Eosinophilic Asthma
Conditions
Brief summary
The primary objective of the study is to characterize the efficacy of reslizumab treatment, at a dosage of 3.0 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) every 4 weeks for a total of 4 doses, in improving pulmonary function in relation to baseline blood eosinophil levels in patients with moderate to severe asthma, as assessed by the change from baseline to week 16 in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1).
Interventions
Reslizumab administered at a dosage of 3.0 mg/kg by intravenous (iv) infusion by qualified study personnel every 4 weeks for 16 weeks (for a total of 4 doses).
Matching placebo administered by intravenous (iv) infusion by qualified study personnel every 4 weeks for 16 weeks (for a total of 4 doses).
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Patients are included in the study if all of the following criteria are met: * The patient is a man or woman, 18 through 65 years of age, with a diagnosis of asthma. * The patient has an ACQ score of at least 1.5. * At screening, the patient has airway reversibility of at least 12% to beta-agonist administration. * The patient is currently taking fluticasone at a dosage of at least 440 µg daily (or equivalent). Patients' baseline asthma therapy regimens (including but not limited to inhaled corticosteroids, leukotriene antagonists, 5-lipoxygenase inhibitors, cromolyn) must be stable for 30 days before screening and continue without dosage changes throughout study. * Female patients must be surgically sterile, 2 years postmenopausal, or must have a negative beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (ßHCG) result for a pregnancy test at screening (serum) and baseline (urine). * Female patients of childbearing potential (not surgically sterile or 2 years postmenopausal), must use a medically accepted method of contraception and must agree to continue use of this method for the duration of the study and for 30 days after participation in the study. Acceptable methods of contraception include barrier method with spermicide, abstinence, intrauterine device (IUD), or steroidal contraceptive (oral, transdermal, implanted, and injected). * Written informed consent is obtained. * The patient is in reasonable health (except for diagnosis of asthma) as judged by the investigator, and as determined by a medical history, medical examination, electrocardiogram (ECG) evaluation, serum chemistry, hematology, urinalysis, and serology. * The patient must be willing and able to comply with study restrictions and to remain at the clinic for the required duration during the study period, and be willing to return to the clinic for the follow-up evaluation as specified in this protocol.
Exclusion criteria
Patients are excluded from participating in this study if 1 or more of the following criteria are met: * The patient has another confounding underlying lung disorder (eg, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary fibrosis, lung cancer). The patient has other pulmonary conditions with symptoms of asthma and blood eosinophilia (eg, Churg-Strauss syndrome, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis). * The patient has a clinically meaningful comorbidity that would interfere with the study schedule or procedures, or compromise the patient's safety. * The patient has known hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES). * The patient is a current smoker (ie, has smoked within the last 6 months prior to screening). * The patient has a history of use of systemic immunosuppressive or immunomodulating agents (anti-immunoglobulin E \[anti-IgE\] mAb, methotrexate, cyclosporin, interferon-α, anti-tumor necrosis factor mAb, or omalizumab) within 6 months prior to study entry (randomization). * The patient is currently using or has used systemic corticosteroids (includes use of oral corticosteroids) within 30 days prior to the screening visit. * The patient is expected to be poorly compliant with study drug administration, study procedures, or visits. * The patient has any aggravating factors that are inadequately controlled, and thus would aggravate asthma symptoms (eg, gastroesophageal reflux disease). * The patient has participated in any investigative drug or device study within 30 days prior to screening. * The patient has participated in any investigative biologics study within 90 days prior to screening. * The patient has previously received reslizumab or other anti-hIL-5 mAbs (eg, mepolizumab). * The patient is a pregnant or lactating woman. (Any women becoming pregnant during the study will be withdrawn from the study.) * The patient has a current infection or disease that may preclude assessment of asthma. * The patient has a history of concurrent immunodeficiency (human immunodeficiency, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, or congenital immunodeficiency). * The patient is suspected of current drug or alcohol abuse as specified in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria. * The patient has presence of or suspected parasitic infestation/infection. * Patients may not have received any live attenuated vaccine within the 12-week period before study entry.