 24 Hours of Labor Induction14.7 percentage of participants
Vaginal MisoprostolVaginal Delivery Within 24 Hours of Labor Induction23.5 percentage of participants
Comparison: A consecutive sample will be used as women are recruited. Based on an 80% power and an alpha of 0.05, a sample size of 103 subjects in each arm is required to detect a 20% difference between deliveries within 24hrs between the two treatment arms. An effect size of 20% was selected as this is thought to be a clinically significant difference. This is based on the Wing study showing 50% delivery within 24 hrs with vaginal misoprostol.p-value: 0.1611Fisher Exact
Secondary

Abnormal Fetal Heart Tracing (FHT)

Feta heart tracing was reviewed for every participant until 4 hours from last misoprostol dose. Percentage of participants who presented with abnormal fetal heart tracing was computed. Abnormal fetal heart tracing was defined as category 2 and 3 fetal heart tracing according to standard criteria. Abnormal fetal heart tracing included any of the following tachycardia, bradycardia without absent variability, minimal variability, absent variability with or without recurrent decelerations, marked variability, prolonged deceleration and recurrent late deceleration, sinusoidal pattern. P values were computed by Fisher exact test.

Time frame: Until 4 hours of last misoprostol dose

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Buccal MisoprostolAbnormal Fetal Heart Tracing (FHT)15.2 percentage of participants
Vaginal MisoprostolAbnormal Fetal Heart Tracing (FHT)20.6 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.751Fisher Exact
Secondary

APGARS

Median (APGAR) score at 5 minutes after delivery. APGAR: Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, Respiration Apgar scale is determine by evaluating a newborn on 5 categories on a scale from 0 to 2, then summing up the five values. Score range is 0 to 10. Score above 7 are generally normal. Score below 3 may indicated poor status.

Time frame: 5 minutes after delivery

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Buccal MisoprostolAPGARS9 score
Vaginal MisoprostolAPGARS9 score
p-value: 0.579Kruskal-Wallis
Secondary

Arrest of Dilation

Percentage of participants who presented with arrest of dilation. Arrest of dilation was determined by the delivering physician. P-value was computed using Fisher exact test.

Time frame: Until delivery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Buccal MisoprostolArrest of Dilation29.4 percentage of participants
Vaginal MisoprostolArrest of Dilation14.7 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.2417Fisher Exact
Secondary

Artificial Rupture of Membranes (AROM)

Percentage of participants that required AROM

Time frame: Until delivery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Buccal MisoprostolArtificial Rupture of Membranes (AROM)64.7 percentage of participants
Vaginal MisoprostolArtificial Rupture of Membranes (AROM)67.6 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.797Fisher Exact
Secondary

Cesarean Delivery Rate

Percentage of participants who underwent a cesarean delivery was computed. P-value was computed using Fisher's exact test.

Time frame: Until delivery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Buccal MisoprostolCesarean Delivery Rate41.2 percentage of participants
Vaginal MisoprostolCesarean Delivery Rate29.4 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.4469Fisher Exact
Secondary

Chorioamnionitis

Percentage of participants affected with chorioamnionitis

Time frame: Until 48 hours after delivery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Buccal MisoprostolChorioamnionitis17.6 percentage of participants
Vaginal MisoprostolChorioamnionitis14.7 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.741Fisher Exact
Secondary

Failed Induction of Labor

Percentage of participants who were determined as a failed induction of labor. Failed induction was defined as no cervical change despite 24 hours of pitocin or 12 hours of pitocin after rupture of membranes. P value was computed by Fisher exact test.

Time frame: Until delivery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Buccal MisoprostolFailed Induction of Labor0 percentage of participants
Vaginal MisoprostolFailed Induction of Labor0 percentage of participants
p-value: 1Fisher Exact
Secondary

Foley Bulb

Percentage of participants that required foley bulb use.

Time frame: Until delivery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Buccal MisoprostolFoley Bulb38.2 percentage of participants
Vaginal MisoprostolFoley Bulb41.2 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.8043Fisher Exact
Secondary

Meconium

Percentage of participants who developed meconium was computed. Presence of meconium was evaluated by the delivering physician. P-value was computed using Fisher exact test.

Time frame: Until delivery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Buccal MisoprostolMeconium23.5 percentage of participants
Vaginal MisoprostolMeconium23.5 percentage of participants
p-value: 1Fisher Exact
Secondary

Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) Admission

Percentage of participants whose baby was admitted to NICU was computed from time to delivery to time of hospital discharge. P-value was computed using Fisher Exact test.

Time frame: Until discharge from hospital

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Buccal MisoprostolNeonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) Admission20.6 percentage of participants
Vaginal MisoprostolNeonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) Admission11.8 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.5118Fisher Exact
Secondary

Number of Misoprostol Doses

Number of misoprostol 25 mcg doses used during induction of labor.

Time frame: Until delivery

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Buccal MisoprostolNumber of Misoprostol Doses2 doses
Vaginal MisoprostolNumber of Misoprostol Doses2 doses
p-value: 0.093Kruskal-Wallis
Secondary

Patient Preference

All patients were given a patient satisfaction survey after delivery. They were asked to select their preference for misoprostol intervention type: buccal, vaginal, or either.

