Skip to content

Study of Paliperidone Palmitate 3 Month and 1 Month Formulations for the Treatment of Patients With Schizophrenia

A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Non-inferiority Study of Paliperidone Palmitate 3 Month and 1 Month Formulations for the Treatment of Subjects With Schizophrenia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01515423
Enrollment
1429
Registered
2012-01-24
Start date
2012-05-31
Completion date
2015-03-31
Last updated
2016-05-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Schizophrenia

Keywords

Schizophrenia, R092670, Paliperidone Palmitate, Paliperidone palmitate 1 month formulation (PP1M), Paliperidone palmitate 3 month formulation (PP3M)

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that a paliperidone palmitate 3 month formulation (PP3M) is as effective as the paliperidone palmitate 1 month formulation (PP1M) in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia who have been stabilized on PP1M.

Detailed description

This is a randomized (the study drug is assigned by chance), double blind (neither physician nor patient knows the treatment that the patient receives), parallel group (each group of patients will be treated at the same time), multicenter non-inferiority (the effect of the new treatment is not worse than that of the comparison treatment) study. A new formulation of paliperidone palmitate with a 3-month injection interval (PP3M) is being tested for use as maintenance treatment for subjects with schizophrenia who have been first stabilized on paliperidone palmitate with a 1-month injection interval (PP1M). The study consists of 3 phases: a screening/washout/tolerability phase (up to 21 days); a 17-week open-label (all people know the identity of the intervention) stabilization phase (referred to as the Open-label Phase) and a 48-week fixed dose, randomized, double-blind controlled phase (referred to as the Double-blind Phase). After completion of the Screening Phase, all patients will receive PP1M in the Open-label Phase. During this time, flexible dosing will occur at Weeks 5 and 9. At Week 13 patients are to receive the dose of PP1M that was administered at Week 9. Patients who are clinically stable at the end of the Open-label Phase will enter the Double-blind Phase and will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive fixed doses of PP3M or PP1M.

Interventions

Type= exact number, unit= mg eq., number= 175, form= injection, route= intramuscular use. One injection every third month for 48 weeks.

Type= exact number, unit= mg eq., number= 263, form= injection, route= intramuscular use. One injection every third month for 48 weeks.

Type= exact number, unit= mg eq., number= 350, form= injection, route= intramuscular use. One injection every third month for 48 weeks.

Type= exact number, unit= mg eq., number= 525, form= injection, route= intramuscular use. One injection every third month for 48 weeks.

DRUGPlacebo (20% Intralipid)

Form= injection, route= intramuscular use. One injection monthly when not receiving active medication for 48 weeks.

DRUGPP1M 50 mg eq.

Type= exact number, unit= mg eq., number= 50, form= injection, route= intramuscular use. One injection every month for 48 weeks.

DRUGPP1M 75 mg eq.

Type= exact number, unit= mg eq., number= 75, form= injection, route= intramuscular use. One injection every month for 48 weeks.

DRUGPP1M 100 mg eq.

Type= exact number, unit= mg eq., number= 100, form= injection, route= intramuscular use. One injection every month for 48 weeks.

DRUGPP1M 150 mg eq.

Type= exact number, unit= mg eq., number= 150, form= injection, route= intramuscular use. One injection every month for 48 weeks.

Sponsors

Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with schizophrenia for more than 1 year and whose symptoms are worsening in the opinion of the investigator * A total score in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) between 70 and 120 * Signed informed consent * Women must not be pregnant, breastfeeding, and if capable of pregnancy must practice an effective method of birth control * Men must agree to use a double-barrier method of birth control * Be medically stable on the basis of clinical laboratory tests, physical examination, medical history, vital signs, and electrocardiogram (ECG)

