Skip to content

Pharmacokinetics Of CP-690,550 In Pediatric Patients With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA)

An Open-label Multiple Dose Study To Evaluate The Pharmacokinetics, Safety And Tolerability Of CP-690,550 In Pediatric Patients From 2 To Less Than 18 Years Of Age With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01513902
Enrollment
26
Registered
2012-01-20
Start date
2013-03-31
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2016-07-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Keywords

Arthritis, Pediatric, Tofacitinib, JIA

Brief summary

Phase 1 study to describe pharmacokinetics of CP-690,550 in pediatric patients 2 to less than 18 years of age with Juvenile Idiopathic Rheumatoid Arthritis (JIA).

Detailed description

This is an open-label, non-randomized, multi-center, oral CP-690,550, multiple-dose (twice daily for 5 days \[except Day 5 when only morning dose will be given\]) study in pediatric subjects with JIA aged from 2 to less than 18 years. Baseline visit will occur within 1 month of the completion of the Screening Visit. The study will consist of three cohorts based on the age of the subjects, Cohort 3: 2 to less than 6 years, Cohort 2: 6 to less than 12 years and Cohort 1: 12 to less than 18 years. In each cohort, at least 8 pediatric subjects with JIA will participate in the study ensuring a total number of at least 24 pediatric evaluable subjects completing the PK period.

Interventions

DRUGCP-690,550

CP-690,550 will be administered orally twice daily according to the dosing regimen provided below. Oral solution will be used for children weighing \<40 kg. Oral tablets will be used for children weighing ≥40 kg. Children aged 12 to less than 18 years who are unable to swallow tablets will have the option of taking oral solution. Body Weight (kg) Dose (mg) Volume (mL) 5-11 1 1; 12-18 1.5 1.5; 19-24 2 2; 25-31 2.5 2.5; 32-39 3 3; ≥40 5 5

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Pediatric patients with JIA aged from 2 to less than 18 years with active JIA (extended oligoarthritis, polyarthritis rheumatoid factor positive or negative, psoriatic arthritis, enthesitis related arthritis), in 5 or more joints (using American College Rheumatology definition of active joint) at the time of the first study drug administration. 2. For subjects receiving MTX treatment, minimum duration of therapy is 4 months and dose stable for at least 6 weeks prior to first dose of study drug. MTX may be administered either orally or parenterally at doses not to exceed 20 mg/wk or 15 mg/m2/week. 3. A negative QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube test performed within the 3 months prior to screening. A negative PPD test can be substituted for the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube test only if the central laboratory is unable to perform the test or cannot determine the results to be positive or negative and the Pfizer medical monitor approves it, on a case-by-case basis.

