Skip to content

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Reslizumab Treatment in Patients With Moderate to Severe Asthma

A 16-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Reslizumab (3.0 mg/kg) Treatment in Patients With Moderate to Severe Asthma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01508936
Enrollment
511
Registered
2012-01-12
Start date
2012-02-29
Completion date
2013-08-31
Last updated
2016-06-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Eosinophilic Asthma

Brief summary

The primary objective of the study is to characterize the efficacy of reslizumab treatment, at a dosage of 3.0 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) every 4 weeks for a total of 4 doses, in improving pulmonary function in relation to baseline blood eosinophil levels in patients with moderate to severe asthma, as assessed by the change from baseline to week 16 in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1).

Interventions

DRUGReslizumab

Reslizumab administered at a dosage of 3.0 mg/kg by intravenous (iv) infusion by qualified study personnel every 4 weeks for 16 weeks (for a total of 4 doses).

DRUGPlacebo

Matching placebo administered by intravenous (iv) infusion by qualified study personnel every 4 weeks for 16 weeks (for a total of 4 doses).

Sponsors

Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients are included in the study if all of the following criteria are met: * The patient is a man or woman, 18 through 65 years of age, with a diagnosis of asthma. * The patient has an ACQ score of at least 1.5. * At screening, the patient has airway reversibility of at least 12% to beta-agonist administration. * The patient is currently taking fluticasone at a dosage of at least 440 µg daily (or equivalent). Patients' baseline asthma therapy regimens (including but not limited to inhaled corticosteroids, leukotriene antagonists, 5-lipoxygenase inhibitors, cromolyn) must be stable for 30 days before screening and continue without dosage changes throughout study. * Female patients must be surgically sterile, 2 years postmenopausal, or must have a negative beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (ßHCG) result for a pregnancy test at screening (serum) and baseline (urine). * Female patients of childbearing potential (not surgically sterile or 2 years postmenopausal), must use a medically accepted method of contraception and must agree to continue use of this method for the duration of the study and for 30 days after participation in the study. Acceptable methods of contraception include barrier method with spermicide, abstinence, intrauterine device (IUD), or steroidal contraceptive (oral, transdermal, implanted, and injected). * Written informed consent is obtained. * The patient is in reasonable health (except for diagnosis of asthma) as judged by the investigator, and as determined by a medical history, medical examination, electrocardiogram (ECG) evaluation, serum chemistry, hematology, urinalysis, and serology. * The patient must be willing and able to comply with study restrictions and to remain at the clinic for the required duration during the study period, and be willing to return to the clinic for the follow-up evaluation as specified in this protocol.