Exclusion criteria

* A diagnosis other than schizophrenia, e.g., dissociative disorder, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, schizoaffective disorder, schizophreniform disorder, autistic disorder, primary substance-induced psychotic disorder, dementia-related psychosis * Relevant history or current presence of any significant or unstable medical condition(s) determined to be clinically significant by the Investigator (ie, obesity, diabetes, heart disease etc) * A diagnosis of substance dependence within 6 months before screening * History of neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) or tardive dyskinesia * Clozapine use in the last 2 months when used for treatment-resistant or treatment-refractory illness * Clinically significant findings in biochemistry, hematology, ECG or urinalysis results * Any other disease or condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would make participation not in the best interest of the patient or that could prevent, limit, or confound the protocol-specified assessments

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Without Relapse at Week 48 During the Double-Blind PhaseUp to 48 weeksRelapse defined as: Psychiatric hospitalization;participant had an increase of 25 percent in total PANSS score from randomization for 2 consecutive assessments separated by 3-7 days if score at randomization was greater than (\>) 40; had a 10 point increase in total PANSS score from randomization for 2 consecutive assessments separated by 3-7 days if score at randomization was less than or equal to (\<=) 40; deliberate self-injury or exhibited violent behavior resulting in suicide, clinically significant injury;suicidal or homicidal ideation and aggressive behavior;For PANSS items-had a score of greater than or equal to (\>=) 5 after randomization for 2 consecutive assessments separated by 3-7 days on any of above items if maximum score for these above PANSS items was \<=3 at randomization; had a score of \>=6 after randomization for 2 consecutive assessments separated by 3-7 days on any of above items if maximum score for these above PANSS items was 4 at randomization.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From DB Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) Scale Score at Week 48DB Baseline (Week 17) and 48 week or DB EndpointThe Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) rating scale is a 7 point global assessment that measures the clinician's impression of the severity of illness exhibited by a participant. A rating of 1 is equivalent to Normal, not at all ill and a rating of 7 is equivalent to Among the most extremely ill participants. Higher scores indicate worsening.
Change From DB Baseline in Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Total Score at Week 48DB Baseline (Week 17) and 48 week or DB EndpointThe Personal and Social Performance (PSP) scale assesses degree of a participant's dysfunction within 4 domains of behavior: socially useful activities, personal and social relationships, self-care, and disturbing and aggressive behavior. Score ranges from 1 to 100. Participants with a score of 71 to 100 have mild degree of difficulty; from 31 to 70, varying degrees of disability; less than or equal to 30, functioning so poorly as to require intensive supervision.
Change From Double-Blind (DB) Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Week 48DB Baseline (Week 17) and 48 week or DB EndpointThe neuropsychiatric symptoms of schizophrenia were assessed by means of the 30-item Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). The PANSS provides a total score (sum of the scores of all 30 items) ranging from 30 to 210, higher scores indicate more severe neuropsychiatric symptoms of schizophrenia. Scores for 3 subscales, that is, for positive subscale (sum of the scores of all 7 items) and negative subscale (sum of the scores of all 7 items) ranges from 7 (absent) to 49 (extreme psychopathology), and for the general psychopathology subscale (sum of the scores of all 16 items) score ranges from 16 (absent) to 112 (extreme psychopathology).
Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Subscales Score at Week 48DB Baseline (Week 17) and 48 week or DB EndpointThe neuropsychiatric symptoms of schizophrenia were assessed by means of the 30-item Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). The PANSS provides a total score (sum of the scores of all 30 items) ranging from 30 to 210, higher scores indicate more severe neuropsychiatric symptoms of schizophrenia. Scores for 3 subscales, that is, for positive subscale (sum of the scores of all 7 items) and negative subscale (sum of the scores of all 7 items) ranges from 7 (absent) to 49 (extreme psychopathology), and for the general psychopathology subscale (sum of the scores of all 16 items) score ranges from 16 (absent) to 112 (extreme psychopathology).
Change From Baseline in Marder Factor Subscale Score at Week 48DB Baseline (Week 17) and 48 week or DB Endpoint5 PANSS Marder factor scores (positive symptoms \[range:8 to 56\], negative symptoms \[range: 7 to 49\], disorganized thoughts \[range: 7 to 49\], uncontrolled hostility/excitement \[range: 4 to 28\], and anxiety/depression \[range: 4 to 28\]) were examined to gain insight into the symptoms affected by treatment with the study drug. Negative change from baseline in subscales score for positive symptoms, negative symptoms, disorganized thoughts, uncontrolled hostility/excitement, and anxiety/depression indicates improvement in various symptoms of schizophrenia.
Percentage of Participants Who Met the Criteria for Symptomatic Remission Based on Andreasen CriteriaWeeks 41 to 65Symptomatic remission criterion was defined as having a simultaneous score of mild or less on all selected PANSS items (P1, P2, P3, N1, N4, N6, G5, and G9). Symptomatic remission was defined for the last 6 months of the Double-blind Phase as meeting the remission criterion during the 6 months prior to the End of study visit during the Double-blind Phase, with one excursion allowed.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Czechia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Japan, Mexico, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, Ukraine, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