Exclusion criteria

1. Systemic JIA, persistent oligoarthritis, undifferentiated arthritis. 2. Current or recent history of uncontrolled clinically significant renal, hepatic, hematological, gastrointestinal, endocrine, pulmonary, cardiac, or neurological disease. 3. History of any other rheumatic autoimmune disease. 4. Infections: 1. Latent or active TB or any history of previous TB. 2. Chronic infections. 3. Any infection requiring hospitalization, parenteral antimicrobial therapy or judged to be opportunistic by the investigator within the 6 months prior to the first dose of study drug. 4. Any treated infections within 2 weeks of Baseline visit. 5. A subject known to be infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B or hepatitis C virus. 6. History of infected joint prosthesis with prosthesis still in situ. 5. History of recurrent (more than one episode) herpes zoster or disseminated (a single episode) herpes zoster or disseminated (a single episode) herpes simplex. 6. The biologic agents and DMARDs are disallowed at any time during this study. If a subject needs to be treated with one of these agents, the subject should be discontinued from the study. 7. Subjects who have been vaccinated with live or attenuated vaccines within the 6 weeks prior to the first dose of study medication or is to be vaccinated with these vaccines at any time during treatment or within 6 weeks following discontinuation of study drug. 8. Subjects with a malignancy or with a history of malignancy with the exception of adequately treated or excised non-metastatic basal cell or squamous cell cancer of the skin or cervical carcinoma in situ.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F)Day 5: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 hours post doseClearance of a drug is a measure of the rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes. Clearance obtained after oral dose (apparent oral clearance) is also influenced by the fraction of the dose absorbed. Clearance was estimated by non compartmental analysis (NCA) of PK data. Drug clearance is a quantitative measure of the rate at which a drug substance is removed from the blood. It was calculated by dividing the given oral dose by AUCtau. AUCtau is the area under the plasma concentration time-curve from time zero to end of dosing interval.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) All CausalitiesBaseline up to 28 days after the last dose of study drug (Day 5)An AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment emergent AEs included both serious and non-serious AEs.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesBaseline up to Day 5Participants with laboratory test abnormalities of potential clinical concern without regard to baseline abnormality were reported. Criteria: Hematology(hemoglobin,hematocrit,red blood cell\[RBC\] count:\<0.8\*lower limit of normal \[LLN\], platelets:\<0.5\*LLN/greater than \[\>\]1.75\*upper limit of normal\[ULN\], white blood cell \[WBC\] count:\<0.6\*LLN\>\</0\>1.5\*ULN, lymphocytes, total neutrophils:\<0.8\*LLN or \>1.2\*ULN, basophils, eosinophil, monocytes:\>1.2\*ULN); Liver Function (total bilirubin: \>1.5\*ULN, aspartate aminotransferase,alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase:\>3.0\*ULN, total protein, albumin:\<0.8\*LLN or \>1.2\*ULN);Renal Function (blood urea nitrogen, creatinine:\>1.3\*ULN, uric acid:\>1.2\*ULN); Electrolytes (sodium:\<0.95\*LLN or \>1.05\*ULN,potassium,chloride,calcium,bicarbonate:\<0.9\*LLN or \>1.1\*ULN);Clinical chemistry (glucose \<0.6\*LLN or \>1.5\*ULN, creatine kinase:\>3.0\*ULN); Urinalysis (Urine WBC and RBC: greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 6/High Power Field \[HPF\]).
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs AbnormalitiesBaseline up to Day 5Criteria for vital signs of potentially clinical concern included supine/sitting pulse rate of \<40 beats per minute (bpm) or \>120 bpm, standing pulse rate of \<40 bpm or \>140 bpm, systolic blood pressure of \>=30 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) change from baseline and systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure \>=20 mmHg change from baseline and diastolic blood pressure \<50 mm Hg.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Plasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2)Day 5: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 hours post dosePlasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half.
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau)Day 5: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 hours post dose
Taste AssessmentDay 1, Day 5Participants were evaluated for taste assessment using a 5 categories questionnaire. Participants were asked to answer one of the following to describe the taste of oral solution of tofacitinib: Dislike very much, dislike a little, not sure, like a little, or like very much. The taste assessment was only performed for participants who received the oral solution. Number of participants within each category are reported.
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax)Day 5: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 hours post dose
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax)Day 5: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 hours post dose
Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F)Day 5: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 hours post doseVolume of distribution is defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired plasma concentration of a drug. Apparent volume of distribution after oral dose (Vz/F) is influenced by the fraction absorbed.

Countries

Germany, Poland, Slovakia, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Participants aged 2 to less than (\<)18 years with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) were enrolled in the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort I: 12 Years to <18 Years
CP-690,550 was administered orally, twice daily as oral solution (ranging from 1 milliliter \[mL\] to 3 mL) for children weighing \<40 kilogram (kg) or twice daily as oral tablets (5 milligram \[mg\]) for participants weighing greater than or equal to (\>=) 40 kg. Participants who were unable to swallow tablets had the option of taking oral solution.
8
Cohort II: 6 Years to <12 Years
CP-690,550 was administered orally, twice daily as oral solution (ranging from 1 mL to 3 mL) for participants weighing \<40 kg, oral tablets (5 mg) were used for participants weighing \>=40 kg. Participants with a body weight of \>=40 kg had the option of taking oral solution (5 mL) or tablets (5 mg).
9
Cohort III: 2 Years to <6 Years
CP-690,550 was administered orally, twice daily as oral solution (ranging from 1 mL to 4.5 mL) for participants weighing \<30 kg. Participants weighing \>=30 kg had the option of taking oral solution (5 mL) or tablets (5 mg).
9
Total26

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohort I: 12 Years to <18 YearsCohort II: 6 Years to <12 YearsCohort III: 2 Years to <6 YearsTotal
Age, Continuous14.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
9.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
4.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
9.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants5 Participants7 Participants17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants4 Participants2 Participants9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 81 / 92 / 9
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 80 / 90 / 9

Outcome results

Primary

Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F)

Clearance of a drug is a measure of the rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes. Clearance obtained after oral dose (apparent oral clearance) is also influenced by the fraction of the dose absorbed. Clearance was estimated by non compartmental analysis (NCA) of PK data. Drug clearance is a quantitative measure of the rate at which a drug substance is removed from the blood. It was calculated by dividing the given oral dose by AUCtau. AUCtau is the area under the plasma concentration time-curve from time zero to end of dosing interval.