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 16 in Full Analysis Set | Baseline (Day 1), Week 16 | FEV1 is a standard measurement of air movement in the lungs of patients with asthma. It is the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration. Improvement in FEV1 is a measure in the reduction of bronchospasm, the reduction of airway inflammation, or both. FEV1 was measured using forced expiratory air spirometry. Data represent the slope estimate of change from baseline in FEV1 (measured in liters) at Week 16 versus baseline eosinophil count (measured in 10\^9/liter) by treatment group. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Over 16 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures | Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 | The ACQ score was measured using the ACQ-7. Six questions are-self assessments; the seventh item is the result of the patient's % predicted FEV1 measurement. Each item has 7 possible answers on a scale of 0 to 6, and the total score is the mean of all responses (the total scale is therefore 0-6). A score of 0 indicates good asthma control; higher scores indicate increasingly poorer asthma control. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control. During study (Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16) average value was calculated from mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, history of asthma exacerbation in the previous year, height, baseline value, and sex as fixed factors, and patient as a random effect. |
| Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 16 in FEV1 Subpopulation | Baseline (Day 1), Week 16 | FEV1 is a standard measurement of air movement in the lungs of patients with asthma. It is the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration. Improvement in FEV1 is a measure in the reduction of bronchospasm, the reduction of airway inflammation, or both. FEV1 was measured using forced expiratory air spirometry. As with the primary outcome, data represent the slope estimate of change from baseline in FEV1 (measured in liters) at Week 16 versus baseline eosinophil count (measured in 10\^9/liter) by treatment group. However the FEV1 subpopulation includes participants with more impaired lung function (% predicted FEV1 \<85% at baseline). |
| Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 | Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 | FEV1 is a standard measurement of air movement in the lungs of patients with asthma. It is the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration. Improvement in FEV1 is a measure in the reduction of bronchospasm, the reduction of airway inflammation, or both. FEV1 was measured using forced expiratory air spirometry. Positive change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control. |
| Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint | Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 | The percent predicted FEV1 is the ratio of the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration to the patient's predicted FEV based on a similar population without asthma. Percent predicted lung function values were transcribed directly from the lung function report to the CRF, without any calculation by Teva. Positive change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control. |
| Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 | Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 | The FVC is the volume of air that can be forcibly blown out after full inspiration, measured in liters. FV was measured using forced expiratory air spirometry. Positive change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control. |
| Change From Baseline in the Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% of the Forced Vital Capacity (FEF25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 | Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 | The FEF25%-75% is the forced expiratory flow at 25% to 75% of the forced vital capacity. FEF25%-75% was measured using forced expiratory air spirometry. Positive change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control. |
| Change From Baseline in Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist Therapy (SABA) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 | Baseline (Day -2 to 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 | SABA are used for quick relief of asthma symptoms. The number of times SABA therapy was used was assessed using 3 day recall at scheduled visits. Participants were asked to recall whether SABAs were used within 3 days of the scheduled visit and, if so, how many puffs were used. Daily use was the average of those 3 days. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control. |
| Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Over 16 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures | Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 | FEV1 is a standard measurement of air movement in the lungs of patients with asthma. It is the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration. Improvement in FEV1 is a measure in the reduction of bronchospasm, the reduction of airway inflammation, or both. FEV1 was measured using forced expiratory air spirometry. Positive change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control. During study (Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16) average value was calculated using a mixed effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment (reslizumab or placebo), blood eosinophil count at baseline, and the interaction of treatment and eosinophil count as a random effect. |
| Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16 | Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16 | The ACQ score was measured using the ACQ-7. Six questions are self-assessments; the seventh item is the result of the patient's % predicted FEV1 measurement. Each item has 7 possible answers on a scale of 0 to 6, and the total score is the mean of all responses (the total scale is therefore 0-6). A score of 0 indicates good asthma control; higher scores indicate increasingly poorer asthma control. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control. |
| Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | Day 1 to Week 28 | An adverse event was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an inability to carry out usual activities. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes. |
| Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Week 4 to Week 16 | Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) abnormal serum chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis values during any of the lab tests conducted during the treatment period. Significance criteria: * Blood urea nitrogen: \>=10.71 mmol/L * Creatinine: \>=177 μmol/L * Uric acid: M\>=625, F\>=506 μmol/L * Aspartate aminotransferase: \>=3\*upper limit of normal (ULN). Normal range is 10-43 U/L * Alanine aminotransferase: \>=3\*ULN. Normal range is 10-40 U/L * GGT = gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase: \>= 3\*ULN. Normal range is 4-49 U/L. * Total bilirubin: \>=34.2 μmol/L * Creatinine phosphokinase: \>5\*ULN. Normal range is 24-207 U/L. * White blood cells: \<=3.0 or \>20 10\^9/L * Hemoglobin: M\<=115, F\<=95 g/dL * Hematocrit: M\<0.37, F\<0.32 L/L * Platelets: \<=75 10\^9/L * Absolute neutrophil count: \<=1.0 10\^9/L * Urinalysis: blood, glucose, ketones and total protein: \>=2 unit increase from baseline |
| Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Week 4 to Week 28 | Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) vital sign values during any of the treatment period exams. Significance criteria * Heart rate - high: \>100 and increase of \>= 30 beats/minute (bpm) * Sitting systolic blood pressure - high: \>160 and increase of \>=30 mmHg * Sitting systolic blood pressure - low: \<90 and decrease of \>=30 mmHg * Sitting diastolic blood pressure - high: \>100 and increase of \>=12 mmHg * Sitting diastolic blood pressure - low: \<50 and decrease of \>=12 mmHg * Body temperature - high: \>100.5° Fahrenheit or 38.1° Celsius and increase of \>2° * Body temperature - low: \<96.5° Fahrenheit or \<35.8° Celsius |
| Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | Week 16 or endpoint | Counts represent the number of participants with potentially clinically significant ECG abnormalities as assessed by the investigator. |
| Participants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status During Study | Screening (Week -3), Weeks 8 and 16 | Counts of participants with a positive anti-drug antibody (ADA) response during treatment is offered for the experimental treatment arm. Blood samples were collected for determination of ADAs before study drug infusion at screening, weeks 8 and 16 or early withdrawal. Serum samples from patients who were treated with reslizumab were analyzed for ADA by Teva (Teva Biopharmaceuticals USA, Rockville, MD) using a validated homogeneous solution-based bridging enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Endpoint =week 16 or early withdrawal. Counts represent the total number of participants at each time point with a positive immunogenicity test, and not 'new' participants with a positive test. An overall status of positive includes participants who had a positive ADA at any time point. |
| Change From Baseline in Blood Eosinophil Counts at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, Follow-up (Week 28) and Endpoint | Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, Follow-up (Week 28) | Blood eosinophil counts were measured using a standard complete blood count with differential blood test at each scheduled visit. Follow-up was performed approximately 12 weeks after the 16 week treatment period. Endpoint is the last post-baseline assessment. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
A total of 869 patients were screened for enrollment into this study. Of the 869 patients screened, 511 patients at 103 centers in the US met entry criteria and were considered to be eligible for enrollment into the study.