1429 participants received at least 1 dose of the study agent in the Open-label Phase, out of which 1016 participants were randomized into the Double blind Phase (Safety population).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Double-Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate(PP3M) 3-month Formulation
Participants received Paliperidone Palmitate 3-month formulation (PP3M) in a fixed dose of 3.5 fold multiple of the PP1M dose administered at Week 13, that is participants received fixed dose injections of PP3M (175, 263, 350, or 525 mg eq.) on Week 17, 29, 41, and 53 as injection in deltoid muscle or gluteal muscle.
504
Double-Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate(PP1M) 1-month Formulation
Participants received Paliperidone Palmitate 1-month formulation (PP1M) in a fixed dose that was administered at Week 9 at every month for 48 weeks, that is, participants received fixed dose injections of PP1M (50, 75, 100, or 150 mg eq.) as injection on deltoid muscle or gluteal muscle.
512
Total1,016

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
DOUBLE BLINDAdverse Event01513
DOUBLE BLINDBlind broken by investigator010
DOUBLE BLINDDeath012
DOUBLE BLINDLost to Follow-up0712
DOUBLE BLINDOther0612
DOUBLE BLINDPregnancy020
DOUBLE BLINDWithdrawal by Subject05053
Open Label PhaseAdverse Event5700
Open Label PhaseDeath200
Open Label Phaseexcluded from DB Phase7000
Open Label PhaseLack of Efficacy11700
Open Label PhaseLost to Follow-up2100
Open Label PhaseOther2800
Open Label PhaseWithdrawal by Subject11800

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalDouble-Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate(PP3M) 3-month FormulationDouble-Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate(PP1M) 1-month Formulation
Age, Continuous38.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.06
39.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.89
38.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.24
Region of Enrollment
Argentina
30 participants14 participants16 participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
5 participants3 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Austria
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
11 participants7 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
25 participants13 participants12 participants
Region of Enrollment
Bulgaria
28 participants12 participants16 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
9 participants3 participants6 participants
Region of Enrollment
China
210 participants104 participants106 participants
Region of Enrollment
Czech Republic
60 participants31 participants29 participants
Region of Enrollment
France
3 participants1 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
12 participants8 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
Greece
11 participants5 participants6 participants
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
40 participants21 participants19 participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
108 participants52 participants56 participants
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
16 participants7 participants9 participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
37 participants17 participants20 participants
Region of Enrollment
Portugal
21 participants11 participants10 participants
Region of Enrollment
Romania
13 participants7 participants6 participants
Region of Enrollment
Russian Federation
150 participants75 participants75 participants
Region of Enrollment
Slovakia
22 participants12 participants10 participants
Region of Enrollment
South Korea
12 participants7 participants5 participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
25 participants11 participants14 participants
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan
14 participants7 participants7 participants
Region of Enrollment
Ukraine
64 participants35 participants29 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
89 participants41 participants48 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
477 Participants246 Participants231 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
539 Participants258 Participants281 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
457 / 1,429212 / 504208 / 512
serious
Total, serious adverse events
101 / 1,42926 / 50437 / 512

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Without Relapse at Week 48 During the Double-Blind Phase

