Skip to content

Study To Understand Efficacy And Safety Of Investigational Agent (PF-04937319) Compared To Approved Agent (Glimepiride) In Patients With Diabetes On Metformin

A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled, Dose-ranging, Parallel Group Study To Evaluate Safety And Efficacy Of Pf-04937319 And Glimepiride In Adult Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled On Metformin

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01517373
Enrollment
304
Registered
2012-01-25
Start date
2012-02-29
Completion date
2013-01-31
Last updated
2017-01-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Keywords

T2DM, PF-04937319, Phase 2

Brief summary

This is a study to understand efficacy and safety of investigational agent (PF-04937319) compared to approved agent (glimepiride) in patients with diabetes on metformin

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo

Combination of tablets and capsules, a total of 3 pills/dose, administered once daily for 84-days

DRUGPF-04937319 10 mg

Combination of tablets and capsules, dose of 10 mg, a total of 3 pills/dose, administered once daily for 84-days

DRUGPF-04937319 50 mg

Combination of tablets and capsules, dose of 50 mg, a total of 3 pills/dose, administered once daily for 84-days

DRUGPF-04937319 100 mg

Combination of tablets and capsules, dose of 100 mg, a total of 3 pills/dose, administered once daily for 84-days

DRUGGlimepiride

Combination of tablets and capsules, dose of up to 6 mg, a total of 3 pills/dose, administered once daily for 84-days

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18-70 yrs, male and females, with T2DM, on metformin alone or in combination with 1 other oral agent

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects with recent cardiovascular events, those with evidence of diabetic complications

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 12Baseline (Day 1), Week 12HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin which is measured primarily to identify the average glycemic control over prolonged periods of time. The normal range for the HbA1c test, was identified as less than 6.5 percent by the study-specific central laboratory used. Change from baseline in percentage of HbA1C was reported.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12Baseline (Day 1), Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving Less Than 6.5 Percent and Less Than 7 Percent Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Levels at Week 12Week 12HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin which is measured primarily to identify the average glycemic control over prolonged periods of time. The normal range for the HbA1c test, was identified as less than 6.5 percent by the study-specific central laboratory used and data are presented in categories of less than 6.5 percent and less than 7 percent.
Number of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataBaseline (Day 1) up to Week 14Participants who met the criteria for increase from baseline in ECG data were reported. Criteria for increase from baseline data: PR interval (percent change of greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 25/50% \[if baseline value was \>200 then percent change of \>25% counts; if baseline value was \<=200 then percent change of \>50% counts\]); QRS complex (percent change of \>=50%); QT Fridericia's correction (QTcF) interval (change of \>= 30 to \<60 millisecond \[msec\], and change of \>=60 msec).
Number of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataBaseline (Day 1) up to Week 14Participants who met the criteria for increase or decrease in vital signs data were reported. Criteria for increase or decrease from baseline vital signs data: sitting systolic blood pressure (BP) of \>=30 millimeter of mercury (mmHg); sitting diastolic BP of \>=20 mmHg and pulse rate was based on investigator's discretion.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Baseline (Day 1) up to 14 days after last dose of study treatment (up to 101 days)An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 14 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse events.
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 2, 4, 6 and 8Baseline (Day 1), Week 2, 4, 6, 8HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin which is measured primarily to identify the average glycemic control over prolonged periods of time. The normal range for the HbA1c test, was identified as less than 6.5 percent by the study-specific central laboratory used. Change from baseline in percentage of HbA1C was reported.
Number of Hypoglycemic Events (HAE) Episodes Per ParticipantBaseline (Day 1) up to Week 14A hypoglycemic event was identified by characteristic symptoms or blood glucose levels. Median of 1 and 2 events per participant was reported.
Time to Each Recurrent Hypoglycemic Events (HAE) Episode Per ParticipantBaseline (Day 1) up to Week 14Median recurrence time was not to be calculated when less than 50% of the participants in a given arm experienced 1 or more HAEs.
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 14Baseline (Day 1), Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 14 (follow-up)
Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory ValuesBaseline (Day 1) up to Week 14Hemoglobin,hematocrit,red blood cells(RBC) count:less than \[\<\]0.8\*lower limit of normal \[LLN\],platelets:\<0.5\*LLN/greater than \[\>\]1.75\*upper limit of normal \[ULN\],white blood cells(WBC):\<0.6\*LLN or \>1.5\*ULN,lymphocytes,total neutrophils:\<0.8\*LLN or \>1.2\*ULN, basophils,eosinophil,monocytes:\>1.2\*ULN;aspartate aminotransferase,alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase:\>0.3\*ULN,total protein,albumin:\<0.8\*LLN or \>1.2\*ULN;total bilirubin,direct bilirubin,indirect bilirubin:\>1.5\*ULN;triglycerides,cholesterol:\>1.3\*ULN, HDL:\<0.8\*LLN, LDL:\>1.2\*ULN,blood urea nitrogen,creatinine:\>1.3\*ULN,uric acid:\>1.2\*ULN;sodium: \<0.95\*LLN or \>1.05\*ULN,potassium,chloride,calcium,bicarbonate:\<0.9\*LLN or \>1.1\*ULN;creatine kinase:\>2.0\*ULN;glucose:\<0.6\*LLN or \>1.5\*ULN,urine WBC and RBC:\>= 20/High Power Field \[HPF\]),urine epithelial cells (\>=1 HPF),urine bacteria \>20 high-powered field;qualitative urine glucose,urine blood to Hgb ratio (\>=1);urine(protein,nitrite,mucus,leukocyte \>=1 in urine dipstick test).
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Hypoglycemic Events (HAE) EpisodeBaseline (Day 1) up to Week 14A hypoglycemic event was identified by characteristic symptoms or blood glucose levels. HAE was defined as 1 of the given definitions: Characteristic symptoms of HAE with no home glucose monitoring performed where clinical picture included prompt resolution with food intake, subcutaneous glucagon, or intravenous glucose; or characteristic symptoms of HAE with home glucose monitoring measurement =\< 70 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL) using ACCU-CHEK plasma-referenced home glucometers or =\<74 mg/dL using International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) referenced ACCU-CHEK or central laboratory glucometers; or any laboratory glucose value, meeting the following criterion with or without accompanying symptoms: =\<49 mg/dL using ACCU-CHEK plasma-referenced home glucometers or =\<53 mg/dL using IFCC referenced ACCU-CHEK or central laboratory glucometers.