Time frame: Day 5: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 hours post dose

Population: The PK analysis population included all enrolled and treated participants who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of primary interest. Here 'number of participants analyzed (N)' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort I: 12 Years to <18 YearsApparent Oral Clearance (CL/F)28.09 liter per hourGeometric Coefficient of Variation 22
Cohort II: 6 Years to <12 YearsApparent Oral Clearance (CL/F)25.48 liter per hourGeometric Coefficient of Variation 40
Cohort III: 2 Years to <6 YearsApparent Oral Clearance (CL/F)20.53 liter per hourGeometric Coefficient of Variation 33
Primary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs Abnormalities

Criteria for vital signs of potentially clinical concern included supine/sitting pulse rate of \<40 beats per minute (bpm) or \>120 bpm, standing pulse rate of \<40 bpm or \>140 bpm, systolic blood pressure of \>=30 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) change from baseline and systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure \>=20 mmHg change from baseline and diastolic blood pressure \<50 mm Hg.

Time frame: Baseline up to Day 5

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort I: 12 Years to <18 YearsNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs Abnormalities0 participants
Cohort II: 6 Years to <12 YearsNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs Abnormalities0 participants
Cohort III: 2 Years to <6 YearsNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs Abnormalities0 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities

Participants with laboratory test abnormalities of potential clinical concern without regard to baseline abnormality were reported. Criteria: Hematology(hemoglobin,hematocrit,red blood cell\[RBC\] count:\<0.8\*lower limit of normal \[LLN\], platelets:\<0.5\*LLN/greater than \[\>\]1.75\*upper limit of normal\[ULN\], white blood cell \[WBC\] count:\<0.6\*LLN\>\</0\>1.5\*ULN, lymphocytes, total neutrophils:\<0.8\*LLN or \>1.2\*ULN, basophils, eosinophil, monocytes:\>1.2\*ULN); Liver Function (total bilirubin: \>1.5\*ULN, aspartate aminotransferase,alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase:\>3.0\*ULN, total protein, albumin:\<0.8\*LLN or \>1.2\*ULN);Renal Function (blood urea nitrogen, creatinine:\>1.3\*ULN, uric acid:\>1.2\*ULN); Electrolytes (sodium:\<0.95\*LLN or \>1.05\*ULN,potassium,chloride,calcium,bicarbonate:\<0.9\*LLN or \>1.1\*ULN);Clinical chemistry (glucose \<0.6\*LLN or \>1.5\*ULN, creatine kinase:\>3.0\*ULN); Urinalysis (Urine WBC and RBC: greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 6/High Power Field \[HPF\]).

Time frame: Baseline up to Day 5

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort I: 12 Years to <18 YearsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities3 participants
Cohort II: 6 Years to <12 YearsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities1 participants
Cohort III: 2 Years to <6 YearsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities5 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) All Causalities

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment emergent AEs included both serious and non-serious AEs.

Time frame: Baseline up to 28 days after the last dose of study drug (Day 5)

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort I: 12 Years to <18 YearsNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) All CausalitiesAE1 participants
Cohort I: 12 Years to <18 YearsNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) All CausalitiesSAE0 participants
Cohort II: 6 Years to <12 YearsNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) All CausalitiesAE1 participants
Cohort II: 6 Years to <12 YearsNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) All CausalitiesSAE0 participants
Cohort III: 2 Years to <6 YearsNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) All CausalitiesAE2 participants
Cohort III: 2 Years to <6 YearsNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) All CausalitiesSAE0 participants
Secondary

Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F)

Volume of distribution is defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired plasma concentration of a drug. Apparent volume of distribution after oral dose (Vz/F) is influenced by the fraction absorbed.

Time frame: Day 5: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 hours post dose

Population: The PK analysis population included all enrolled and treated participants who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of primary interest. Here 'N' signifies those participants who were analyzed for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort I: 12 Years to <18 YearsApparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F)104.9 literGeometric Coefficient of Variation 35
Cohort II: 6 Years to <12 YearsApparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F)71.0 literGeometric Coefficient of Variation 40
Cohort III: 2 Years to <6 YearsApparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F)51.44 literGeometric Coefficient of Variation 34
Secondary

Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau)

Time frame: Day 5: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 hours post dose

Population: The PK analysis population included all enrolled and treated participants who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of primary interest. Here 'N' signifies those participants who were analyzed for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort I: 12 Years to <18 YearsArea Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau)156.6 nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*hr/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 25
Cohort II: 6 Years to <12 YearsArea Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau)118.8 nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*hr/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 27
Cohort III: 2 Years to <6 YearsArea Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau)142.5 nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*hr/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 32
Secondary

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax)

Time frame: Day 5: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 hours post dose

Population: The PK analysis population included all enrolled and treated participants who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of primary interest.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort I: 12 Years to <18 YearsMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax)46.97 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 40
Cohort II: 6 Years to <12 YearsMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax)41.67 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 29
Cohort III: 2 Years to <6 YearsMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax)66.15 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 28
Secondary

Plasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2)

Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half.

