Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of Liraglutide in Combination With an OAD in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Insufficiently Controlled on OAD Alone

A 52-week, Multi-centre, Open-labelled, Randomised (2:1), Parallel-group Trial With an Active Control (Two OADs Combination Therapy) to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Liraglutide in Combination With an OAD in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Insufficiently Controlled on OAD Monotherapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01512108
Enrollment
363
Registered
2012-01-19
Start date
2012-01-10
Completion date
2013-04-26
Last updated
2017-12-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Brief summary

This trial was conducted in Japan. The aim of this trial was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of once daily administration of liraglutide in combination with an oral anti-diabetic drug (OAD) in Japanese subjects with type 2 diabetes who are insufficiently controlled on OAD monotherapy. All subjects will continue their pre-trial OAD (either glinide, metformin, alpha-glucosidase inhibitor or thiazolidinedione) during the trial at unchanged type and dose.

Interventions

DRUGliraglutide

0.9 mg/day liraglutide was injected once daily subcutaneously (s.c., under the skin).

DRUGoral anti-diabetic drug

An additional oral anti-diabetic drug (OAD) with a different mechanism of action than the pre-trial OAD. The type and dosage of the additional OAD should be chosen by the investigator within the Japanese labelled dose.

Sponsors

Novo Nordisk A/S
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Informed consent obtained before any trial-related activities (trial-related activities are any procedures that would not have been performed during normal management of the subject.) * Japanese subjects with type 2 diabetes on monotherapy with an OAD (either glinide, metformin, a-glucosidase inhibitor or thiazolidinedione) within approved Japanese labelling in addition to diet and exercise therapy. Total daily dose and type of drug should have remained unchanged for at least 8 weeks prior to Visit 1 * Type 2 diabetes mellitus (clinically diagnosed) for at least 6 months * HbA1c between 7.0-10.0% (both inclusive) * Body Mass Index (BMI) below 40.0 kg/m\^2 * Outpatients who have no plans for an educational hospitalisation for the purpose of glycaemic control. However, hospitalisation for training of self-injection from Visit 2 that is for no longer than one week is allowed * Subjects able and willing to perform self-monitoring of plasma glucose (SMPG)

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects with known or previous malignant tumor and are strongly suspected of recurrence (except basal cell skin cancer or squamous cell skin cancer) * Calcitonin above or equal to 160 pg/mL * Personal history of non-familial medullary thyroid carcinoma * Family or personal history of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN-2) or familial medullary thyroid carcinoma (FMTC) * History of chronic pancreatitis or idiopathic acute pancreatitis * Recurrent severe hypoglycaemia (more than 1 severe hypoglycaemic event during the last 12 months) or hypoglycaemic unawareness as judged by the investigator or hospitalisation for diabetic ketoacidosis during the previous 6 months * Treatment with GLP-1 receptor agonist or dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitor within 12 weeks prior to Visit 1 * Having contraindications to liraglutide and any of the OADs (according to Japanese labelling)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Week 0 to Week 52 + 7 daysAdverse events were defined as events occurring after administration of trial product and no later than 7 days after last day of treatment. Severe AEs: considerable interference with subject's daily activities. Moderate AEs: Marked symptoms, moderate interference with the subject's daily activities. Mild AEs: No or transient symptoms, no interference with the subject's daily activities. Serious AEs: AEs that resulted in any of the following: death, a life-threatening experience, hospitalization/prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent/significant disability, and congenital anomaly.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Confirmed Hypoglycaemic EpisodesWeek 0 to Week 52Confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes consisted of the pool of episodes of severe hypoglycaemia as well as minor hypoglycaemic episodes \[An episode with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia with confirmation by plasma glucose \<3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) or full blood glucose \<2.8 mmol/L (50 mg/dL) and which is handled by the subject himself or herself or any asymptomatic PG value \<3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) or full blood glucose value \<2.8 mmol/L (50 mg/dL)\] with a confirmed plasma glucose value of less than 3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL).
Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 52Week 0, week 52Estimated mean change in HbA1c from baseline after 52 Weeks of treatment
Change in FPG From Baseline to Week 52Week 0, week 52Estimated mean change from baseline in FPG after 52 Weeks of treatment