Countries

Bulgaria, Canada, Hungary, India, Slovakia, Taiwan, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 628 participants were consented. Of these, 361 participants transitioned to the run-in period and received sponsor provided background therapy of Metformin. Participants completed the run-in period were then randomized to receive either placebo, PF-04937319 (10, 50 or 100 milligram \[mg\]) or Glimepiride in treatment period.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Placebo matched to PF-04937319 tablet and placebo matched to glimepiride oral capsule once daily along with background metformin 500 mg immediate release tablets or as per standard clinical practice, for 12 weeks.
61
PF-04937319 10 mg
PF-04937319 10 mg tablet orally once daily along with background metformin 500 mg immediate release tablets or as per standard clinical practice, for 12 weeks.
60
PF-04937319 50 mg
PF-04937319 50 mg tablet orally once daily along with background metformin 500 mg immediate release tablets or as per standard clinical practice, for 12 weeks.
61
PF-04937319 100 mg
PF-04937319 100 mg tablet orally once daily along with background metformin 500 mg immediate release tablets or as per standard clinical practice, for 12 weeks.
61
Glimepiride
Glimepiride capsule at a starting dose of 2 milligram per day (mg/day) up to a maximum dose of 6 mg/day along with background metformin 500 mg immediate release tablets or as per standard clinical practice, for 12 weeks.
61
Total304

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Run-in PeriodAdverse Event500000
Run-in PeriodDeath100000
Run-in PeriodDid not meet eligibility criteria3400000
Run-in PeriodLost to Follow-up100000
Run-in PeriodOther100000
Run-in PeriodSponsor Decision300000
Run-in PeriodWithdrawal by Subject1200000
Treatment PeriodAdverse Event000002
Treatment PeriodLack of Efficacy011320
Treatment PeriodLost to Follow-up001100
Treatment PeriodMedication error without AEs002102
Treatment PeriodOther000010
Treatment PeriodProtocol Violation000010
Treatment PeriodWithdrawal by Subject032223

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboPF-04937319 10 mgPF-04937319 50 mgPF-04937319 100 mgGlimepirideTotal
Age, Customized
>=18 to =<44 years
8 participants4 participants8 participants11 participants7 participants38 participants
Age, Customized
>=45 to =<64 years
45 participants48 participants40 participants35 participants48 participants216 participants
Age, Customized
>64 years
8 participants8 participants13 participants15 participants6 participants50 participants
Gender
Female
27 Participants26 Participants24 Participants32 Participants22 Participants131 Participants
Gender
Male
34 Participants34 Participants37 Participants29 Participants39 Participants173 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
63 / 36126 / 6128 / 6031 / 6129 / 6136 / 61
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 3610 / 611 / 602 / 611 / 611 / 61