Exclusion criteria

Patients are excluded from participating in this study if 1 or more of the following criteria are met: * The patient has another confounding underlying lung disorder (eg, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary fibrosis, lung cancer). The patient has other pulmonary conditions with symptoms of asthma and blood eosinophilia (eg, Churg-Strauss syndrome, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis). * The patient has a clinically meaningful comorbidity that would interfere with the study schedule or procedures, or compromise the patient's safety. * The patient has known hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES). * The patient is a current smoker (ie, has smoked within the last 6 months prior to screening). * The patient has a history of use of systemic immunosuppressive or immunomodulating agents (anti-immunoglobulin E \[anti-IgE\] mAb, methotrexate, cyclosporin, interferon-α, anti-tumor necrosis factor mAb, or omalizumab) within 6 months prior to study entry (randomization). * The patient is currently using or has used systemic corticosteroids (includes use of oral corticosteroids) within 30 days prior to the screening visit. * The patient is expected to be poorly compliant with study drug administration, study procedures, or visits. * The patient has any aggravating factors that are inadequately controlled, and thus would aggravate asthma symptoms (eg, gastroesophageal reflux disease). * The patient has participated in any investigative drug or device study within 30 days prior to screening. * The patient has participated in any investigative biologics study within 90 days prior to screening. * The patient has previously received reslizumab or other anti-hIL-5 mAbs (eg, mepolizumab). * The patient is a pregnant or lactating woman. (Any women becoming pregnant during the study will be withdrawn from the study.) * The patient has a current infection or disease that may preclude assessment of asthma. * The patient has a history of concurrent immunodeficiency (human immunodeficiency, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, or congenital immunodeficiency). * The patient is suspected of current drug or alcohol abuse as specified in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria. * The patient has presence of or suspected parasitic infestation/infection. * Patients may not have received any live attenuated vaccine within the 12-week period before study entry.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 16 in Full Analysis SetBaseline (Day 1), Week 16FEV1 is a standard measurement of air movement in the lungs of patients with asthma. It is the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration. Improvement in FEV1 is a measure in the reduction of bronchospasm, the reduction of airway inflammation, or both. FEV1 was measured using forced expiratory air spirometry. Data represent the slope estimate of change from baseline in FEV1 (measured in liters) at Week 16 versus baseline eosinophil count (measured in 10\^9/liter) by treatment group.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Over 16 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated MeasuresBaseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16The ACQ score was measured using the ACQ-7. Six questions are-self assessments; the seventh item is the result of the patient's % predicted FEV1 measurement. Each item has 7 possible answers on a scale of 0 to 6, and the total score is the mean of all responses (the total scale is therefore 0-6). A score of 0 indicates good asthma control; higher scores indicate increasingly poorer asthma control. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control. During study (Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16) average value was calculated from mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, history of asthma exacerbation in the previous year, height, baseline value, and sex as fixed factors, and patient as a random effect.
Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 16 in FEV1 SubpopulationBaseline (Day 1), Week 16FEV1 is a standard measurement of air movement in the lungs of patients with asthma. It is the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration. Improvement in FEV1 is a measure in the reduction of bronchospasm, the reduction of airway inflammation, or both. FEV1 was measured using forced expiratory air spirometry. As with the primary outcome, data represent the slope estimate of change from baseline in FEV1 (measured in liters) at Week 16 versus baseline eosinophil count (measured in 10\^9/liter) by treatment group. However the FEV1 subpopulation includes participants with more impaired lung function (% predicted FEV1 \<85% at baseline).
Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16FEV1 is a standard measurement of air movement in the lungs of patients with asthma. It is the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration. Improvement in FEV1 is a measure in the reduction of bronchospasm, the reduction of airway inflammation, or both. FEV1 was measured using forced expiratory air spirometry. Positive change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.
Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and EndpointBaseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16The percent predicted FEV1 is the ratio of the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration to the patient's predicted FEV based on a similar population without asthma. Percent predicted lung function values were transcribed directly from the lung function report to the CRF, without any calculation by Teva. Positive change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.
Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16The FVC is the volume of air that can be forcibly blown out after full inspiration, measured in liters. FV was measured using forced expiratory air spirometry. Positive change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.
