Skip to content

Interbody Fusion Devices in the Treatment of Cervicobrachial Syndrome

Interbody Fusion Devices in the Treatment of Cervicobrachial Syndrome; a Blinded Randomised Trial of Cancellous Structured Ceramic (CSC) Versus PEEK Cages.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01511445
Acronym
CASCADE
Enrollment
100
Registered
2012-01-18
Start date
2011-12-31
Completion date
2015-11-30
Last updated
2017-05-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervicobrachial Syndrome, Myelopathy, Radiating Pain

Keywords

Cervicobrachial pain, radicular pain, arm pain, myelopathy, radiculitis, Radiating pain with or without signs of myelopathy.

Brief summary

This study randomizes neck and arm pain patients being treated with discectomy and anterior interbody fusion into two groups: one to receive a new ceramic implant and a control group with a more traditional plastic implant. The study will measure and compare pain and disability improvement with the two products over a period of two years. The fusion status will also be judged with plane x-rays and one CT scan.

Interventions

DEVICEAnterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with PEEK Cage

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with the use of a PEEK plastic interbody spacer

DEVICEAnterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with a Valeo CSC Cage

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a Valeo ceramic cage interbody spacer.

Sponsors

Amedica Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 75 years * Radicular signs and symptoms in one or both arms (i.e., pain, paraesthesiae or paresis in a specific nerve root distribution) or symptoms and signs of acute or chronic myelopathy. * At least 8 weeks prior conservative treatment (i.e., physical therapy, pain medication) * Radiographic diagnosis of cervical disc herniation and/or osteophyte at 1 level (C3-C4 to C7-T1) in accordance with clinical signs and symptoms * Ability and willingness to comply with project requirements * Written informed consent given by the subject or the subject's legally authorised representative

Exclusion criteria

* Previous cervical surgery (either anterior or posterior) * Increased motion on dynamic studies (\> 3 mm) * Severe segmental kyphosis of the involved disc level (\> 7 degrees) * Patient cannot be imaged with MRI * Neck pain only (without radicular or medullary symptoms) * Infection * Metabolic and bone diseases (osteoporosis, severe osteopenia) * Neoplasma or trauma of the cervical spine * Spinal anomaly (Klippel Feil, Bechterew, OPLL) * Severe mental or psychiatric disorder * Inadequate Dutch language * Planned (e)migration abroad in the year after inclusion

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Neck Disability Index24 months post-opThe change in the Neck Disability Index compared to the pre-op value for each group will be compared. Neck disability index is a unitless measure from zero (no disability) to 100 (absolute disability). Change is calculated as the pre-op value minus the 24 month value. A negative difference indicates that the patient is more disabled at 24 months.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fusion Status3 mo., 6mo., 12 mo., 24 monthsDynamic flexion-extension plane film x-rays will be used to assess fusion at all four follow-up periods. The criteria for fusion are rotation motion less than or equal to four degrees and translation less than 1.25 mm. The final fusion judgement will be fusion status at 24 months or the last time point with flexion-extension data available.

Countries

Netherlands

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was designed as double-blind randomized trial. The design called for randomizing 100 patients.

Pre-assignment details

Four additional patients were randomized when four patients were excluded for protocol violations prior to the primary endpoint. A surgeon who had not been trained as an investigator operated on these four patients, making numerous protocol violations in implant technique. These patients were randomized and had pre-op data in the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
ACDF With Valeo CSC Ceramic Cage
ACDF with the Valeo CSC cage, a silicon nitride ceramic interbody cage.
53
ACDF With PEEK Interbody Cage
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with an interbody spacer made from polyetheretherketone (PEEK) plastic.
51
Total104

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up31
Overall StudyProtocol Violation13

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicACDF With PEEK Interbody CageTotalACDF With Valeo CSC Ceramic Cage
Age, Continuous49.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
51.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
53.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
51 participants104 participants53 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
25 Participants52 Participants27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
26 Participants52 Participants26 Participants
Symptomatic (operated) spinal level
C3-C4
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Symptomatic (operated) spinal level
C4-C5
6 Participants6 Participants0 Participants
Symptomatic (operated) spinal level
C5-C6
30 Participants60 Participants30 Participants
Symptomatic (operated) spinal level
C6-C7
12 Participants32 Participants20 Participants
Symptomatic (operated) spinal level
C7-T1
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Use of nicotine products20 Participants43 Participants23 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
16 / 5311 / 51
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 531 / 51

Outcome results

Primary

Neck Disability Index

The change in the Neck Disability Index compared to the pre-op value for each group will be compared. Neck disability index is a unitless measure from zero (no disability) to 100 (absolute disability). Change is calculated as the pre-op value minus the 24 month value. A negative difference indicates that the patient is more disabled at 24 months.

Time frame: 24 months post-op

Population: Patients who had data from 24 month follow-up visit

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ACDF With Valeo CSC Ceramic CageNeck Disability Index17.9 units on a scale from 0 to 100Standard Deviation 14.9
ACDF With PEEK Interbody CageNeck Disability Index16.7 units on a scale from 0 to 100Standard Deviation 16.1
Comparison: The null hypothesis was that the mean change in NDI scores from pre-op to 24 months was equal in the two study arms.p-value: 0.64195% CI: [-7.3, 4.5]Fisher Exact
Secondary

Fusion Status

Dynamic flexion-extension plane film x-rays will be used to assess fusion at all four follow-up periods. The criteria for fusion are rotation motion less than or equal to four degrees and translation less than 1.25 mm. The final fusion judgement will be fusion status at 24 months or the last time point with flexion-extension data available.

Time frame: 3 mo., 6mo., 12 mo., 24 months

Population: Patients with 24 month films

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ACDF With Valeo CSC Ceramic CageFusion Status40 Participants
ACDF With PEEK Interbody CageFusion Status37 Participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis was that the fusion rates would be equal in the two study arms. The comparison includes patients with flexion-extension films at 24 months (as-treated population).p-value: 0.71Fisher Exact

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026