Pre-assignment details
Randomization was stratified by occurrence of asthma exacerbation(s) during the previous year (yes or no). Within each stratum, patients were randomly assigned in a 4:1 ratio to receive treatment with reslizumab at 3.0 mg/kg or matching placebo.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Placebo Placebo intravenous injection every 4 weeks for a total of 4 doses. | 98 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg Reslizumab intravenous injection at a dosage of 3.0 mg/kg every 4 weeks for a total of 4 doses. | 398 |
| Total | 496 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 11 | 32 |
| Overall Study | Data from 2 sites deemed invalid | 4 | 11 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 2 | 9 |
| Overall Study | Other | 0 | 5 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 2 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 4 | 18 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Placebo | Total | Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 45.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.38 | 44.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.27 | 44.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12 |
| Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) | 2.564 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6909 | 2.559 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6969 | 2.558 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6992 |
| Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist Therapy (SABA) in Past 3 Days | 2.0 puffs of SABA/day STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.82 | 1.9 puffs of SABA/day STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.83 | 1.9 puffs of SABA/day STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.84 |
| Blood Eosinophil Counts | 0.277 10^9 blood eosinophil/liter STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2209 | 0.280 10^9 blood eosinophil/liter STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2401 | 0.281 10^9 blood eosinophil/liter STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2448 |
| Body Mass Index | 31.6 kg/m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.66 | 32.2 kg/m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.33 | 32.2 kg/m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.69 |
| Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% of the Forced Vital Capacity (FEF25%-75%) | 1.553 liters/second STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6791 | 1.631 liters/second STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8645 | 1.650 liters/second STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9037 |
| Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) | 2.180 liters STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6355 | 2.117 liters STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6837 | 2.101 liters STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.695 |
| Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) | 3.215 liters STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9076 | 3.081 liters STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9494 | 3.047 liters STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9577 |
| Height | 169.7 cm STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.25 | 168.1 cm STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.35 | 167.7 cm STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.35 |
| Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (% predicted FEV1) | 66.5 % predicted STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.53 | 66.7 % predicted STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.1 | 66.8 % predicted STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.26 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized American Indian or Alaskan Native | 0 participants | 3 participants | 3 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 2 participants | 12 participants | 10 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black | 21 participants | 134 participants | 113 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Hispanic or Latino | 8 participants | 52 participants | 44 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Non-Hispanic and Non-Latino | 90 participants | 444 participants | 354 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 0 participants | 12 participants | 12 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Pacific Islander | 2 participants | 2 participants | 0 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 73 participants | 333 participants | 260 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 54 Participants | 315 Participants | 261 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 44 Participants | 181 Participants | 137 Participants |
| Weight | 90.9 kg STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.68 | 90.7 kg STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.3 | 90.6 kg STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.92 |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 41 / 97 | 118 / 395 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 4 / 97 | 16 / 395 |
Outcome results
Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 16 in Full Analysis Set
FEV1 is a standard measurement of air movement in the lungs of patients with asthma. It is the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration. Improvement in FEV1 is a measure in the reduction of bronchospasm, the reduction of airway inflammation, or both. FEV1 was measured using forced expiratory air spirometry. Data represent the slope estimate of change from baseline in FEV1 (measured in liters) at Week 16 versus baseline eosinophil count (measured in 10\^9/liter) by treatment group.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 16
Population: Full analysis set (FAS) includes randomized patients treated with at least 1 dose of study drug, and had assessments in the timeframes. Pulmonary function tests were excluded if a limited subset of medications that could significantly confound interpretation were used within 7 days of scheduled visits.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 16 in Full Analysis Set | -0.2778 FEV1 liters/ eosinophils 10^9/liter | Standard Error 0.2379 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 16 in Full Analysis Set | 0.0229 FEV1 liters/ eosinophils 10^9/liter | Standard Error 0.0944 |
Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16
The ACQ score was measured using the ACQ-7. Six questions are self-assessments; the seventh item is the result of the patient's % predicted FEV1 measurement. Each item has 7 possible answers on a scale of 0 to 6, and the total score is the mean of all responses (the total scale is therefore 0-6). A score of 0 indicates good asthma control; higher scores indicate increasingly poorer asthma control. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16
Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analyzed represents # with ACQ baseline values. Number participants with assessments in the timeframes are listed with the time designation. ACQ were excluded if obtained at visits which were preceded by usage within 7 days of a limited subset of medications that could significantly alter interpretation.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16 | Week 4 (n=96, 385) | -0.502 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.071 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16 | Week 8 (n=93, 377) | -0.631 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0807 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16 | Week 12 (n=90, 357) | -0.674 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0843 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16 | Week 16 (n=83, 343) | -0.648 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0878 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16 | Week 16 (n=83, 343) | -0.844 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0453 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16 | Week 4 (n=96, 385) | -0.585 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0375 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16 | Week 12 (n=90, 357) | -0.818 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0439 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16 | Week 8 (n=93, 377) | -0.701 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.042 |
Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Over 16 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
The ACQ score was measured using the ACQ-7. Six questions are-self assessments; the seventh item is the result of the patient's % predicted FEV1 measurement. Each item has 7 possible answers on a scale of 0 to 6, and the total score is the mean of all responses (the total scale is therefore 0-6). A score of 0 indicates good asthma control; higher scores indicate increasingly poorer asthma control. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control. During study (Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16) average value was calculated from mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, history of asthma exacerbation in the previous year, height, baseline value, and sex as fixed factors, and patient as a random effect.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16
Population: Full analysis set of participants who contributed at least once to the analysis. ACQ were excluded from the FAS if they were obtained at scheduled visits which were preceded by usage within 7 days of a limited subset of medications that could significantly confound interpretation.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Over 16 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures | -0.614 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0689 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Over 16 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures | -0.737 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0364 |
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist Therapy (SABA) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
SABA are used for quick relief of asthma symptoms. The number of times SABA therapy was used was assessed using 3 day recall at scheduled visits. Participants were asked to recall whether SABAs were used within 3 days of the scheduled visit and, if so, how many puffs were used. Daily use was the average of those 3 days. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.
