Skip to content

Effectiveness of 3,4-Diaminopyridine in Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome

Inpatient Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Withdrawal Study of 3,4-Diaminopyridine Base (3,4-DAP) in Subjects With Known Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01511978
Acronym
DAPPER
Enrollment
32
Registered
2012-01-19
Start date
2012-01-31
Completion date
2015-07-31
Last updated
2017-07-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Eaton-Lambert Myasthenic Syndrome, Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome

Keywords

Lambert-Eaton, Eaton-Lambert, myasthenia, myasthenic, LEMS, LES, DAP, diaminopyridine, 3,4-diaminopyridine, 3,4-DAP

Brief summary

Hypothesis: 3,4-Diaminopyridine base (3,4-DAP) improves Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome (LEMS)-related weakness.

Detailed description

The objectives of the study were to confirm the safety and to test the efficacy of 3,4-DAP in the treatment of LEMS-related weakness. This was a phase 2 randomized double-blind placebo-controlled withdrawal study in subjects with known clinically active LEMS who had been on a chronic stable dose of compassionate distribution Jacobus 3,4-DAP provided through FDA-approved individual investigator-held INDs.

Interventions

DRUGContinuous 3,4-DAP

Subjects were maintained on their usual personal dose and schedule of 3,4-DAP base

DRUGTaper 3,4-DAP to Placebo

Subjects were tapered over 3 days from their usual regimen of 3,4-DAP base to placebo with up to an additional 16 hours of placebo before resuming their usual pre-study regimen of 3,4-DAP base

Sponsors

Jacobus Pharmaceutical
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled withdrawal study to assess the safety and efficacy of 3,4-DAP in subjects on a stable regimen of all LEMS-related treatments, including 3,4-DAP, for a minimum of 3 months prior to study entry. Subjects who met all study entry criteria were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to continue their current treatment regimen (Group A, continuous 3,4-DAP) or tapered withdrawal from 3,4-DAP (Group B, taper to placebo).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age 18 or over 2. Ambulatory while taking 3,4-DAP, i.e. the patient was able to perform the timed up and go (TUG), either with or without an assistive device 3. Established diagnosis of LEMS, with documentation provided 4. Continuous use of Jacobus 3,4-DAP for at least 3 months 5. Minimum of 3 doses per day with no single dose less than 10 mg of 3,4-DAP 6. The patient needed to wait about 15 to 30 minutes to experience an unequivocal improvement in a LEMS-induced dysfunction after they take their first dose of 3,4-DAP in the morning \[a patient who remains in bed past this point by choice may still be eligible\] 7. Stable regimen of all LEMS-related treatments for at least 3 months 8. Stable daily regimen of other medications (prescription and over-the-counter) for a minimum of 1 month 9. Willing to chance being tapered off of 3,4-DAP 10. Fluency in English 11. If applicable, agreed to use birth control during heterosexual intercourse until at least 2 weeks after completion of study 12. A signed informed consent by the study subject

Exclusion criteria

1. Last monoclonal antibody treatment (e.g. rituximab) was less than 6 months ago (i.e., recent treatment is an exclusion) 2. Clinically significant or poorly controlled condition that in the opinion of the study personnel might pose an unacceptable risk to the patient if entered into the study 3. Respiratory failure requiring intubation while on 3,4-DAP with no precipitating event or medication 4. Use of any investigational drug other than 3,4-DAP within the last 30 days 5. Pregnant or lactating 6. Current use of other aminopyridines (e.g.4-AP) or guanidine 7. Did not display a sufficiently large response to 3,4-DAP during the baseline observation period in the CRU to detect a decline during withdrawal of 3,4-DAP