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 12

HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin which is measured primarily to identify the average glycemic control over prolonged periods of time. The normal range for the HbA1c test, was identified as less than 6.5 percent by the study-specific central laboratory used. Change from baseline in percentage of HbA1C was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants for whom data was summarized for this measure and 'n' signifies participants evaluable at given time points for each group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 12Baseline (n=59, 57, 55, 60, 60)7.90 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.988
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 12Change at Week 12 (n=56, 53, 53, 54, 54)-0.13 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.789
PF-04937319 10 mgChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 12Baseline (n=59, 57, 55, 60, 60)7.97 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.886
PF-04937319 10 mgChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 12Change at Week 12 (n=56, 53, 53, 54, 54)-0.18 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.804
PF-04937319 50 mgChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 12Baseline (n=59, 57, 55, 60, 60)7.91 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.987
PF-04937319 50 mgChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 12Change at Week 12 (n=56, 53, 53, 54, 54)-0.45 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.733
PF-04937319 100 mgChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 12Change at Week 12 (n=56, 53, 53, 54, 54)-0.64 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.797
PF-04937319 100 mgChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 12Baseline (n=59, 57, 55, 60, 60)7.88 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.969
GlimepirideChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 12Baseline (n=59, 57, 55, 60, 60)8.12 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.884
GlimepirideChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 12Change at Week 12 (n=56, 53, 53, 54, 54)-1.01 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.709
Comparison: Treatment difference and 80 percent (%) confidence interval (CI) were based on least squares (LS) mean. A mixed model repeated measure (MMRM) analysis was performed with treatment,duration of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM),time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects,baseline as the covariate,time was repeated for participant. Null hypothesis stated there was no difference between PF 04937319 and placebo, alternative hypothesis stated PF 04937319 was superior to placebo.p-value: 0.446880% CI: [-0.21, 0.17]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant. Null hypothesis stated there was no difference between PF 04937319 and placebo, alternative hypothesis stated PF 04937319 was superior to placebo.p-value: 0.021880% CI: [-0.48, -0.11]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant. Null hypothesis stated there was no difference between PF 04937319 and placebo, alternative hypothesis stated PF 04937319 was superior to placebo.p-value: 0.000680% CI: [-0.65, -0.28]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant. Null hypothesis stated there was no difference between PF 04937319 and placebo, alternative hypothesis stated PF 04937319 was superior to placebo.p-value: <0.000180% CI: [-1.02, -0.65]t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 14

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 14 (follow-up)