Time frame: Until 72 hours after delivery

Population: All participants were given the survey however incomplete collection was obtained.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Buccal MisoprostolPatient PreferenceBuccal19 participants
Buccal MisoprostolPatient PreferenceVaginal1 participants
Buccal MisoprostolPatient PreferenceEither1 participants
Vaginal MisoprostolPatient PreferenceBuccal18 participants
Vaginal MisoprostolPatient PreferenceVaginal3 participants
Vaginal MisoprostolPatient PreferenceEither4 participants
p-value: 0.2868Chi-squared
Secondary

Patient Satisfaction With Buccal Versus Vaginal Misoprostol Administration.

All patients were given a patient satisfaction survey. Patients were asked to use a Likert scale to rate their experience on the following: Likert sub-scale: 1 to 5 1=Not at all/ Never to 5= Very Much/ Always 1. Nausea and vomiting 1=better outcome 5=worse outcome 2. effectiveness of misoprostol 1=worse outcome 5=better outcome 3. concerns of misoprostol 1=better outcome 5=worse outcome 4. overall labor experience 1=worse outcome 5=better outcome Patients will be followed for the duration of their labor(usually up to 72hrs). The satisfaction survey will be conducted after delivery but will evaluate side effects that they recollect in labor.

Time frame: Until 72 hours after delivery

Population: Patient surveys were requested from all participants however incomplete patient survey collection was obtained.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Buccal MisoprostolPatient Satisfaction With Buccal Versus Vaginal Misoprostol Administration.Nausea/ Vomiting1 units on a scale
Buccal MisoprostolPatient Satisfaction With Buccal Versus Vaginal Misoprostol Administration.Effectiveness4 units on a scale
Buccal MisoprostolPatient Satisfaction With Buccal Versus Vaginal Misoprostol Administration.Patient Concern2 units on a scale
Buccal MisoprostolPatient Satisfaction With Buccal Versus Vaginal Misoprostol Administration.Labor satisfaction4 units on a scale
Vaginal MisoprostolPatient Satisfaction With Buccal Versus Vaginal Misoprostol Administration.Labor satisfaction4 units on a scale
Vaginal MisoprostolPatient Satisfaction With Buccal Versus Vaginal Misoprostol Administration.Nausea/ Vomiting1 units on a scale
Vaginal MisoprostolPatient Satisfaction With Buccal Versus Vaginal Misoprostol Administration.Patient Concern1 units on a scale
Vaginal MisoprostolPatient Satisfaction With Buccal Versus Vaginal Misoprostol Administration.Effectiveness4 units on a scale
Comparison: Score for Nausea and vomitingp-value: 0.8062Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Effectivenessp-value: 0.1505Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Patient concernp-value: 0.1223Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Labor satisfactionp-value: 0.538Kruskal-Wallis
Secondary

Pitocin

Percentage of patients that used pitocin during labor. P-values were computed using Fisher exact test.

Time frame: Until delivery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Buccal MisoprostolPitocin97.1 percentage of participants
Vaginal MisoprostolPitocin82.4 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.1054Fisher Exact
Secondary

Rates of Vaginal Delivery

Percentage of participants who delivered vaginally

Time frame: Until delivery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Buccal MisoprostolRates of Vaginal Delivery58.8 percentage of participants
Vaginal MisoprostolRates of Vaginal Delivery70.6 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.4469Fisher Exact
Secondary

Tachysystole

Fetal heart tracing was reviewed until 4 hours after last misoprostol dose. Percentage of participant with tachysystole were computed. Tachysystole was defined as more than five uterine contractions in 10 minutes. P value was computed using Fisher exact test

Time frame: Until 4 hours after last misoprostol dose

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Buccal MisoprostolTachysystole26.5 percentage of participants
Vaginal MisoprostolTachysystole32.4 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.7906Fisher Exact
Secondary

Tachysystole With Abnormal FHT

Feta heart tracing was reviewed for every participant until 4 hours from last misoprostol dose. Percentage of participants who presented with tachysystole and abnormal fetal heart tracing was computed. Abnormal fetal heart tracing was defined as category 2 and above. Tachysystole was defined as more than 5 uterine contractions within 10 minutes. P values were computed by Fisher exact test.

Time frame: Until 4 hours after last misoprostol dose

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Buccal MisoprostolTachysystole With Abnormal FHT5.9 percentage of participants
Vaginal MisoprostolTachysystole With Abnormal FHT8.8 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.6244Fisher Exact
Secondary

Time to Active Labor

Time from induction to active labor. Active labor defined as 4 cm and above. P-value computed by Kruskal-Wallis test.

Time frame: Until active labor

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Buccal MisoprostolTime to Active Labor22.1 hours
Vaginal MisoprostolTime to Active Labor19.4 hours
p-value: 0.1141Kruskal-Wallis
Secondary

Time to Delivery

Time from induction to delivery. All participants were included.

Time frame: Until delivery

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Buccal MisoprostolTime to Delivery34.1 hours
Vaginal MisoprostolTime to Delivery27.5 hours
p-value: 0.0623Kruskal-Wallis
Secondary

Time to Vaginal Delivery

Time from start of induction to vaginal delivery was computed in participants who achieved vaginal delivery.

Time frame: Start of induction until vaginal delivery

Population: Participants who achieved vaginal delivery were included in the analysis

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Buccal MisoprostolTime to Vaginal Delivery33.3 hours
Vaginal MisoprostolTime to Vaginal Delivery26.5 hours
p-value: 0.018t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026