Relapse defined as: Psychiatric hospitalization;participant had an increase of 25 percent in total PANSS score from randomization for 2 consecutive assessments separated by 3-7 days if score at randomization was greater than (\>) 40; had a 10 point increase in total PANSS score from randomization for 2 consecutive assessments separated by 3-7 days if score at randomization was less than or equal to (\<=) 40; deliberate self-injury or exhibited violent behavior resulting in suicide, clinically significant injury;suicidal or homicidal ideation and aggressive behavior;For PANSS items-had a score of greater than or equal to (\>=) 5 after randomization for 2 consecutive assessments separated by 3-7 days on any of above items if maximum score for these above PANSS items was \<=3 at randomization; had a score of \>=6 after randomization for 2 consecutive assessments separated by 3-7 days on any of above items if maximum score for these above PANSS items was 4 at randomization.

Time frame: Up to 48 weeks

Population: Modified intent-to-treat (mITT) analysis set included all participants who were randomly assigned to treatment during Double-blind Phase, received at least 1 dose of study drug and did not have any errors in delivery of active treatment. Here,N=number of participants analysed is the total participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 3 Month FormulationPercentage of Participants Without Relapse at Week 48 During the Double-Blind Phase91.5 Percentage of Participants
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 1 Month FormulationPercentage of Participants Without Relapse at Week 48 During the Double-Blind Phase90.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Marder Factor Subscale Score at Week 48

5 PANSS Marder factor scores (positive symptoms \[range:8 to 56\], negative symptoms \[range: 7 to 49\], disorganized thoughts \[range: 7 to 49\], uncontrolled hostility/excitement \[range: 4 to 28\], and anxiety/depression \[range: 4 to 28\]) were examined to gain insight into the symptoms affected by treatment with the study drug. Negative change from baseline in subscales score for positive symptoms, negative symptoms, disorganized thoughts, uncontrolled hostility/excitement, and anxiety/depression indicates improvement in various symptoms of schizophrenia.

Time frame: DB Baseline (Week 17) and 48 week or DB Endpoint

Population: mITT analysis set included all participants who were randomly assigned to treatment during Double-blind Phase, received at least 1 dose of study drug and did not have any errors in the delivery of active treatment. Here,N=number of participants analysed is the total participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 3 Month FormulationChange From Baseline in Marder Factor Subscale Score at Week 48Positive symptoms factor: Baseline15.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.66
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 3 Month FormulationChange From Baseline in Marder Factor Subscale Score at Week 48Positive symptoms factor:Change at Endpoint-1.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.61
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 3 Month FormulationChange From Baseline in Marder Factor Subscale Score at Week 48Negative symptoms factor: Baseline16.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.03
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 3 Month FormulationChange From Baseline in Marder Factor Subscale Score at Week 48Negative symptoms factor : Change at Endpoint-1.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.57
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 3 Month FormulationChange From Baseline in Marder Factor Subscale Score at Week 48Disorganized thoughts factor :Baseline14.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 3 Month FormulationChange From Baseline in Marder Factor Subscale Score at Week 48Disorganized thoughts factor:Change at Endpoint-1.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.36
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 3 Month FormulationChange From Baseline in Marder Factor Subscale Score at Week 48Uncontrolled hostility Factor:Baseline5.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.64
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 3 Month FormulationChange From Baseline in Marder Factor Subscale Score at Week 48Uncontrolled hostility Factor:Change at Endpoint0.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.31
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 3 Month FormulationChange From Baseline in Marder Factor Subscale Score at Week 48Anxiety/depression factor:Baseline6.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.02
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 3 Month FormulationChange From Baseline in Marder Factor Subscale Score at Week 48Anxiety/depression factor:Change at Endpoint-0.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.69
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 1 Month FormulationChange From Baseline in Marder Factor Subscale Score at Week 48Uncontrolled hostility Factor:Change at Endpoint-0.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.21
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 1 Month FormulationChange From Baseline in Marder Factor Subscale Score at Week 48Positive symptoms factor: Baseline15.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.88
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 1 Month FormulationChange From Baseline in Marder Factor Subscale Score at Week 48Disorganized thoughts factor:Change at Endpoint-1.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.24
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 1 Month FormulationChange From Baseline in Marder Factor Subscale Score at Week 48Positive symptoms factor:Change at Endpoint-1.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.16
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 1 Month FormulationChange From Baseline in Marder Factor Subscale Score at Week 48Anxiety/depression factor:Change at Endpoint-0.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.43
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 1 Month FormulationChange From Baseline in Marder Factor Subscale Score at Week 48Negative symptoms factor: Baseline16.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.9
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 1 Month FormulationChange From Baseline in Marder Factor Subscale Score at Week 48Uncontrolled hostility Factor:Baseline5.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.77
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 1 Month FormulationChange From Baseline in Marder Factor Subscale Score at Week 48Negative symptoms factor : Change at Endpoint-1.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 1 Month FormulationChange From Baseline in Marder Factor Subscale Score at Week 48Anxiety/depression factor:Baseline6.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.12
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 1 Month FormulationChange From Baseline in Marder Factor Subscale Score at Week 48Disorganized thoughts factor :Baseline14.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.17
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Subscales Score at Week 48