Population: Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants for whom data was summarized for this measure and 'n' signifies participants evaluable at given time points for each group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 8 (n=58, 54, 53, 58, 56)-1.082 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.7217
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 6 (n=57, 54, 55, 59, 56)-0.564 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.388
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 14 (n=55, 51, 53, 55, 53)-1.478 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 2.0389
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 12 (n=56, 52, 53, 55, 54)-1.529 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 2.0906
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 4 (n=58, 56, 55, 59, 60)-0.620 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.2025
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 2 (n=59, 57, 58, 61, 58)-0.402 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.0127
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 14Baseline (n=59, 57, 58, 61, 60)89.859 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 21.9513
PF-04937319 10 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 2 (n=59, 57, 58, 61, 58)-0.069 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.1309
PF-04937319 10 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 6 (n=57, 54, 55, 59, 56)-0.604 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.3153
PF-04937319 10 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 14 (n=55, 51, 53, 55, 53)-0.472 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 2.0387
PF-04937319 10 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 8 (n=58, 54, 53, 58, 56)-0.522 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.5396
PF-04937319 10 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 14Baseline (n=59, 57, 58, 61, 60)89.518 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 20.5752
PF-04937319 10 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 12 (n=56, 52, 53, 55, 54)-0.685 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.7244
PF-04937319 10 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 4 (n=58, 56, 55, 59, 60)-0.378 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.2415
PF-04937319 50 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 12 (n=56, 52, 53, 55, 54)-0.961 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 2.6114
PF-04937319 50 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 14Baseline (n=59, 57, 58, 61, 60)89.860 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 21.4376
PF-04937319 50 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 2 (n=59, 57, 58, 61, 58)-0.028 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.0557
PF-04937319 50 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 4 (n=58, 56, 55, 59, 60)-0.074 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.2356
PF-04937319 50 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 6 (n=57, 54, 55, 59, 56)-0.228 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.6697
PF-04937319 50 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 8 (n=58, 54, 53, 58, 56)-0.311 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 2.226
PF-04937319 50 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 14 (n=55, 51, 53, 55, 53)-0.978 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 2.704
PF-04937319 100 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 12 (n=56, 52, 53, 55, 54)-0.545 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.4004
PF-04937319 100 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 8 (n=58, 54, 53, 58, 56)-0.397 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.1285
PF-04937319 100 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 4 (n=58, 56, 55, 59, 60)-0.284 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.2856
PF-04937319 100 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 14Baseline (n=59, 57, 58, 61, 60)87.530 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 19.2248
PF-04937319 100 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 14 (n=55, 51, 53, 55, 53)-0.573 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.6589
PF-04937319 100 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 6 (n=57, 54, 55, 59, 56)-0.290 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.2669
PF-04937319 100 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 2 (n=59, 57, 58, 61, 58)-0.021 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 0.9504
GlimepirideChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 6 (n=57, 54, 55, 59, 56)0.473 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.4922
GlimepirideChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 8 (n=58, 54, 53, 58, 56)0.493 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.7023
GlimepirideChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 2 (n=59, 57, 58, 61, 58)-0.024 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.1295
GlimepirideChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 12 (n=56, 52, 53, 55, 54)1.211 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.8771
GlimepirideChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 14Baseline (n=59, 57, 58, 61, 60)90.388 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 17.9358
GlimepirideChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 14 (n=55, 51, 53, 55, 53)1.234 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.7481
GlimepirideChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 4 (n=58, 56, 55, 59, 60)0.310 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.3831
Comparison: Week 2: Treatment difference and 80 percent(%) confidence interval (CI) were based on least squares (LS) mean. A mixed model repeated measure (MMRM) analysis was performed with treatment, duration of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.089880% CI: [0.08, 0.59]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 2: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.055580% CI: [0.12, 0.62]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 2: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.058580% CI: [0.12, 0.61]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 2: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.045480% CI: [0.14, 0.64]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 4: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.281980% CI: [-0.05, 0.55]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 4: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.031980% CI: [0.2, 0.81]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 4: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.183580% CI: [0.01, 0.6]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 4: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.000180% CI: [0.63, 1.22]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 6: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.968980% CI: [-0.35, 0.33]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 6: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.222180% CI: [-0.02, 0.67]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 6: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.277480% CI: [-0.05, 0.62]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 6: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: <0.000180% CI: [0.76, 1.43]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 8: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.066780% CI: [0.17, 0.98]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 8: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.013380% CI: [0.38, 1.19]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 8: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.02680% CI: [0.29, 1.08]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 8: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: <0.000180% CI: [1.23, 2.02]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 12: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.033580% CI: [0.32, 1.28]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 12: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.155780% CI: [0.05, 1.01]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 12: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.013280% CI: [0.45, 1.39]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 12: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: <0.000180% CI: [2.2, 3.15]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 14 (Follow-up): Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. A MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.015880% CI: [0.45, 1.46]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 14 (Follow-up): Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. A MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.213280% CI: [-0.01, 0.99]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 14 (Follow-up): Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. A MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.026380% CI: [0.37, 1.36]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 14 (Follow-up): Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. A MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: <0.000180% CI: [2.12, 3.12]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants for whom data was summarized for this measure and 'n' signifies participants evaluable at given time points for each group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12Baseline (n=60, 59, 60, 61, 61)161.3 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 30.74
