Skip to content

Comparison of Two Gelatine Solutions

Efficacy and Safety of a Balanced Gelatine Solution in Combination With a Balanced Electrolyte Solution Versus a Standard Gelatine Solution in Combination With a Non-balanced Electrolyte Solution in Patients Scheduled for Abdominal Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01515397
Enrollment
40
Registered
2012-01-24
Start date
2011-12-31
Completion date
2013-01-31
Last updated
2013-11-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypovolemia

Brief summary

The aim of volume replacement is to compensate a reduction in the intravascular volume e.g. during surgery and to counteract hypovolemia in order to maintain hemodynamics and vital functions. To achieve this, different plasma substitutes are available: Albumin, dextran, hydroxyethylstarches and gelatine. The aim of this study is to demonstrate that acid-base alterations during elective abdominal surgery can be reduced by the use of a new gelatine solution.

Interventions

DRUGGelofusine balanced

Gelofusine balanced combined with Sterofundin ISO

Gelofusine 4% combined with NaCl 0.9%

Sponsors

B. Braun Melsungen AG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion: * Male or female patients \>= 18 years of age and \<= 90 years of age. Women of child bearing potential must test negative on standard pregnancy test. * Patients scheduled to undergo elective abdominal surgery (e.g. Rectal resection, liver resection, open bowl resection, duodenopancreatectomy reconstitution). * Scheduled intraoperative volume requirement of at least 15 ml / kg body weight (BROCA) gelatine solution * Provision of voluntary consent to participate in the study, following a full explanation of the nature and purpose of the study, by signing the informed consent form approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) prior to all evaluations. Exclusion: * Patients of ASA-class \> III * Known hypersensitivity to gelatine or to any of the constituents of the solution * Patients treated with other colloid solutions and / or blood products 24 hours prior to surgery * Patients on hemodialysis * Patients suffering from decompensated renal function (i.e. serum creatinine \> 3.0 mg/dl) * Patients suffering from Hypervolemia Hyperhydration Severe blood coagulation disorders Hypernatremia (serum(Na+) \> 150 mmol/L) Hyperchloremia (serum(Cl-) \> 110 mmol/L) * Estimated perioperative need for blood products of 3,5 ml / kg body weight (BROCA) * Lactation period * Simultaneous participation in another clinical trial * Emergencies

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
base excess [mmol/l]Change from baseline at end of surgery, an expected average of 2 hours surgery
chloride [mmol/l]Change from baseline at end of surgery, an expected average of 2 hours surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
adverse eventsuntil 12 hours after surgery
arterial blood gase analysesuntil 12 hours after surgery
coagulation statusuntil 12 hours after surgery
time on ventilationuntil 12 hours after surgery
hemodynamics (systolic and diastolic blood pressure)until 12 hours after surgery
renal functionuntil 12 hours after surgery

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026