Time frame: Baseline (Day -2 to 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analyzed represents # with SABA use baseline values. Number participants with assessments in the timeframes are listed with the time designation.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist Therapy (SABA) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 | Week 4 (n=96, 388) | -0.1 puffs of SABA/day | Standard Error 0.19 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist Therapy (SABA) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 | Week 8 (n=94, 377) | -0.2 puffs of SABA/day | Standard Error 0.18 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist Therapy (SABA) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 | Week 12 (n=89, 356) | -0.2 puffs of SABA/day | Standard Error 0.2 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist Therapy (SABA) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 | Week 16 (n=84, 345) | -0.4 puffs of SABA/day | Standard Error 0.18 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist Therapy (SABA) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 | Week 16 (n=84, 345) | -0.3 puffs of SABA/day | Standard Error 0.09 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist Therapy (SABA) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 | Week 4 (n=96, 388) | -0.2 puffs of SABA/day | Standard Error 0.1 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist Therapy (SABA) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 | Week 12 (n=89, 356) | -0.3 puffs of SABA/day | Standard Error 0.1 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist Therapy (SABA) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 | Week 8 (n=94, 377) | -0.3 puffs of SABA/day | Standard Error 0.09 |
Change From Baseline in Blood Eosinophil Counts at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, Follow-up (Week 28) and Endpoint
Blood eosinophil counts were measured using a standard complete blood count with differential blood test at each scheduled visit. Follow-up was performed approximately 12 weeks after the 16 week treatment period. Endpoint is the last post-baseline assessment.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, Follow-up (Week 28)
Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analyzed represents # with blood eosinophil count baseline values. Number participants with assessments in the timeframes are listed with the time designation.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Eosinophil Counts at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, Follow-up (Week 28) and Endpoint | Week 4 (n=93, 385) | 0.010 10^9/liter | Standard Deviation 0.1917 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Eosinophil Counts at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, Follow-up (Week 28) and Endpoint | Week 8 (n=91, 372) | 0.036 10^9/liter | Standard Deviation 0.3104 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Eosinophil Counts at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, Follow-up (Week 28) and Endpoint | Week 12 (n=84, 353) | 0.027 10^9/liter | Standard Deviation 0.2082 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Eosinophil Counts at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, Follow-up (Week 28) and Endpoint | Week 16 (n=80, 346) | 0.021 10^9/liter | Standard Deviation 2466 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Eosinophil Counts at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, Follow-up (Week 28) and Endpoint | Follow-up (n=90, 364) | 0.035 10^9/liter | Standard Deviation 0.3369 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Blood Eosinophil Counts at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, Follow-up (Week 28) and Endpoint | Endpoint (n=94, 392) | 0.036 10^9/liter | Standard Deviation 0.3306 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Blood Eosinophil Counts at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, Follow-up (Week 28) and Endpoint | Follow-up (n=90, 364) | -0.159 10^9/liter | Standard Deviation 0.2301 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Blood Eosinophil Counts at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, Follow-up (Week 28) and Endpoint | Week 4 (n=93, 385) | -0.226 10^9/liter | Standard Deviation 0.2297 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Blood Eosinophil Counts at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, Follow-up (Week 28) and Endpoint | Week 16 (n=80, 346) | -0.239 10^9/liter | Standard Deviation 0.2462 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Blood Eosinophil Counts at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, Follow-up (Week 28) and Endpoint | Week 8 (n=91, 372) | -0.239 10^9/liter | Standard Deviation 0.2389 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Blood Eosinophil Counts at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, Follow-up (Week 28) and Endpoint | Endpoint (n=94, 392) | -0.169 10^9/liter | Standard Deviation 0.2294 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Blood Eosinophil Counts at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, Follow-up (Week 28) and Endpoint | Week 12 (n=84, 353) | -0.240 10^9/liter | Standard Deviation 0.2418 |
Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 16 in FEV1 Subpopulation