Time frame: Day 5: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 hours post dose

Population: The PK analysis population included all enrolled and treated participants who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of primary interest. Here 'N' signifies those participants who were analyzed for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort I: 12 Years to <18 YearsPlasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2)2.616 hoursStandard Deviation 0.454
Cohort II: 6 Years to <12 YearsPlasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2)1.949 hoursStandard Deviation 0.294
Cohort III: 2 Years to <6 YearsPlasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2)1.771 hoursStandard Deviation 0.406
Secondary

Taste Assessment

Participants were evaluated for taste assessment using a 5 categories questionnaire. Participants were asked to answer one of the following to describe the taste of oral solution of tofacitinib: Dislike very much, dislike a little, not sure, like a little, or like very much. The taste assessment was only performed for participants who received the oral solution. Number of participants within each category are reported.

Time frame: Day 1, Day 5

Population: The analysis population was defined as all participants who had received at least 1 oral solution formulation of tofacitinib.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)Dispersion
Cohort I: 12 Years to <18 YearsTaste AssessmentDay 5: Dislike a little1 participants
Cohort I: 12 Years to <18 YearsTaste AssessmentDay 1: Like a little1 participants
Cohort I: 12 Years to <18 YearsTaste AssessmentDay 1: Dislike a little0 participants
Cohort I: 12 Years to <18 YearsTaste AssessmentDay 5: Dislike very much0 participants
Cohort I: 12 Years to <18 YearsTaste AssessmentDay 1: Like very much0 participants
Cohort I: 12 Years to <18 YearsTaste AssessmentDay 5: Like very much0 participants
Cohort I: 12 Years to <18 YearsTaste AssessmentDay 1: Dislike very much0 participants 0.4535
Cohort I: 12 Years to <18 YearsTaste AssessmentDay 5: Not sure1 participants
Cohort I: 12 Years to <18 YearsTaste AssessmentDay 1: Not sure1 participants
Cohort I: 12 Years to <18 YearsTaste AssessmentDay 5: Like a little0 participants
Cohort II: 6 Years to <12 YearsTaste AssessmentDay 1: Like very much2 participants
Cohort II: 6 Years to <12 YearsTaste AssessmentDay 5: Like very much2 participants
Cohort II: 6 Years to <12 YearsTaste AssessmentDay 1: Dislike very much1 participants 0.29396
Cohort II: 6 Years to <12 YearsTaste AssessmentDay 1: Dislike a little0 participants
Cohort II: 6 Years to <12 YearsTaste AssessmentDay 1: Not sure1 participants
Cohort II: 6 Years to <12 YearsTaste AssessmentDay 1: Like a little3 participants
Cohort II: 6 Years to <12 YearsTaste AssessmentDay 5: Dislike very much1 participants
Cohort II: 6 Years to <12 YearsTaste AssessmentDay 5: Dislike a little0 participants
Cohort II: 6 Years to <12 YearsTaste AssessmentDay 5: Not sure2 participants
Cohort II: 6 Years to <12 YearsTaste AssessmentDay 5: Like a little2 participants
Cohort III: 2 Years to <6 YearsTaste AssessmentDay 1: Not sure1 participants
Cohort III: 2 Years to <6 YearsTaste AssessmentDay 5: Like very much3 participants
Cohort III: 2 Years to <6 YearsTaste AssessmentDay 5: Dislike a little3 participants
Cohort III: 2 Years to <6 YearsTaste AssessmentDay 1: Dislike a little2 participants
Cohort III: 2 Years to <6 YearsTaste AssessmentDay 5: Like a little2 participants
Cohort III: 2 Years to <6 YearsTaste AssessmentDay 5: Not sure1 participants
Cohort III: 2 Years to <6 YearsTaste AssessmentDay 1: Like very much4 participants
Cohort III: 2 Years to <6 YearsTaste AssessmentDay 1: Like a little1 participants
Cohort III: 2 Years to <6 YearsTaste AssessmentDay 1: Dislike very much1 participants 0.40634
Cohort III: 2 Years to <6 YearsTaste AssessmentDay 5: Dislike very much0 participants
Secondary

Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax)

Time frame: Day 5: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 hours post dose

Population: The PK analysis population included all enrolled and treated participants who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of primary interest.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Cohort I: 12 Years to <18 YearsTime to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax)0.750 hoursFull Range 25
Cohort II: 6 Years to <12 YearsTime to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax)1.00 hoursFull Range 27
Cohort III: 2 Years to <6 YearsTime to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax)0.500 hoursFull Range 32

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026