Skip to content

Comparison of Staples Versus Prolene Suture for Skin Closure at Cesarean Delivery

Comparison of Staples Versus Nonabsorbable Subcuticular (Prolene) Suture for Skin Closure in Cesarean Deliveries: A Randomized Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01509950
Enrollment
15
Registered
2012-01-13
Start date
2012-01-31
Completion date
2013-05-04
Last updated
2019-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pregnancy, Cesarean Section

Brief summary

Currently different materials are used to close the skin after a cesarean delivery, including absorbable suture, non-absorbable suture and staples. It is not known what is the best choice of material to close the skin after a cesarean section, but commonly staples or dissolvable suture is used. Recently plastic surgeons have found that non-dissolvable suture may have a better cosmetic outcome than staples. The investigators hope to learn if there is a difference in pain both at suture/staple removal and 6 weeks postoperatively between Prolene suture, Absorbable suture (monocryl or vicryl) or staples. The investigators also plan to look for differences in wound complications and patient satisfaction, as well as operating and removal times. This knowledge will be important in helping practitioners choose the closure technique at cesarean delivery.

Detailed description

Patients who meet inclusion criteria will be approached upon admission to Labor and Delivery. A study staff member will describe the study and offer participation. If a patient agrees to participate, she will sign research protocol and HIPAA consent forms and receive a copy of these forms. The patient's chart will be flagged, indicating that she is a study participant. The patient's prenatal care and labor and delivery will be managed by her physician per standard of care at the physician's discretion, including routine surgical preparation and procedures. When a participating patient is scheduled for a cesarean section, she will be randomized to Arm 1 (Staples) or Arm 2 (Prolene) or Arm 3 (Monocryl or Vicryl absorbable suture). She will be treated as per standard of care and her cesarean section performed per physician discretion. After the closure of the fascial layer, the surgeons will follow the same protocol for each study participant, including wound irrigation with warm sterile saline and reapproximation of the subcutaneous layer if greater than 2.0 cm in depth (per standard of care). The patient in Arm 1 will have skin closure with staples. The patient in Arm 2 will have skin closure with 2-0 Prolene in a subcuticular fashion. The patient in Arm 3 will have skin closure with monocryl or vicryl in the standard fashion. Patients in Arms 1 and 2 will have their closure material removed at the physician's discretion per the standard of care at post-operative day 3 or 4. Pain level will be assessed on the first and third or fourth day after surgery and again at six weeks.

Interventions

PROCEDUREStaples

Staples for closure of cesarean section skin incision

PROCEDUREProlene non-absorbable sutures

Prolene non-absorbable sutures for closure of cesarean skin incision

Absorbable sutures for closure of cesarean skin incision

Sponsors

Stanford University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Pregnant women undergoing primary or repeat cesarean section * Maternal age greater than or equal to 18 years of age * Gestational age greater than or equal to 34 weeks * Elective and non-elective cesarean section

Exclusion criteria

* Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes * BMI greater than 35 * Pre-operative diagnosis of chorioamnionitis * History of drug or alcohol abuse * Contraindication to NSAIDs * Chronic pain diagnosis * Narcotic use prior to pregnancy * Maternal age less than 18 years of age * General anesthesia * Chorioamnionitis, clinical suspicion of chorioamnionitis, or risk factors for chorioamnionitis (membrane rupture greater than 18 hours, GBS positive status) * Vertical skin incision

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Level of Pain on a Scale During the Post-operative Hospitalization PeriodPost-operative day 3 or 4.Pain level on a Mosby visual analog pain scale of 1 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Count of Participants With Wound ComplicationsPost-operative week 6Wound complications include conditions like infection, seroma/hematoma and dehiscence
Level of Patient Satisfaction to the Wound AppearancePost-operative day 3 or 4Level of patient satisfaction measured on a scale of 1 (very unsatisfied) to 10 (very satisfied)
Level of Patient Satisfaction to the Wound Appearance at 6 Weeks PostpartumPost-operative week 6Level of patient satisfaction measured on a scale of 1 (very unsatisfied) to 10 (very satisfied)
Level of Pain on a Scale at 6 Weeks PostpartumPost-operative week 6Pain level on a scale (Mosby visual analog pain scale) of 1 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain).
Time Needed for the Suture RemovalPost-operative day 3 or 4Measured in seconds
Level of Patient's Satisfaction to the Cosmesis of the WoundPost-operative week 6Measured on a scale of 0 (very unsatisfied to the cosmesis) to 10 (very satisfied to the cosmesis)
Level of Patient's Overall Patient Satisfaction to the Type of ClosurePost-operative day 1Level of patient satisfaction measured on a scale of 1 (very unsatisfied) to 10 (very satisfied)
Time From Skin Incision to the Skin ClosureDay of cesarean delivery (up to 8 hours)Measured in minutes

