Skip to content

Comparison of Closed-loop Operation After Morning Meal With and Without Carbohydrate Counting

An Open-label, Randomized Two-way, Cross-over Study to Compare Meal-and-carbohydrate-announcement Strategy Versus Meal-announcement Strategy During Closed-loop Regulation of Glucose Levels in a Morning Meal in Adults With Type-1 Diabetes.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01519102
Acronym
CLASS02
Enrollment
12
Registered
2012-01-26
Start date
2012-01-31
Completion date
2012-11-30
Last updated
2012-12-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type-1 Diabetes

Brief summary

Closed-loop strategy is composed of three components: glucose sensor to read glucose levels, insulin pump to infuse insulin and a dosing mathematical algorithm to decide on the required insulin dosage based on the sensor's readings. A dual-hormone closed-loop system would regulate glucose levels through the infusion of two hormones: insulin and glucagon. The main goal of this project is to assess whether a dual-hormone closed-loop strategy would alleviate the burden of carbohydrate counting from patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) without a significant degradation in post-meal glucose control. Each patient will be admitted twice to a clinical research facility. In one visit, patients will eat a morning meal accompanied with a matching insulin bolus (depending on the carbohydrate content of the meal) and glucose levels will be subsequently regulated using dual-hormone closed-loop system. In the other visit, patients will eat the same meal but will inject only a partial insulin bolus (not depending on carbohydrate content of the meal) and the remaining needed insulin will be delivered based on glucose sensor excursions as part of closed-loop operation. If post-meal glucose levels were indifferent between the two visits, then this would suggest that carbohydrate counting may not be necessary during closed-loop operation as the closed-loop system will give any remaining insulin needed to cover the glucose absorbed from the meal. Twelve subjects will be enrolled in this study.

Interventions

DEVICEDual Hormone closed-loop system

The closed-loop system is composed of three components: continuous glucose system, insulin infusion pumps that infuses insulin and glucagon and a control algorithm that decides on the infusion rates based on sensor readings.

Sponsors

McGill University
CollaboratorOTHER
Montreal Children's Hospital of the MUHC
CollaboratorOTHER
Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montreal
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Males and females ≥ 18 and ≤ 65 years of old. * Clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes for at least one year. The diagnosis of type 1 diabetes is based on the investigator's judgment and medical history (e.g. history of acido-ketosis, etc.); C peptide level and antibody determinations are not needed. * The subject will have been on insulin pump therapy for at least 3 months. * Last (less than 3 months) HbA1c ≤ 12%.

Exclusion criteria

* Clinically significant nephropathy, neuropathy (especially clinically significant gastroparesis) or retinopathy as judged by the investigator. * Recent (\< 3 months) acute macrovascular event e.g. acute coronary syndrome or cardiac surgery. * Pregnancy. * Severe hypoglycemic episode within two weeks of screening. • Medication likely to affect with the interpretation of the results: Prandase, Victoza, Byetta and Symlin * Known or suspected allergy to the trial products or meal contents. * Other serious medical illness likely to interfere with study participation or with the ability to complete the trial by the judgment of the investigator. * Failure to comply with team's recommendations (e.g. not willing to eat snack, not willing to change pump parameters, etc). * Unreliable carbohydrate counting * Problems with venous access

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Incremental area under the curve of plasma glucose concentration as compared to pre-meal glucose value of the postprandial glucose excursions0-300min

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Mean plasma glucose concentration.
Total insulin delivery
Total glucagon delivery
Percentage of postprandial time of plasma glucose concentrations spent in the high range (above 10.0 mmol/l).0-300 min
Postprandial peak and incremental postprandial peak of plasma glucose concentration
Percentage of time of plasma glucose concentrations spent in target range. Target range is defined to be between 4.0 and 10.0 mmol/l for 150 minutes postmeal and between 4.0 and 8.0 mmol/l afterwards
Percentage of postprandial time of plasma glucose concentrations spent in the low range (below 4.0mmol/l)0-300min
Plasma glucose concentration and incremental plasma glucose concentration at 2 hours postmeal

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 21, 2026