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12Change at Week 2 (n=60, 59, 60, 61, 59)3.1 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 23.89
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12Change at Week 4 (n=59, 58, 56, 59, 60)-0.5 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 27.66
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12Change at Week 6 (n=58, 56, 56, 59, 57)-2.6 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 31.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12Change at Week 8 (n=59, 56, 54, 58, 57)0.9 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 29.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12Change at Week 12 (n=57, 54, 54, 55, 55)3.4 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 31.29
PF-04937319 10 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12Change at Week 8 (n=59, 56, 54, 58, 57)-7.0 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 43.93
PF-04937319 10 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12Change at Week 12 (n=57, 54, 54, 55, 55)-6.2 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 45.22
PF-04937319 10 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12Baseline (n=60, 59, 60, 61, 61)168.7 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 43.01
PF-04937319 10 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12Change at Week 4 (n=59, 58, 56, 59, 60)-8.4 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 41.99
PF-04937319 10 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12Change at Week 6 (n=58, 56, 56, 59, 57)-6.9 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 41.8
PF-04937319 10 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12Change at Week 2 (n=60, 59, 60, 61, 59)-2.0 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 46.24
PF-04937319 50 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12Change at Week 6 (n=58, 56, 56, 59, 57)-7.2 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 24.63
PF-04937319 50 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12Change at Week 8 (n=59, 56, 54, 58, 57)-13.0 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 27.48
PF-04937319 50 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12Baseline (n=60, 59, 60, 61, 61)174.7 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 36.43
PF-04937319 50 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12Change at Week 4 (n=59, 58, 56, 59, 60)-7.7 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 27.49
PF-04937319 50 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12Change at Week 2 (n=60, 59, 60, 61, 59)-7.9 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 29.29
PF-04937319 50 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12Change at Week 12 (n=57, 54, 54, 55, 55)-9.9 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 37.09
PF-04937319 100 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12Change at Week 6 (n=58, 56, 56, 59, 57)-10.4 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 28.48
PF-04937319 100 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12Change at Week 2 (n=60, 59, 60, 61, 59)-10.5 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 20.83
PF-04937319 100 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12Change at Week 4 (n=59, 58, 56, 59, 60)-11.4 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 22.84
PF-04937319 100 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12Change at Week 12 (n=57, 54, 54, 55, 55)-10.3 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 34.69
PF-04937319 100 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12Change at Week 8 (n=59, 56, 54, 58, 57)-13.0 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 23.07
PF-04937319 100 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12Baseline (n=60, 59, 60, 61, 61)160.4 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 37.03
GlimepirideChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12Change at Week 8 (n=59, 56, 54, 58, 57)-26.9 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 32.08
GlimepirideChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12Change at Week 4 (n=59, 58, 56, 59, 60)-26.2 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 31
GlimepirideChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12Change at Week 2 (n=60, 59, 60, 61, 59)-19.9 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 25.68
GlimepirideChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12Change at Week 12 (n=57, 54, 54, 55, 55)-22.5 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 30.86
GlimepirideChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12Change at Week 6 (n=58, 56, 56, 59, 57)-23.4 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 35.01
GlimepirideChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12Baseline (n=60, 59, 60, 61, 61)163.7 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 35.99
Comparison: Week 2: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.344680% CI: [-8.8, 4.62]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 2: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.120480% CI: [-12.81, 0.57]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 2: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.004180% CI: [-20.37, -7.1]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 2: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: <0.000180% CI: [-28.01, -14.67]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 4: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.161680% CI: [-11.8, 1.53]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 4: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.197480% CI: [-11.15, 2.26]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 4: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.012280% CI: [-18.22, -5.02]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 4: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: <0.000180% CI: [-31.37, -18.2]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 6: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.364580% CI: [-9.26, 5.32]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 6: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.367280% CI: [-9.22, 5.36]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 6: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.090680% CI: [-14.69, -0.31]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 6: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.000380% CI: [-26.91, -12.46]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 8: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.174880% CI: [-12.29, 1.93]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 8: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.029780% CI: [-17.69, -3.38]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 8: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.011880% CI: [-19.47, -5.41]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 8: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: <0.000180% CI: [-34.04, -19.96]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 12: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.101280% CI: [-16.1, 0.04]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 12: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.040980% CI: [-19.07, -2.91]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 12: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.008980% CI: [-22.88, -6.86]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 12: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: <0.000180% CI: [-33.93, -17.92]t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 2, 4, 6 and 8

HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin which is measured primarily to identify the average glycemic control over prolonged periods of time. The normal range for the HbA1c test, was identified as less than 6.5 percent by the study-specific central laboratory used. Change from baseline in percentage of HbA1C was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 2, 4, 6, 8

Population: FAS: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, 'N' signifies participants for whom data was summarized for this measure and 'n' signifies participants who were evaluable at given time points for each group. Data for Week 2 had not been reported because as per protocol it was not intended to be collected.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 2, 4, 6 and 8Week 4 (n=58, 57, 55, 58, 60)-0.08 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.59
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 2, 4, 6 and 8Week 8 (n=58, 55, 53, 57, 55)-0.19 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.756
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 2, 4, 6 and 8Week 6 (n=57, 55, 55, 58, 55)-0.14 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.676
PF-04937319 10 mgChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 2, 4, 6 and 8Week 6 (n=57, 55, 55, 58, 55)-0.14 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.545
PF-04937319 10 mgChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 2, 4, 6 and 8Week 4 (n=58, 57, 55, 58, 60)-0.07 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.422
PF-04937319 10 mgChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 2, 4, 6 and 8Week 8 (n=58, 55, 53, 57, 55)-0.17 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.628
PF-04937319 50 mgChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 2, 4, 6 and 8Week 6 (n=57, 55, 55, 58, 55)-0.22 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.494
PF-04937319 50 mgChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 2, 4, 6 and 8Week 4 (n=58, 57, 55, 58, 60)-0.22 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.431
PF-04937319 50 mgChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 2, 4, 6 and 8Week 8 (n=58, 55, 53, 57, 55)-0.38 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.575
PF-04937319 100 mgChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 2, 4, 6 and 8Week 4 (n=58, 57, 55, 58, 60)-0.32 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.532
PF-04937319 100 mgChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 2, 4, 6 and 8Week 8 (n=58, 55, 53, 57, 55)-0.59 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.571
PF-04937319 100 mgChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 2, 4, 6 and 8Week 6 (n=57, 55, 55, 58, 55)-0.51 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.479
GlimepirideChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 2, 4, 6 and 8Week 6 (n=57, 55, 55, 58, 55)-0.78 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.5
GlimepirideChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 2, 4, 6 and 8Week 4 (n=58, 57, 55, 58, 60)-0.54 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.379
GlimepirideChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 2, 4, 6 and 8Week 8 (n=58, 55, 53, 57, 55)-0.89 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.582
Comparison: Week 4: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.611280% CI: [-0.09, 0.14]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 4: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.05580% CI: [-0.25, -0.03]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 4: Treatment difference and 80%CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.003280% CI: [-0.35, -0.13]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 4: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: <0.000180% CI: [-0.55, -0.33]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 6: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.614680% CI: [-0.1, 0.16]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 6: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.260680% CI: [-0.19, 0.06]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 6: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.000680% CI: [-0.45, -0.2]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 6: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: <0.000180% CI: [-0.7, -0.44]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 8: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.661880% CI: [-0.1, 0.2]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 8: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.087880% CI: [-0.31, -0.01]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 8: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.002280% CI: [-0.49, -0.19]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 8: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, duration of T2DM, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: <0.000180% CI: [-0.81, -0.51]t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Number of Hypoglycemic Events (HAE) Episodes Per Participant

A hypoglycemic event was identified by characteristic symptoms or blood glucose levels. Median of 1 and 2 events per participant was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14

Population: Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboNumber of Hypoglycemic Events (HAE) Episodes Per Participant0 events per participant
PF-04937319 10 mgNumber of Hypoglycemic Events (HAE) Episodes Per Participant0 events per participant
PF-04937319 50 mgNumber of Hypoglycemic Events (HAE) Episodes Per Participant0 events per participant
PF-04937319 100 mgNumber of Hypoglycemic Events (HAE) Episodes Per Participant0 events per participant
GlimepirideNumber of Hypoglycemic Events (HAE) Episodes Per Participant0 events per participant
Secondary

Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Values

Hemoglobin,hematocrit,red blood cells(RBC) count:less than \[\<\]0.8\*lower limit of normal \[LLN\],platelets:\<0.5\*LLN/greater than \[\>\]1.75\*upper limit of normal \[ULN\],white blood cells(WBC):\<0.6\*LLN or \>1.5\*ULN,lymphocytes,total neutrophils:\<0.8\*LLN or \>1.2\*ULN, basophils,eosinophil,monocytes:\>1.2\*ULN;aspartate aminotransferase,alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase:\>0.3\*ULN,total protein,albumin:\<0.8\*LLN or \>1.2\*ULN;total bilirubin,direct bilirubin,indirect bilirubin:\>1.5\*ULN;triglycerides,cholesterol:\>1.3\*ULN, HDL:\<0.8\*LLN, LDL:\>1.2\*ULN,blood urea nitrogen,creatinine:\>1.3\*ULN,uric acid:\>1.2\*ULN;sodium: \<0.95\*LLN or \>1.05\*ULN,potassium,chloride,calcium,bicarbonate:\<0.9\*LLN or \>1.1\*ULN;creatine kinase:\>2.0\*ULN;glucose:\<0.6\*LLN or \>1.5\*ULN,urine WBC and RBC:\>= 20/High Power Field \[HPF\]),urine epithelial cells (\>=1 HPF),urine bacteria \>20 high-powered field;qualitative urine glucose,urine blood to Hgb ratio (\>=1);urine(protein,nitrite,mucus,leukocyte \>=1 in urine dipstick test).