FEV1 is a standard measurement of air movement in the lungs of patients with asthma. It is the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration. Improvement in FEV1 is a measure in the reduction of bronchospasm, the reduction of airway inflammation, or both. FEV1 was measured using forced expiratory air spirometry. As with the primary outcome, data represent the slope estimate of change from baseline in FEV1 (measured in liters) at Week 16 versus baseline eosinophil count (measured in 10\^9/liter) by treatment group. However the FEV1 subpopulation includes participants with more impaired lung function (% predicted FEV1 \<85% at baseline).
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 16
Population: The FEV1 sub-population analysis set includes all participants in the FAS with % predicted FEV1 \<85% at baseline. Pulmonary function tests were excluded if a limited subset of medications that could significantly confound interpretation were used within 7 days of scheduled visits.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 16 in FEV1 Subpopulation | -0.2944 FEV1 liters/ eosinophils 10^9/liter | Standard Error 0.2443 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 16 in FEV1 Subpopulation | 0.0271 FEV1 liters/ eosinophils 10^9/liter | Standard Error 0.1019 |
Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
FEV1 is a standard measurement of air movement in the lungs of patients with asthma. It is the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration. Improvement in FEV1 is a measure in the reduction of bronchospasm, the reduction of airway inflammation, or both. FEV1 was measured using forced expiratory air spirometry. Positive change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analyzed represents # with FEV1 baseline values (one reslizumab participant was missing a valid baseline FEV1.) Number participants with assessments in the timeframes are listed with the time designation.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 | Week 4 (n= 96, 386) | 0.164 liters | Standard Error 0.0395 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 | Week 8 (n= 93, 377) | 0.199 liters | Standard Error 0.0421 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 | Week 12 (n= 90, 357) | 0.152 liters | Standard Error 0.043 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 | Week 16 (n=83, 344) | 0.187 liters | Standard Error 0.0446 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 | Week 16 (n=83, 344) | 0.255 liters | Standard Error 0.0232 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 | Week 4 (n= 96, 386) | 0.224 liters | Standard Error 0.0208 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 | Week 12 (n= 90, 357) | 0.277 liters | Standard Error 0.0226 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 | Week 8 (n= 93, 377) | 0.249 liters | Standard Error 0.022 |
Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Over 16 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
FEV1 is a standard measurement of air movement in the lungs of patients with asthma. It is the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration. Improvement in FEV1 is a measure in the reduction of bronchospasm, the reduction of airway inflammation, or both. FEV1 was measured using forced expiratory air spirometry. Positive change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control. During study (Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16) average value was calculated using a mixed effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment (reslizumab or placebo), blood eosinophil count at baseline, and the interaction of treatment and eosinophil count as a random effect.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16
Population: Full analysis set (FAS) includes randomized patients treated with at least 1 dose of study drug, and contributed at least once to the analysis. Pulmonary function tests were excluded if a limited subset of medications that could significantly confound interpretation were used within 7 days of scheduled visits.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Over 16 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures | 0.175 liters | Standard Error 0.0377 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Over 16 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures | 0.251 liters | Standard Error 0.02 |
Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
The FVC is the volume of air that can be forcibly blown out after full inspiration, measured in liters. FV was measured using forced expiratory air spirometry. Positive change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analyzed represents # with FVC baseline values (one reslizumab participant was missing a valid baseline FVC.) Number participants with assessments in the timeframes are listed with the time designation.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 | Week 4 (n=96, 386) | 0.167 liters | Standard Error 0.0469 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 | Week 8 (n=93, 377) | 0.179 liters | Standard Error 0.0474 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 | Week 12 (n=90, 357) | 0.176 liters | Standard Error 0.05 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 | Week 16 (n=84, 345) | 0.234 liters | Standard Error 0.0506 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 | Week 16 (n=84, 345) | 0.246 liters | Standard Error 0.0264 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 | Week 4 (n=96, 386) | 0.235 liters | Standard Error 0.0247 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 | Week 12 (n=90, 357) | 0.284 liters | Standard Error 0.0263 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 | Week 8 (n=93, 377) | 0.243 liters | Standard Error 0.0249 |
Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint
The percent predicted FEV1 is the ratio of the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration to the patient's predicted FEV based on a similar population without asthma. Percent predicted lung function values were transcribed directly from the lung function report to the CRF, without any calculation by Teva. Positive change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analyzed represents # with FEV1 baseline values (one reslizumab participant was missing a valid baseline FEV1.) Number participants with assessments in the timeframes are listed with the time designation.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint | Week 8 (n=93, 377) | 6.0 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 9.9 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint | Week 16 (n=83, 344) | 5.5 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 11.76 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint | Week 12 (n=90, 357) | 4.2 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 10.36 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint | Endpoint (n=96, 390) | 5.2 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 11.76 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint | Week 4 (n=96, 385) | 4.8 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 9.83 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint | Endpoint (n=96, 390) | 7.5 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 13.26 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint | Week 4 (n=96, 385) | 6.7 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 12.26 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint | Week 8 (n=93, 377) | 7.2 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 13.41 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint | Week 12 (n=90, 357) | 8.2 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 13.23 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint | Week 16 (n=83, 344) | 7.8 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 13.6 |
Change From Baseline in the Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% of the Forced Vital Capacity (FEF25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
The FEF25%-75% is the forced expiratory flow at 25% to 75% of the forced vital capacity. FEF25%-75% was measured using forced expiratory air spirometry. Positive change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analyzed represents # with FEF25%-75% baseline values. Number of participants with assessments in the timeframes are listed with the time designation.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% of the Forced Vital Capacity (FEF25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 | Week 4 (n=93, 382) | 0.210 liters/second | Standard Error 0.0565 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% of the Forced Vital Capacity (FEF25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 | Week 8 (n=90, 374) | 0.270 liters/second | Standard Error 0.0609 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% of the Forced Vital Capacity (FEF25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 | Week 12 (n=87, 354) | 0.136 liters/second | Standard Error 0.0635 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% of the Forced Vital Capacity (FEF25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 | Week 16 (n=82, 342) | 0.179 liters/second | Standard Error 0.0875 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in the Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% of the Forced Vital Capacity (FEF25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 | Week 16 (n=82, 342) | 0.241 liters/second | Standard Error 0.0441 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in the Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% of the Forced Vital Capacity (FEF25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 | Week 4 (n=93, 382) | 0.184 liters/second | Standard Error 0.0295 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in the Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% of the Forced Vital Capacity (FEF25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 | Week 12 (n=87, 354) | 0.256 liters/second | Standard Error 0.0329 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in the Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% of the Forced Vital Capacity (FEF25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 | Week 8 (n=90, 374) | 0.240 liters/second | Standard Error 0.0315 |
Participants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status During Study
Counts of participants with a positive anti-drug antibody (ADA) response during treatment is offered for the experimental treatment arm. Blood samples were collected for determination of ADAs before study drug infusion at screening, weeks 8 and 16 or early withdrawal. Serum samples from patients who were treated with reslizumab were analyzed for ADA by Teva (Teva Biopharmaceuticals USA, Rockville, MD) using a validated homogeneous solution-based bridging enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Endpoint =week 16 or early withdrawal. Counts represent the total number of participants at each time point with a positive immunogenicity test, and not 'new' participants with a positive test. An overall status of positive includes participants who had a positive ADA at any time point.