The neuropsychiatric symptoms of schizophrenia were assessed by means of the 30-item Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). The PANSS provides a total score (sum of the scores of all 30 items) ranging from 30 to 210, higher scores indicate more severe neuropsychiatric symptoms of schizophrenia. Scores for 3 subscales, that is, for positive subscale (sum of the scores of all 7 items) and negative subscale (sum of the scores of all 7 items) ranges from 7 (absent) to 49 (extreme psychopathology), and for the general psychopathology subscale (sum of the scores of all 16 items) score ranges from 16 (absent) to 112 (extreme psychopathology).

Time frame: DB Baseline (Week 17) and 48 week or DB Endpoint

Population: mITT analysis set included all participants who were randomly assigned to treatment during Double-blind Phase, received at least 1 dose of study drug and did not have any errors in the delivery of active treatment. Here,N=number of participants analysed is the total participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 3 Month FormulationChange From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Subscales Score at Week 48Positive subscale: Baseline11.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.12
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 3 Month FormulationChange From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Subscales Score at Week 48Positive subscale:Change at Endpoint-0.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.31
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 3 Month FormulationChange From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Subscales Score at Week 48Negative subscale: Baseline17.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.27
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 3 Month FormulationChange From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Subscales Score at Week 48Negative subscale:Change at Endpoint-1.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.63
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 3 Month FormulationChange From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Subscales Score at Week 48General psychopathology : Baseline28.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.55
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 3 Month FormulationChange From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Subscales Score at Week 48General psychopathology : Change at Endpoint-1.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.77
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 1 Month FormulationChange From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Subscales Score at Week 48General psychopathology : Baseline28.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.79
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 1 Month FormulationChange From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Subscales Score at Week 48Positive subscale: Baseline12.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.19
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 1 Month FormulationChange From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Subscales Score at Week 48Negative subscale:Change at Endpoint-1.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.67
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 1 Month FormulationChange From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Subscales Score at Week 48Positive subscale:Change at Endpoint-0.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 1 Month FormulationChange From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Subscales Score at Week 48General psychopathology : Change at Endpoint-2.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.57
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 1 Month FormulationChange From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Subscales Score at Week 48Negative subscale: Baseline17.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.11
Secondary

Change From DB Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) Scale Score at Week 48

The Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) rating scale is a 7 point global assessment that measures the clinician's impression of the severity of illness exhibited by a participant. A rating of 1 is equivalent to Normal, not at all ill and a rating of 7 is equivalent to Among the most extremely ill participants. Higher scores indicate worsening.