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14

Population: Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants for whom data was summarized for this measure

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Values56 participants
PF-04937319 10 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Values52 participants
PF-04937319 50 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Values56 participants
PF-04937319 100 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Values54 participants
GlimepirideNumber of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Values51 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs Data

Participants who met the criteria for increase or decrease in vital signs data were reported. Criteria for increase or decrease from baseline vital signs data: sitting systolic blood pressure (BP) of \>=30 millimeter of mercury (mmHg); sitting diastolic BP of \>=20 mmHg and pulse rate was based on investigator's discretion.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14

Population: Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants for whom data was summarized for this measure

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataIncrease in systolic BP (>=30 mmHg)2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataIncrease in diastolic BP (>=20 mmHg)1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataDecrease in systolic BP (>=30 mmHg)5 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataDecrease in diastolic BP (>=20 mmHg)4 participants
PF-04937319 10 mgNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataIncrease in systolic BP (>=30 mmHg)1 participants
PF-04937319 10 mgNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataDecrease in diastolic BP (>=20 mmHg)3 participants
PF-04937319 10 mgNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataIncrease in diastolic BP (>=20 mmHg)3 participants
PF-04937319 10 mgNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataDecrease in systolic BP (>=30 mmHg)3 participants
PF-04937319 50 mgNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataDecrease in diastolic BP (>=20 mmHg)2 participants
PF-04937319 50 mgNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataIncrease in diastolic BP (>=20 mmHg)0 participants
PF-04937319 50 mgNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataDecrease in systolic BP (>=30 mmHg)3 participants
PF-04937319 50 mgNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataIncrease in systolic BP (>=30 mmHg)3 participants
PF-04937319 100 mgNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataIncrease in systolic BP (>=30 mmHg)3 participants
PF-04937319 100 mgNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataIncrease in diastolic BP (>=20 mmHg)4 participants
PF-04937319 100 mgNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataDecrease in diastolic BP (>=20 mmHg)6 participants
PF-04937319 100 mgNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataDecrease in systolic BP (>=30 mmHg)5 participants
GlimepirideNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataDecrease in diastolic BP (>=20 mmHg)5 participants
GlimepirideNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataDecrease in systolic BP (>=30 mmHg)1 participants
GlimepirideNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataIncrease in diastolic BP (>=20 mmHg)2 participants
GlimepirideNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataIncrease in systolic BP (>=30 mmHg)5 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data

Participants who met the criteria for increase from baseline in ECG data were reported. Criteria for increase from baseline data: PR interval (percent change of greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 25/50% \[if baseline value was \>200 then percent change of \>25% counts; if baseline value was \<=200 then percent change of \>50% counts\]); QRS complex (percent change of \>=50%); QT Fridericia's correction (QTcF) interval (change of \>= 30 to \<60 millisecond \[msec\], and change of \>=60 msec).

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14

Population: Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. N(number of participants analyzed)= participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataPR interval: Percent change of >=25/50%0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQRS interval: Percent change of >=50%0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQTcF interval: Change of >=30 to <60 msec6 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQTcF interval: Change of >=60 msec2 participants
PF-04937319 10 mgNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataPR interval: Percent change of >=25/50%0 participants
PF-04937319 10 mgNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQTcF interval: Change of >=60 msec2 participants
PF-04937319 10 mgNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQRS interval: Percent change of >=50%1 participants
PF-04937319 10 mgNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQTcF interval: Change of >=30 to <60 msec5 participants
PF-04937319 50 mgNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQTcF interval: Change of >=60 msec2 participants
PF-04937319 50 mgNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQRS interval: Percent change of >=50%1 participants
PF-04937319 50 mgNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQTcF interval: Change of >=30 to <60 msec8 participants
PF-04937319 50 mgNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataPR interval: Percent change of >=25/50%1 participants
PF-04937319 100 mgNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataPR interval: Percent change of >=25/50%0 participants
PF-04937319 100 mgNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQRS interval: Percent change of >=50%2 participants
PF-04937319 100 mgNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQTcF interval: Change of >=60 msec2 participants
PF-04937319 100 mgNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQTcF interval: Change of >=30 to <60 msec6 participants
GlimepirideNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQTcF interval: Change of >=60 msec1 participants
GlimepirideNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQTcF interval: Change of >=30 to <60 msec4 participants
GlimepirideNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataQRS interval: Percent change of >=50%1 participants
GlimepirideNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG) DataPR interval: Percent change of >=25/50%0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 14 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse events.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to 14 days after last dose of study treatment (up to 101 days)