Change From Baseline in the Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% of the Forced Vital Capacity (FEF25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16The FEF25%-75% is the forced expiratory flow at 25% to 75% of the forced vital capacity. FEF25%-75% was measured using forced expiratory air spirometry. Positive change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist Therapy (SABA) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline (Day -2 to 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16SABA are used for quick relief of asthma symptoms. The number of times SABA therapy was used was assessed using 3 day recall at scheduled visits. Participants were asked to recall whether SABAs were used within 3 days of the scheduled visit and, if so, how many puffs were used. Daily use was the average of those 3 days. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.
Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Over 16 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated MeasuresBaseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16FEV1 is a standard measurement of air movement in the lungs of patients with asthma. It is the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration. Improvement in FEV1 is a measure in the reduction of bronchospasm, the reduction of airway inflammation, or both. FEV1 was measured using forced expiratory air spirometry. Positive change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control. During study (Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16) average value was calculated using a mixed effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment (reslizumab or placebo), blood eosinophil count at baseline, and the interaction of treatment and eosinophil count as a random effect.
Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16The ACQ score was measured using the ACQ-7. Six questions are self-assessments; the seventh item is the result of the patient's % predicted FEV1 measurement. Each item has 7 possible answers on a scale of 0 to 6, and the total score is the mean of all responses (the total scale is therefore 0-6). A score of 0 indicates good asthma control; higher scores indicate increasingly poorer asthma control. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsDay 1 to Week 28An adverse event was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an inability to carry out usual activities. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes.
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesWeek 4 to Week 16Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) abnormal serum chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis values during any of the lab tests conducted during the treatment period. Significance criteria: * Blood urea nitrogen: \>=10.71 mmol/L * Creatinine: \>=177 μmol/L * Uric acid: M\>=625, F\>=506 μmol/L * Aspartate aminotransferase: \>=3\*upper limit of normal (ULN). Normal range is 10-43 U/L * Alanine aminotransferase: \>=3\*ULN. Normal range is 10-40 U/L * GGT = gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase: \>= 3\*ULN. Normal range is 4-49 U/L. * Total bilirubin: \>=34.2 μmol/L * Creatinine phosphokinase: \>5\*ULN. Normal range is 24-207 U/L. * White blood cells: \<=3.0 or \>20 10\^9/L * Hemoglobin: M\<=115, F\<=95 g/dL * Hematocrit: M\<0.37, F\<0.32 L/L * Platelets: \<=75 10\^9/L * Absolute neutrophil count: \<=1.0 10\^9/L * Urinalysis: blood, glucose, ketones and total protein: \>=2 unit increase from baseline
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesWeek 4 to Week 28Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) vital sign values during any of the treatment period exams. Significance criteria * Heart rate - high: \>100 and increase of \>= 30 beats/minute (bpm) * Sitting systolic blood pressure - high: \>160 and increase of \>=30 mmHg * Sitting systolic blood pressure - low: \<90 and decrease of \>=30 mmHg * Sitting diastolic blood pressure - high: \>100 and increase of \>=12 mmHg * Sitting diastolic blood pressure - low: \<50 and decrease of \>=12 mmHg * Body temperature - high: \>100.5° Fahrenheit or 38.1° Celsius and increase of \>2° * Body temperature - low: \<96.5° Fahrenheit or \<35.8° Celsius
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesWeek 16 or endpointCounts represent the number of participants with potentially clinically significant ECG abnormalities as assessed by the investigator.
Participants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status During StudyScreening (Week -3), Weeks 8 and 16Counts of participants with a positive anti-drug antibody (ADA) response during treatment is offered for the experimental treatment arm. Blood samples were collected for determination of ADAs before study drug infusion at screening, weeks 8 and 16 or early withdrawal. Serum samples from patients who were treated with reslizumab were analyzed for ADA by Teva (Teva Biopharmaceuticals USA, Rockville, MD) using a validated homogeneous solution-based bridging enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Endpoint =week 16 or early withdrawal. Counts represent the total number of participants at each time point with a positive immunogenicity test, and not 'new' participants with a positive test. An overall status of positive includes participants who had a positive ADA at any time point.
Change From Baseline in Blood Eosinophil Counts at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, Follow-up (Week 28) and EndpointBaseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, Follow-up (Week 28)Blood eosinophil counts were measured using a standard complete blood count with differential blood test at each scheduled visit. Follow-up was performed approximately 12 weeks after the 16 week treatment period. Endpoint is the last post-baseline assessment.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 869 patients were screened for enrollment into this study. Of the 869 patients screened, 511 patients at 103 centers in the US met entry criteria and were considered to be eligible for enrollment into the study.

