Skip to content

More Options Available With a Quadripolar LV Lead pRovidE In-clinic Solutions to CRT Challenges

More Options Available With a Quadripolar Left Ventricular (LV) Lead pRovidE In-clinic Solutions to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) Challenges

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01510652
Acronym
MORE-CRT
Enrollment
1078
Registered
2012-01-16
Start date
2011-11-30
Completion date
2014-05-31
Last updated
2019-02-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure, Inappropriate Phrenic Nerve Stimulation, Left Ventricular Cardiac Dysfunction, Perioperative/Postoperative Complications, Postoperative Cardiac Complication

Keywords

Cardiac Resynchronization therapy,, Heart Failure,, Left Ventricular Lead,, Quadripolar Left ventricular Lead,, Phrenic Nerve Stimulation,, Intra and post operative related complications

Brief summary

This investigation is designed with the hypothesis that using a quadripolar left ventricular lead results in less interventions when dealing with high pacing thresholds and Phrenic Nerve Stimulation (PNS), both at implant and during follow-up, compared to standard bipolar left ventricular leads.

Interventions

PROCEDUREBiP Group

Implantation of standard Left Ventricular (LV) lead

DEVICEQuad Group

Implantation of quadripolar Left ventricular (LV) lead Quartet

Sponsors

Abbott Medical Devices
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients are indicated for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with Defibrillation backup device (CRT-D) implantation, as per current international certified guidelines * Patients age is 18 years or greater * Patients must indicate their understanding of the study and willingness to participate by signing the appropriate informed consent form * Patients must be willing and able to comply with all study requirements

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with a life expectancy \<12 months. * Patients who are or may potentially be pregnant. * Patient has suffered any of the following in the 4 weeks prior to enrolment: * Myocardial Infarction (MI) * Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) * Unstable Angina Pectoris * Patient has primary valvular disease which has not been corrected

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lead Performance6 monthsPercentage of patients with freedom from event (intra- and post-operative). Intra-operative events were defined as: need to use more than 1 left ventricular lead, need to change lead implant position, use of any device to actively fixate the lead, unsuccessful implant, due to phrenic nerve stimulation, high pacing threshold or lead instability. Post-operative events were defined as any left ventricular lead related serious adverse device effect and CRT switched off.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy RespondersBaseline and 6 monthsPercentage of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) responders measured by a decrease of at least 10% of Left Ventricle End-Systolic Volume (LVESV)
Implant DurationTotal duration of the implant procedure reported at the end of the procedureThis measure reports the length (in time) of the implantation procedure. The measurement start at skin incision and stop at skin suture (so called skin-to-skin time) The total implant procedure duration time will be compared between the control and the treatment group.

Countries

Belgium, Canada, Finland, France, Germany, India, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

1078 patients have been enrolled in this study, while 1074 have been randomized to Quad or BiP group. The randomization procedure happened after the enrollment and before the implant, this explains why not all 1078 patients have been randomized

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Quad Group
Patients in the Quad group will be implanted with St. Jude Medical (SJM) quadripolar Left Ventricular (LV) lead Quartet Quartet Left Ventricular (LV) lead: Implantation of quadripolar Left ventricular (LV) lead Quartet
718
BiP Group
Patients in the BiP Group will be implanted with a standard (regulatory approved and commercially available) bipolar left ventricular lead from other companies (non St. Jude Medical leads) Standard Left Ventricular (LV) lead: Implantation of standard Left Ventricular (LV) lead
348
Total1,066

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicQuad GroupBiP GroupTotal
Age, Continuous67.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
68.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
67.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
Atrial Arrhythmia History
Atrial Fibrillation
114 participants58 participants172 participants
Atrial Arrhythmia History
Atrial Flutter
21 participants7 participants28 participants
Atrial Arrhythmia History
None
583 participants283 participants866 participants
Cardiomyopathy
Ischemic
353 participants196 participants549 participants
Cardiomyopathy
Non Ischemic
365 participants152 participants517 participants
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)27.1 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6
27.5 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1
27.2 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7
Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Volume (LVEDV)200.4 ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 74.9
204.5 ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 72
203.2 ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 80.6
Left Ventricular End-Systolic Volume (LVESV)151.2 ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 64
149.0 ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 58.3
150.5 ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 62.2
QRS duration158 ms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29
157 ms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27
157.5 ms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.4
Sex: Female, Male
Female
173 Participants74 Participants247 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
545 Participants274 Participants819 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
186 / 71976 / 355
serious
Total, serious adverse events
332 / 719211 / 355

Outcome results

Primary

Lead Performance

Percentage of patients with freedom from event (intra- and post-operative). Intra-operative events were defined as: need to use more than 1 left ventricular lead, need to change lead implant position, use of any device to actively fixate the lead, unsuccessful implant, due to phrenic nerve stimulation, high pacing threshold or lead instability. Post-operative events were defined as any left ventricular lead related serious adverse device effect and CRT switched off.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Quad GroupLead Performance83 % of patients with freedom from event
BiP GroupLead Performance74.4 % of patients with freedom from event
Secondary

Implant Duration

This measure reports the length (in time) of the implantation procedure. The measurement start at skin incision and stop at skin suture (so called skin-to-skin time) The total implant procedure duration time will be compared between the control and the treatment group.

Time frame: Total duration of the implant procedure reported at the end of the procedure

Population: The number of participants analyzed is the number of patients with implant data duration time available.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quad GroupImplant Duration100.4 minStandard Deviation 54.5
BiP GroupImplant Duration101.1 minStandard Deviation 51
Secondary

Percentage of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Responders

Percentage of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) responders measured by a decrease of at least 10% of Left Ventricle End-Systolic Volume (LVESV)

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

Population: The number of participants analyzed is the number of patients with echo data received for both baseline and 6 months follow up visits (and so comparable)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Quad GroupPercentage of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Responders62.0 % of patients that are CRT responders
BiP GroupPercentage of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Responders56.0 % of patients that are CRT responders

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 15, 2026