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment into the first two arms (Staples and Prolene non-absorbable sutures) occurred through May 2013. The study protocol was modified in July 2014 and the third arm of the study, absorbable sutures, was added, however, no recruitment occurred after this modification.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Staples
Use of staples for skin closure at cesarean section Staples: Staples for closure of cesarean section skin incision
7
Prolene Non-absorbable Sutures
Use of Prolene non-absorbable sutures for skin closure at cesarean section Prolene non-absorbable sutures: Prolene non-absorbable sutures for closure of cesarean skin incision
8
Total15

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicStaplesProlene Non-absorbable SuturesTotal
Age, Continuous33.0 years33.5 years33.3 years
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
2 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-Hispanic Black
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-Hispanic White
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
7 participants8 participants15 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants8 Participants15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 70 / 8
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 70 / 8

Outcome results

Primary

Level of Pain on a Scale During the Post-operative Hospitalization Period

Pain level on a Mosby visual analog pain scale of 1 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain)

Time frame: Post-operative day 3 or 4.

Population: Only patients with available data were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
StaplesLevel of Pain on a Scale During the Post-operative Hospitalization Period2.0 units on a scale
Prolene Non-absorbable SuturesLevel of Pain on a Scale During the Post-operative Hospitalization Period2.0 units on a scale
p-value: 0.6t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Count of Participants With Wound Complications

Wound complications include conditions like infection, seroma/hematoma and dehiscence

Time frame: Post-operative week 6

Population: Only patients with available data were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
StaplesCount of Participants With Wound Complications0 Participants
Prolene Non-absorbable SuturesCount of Participants With Wound Complications0 Participants
Secondary

Level of Pain on a Scale at 6 Weeks Postpartum

Pain level on a scale (Mosby visual analog pain scale) of 1 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain).

Time frame: Post-operative week 6

Population: Only patients with available data were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
StaplesLevel of Pain on a Scale at 6 Weeks Postpartum3 units on a scale
Prolene Non-absorbable SuturesLevel of Pain on a Scale at 6 Weeks Postpartum1 units on a scale
Secondary

Level of Patient Satisfaction to the Wound Appearance

Level of patient satisfaction measured on a scale of 1 (very unsatisfied) to 10 (very satisfied)

Time frame: Post-operative day 3 or 4

Population: Only patients with available data were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Prolene Non-absorbable SuturesLevel of Patient Satisfaction to the Wound Appearance9 units on a scale
Secondary

Level of Patient Satisfaction to the Wound Appearance at 6 Weeks Postpartum

Level of patient satisfaction measured on a scale of 1 (very unsatisfied) to 10 (very satisfied)

Time frame: Post-operative week 6

Population: There were no patients that had data available for analysis for staples and prolene non-absorbable sutures study arms.

Secondary

Level of Patient's Overall Patient Satisfaction to the Type of Closure

Level of patient satisfaction measured on a scale of 1 (very unsatisfied) to 10 (very satisfied)

Time frame: Post-operative week 6

Population: No patients had data available for the analysis.

Secondary

Level of Patient's Overall Patient Satisfaction to the Type of Closure

Level of patient satisfaction measured on a scale of 1 (very unsatisfied) to 10 (very satisfied)

Time frame: Post-operative day 1

Population: Only patients with available data were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
StaplesLevel of Patient's Overall Patient Satisfaction to the Type of Closure8.0 units on a scale
Prolene Non-absorbable SuturesLevel of Patient's Overall Patient Satisfaction to the Type of Closure7.5 units on a scale
Secondary

Level of Patient's Overall Patient Satisfaction to the Type of Closure

Level of patient satisfaction measured on a scale of 1 (very unsatisfied) to 10 (very satisfied)

Time frame: Post-operative day 3 or 4

Population: Only patients with available data were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Prolene Non-absorbable SuturesLevel of Patient's Overall Patient Satisfaction to the Type of Closure8.7 units on a scale
Secondary

Level of Patient's Satisfaction to the Cosmesis of the Wound

Measured on a scale of 0 (very unsatisfied to the cosmesis) to 10 (very satisfied to the cosmesis)

Time frame: Post-operative week 6

Population: Only patients with available data were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
StaplesLevel of Patient's Satisfaction to the Cosmesis of the Wound9.0 units on a scale
Prolene Non-absorbable SuturesLevel of Patient's Satisfaction to the Cosmesis of the Wound5.0 units on a scale
Secondary

Time From Skin Incision to the Skin Closure

Measured in minutes

Time frame: Day of cesarean delivery (up to 8 hours)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
StaplesTime From Skin Incision to the Skin Closure55.0 minutes
Prolene Non-absorbable SuturesTime From Skin Incision to the Skin Closure56.5 minutes
Secondary

Time Needed for the Suture Removal

Measured in seconds

Time frame: Post-operative day 3 or 4

Population: Only patients with available data were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
StaplesTime Needed for the Suture Removal79.0 seconds
Prolene Non-absorbable SuturesTime Needed for the Suture Removal1.5 seconds

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026