Pre-assignment details

Randomization was stratified by occurrence of asthma exacerbation(s) during the previous year (yes or no). Within each stratum, patients were randomly assigned in a 4:1 ratio to receive treatment with reslizumab at 3.0 mg/kg or matching placebo.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Placebo intravenous injection every 4 weeks for a total of 4 doses.
98
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg
Reslizumab intravenous injection at a dosage of 3.0 mg/kg every 4 weeks for a total of 4 doses.
398
Total496

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event1132
Overall StudyData from 2 sites deemed invalid411
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy01
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up29
Overall StudyOther05
Overall StudyProtocol Violation23
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject418

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboTotalReslizumab 3.0 mg/kg
Age, Continuous45.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.38
44.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.27
44.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)2.564 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6909
2.559 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6969
2.558 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6992
Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist Therapy (SABA) in Past 3 Days2.0 puffs of SABA/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.82
1.9 puffs of SABA/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.83
1.9 puffs of SABA/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.84
Blood Eosinophil Counts0.277 10^9 blood eosinophil/liter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2209
0.280 10^9 blood eosinophil/liter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2401
0.281 10^9 blood eosinophil/liter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2448
Body Mass Index31.6 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.66
32.2 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.33
32.2 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.69
Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% of the Forced Vital Capacity (FEF25%-75%)1.553 liters/second
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6791
1.631 liters/second
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8645
1.650 liters/second
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9037
Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1)2.180 liters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6355
2.117 liters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6837
2.101 liters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.695
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)3.215 liters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9076
3.081 liters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9494
3.047 liters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9577
Height169.7 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.25
168.1 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.35
167.7 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.35
Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (% predicted FEV1)66.5 % predicted
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.53
66.7 % predicted
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.1
66.8 % predicted
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.26
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaskan Native
0 participants3 participants3 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 participants12 participants10 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
21 participants134 participants113 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
8 participants52 participants44 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-Hispanic and Non-Latino
90 participants444 participants354 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
0 participants12 participants12 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Pacific Islander
2 participants2 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
73 participants333 participants260 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
54 Participants315 Participants261 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
44 Participants181 Participants137 Participants
Weight90.9 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.68
90.7 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.3
90.6 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.92

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
41 / 97118 / 395
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 9716 / 395

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 16 in Full Analysis Set

FEV1 is a standard measurement of air movement in the lungs of patients with asthma. It is the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration. Improvement in FEV1 is a measure in the reduction of bronchospasm, the reduction of airway inflammation, or both. FEV1 was measured using forced expiratory air spirometry. Data represent the slope estimate of change from baseline in FEV1 (measured in liters) at Week 16 versus baseline eosinophil count (measured in 10\^9/liter) by treatment group.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 16

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) includes randomized patients treated with at least 1 dose of study drug, and had assessments in the timeframes. Pulmonary function tests were excluded if a limited subset of medications that could significantly confound interpretation were used within 7 days of scheduled visits.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 16 in Full Analysis Set-0.2778 FEV1 liters/ eosinophils 10^9/literStandard Error 0.2379
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 16 in Full Analysis Set0.0229 FEV1 liters/ eosinophils 10^9/literStandard Error 0.0944
Comparison: The primary analysis was the linear regression model with model effects including treatment (reslizumab or placebo), blood eosinophil count at baseline, and the interaction of treatment and eosinophil count. A significant treatment by baseline eosinophil interaction would indicate that treatment difference varies by the baseline eosinophil count.p-value: 0.2407Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16

The ACQ score was measured using the ACQ-7. Six questions are self-assessments; the seventh item is the result of the patient's % predicted FEV1 measurement. Each item has 7 possible answers on a scale of 0 to 6, and the total score is the mean of all responses (the total scale is therefore 0-6). A score of 0 indicates good asthma control; higher scores indicate increasingly poorer asthma control. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analyzed represents # with ACQ baseline values. Number participants with assessments in the timeframes are listed with the time designation. ACQ were excluded if obtained at visits which were preceded by usage within 7 days of a limited subset of medications that could significantly alter interpretation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16Week 4 (n=96, 385)-0.502 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.071
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16Week 8 (n=93, 377)-0.631 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0807
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16Week 12 (n=90, 357)-0.674 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0843
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16Week 16 (n=83, 343)-0.648 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0878
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16Week 16 (n=83, 343)-0.844 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0453
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16Week 4 (n=96, 385)-0.585 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0375
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16Week 12 (n=90, 357)-0.818 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0439
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16Week 8 (n=93, 377)-0.701 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.042
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Over 16 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures

The ACQ score was measured using the ACQ-7. Six questions are-self assessments; the seventh item is the result of the patient's % predicted FEV1 measurement. Each item has 7 possible answers on a scale of 0 to 6, and the total score is the mean of all responses (the total scale is therefore 0-6). A score of 0 indicates good asthma control; higher scores indicate increasingly poorer asthma control. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control. During study (Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16) average value was calculated from mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, history of asthma exacerbation in the previous year, height, baseline value, and sex as fixed factors, and patient as a random effect.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16

Population: Full analysis set of participants who contributed at least once to the analysis. ACQ were excluded from the FAS if they were obtained at scheduled visits which were preceded by usage within 7 days of a limited subset of medications that could significantly confound interpretation.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Over 16 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures-0.614 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0689
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Over 16 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures-0.737 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0364
Comparison: The change from baseline over the 16 week treatment period was measured for the key secondary variables of:~* Lung function as measured by FEV1~* ACQ~Testing of the key secondary variables was performed using the sequential testing procedure in the order as specified above at the alpha level of 0.05.p-value: 0.107295% CI: [-0.273, 0.027]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist Therapy (SABA) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

SABA are used for quick relief of asthma symptoms. The number of times SABA therapy was used was assessed using 3 day recall at scheduled visits. Participants were asked to recall whether SABAs were used within 3 days of the scheduled visit and, if so, how many puffs were used. Daily use was the average of those 3 days. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.