Time frame: DB Baseline (Week 17) and 48 week or DB Endpoint

Population: mITT analysis set included all participants who were randomly assigned to treatment during Double-blind Phase, received at least 1 dose of study drug and did not have any errors in the delivery of active treatment. Here,N=number of participants analysed is the total participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 3 Month FormulationChange From DB Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) Scale Score at Week 48Baseline2.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.57
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 3 Month FormulationChange From DB Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) Scale Score at Week 48Change from Baseline at DB End point-0.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 1 Month FormulationChange From DB Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) Scale Score at Week 48Baseline2.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.66
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 1 Month FormulationChange From DB Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) Scale Score at Week 48Change from Baseline at DB End point-0.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.75
Secondary

Change From DB Baseline in Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Total Score at Week 48

The Personal and Social Performance (PSP) scale assesses degree of a participant's dysfunction within 4 domains of behavior: socially useful activities, personal and social relationships, self-care, and disturbing and aggressive behavior. Score ranges from 1 to 100. Participants with a score of 71 to 100 have mild degree of difficulty; from 31 to 70, varying degrees of disability; less than or equal to 30, functioning so poorly as to require intensive supervision.

Time frame: DB Baseline (Week 17) and 48 week or DB Endpoint

Population: mITT analysis set included all participants who were randomly assigned to treatment during Double-blind Phase, received at least 1 dose of study drug and did not have any errors in the delivery of active treatment. Here,N=number of participants analysed is the total participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 3 Month FormulationChange From DB Baseline in Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Total Score at Week 48Baseline65.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.4
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 3 Month FormulationChange From DB Baseline in Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Total Score at Week 48Change from Baseline at DB End point1.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.22
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 1 Month FormulationChange From DB Baseline in Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Total Score at Week 48Baseline65.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.06
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 1 Month FormulationChange From DB Baseline in Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Total Score at Week 48Change from Baseline at DB End point1.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.21
Secondary

Change From Double-Blind (DB) Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Week 48

The neuropsychiatric symptoms of schizophrenia were assessed by means of the 30-item Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). The PANSS provides a total score (sum of the scores of all 30 items) ranging from 30 to 210, higher scores indicate more severe neuropsychiatric symptoms of schizophrenia. Scores for 3 subscales, that is, for positive subscale (sum of the scores of all 7 items) and negative subscale (sum of the scores of all 7 items) ranges from 7 (absent) to 49 (extreme psychopathology), and for the general psychopathology subscale (sum of the scores of all 16 items) score ranges from 16 (absent) to 112 (extreme psychopathology).

Time frame: DB Baseline (Week 17) and 48 week or DB Endpoint

Population: mITT analysis set included all participants who were randomly assigned to treatment during Double-blind Phase, received at least 1 dose of study drug and did not have any errors in the delivery of active treatment. Here,N=number of participants analysed is the total participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 3 Month FormulationChange From Double-Blind (DB) Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Week 48Baseline57.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.56
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 3 Month FormulationChange From Double-Blind (DB) Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Week 48Change from Baseline at DB End point-3.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.5
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 1 Month FormulationChange From Double-Blind (DB) Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Week 48Baseline58.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.88
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 1 Month FormulationChange From Double-Blind (DB) Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Week 48Change from Baseline at DB End point-4.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.78
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Met the Criteria for Symptomatic Remission Based on Andreasen Criteria

Symptomatic remission criterion was defined as having a simultaneous score of mild or less on all selected PANSS items (P1, P2, P3, N1, N4, N6, G5, and G9). Symptomatic remission was defined for the last 6 months of the Double-blind Phase as meeting the remission criterion during the 6 months prior to the End of study visit during the Double-blind Phase, with one excursion allowed.

Time frame: Weeks 41 to 65

Population: mITT analysis set included all participants who were randomly assigned to treatment during Double-blind Phase, received at least 1 dose of study drug and did not have any errors in the delivery of active treatment. Here,N=number of participants analysed is the total participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 3 Month FormulationPercentage of Participants Who Met the Criteria for Symptomatic Remission Based on Andreasen Criteria58.4 Percentage of Participants
Double Blind: Paliperidone Palmitate 1 Month FormulationPercentage of Participants Who Met the Criteria for Symptomatic Remission Based on Andreasen Criteria59.2 Percentage of Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026