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With 30% or More Deterioration in Triple Timed Up & Go (3TUG) Test, Compared to Time-matched BaselineBaseline period (days 0, 1, 2); Randomized treatment period (starting with last dose of day 2, and days 3, 4, 5, and ending with first dose on day 6 when pre-randomization regimen was resumed, or rescue, if indicated sooner)The 3TUG time obtained 2 hours after the last dose of the withdrawal period (i.e., at time of theoretical peak drug effect) was compared to the average time-matched 3TUG tests performed during 2 days of baseline observation prior to randomization. The study endpoint was a change of more than 30% in the final post-dose 3TUG during the withdrawal period and was based on blinded readings of video recordings of 3TUG tests.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Self-assessment of LEMS-related Weakness, W-SASParticipants were followed for up to 7 daysThe last post-dose self-assessment of LEMS-related weakness from the withdrawal period with categories of much much weaker (-3), much weaker (-2), somewhat weaker (-1), about the same (0), somewhat stronger (1), much stronger (2), and much much stronger (3).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were referred by active Investigational New Drug (IND) holders involved with the Jacobus Pharmaceutical Company's 3,4-diaminopyridine (3,4-DAP) free base compassionate distribution program.

Pre-assignment details

52 patients were assessed for eligibility. 20 were ineligible. 32 were randomized and completed the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Continuous 3,4-Diaminopyridine (3,4-DAP)
Subjects were administered their usual dosage on their regular personalized schedule
14
3,4-DAP Taper to Placebo
Subjects were administered decreasing amounts of 3,4-DAP on their regular personalized schedule
18
Total32

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalContinuous 3,4-Diaminopyridine (3,4-DAP)3,4-DAP Taper to Placebo
Age at diagnosis48.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.76
44.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.79
52.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.76
Age, Continuous55.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.77
50.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.97
59.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.99
Body Mass Index (BMI)27.5 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.39
27.3 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.92
27.7 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.14
Compound Muscle Action Potential (CMAP) consistent with Lambert-Eaton Myasthenia (LEM) at screening17 Participants7 Participants10 Participants
Duration of diagnosis prior to randomization6.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.82
6.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7
6.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.08
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
31 Participants14 Participants17 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Height169.2 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.67
168.5 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.67
169.6 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.98
Number of 3,4-DAP individual daily doses at randomization5.0 number of daily doses4.5 number of daily doses5.0 number of daily doses
Positive P/Q type voltage-gated calcium channel (VGCC) antibodies at screening29 Participants12 Participants17 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
29 Participants11 Participants18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
21 Participants10 Participants11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants4 Participants7 Participants
Time between symptom onset and diagnosis1.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.35
0.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.62
2.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
Total Daily Dose of 3,4-DAP at randomization80 mg80.0 mg80.0 mg
Weight79.3 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.73
78.0 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.11
80.3 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.95

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 140 / 18
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 1412 / 18
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 141 / 18

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With 30% or More Deterioration in Triple Timed Up & Go (3TUG) Test, Compared to Time-matched Baseline

The 3TUG time obtained 2 hours after the last dose of the withdrawal period (i.e., at time of theoretical peak drug effect) was compared to the average time-matched 3TUG tests performed during 2 days of baseline observation prior to randomization. The study endpoint was a change of more than 30% in the final post-dose 3TUG during the withdrawal period and was based on blinded readings of video recordings of 3TUG tests.

Time frame: Baseline period (days 0, 1, 2); Randomized treatment period (starting with last dose of day 2, and days 3, 4, 5, and ending with first dose on day 6 when pre-randomization regimen was resumed, or rescue, if indicated sooner)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Continuous 3,4-Diaminopyridine (3,4-DAP)Number of Participants With 30% or More Deterioration in Triple Timed Up & Go (3TUG) Test, Compared to Time-matched Baseline0 Participants
3,4-DAP Taper to PlaceboNumber of Participants With 30% or More Deterioration in Triple Timed Up & Go (3TUG) Test, Compared to Time-matched Baseline13 Participants
p-value: <0.0001Fisher Exact
Secondary

Self-assessment of LEMS-related Weakness, W-SAS

The last post-dose self-assessment of LEMS-related weakness from the withdrawal period with categories of much much weaker (-3), much weaker (-2), somewhat weaker (-1), about the same (0), somewhat stronger (1), much stronger (2), and much much stronger (3).

Time frame: Participants were followed for up to 7 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Continuous 3,4-Diaminopyridine (3,4-DAP)Self-assessment of LEMS-related Weakness, W-SAS-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.24
3,4-DAP Taper to PlaceboSelf-assessment of LEMS-related Weakness, W-SAS-2.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.85
p-value: 0.0001t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026