Time frame: Baseline (Day -2 to 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analyzed represents # with SABA use baseline values. Number participants with assessments in the timeframes are listed with the time designation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist Therapy (SABA) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 4 (n=96, 388)-0.1 puffs of SABA/dayStandard Error 0.19
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist Therapy (SABA) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 8 (n=94, 377)-0.2 puffs of SABA/dayStandard Error 0.18
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist Therapy (SABA) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 12 (n=89, 356)-0.2 puffs of SABA/dayStandard Error 0.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist Therapy (SABA) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 16 (n=84, 345)-0.4 puffs of SABA/dayStandard Error 0.18
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist Therapy (SABA) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 16 (n=84, 345)-0.3 puffs of SABA/dayStandard Error 0.09
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist Therapy (SABA) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 4 (n=96, 388)-0.2 puffs of SABA/dayStandard Error 0.1
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist Therapy (SABA) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 12 (n=89, 356)-0.3 puffs of SABA/dayStandard Error 0.1
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist Therapy (SABA) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 8 (n=94, 377)-0.3 puffs of SABA/dayStandard Error 0.09
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Blood Eosinophil Counts at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, Follow-up (Week 28) and Endpoint

Blood eosinophil counts were measured using a standard complete blood count with differential blood test at each scheduled visit. Follow-up was performed approximately 12 weeks after the 16 week treatment period. Endpoint is the last post-baseline assessment.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, Follow-up (Week 28)

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analyzed represents # with blood eosinophil count baseline values. Number participants with assessments in the timeframes are listed with the time designation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Eosinophil Counts at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, Follow-up (Week 28) and EndpointWeek 4 (n=93, 385)0.010 10^9/literStandard Deviation 0.1917
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Eosinophil Counts at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, Follow-up (Week 28) and EndpointWeek 8 (n=91, 372)0.036 10^9/literStandard Deviation 0.3104
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Eosinophil Counts at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, Follow-up (Week 28) and EndpointWeek 12 (n=84, 353)0.027 10^9/literStandard Deviation 0.2082
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Eosinophil Counts at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, Follow-up (Week 28) and EndpointWeek 16 (n=80, 346)0.021 10^9/literStandard Deviation 2466
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Eosinophil Counts at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, Follow-up (Week 28) and EndpointFollow-up (n=90, 364)0.035 10^9/literStandard Deviation 0.3369
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Eosinophil Counts at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, Follow-up (Week 28) and EndpointEndpoint (n=94, 392)0.036 10^9/literStandard Deviation 0.3306
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Blood Eosinophil Counts at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, Follow-up (Week 28) and EndpointFollow-up (n=90, 364)-0.159 10^9/literStandard Deviation 0.2301
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Blood Eosinophil Counts at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, Follow-up (Week 28) and EndpointWeek 4 (n=93, 385)-0.226 10^9/literStandard Deviation 0.2297
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Blood Eosinophil Counts at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, Follow-up (Week 28) and EndpointWeek 16 (n=80, 346)-0.239 10^9/literStandard Deviation 0.2462
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Blood Eosinophil Counts at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, Follow-up (Week 28) and EndpointWeek 8 (n=91, 372)-0.239 10^9/literStandard Deviation 0.2389
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Blood Eosinophil Counts at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, Follow-up (Week 28) and EndpointEndpoint (n=94, 392)-0.169 10^9/literStandard Deviation 0.2294
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Blood Eosinophil Counts at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, Follow-up (Week 28) and EndpointWeek 12 (n=84, 353)-0.240 10^9/literStandard Deviation 0.2418
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 16 in FEV1 Subpopulation

FEV1 is a standard measurement of air movement in the lungs of patients with asthma. It is the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration. Improvement in FEV1 is a measure in the reduction of bronchospasm, the reduction of airway inflammation, or both. FEV1 was measured using forced expiratory air spirometry. As with the primary outcome, data represent the slope estimate of change from baseline in FEV1 (measured in liters) at Week 16 versus baseline eosinophil count (measured in 10\^9/liter) by treatment group. However the FEV1 subpopulation includes participants with more impaired lung function (% predicted FEV1 \<85% at baseline).