Countries

Japan

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The trial was conducted at 36 sites in Japan.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Liraglutide 0.9 mg/Day
Liraglutide 0.9 mg/day was injected subcutaneously, once daily in morning or evening in addition to unchanged pre-trial oral anti-diabetic drug (OAD) (either glinide, metformin, α-glucosidase inhibitor or thiazolidinedione) for 52 weeks. Liraglutide was started at 0.3 mg/day and dose was escalated to maximum dose level of 0.9 mg/day by weekly increment of 0.3 mg.
240
Additional OAD
Subject's received additional OAD to pre-trial OAD. The type and dosage of additional OAD was chosen based on each individual's glycaemic control by the investigator as per Japanese labelling.
120
Total360

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event94
Overall StudyProtocol Violation12
Overall StudyUnclassified113
Overall StudyWithdrawal Criteria10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLiraglutide 0.9 mg/DayAdditional OADTotal
Age, Continuous59.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
59.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
59.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
Fasting plasma glucose (FPG)8.68 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.61
8.96 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.82
8.77 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.69
Glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c)8.1 percentage of glycosylated haemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8
8.1 percentage of glycosylated haemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8
8.1 percentage of glycosylated haemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8
Sex: Female, Male
Female
58 Participants40 Participants98 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
182 Participants80 Participants262 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
161 / 24077 / 120
serious
Total, serious adverse events
11 / 24010 / 120

Outcome results

Primary

Incidence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)

Adverse events were defined as events occurring after administration of trial product and no later than 7 days after last day of treatment. Severe AEs: considerable interference with subject's daily activities. Moderate AEs: Marked symptoms, moderate interference with the subject's daily activities. Mild AEs: No or transient symptoms, no interference with the subject's daily activities. Serious AEs: AEs that resulted in any of the following: death, a life-threatening experience, hospitalization/prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent/significant disability, and congenital anomaly.

Time frame: Week 0 to Week 52 + 7 days

Population: Safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the trial product.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Liraglutide 0.9 mg/DayIncidence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Mild AEs345 Events/100 years of patient exposure
Liraglutide 0.9 mg/DayIncidence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Severe AEs2 Events/100 years of patient exposure
Liraglutide 0.9 mg/DayIncidence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Moderate AEs14 Events/100 years of patient exposure
Liraglutide 0.9 mg/DayIncidence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Serious AEs5 Events/100 years of patient exposure
Liraglutide 0.9 mg/DayIncidence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)All AEs361 Events/100 years of patient exposure
Additional OADIncidence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Serious AEs9 Events/100 years of patient exposure
Additional OADIncidence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)All AEs331 Events/100 years of patient exposure
Additional OADIncidence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Mild AEs321 Events/100 years of patient exposure
Additional OADIncidence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Moderate AEs9 Events/100 years of patient exposure
Additional OADIncidence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Severe AEs2 Events/100 years of patient exposure
Secondary

Change in FPG From Baseline to Week 52

Estimated mean change from baseline in FPG after 52 Weeks of treatment

Time frame: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomised subjects who received at least one dose of trial products and missing data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF). One subject did not contribute to the statistical analysis at Week 52.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 0.9 mg/DayChange in FPG From Baseline to Week 52-1.55 mmol/LStandard Error 0.09
Additional OADChange in FPG From Baseline to Week 52-1.24 mmol/LStandard Error 0.12
p-value: 0.045895% CI: [-0.6, -0.01]ANOVA
Secondary

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 52

Estimated mean change in HbA1c from baseline after 52 Weeks of treatment

Time frame: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomised subjects who received at least one dose of trial products and missing data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF). One subject did not contribute to the statistical analysis at Week 52.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 0.9 mg/DayChange in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 52-1.21 percentage of glycosylated haemoglobinStandard Error 0.05
Additional OADChange in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 52-0.94 percentage of glycosylated haemoglobinStandard Error 0.07
p-value: 0.002695% CI: [-0.44, -0.09]ANOVA
Secondary

Number of Confirmed Hypoglycaemic Episodes

Confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes consisted of the pool of episodes of severe hypoglycaemia as well as minor hypoglycaemic episodes \[An episode with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia with confirmation by plasma glucose \<3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) or full blood glucose \<2.8 mmol/L (50 mg/dL) and which is handled by the subject himself or herself or any asymptomatic PG value \<3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) or full blood glucose value \<2.8 mmol/L (50 mg/dL)\] with a confirmed plasma glucose value of less than 3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL).

Time frame: Week 0 to Week 52

Population: Safety analysis set includes all subjects who received at least one dose of the trial product.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Liraglutide 0.9 mg/DayNumber of Confirmed Hypoglycaemic Episodes7 episodes
Additional OADNumber of Confirmed Hypoglycaemic Episodes2 episodes

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026