Population: Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs26 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs0 participants
PF-04937319 10 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs28 participants
PF-04937319 10 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs1 participants
PF-04937319 50 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs31 participants
PF-04937319 50 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs2 participants
PF-04937319 100 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs1 participants
PF-04937319 100 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs29 participants
GlimepirideNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs36 participants
GlimepirideNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs1 participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Less Than 6.5 Percent and Less Than 7 Percent Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Levels at Week 12

HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin which is measured primarily to identify the average glycemic control over prolonged periods of time. The normal range for the HbA1c test, was identified as less than 6.5 percent by the study-specific central laboratory used and data are presented in categories of less than 6.5 percent and less than 7 percent.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants for whom data was summarized for this measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Less Than 6.5 Percent and Less Than 7 Percent Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Levels at Week 12Less Than 6.5 Percent7.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Less Than 6.5 Percent and Less Than 7 Percent Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Levels at Week 12Less Than 7 Percent26.3 percentage of participants
PF-04937319 10 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving Less Than 6.5 Percent and Less Than 7 Percent Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Levels at Week 12Less Than 6.5 Percent13 percentage of participants
PF-04937319 10 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving Less Than 6.5 Percent and Less Than 7 Percent Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Levels at Week 12Less Than 7 Percent31.5 percentage of participants
PF-04937319 50 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving Less Than 6.5 Percent and Less Than 7 Percent Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Levels at Week 12Less Than 6.5 Percent18.5 percentage of participants
PF-04937319 50 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving Less Than 6.5 Percent and Less Than 7 Percent Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Levels at Week 12Less Than 7 Percent27.8 percentage of participants
PF-04937319 100 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving Less Than 6.5 Percent and Less Than 7 Percent Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Levels at Week 12Less Than 7 Percent52.7 percentage of participants
PF-04937319 100 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving Less Than 6.5 Percent and Less Than 7 Percent Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Levels at Week 12Less Than 6.5 Percent27.3 percentage of participants
GlimepiridePercentage of Participants Achieving Less Than 6.5 Percent and Less Than 7 Percent Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Levels at Week 12Less Than 6.5 Percent18.2 percentage of participants
GlimepiridePercentage of Participants Achieving Less Than 6.5 Percent and Less Than 7 Percent Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Levels at Week 12Less Than 7 Percent45.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Hypoglycemic Events (HAE) Episode

A hypoglycemic event was identified by characteristic symptoms or blood glucose levels. HAE was defined as 1 of the given definitions: Characteristic symptoms of HAE with no home glucose monitoring performed where clinical picture included prompt resolution with food intake, subcutaneous glucagon, or intravenous glucose; or characteristic symptoms of HAE with home glucose monitoring measurement =\< 70 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL) using ACCU-CHEK plasma-referenced home glucometers or =\<74 mg/dL using International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) referenced ACCU-CHEK or central laboratory glucometers; or any laboratory glucose value, meeting the following criterion with or without accompanying symptoms: =\<49 mg/dL using ACCU-CHEK plasma-referenced home glucometers or =\<53 mg/dL using IFCC referenced ACCU-CHEK or central laboratory glucometers.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14

Population: Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With at Least 1 Hypoglycemic Events (HAE) Episode4.9 percentage of participants
PF-04937319 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 1 Hypoglycemic Events (HAE) Episode3.3 percentage of participants
PF-04937319 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 1 Hypoglycemic Events (HAE) Episode4.9 percentage of participants
PF-04937319 100 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 1 Hypoglycemic Events (HAE) Episode6.6 percentage of participants
GlimepiridePercentage of Participants With at Least 1 Hypoglycemic Events (HAE) Episode34.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Time to Each Recurrent Hypoglycemic Events (HAE) Episode Per Participant

Median recurrence time was not to be calculated when less than 50% of the participants in a given arm experienced 1 or more HAEs.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14

Population: Data was not collected since this outcome measure was not analyzed due to infrequency of the occurrence of HAEs among the participants.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026