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 16

Population: The FEV1 sub-population analysis set includes all participants in the FAS with % predicted FEV1 \<85% at baseline. Pulmonary function tests were excluded if a limited subset of medications that could significantly confound interpretation were used within 7 days of scheduled visits.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 16 in FEV1 Subpopulation-0.2944 FEV1 liters/ eosinophils 10^9/literStandard Error 0.2443
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 16 in FEV1 Subpopulation0.0271 FEV1 liters/ eosinophils 10^9/literStandard Error 0.1019
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

FEV1 is a standard measurement of air movement in the lungs of patients with asthma. It is the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration. Improvement in FEV1 is a measure in the reduction of bronchospasm, the reduction of airway inflammation, or both. FEV1 was measured using forced expiratory air spirometry. Positive change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analyzed represents # with FEV1 baseline values (one reslizumab participant was missing a valid baseline FEV1.) Number participants with assessments in the timeframes are listed with the time designation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 4 (n= 96, 386)0.164 litersStandard Error 0.0395
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 8 (n= 93, 377)0.199 litersStandard Error 0.0421
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 12 (n= 90, 357)0.152 litersStandard Error 0.043
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 16 (n=83, 344)0.187 litersStandard Error 0.0446
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 16 (n=83, 344)0.255 litersStandard Error 0.0232
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 4 (n= 96, 386)0.224 litersStandard Error 0.0208
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 12 (n= 90, 357)0.277 litersStandard Error 0.0226
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 8 (n= 93, 377)0.249 litersStandard Error 0.022
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Over 16 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures

FEV1 is a standard measurement of air movement in the lungs of patients with asthma. It is the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration. Improvement in FEV1 is a measure in the reduction of bronchospasm, the reduction of airway inflammation, or both. FEV1 was measured using forced expiratory air spirometry. Positive change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control. During study (Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16) average value was calculated using a mixed effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment (reslizumab or placebo), blood eosinophil count at baseline, and the interaction of treatment and eosinophil count as a random effect.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) includes randomized patients treated with at least 1 dose of study drug, and contributed at least once to the analysis. Pulmonary function tests were excluded if a limited subset of medications that could significantly confound interpretation were used within 7 days of scheduled visits.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Over 16 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures0.175 litersStandard Error 0.0377
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Over 16 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures0.251 litersStandard Error 0.02
Comparison: The change from baseline over the 16 week treatment period was measured for the key secondary variables of:~* Lung function as measured by FEV1~* ACQ~Testing of the key secondary variables was performed using the sequential testing procedure in the order as specified above at the alpha level of 0.05.p-value: 0.069795% CI: [-0.006, 0.158]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

The FVC is the volume of air that can be forcibly blown out after full inspiration, measured in liters. FV was measured using forced expiratory air spirometry. Positive change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analyzed represents # with FVC baseline values (one reslizumab participant was missing a valid baseline FVC.) Number participants with assessments in the timeframes are listed with the time designation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 4 (n=96, 386)0.167 litersStandard Error 0.0469
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 8 (n=93, 377)0.179 litersStandard Error 0.0474
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 12 (n=90, 357)0.176 litersStandard Error 0.05
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 16 (n=84, 345)0.234 litersStandard Error 0.0506
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 16 (n=84, 345)0.246 litersStandard Error 0.0264
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 4 (n=96, 386)0.235 litersStandard Error 0.0247
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 12 (n=90, 357)0.284 litersStandard Error 0.0263
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 8 (n=93, 377)0.243 litersStandard Error 0.0249
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint

The percent predicted FEV1 is the ratio of the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration to the patient's predicted FEV based on a similar population without asthma. Percent predicted lung function values were transcribed directly from the lung function report to the CRF, without any calculation by Teva. Positive change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analyzed represents # with FEV1 baseline values (one reslizumab participant was missing a valid baseline FEV1.) Number participants with assessments in the timeframes are listed with the time designation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and EndpointWeek 8 (n=93, 377)6.0 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 9.9
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and EndpointWeek 16 (n=83, 344)5.5 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 11.76
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and EndpointWeek 12 (n=90, 357)4.2 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 10.36
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and EndpointEndpoint (n=96, 390)5.2 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 11.76
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and EndpointWeek 4 (n=96, 385)4.8 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 9.83
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and EndpointEndpoint (n=96, 390)7.5 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 13.26
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and EndpointWeek 4 (n=96, 385)6.7 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 12.26
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and EndpointWeek 8 (n=93, 377)7.2 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 13.41
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and EndpointWeek 12 (n=90, 357)8.2 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 13.23
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and EndpointWeek 16 (n=83, 344)7.8 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 13.6
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% of the Forced Vital Capacity (FEF25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

The FEF25%-75% is the forced expiratory flow at 25% to 75% of the forced vital capacity. FEF25%-75% was measured using forced expiratory air spirometry. Positive change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analyzed represents # with FEF25%-75% baseline values. Number of participants with assessments in the timeframes are listed with the time designation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% of the Forced Vital Capacity (FEF25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 4 (n=93, 382)0.210 liters/secondStandard Error 0.0565
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% of the Forced Vital Capacity (FEF25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 8 (n=90, 374)0.270 liters/secondStandard Error 0.0609
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% of the Forced Vital Capacity (FEF25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 12 (n=87, 354)0.136 liters/secondStandard Error 0.0635
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% of the Forced Vital Capacity (FEF25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 16 (n=82, 342)0.179 liters/secondStandard Error 0.0875
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in the Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% of the Forced Vital Capacity (FEF25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 16 (n=82, 342)0.241 liters/secondStandard Error 0.0441
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in the Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% of the Forced Vital Capacity (FEF25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 4 (n=93, 382)0.184 liters/secondStandard Error 0.0295
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in the Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% of the Forced Vital Capacity (FEF25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 12 (n=87, 354)0.256 liters/secondStandard Error 0.0329
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in the Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% of the Forced Vital Capacity (FEF25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 8 (n=90, 374)0.240 liters/secondStandard Error 0.0315
Secondary

Participants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status During Study

Counts of participants with a positive anti-drug antibody (ADA) response during treatment is offered for the experimental treatment arm. Blood samples were collected for determination of ADAs before study drug infusion at screening, weeks 8 and 16 or early withdrawal. Serum samples from patients who were treated with reslizumab were analyzed for ADA by Teva (Teva Biopharmaceuticals USA, Rockville, MD) using a validated homogeneous solution-based bridging enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Endpoint =week 16 or early withdrawal. Counts represent the total number of participants at each time point with a positive immunogenicity test, and not 'new' participants with a positive test. An overall status of positive includes participants who had a positive ADA at any time point.

Time frame: Screening (Week -3), Weeks 8 and 16

Population: Safety analysis set; antibody assessments reported for active treatment arm only.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status During StudyOverall status - negative376 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status During StudyOverall status - positive19 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status During StudyScreening status - negative375 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status During StudyScreening status - positive13 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status During StudyWeek 8 - negative346 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status During StudyWeek 8 - positive15 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status During StudyWeek 16 - negative328 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status During StudyWeek 16 - positive9 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status During StudyEndpoint - negative375 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status During StudyEndpoint - positive10 participants
Secondary

Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events

An adverse event was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an inability to carry out usual activities. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes.

Time frame: Day 1 to Week 28

Population: The safety analysis set includes all patients who took at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of whether the patients were randomized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsSevere adverse event10 participants
PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsAny adverse event72 participants
PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsTreatment-related adverse event16 participants
PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsDeaths0 participants
PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsSerious AEs other than death4 participants
PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsTreatment-related serious AE0 participants
PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsWithdrawn from study due to adverse events12 participants
PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsWithdrawn from study due to treatment-related AE1 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsWithdrawn from study due to treatment-related AE3 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsSevere adverse event25 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsSerious AEs other than death16 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsAny adverse event218 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsWithdrawn from study due to adverse events29 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsTreatment-related adverse event28 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsTreatment-related serious AE2 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsDeaths0 participants
Secondary

Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values

Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) abnormal serum chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis values during any of the lab tests conducted during the treatment period. Significance criteria: * Blood urea nitrogen: \>=10.71 mmol/L * Creatinine: \>=177 μmol/L * Uric acid: M\>=625, F\>=506 μmol/L * Aspartate aminotransferase: \>=3\*upper limit of normal (ULN). Normal range is 10-43 U/L * Alanine aminotransferase: \>=3\*ULN. Normal range is 10-40 U/L * GGT = gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase: \>= 3\*ULN. Normal range is 4-49 U/L. * Total bilirubin: \>=34.2 μmol/L * Creatinine phosphokinase: \>5\*ULN. Normal range is 24-207 U/L. * White blood cells: \<=3.0 or \>20 10\^9/L * Hemoglobin: M\<=115, F\<=95 g/dL * Hematocrit: M\<0.37, F\<0.32 L/L * Platelets: \<=75 10\^9/L * Absolute neutrophil count: \<=1.0 10\^9/L * Urinalysis: blood, glucose, ketones and total protein: \>=2 unit increase from baseline

Time frame: Week 4 to Week 16

Population: Safety analysis set with assessments

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesWhite blood cells - low0 participants
PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesAlanine aminotransferase3 participants
PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesWhite blood cells - high0 participants
PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesBlood urea nitrogen0 participants
PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesHemoglobin0 participants
PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesGGT2 participants
PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesHematocrit1 participants
PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesUric acid1 participants
PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesPlatelets0 participants
PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesTotal bilirubin1 participants
PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesAbsolute neutrophil count3 participants
PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesAtleast 1 PCS abnormal serum blood chemistry value8 participants
PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesAt least 1 PCS abnormal urinalysis value23 participants
PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesCreatinine phosphokinase1 participants
PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesBlood (hemoglobin)6 participants
PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesAspartate aminotransferase1 participants
PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesGlucose3 participants
PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesAt least 1 PCS abnormal hematology value4 participants
PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesCreatinine0 participants
PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesTotal protein11 participants
PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesKetones6 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesTotal protein43 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesAtleast 1 PCS abnormal serum blood chemistry value26 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesBlood urea nitrogen7 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesCreatinine1 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesUric acid7 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesAspartate aminotransferase3 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesAlanine aminotransferase5 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesGGT11 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesTotal bilirubin0 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesCreatinine phosphokinase11 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesAt least 1 PCS abnormal hematology value30 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesWhite blood cells - low6 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesWhite blood cells - high4 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesHemoglobin10 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesHematocrit19 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesPlatelets1 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesAbsolute neutrophil count7 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesAt least 1 PCS abnormal urinalysis value94 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesBlood (hemoglobin)40 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesGlucose17 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesKetones7 participants
Secondary

Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities

Counts represent the number of participants with potentially clinically significant ECG abnormalities as assessed by the investigator.

Time frame: Week 16 or endpoint

Population: Safety analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities0 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities1 participants
Secondary

Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values

Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) vital sign values during any of the treatment period exams. Significance criteria * Heart rate - high: \>100 and increase of \>= 30 beats/minute (bpm) * Sitting systolic blood pressure - high: \>160 and increase of \>=30 mmHg * Sitting systolic blood pressure - low: \<90 and decrease of \>=30 mmHg * Sitting diastolic blood pressure - high: \>100 and increase of \>=12 mmHg * Sitting diastolic blood pressure - low: \<50 and decrease of \>=12 mmHg * Body temperature - high: \>100.5° Fahrenheit or 38.1° Celsius and increase of \>2° * Body temperature - low: \<96.5° Fahrenheit or \<35.8° Celsius

Time frame: Week 4 to Week 28

Population: Safety analysis set of participants with assessments

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesAt least 1 PCS abnormality7 participants
PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesHeart rate0 participants
PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesSitting systolic blood pressure - high1 participants
PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesSitting systolic blood pressure - low1 participants
PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesSitting diastolic blood pressure - high2 participants
PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesSitting diastolic blood pressure - low0 participants
PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesBody temperature - high1 participants
PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesBody temperature - low2 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesBody temperature - low25 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesAt least 1 PCS abnormality43 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesSitting diastolic blood pressure - high3 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesHeart rate4 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesBody temperature - high2 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesSitting systolic blood pressure - high6 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesSitting diastolic blood pressure - low2 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesSitting systolic blood pressure - low4 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 13, 2026