Skip to content

Effectiveness of the Propeller Health (Formerly Asthmapolis) Monitoring System

Effectiveness of the Propeller Health (Formerly Asthmapolis) Monitoring System

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01509183
Enrollment
495
Registered
2012-01-12
Start date
2012-04-30
Completion date
2016-09-30
Last updated
2021-07-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma

Keywords

asthma, healthcare utilization costs

Brief summary

Propeller Health is collaborating with Dignity Health (formerly Catholic Healthcare West (CHW)) to carry out a focused demonstration project to evaluate the effectiveness and potential cost savings of a deployment of the Propeller Health approach to asthma management. The Propeller Health goal is to bring together the best technology and asthma insight in order to provide Dignity Health with an engaging, data-driven chronic care program to improve asthma management and lower healthcare utilization costs, and to respond to prevention-focused reforms to health insurance laws. This project has been designed to implement and evaluate a data-driven program to improve asthma management and control and lower direct costs through reductions in healthcare utilization. This program has been developed by Propeller Health and has gone through preliminary testing. Each subject participating in the study will receive an Propeller Health device, which captures the time and location of use of inhaled short-acting bronchodilators over a twelve-month period. This information is processed and delivered at regular intervals to the patient and his or her provider to support improved asthma management.

Detailed description

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the impact of the adoption of the Propeller Health system into a healthcare organization, and to provide sufficient information to inform decision making for potential future adopters. The researchers believe that the Propeller Health system has the potential to improve asthma control by providing rescue inhaler actuation data and tailored asthma management tips to patients with uncontrolled asthma, and rescue inhaler actuation data to their providers. Improvements in asthma control should be reflected in reductions in healthcare utilization for asthma, and potentially for general healthcare utilization. Reductions in utilization would result in lower healthcare costs. The study has been designed to capture data on individual subject asthma control, and changes in utilization and costs over a one-year introduction period.

Interventions

DEVICEPropeller Health System (formerly Asthmapolis System)

The Propeller (formerly Asthmapolis) system works through the provision of information to patients and their providers. With the Propeller (formerly Asthmapolis) device in place, each actuation of a patient's rescue inhaler is recorded with an automatic time stamp; in many circumstances, the location at which the device is actuated is also captured and recorded. Actuation data are then securely transmitted to Propeller (formerly Asthmapolis) where events and an assessment of asthma control can be viewed in secure online interfaces. The information is also compiled into individual reports that are returned to the patient and his or her provider. Patients also receive customized suggestions for asthma management based on their actuation history.

Sponsors

California HealthCare Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Reciprocal Labs
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Provider diagnosis of asthma (ICD9 493.xx); * At least one healthcare utilization event in CHW within last 12 months; and * Prescription for Short Acting Beta Agonist (SABA) at study intake.

Exclusion criteria

* Subject is under the age of 5 at the beginning of the study; * Subject does not speak either English or Spanish; * Subject does not have access to the Internet or email to receive reports; and * Subject has substantial co-morbidity (provider diagnosis of COPD

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Mean SABA UseChange in mean SABA use over the course of 12 monthsMean SABA use as measured by the Propeller Health sensor during the period of intervention (12 months).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in the Proportion of SABA-free Days From Baseline to 12 MonthsBaseline to 12 monthsEvaluate the change in the proportion of SABA-free days from baseline to 12 months

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited between April 2012 & June 2013 via an asthma registry, community outreach efforts, and provider referrals.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intervention Group
Intervention group (IG) participants received access to and feedback from the Propeller Health System (formerly Asthmapolis System). Propeller Health System (formerly Asthmapolis System): The Propeller (formerly Asthmapolis) system works through the provision of information to patients and their providers. With the Propeller (formerly Asthmapolis) device in place, each actuation of a patient's rescue inhaler is recorded with an automatic time stamp; in many circumstances, the location at which the device is actuated is also captured and recorded. Actuation data are then securely transmitted to Propeller (formerly Asthmapolis) where events and an assessment of asthma control can be viewed in secure online interfaces. The information is also compiled into individual reports that are returned to the patient and his or her provider. Patients also receive customized suggestions for asthma management based on their actuation history.
250
Control Group
Control group (CG) participants were outfitted with sensors from the Propeller Health System, but did not receive feedback.
245
Total495

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIntervention GroupControl GroupTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
74 Participants75 Participants149 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
13 Participants12 Participants25 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
163 Participants158 Participants321 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
145 Participants140 Participants285 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
105 Participants105 Participants210 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 2500 / 245
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 2500 / 245
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 2500 / 245

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Mean SABA Use

Mean SABA use as measured by the Propeller Health sensor during the period of intervention (12 months).

Time frame: Change in mean SABA use over the course of 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention GroupChange in Mean SABA Use-0.41 mean puffs per dayStandard Deviation 0.69
Control GroupChange in Mean SABA Use-0.31 mean puffs per dayStandard Deviation 0.75
Secondary

Change in the Proportion of SABA-free Days From Baseline to 12 Months

Evaluate the change in the proportion of SABA-free days from baseline to 12 months

Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intervention GroupChange in the Proportion of SABA-free Days From Baseline to 12 Months21 % Change in proportion of SABA-free days
Control GroupChange in the Proportion of SABA-free Days From Baseline to 12 Months17 % Change in proportion of SABA-free days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 28, 2026