Time frame: Screening (Week -3), Weeks 8 and 16
Population: Safety analysis set; antibody assessments reported for active treatment arm only.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status During Study | Overall status - negative | 376 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status During Study | Overall status - positive | 19 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status During Study | Screening status - negative | 375 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status During Study | Screening status - positive | 13 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status During Study | Week 8 - negative | 346 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status During Study | Week 8 - positive | 15 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status During Study | Week 16 - negative | 328 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status During Study | Week 16 - positive | 9 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status During Study | Endpoint - negative | 375 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status During Study | Endpoint - positive | 10 participants |
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
An adverse event was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an inability to carry out usual activities. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes.
Time frame: Day 1 to Week 28
Population: The safety analysis set includes all patients who took at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of whether the patients were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | Severe adverse event | 10 participants |
| Placebo | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | Any adverse event | 72 participants |
| Placebo | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | Treatment-related adverse event | 16 participants |
| Placebo | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | Deaths | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | Serious AEs other than death | 4 participants |
| Placebo | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | Treatment-related serious AE | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | Withdrawn from study due to adverse events | 12 participants |
| Placebo | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | Withdrawn from study due to treatment-related AE | 1 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | Withdrawn from study due to treatment-related AE | 3 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | Severe adverse event | 25 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | Serious AEs other than death | 16 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | Any adverse event | 218 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | Withdrawn from study due to adverse events | 29 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | Treatment-related adverse event | 28 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | Treatment-related serious AE | 2 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | Deaths | 0 participants |
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values
Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) abnormal serum chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis values during any of the lab tests conducted during the treatment period. Significance criteria: * Blood urea nitrogen: \>=10.71 mmol/L * Creatinine: \>=177 μmol/L * Uric acid: M\>=625, F\>=506 μmol/L * Aspartate aminotransferase: \>=3\*upper limit of normal (ULN). Normal range is 10-43 U/L * Alanine aminotransferase: \>=3\*ULN. Normal range is 10-40 U/L * GGT = gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase: \>= 3\*ULN. Normal range is 4-49 U/L. * Total bilirubin: \>=34.2 μmol/L * Creatinine phosphokinase: \>5\*ULN. Normal range is 24-207 U/L. * White blood cells: \<=3.0 or \>20 10\^9/L * Hemoglobin: M\<=115, F\<=95 g/dL * Hematocrit: M\<0.37, F\<0.32 L/L * Platelets: \<=75 10\^9/L * Absolute neutrophil count: \<=1.0 10\^9/L * Urinalysis: blood, glucose, ketones and total protein: \>=2 unit increase from baseline
Time frame: Week 4 to Week 16
Population: Safety analysis set with assessments
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | White blood cells - low | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Alanine aminotransferase | 3 participants |
| Placebo | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | White blood cells - high | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Blood urea nitrogen | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Hemoglobin | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | GGT | 2 participants |
| Placebo | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Hematocrit | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Uric acid | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Platelets | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Total bilirubin | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Absolute neutrophil count | 3 participants |
| Placebo | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Atleast 1 PCS abnormal serum blood chemistry value | 8 participants |
| Placebo | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | At least 1 PCS abnormal urinalysis value | 23 participants |
| Placebo | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Creatinine phosphokinase | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Blood (hemoglobin) | 6 participants |
| Placebo | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Aspartate aminotransferase | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Glucose | 3 participants |
| Placebo | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | At least 1 PCS abnormal hematology value | 4 participants |
| Placebo | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Creatinine | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Total protein | 11 participants |
| Placebo | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Ketones | 6 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Total protein | 43 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Atleast 1 PCS abnormal serum blood chemistry value | 26 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Blood urea nitrogen | 7 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Creatinine | 1 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Uric acid | 7 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Aspartate aminotransferase | 3 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Alanine aminotransferase | 5 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | GGT | 11 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Total bilirubin | 0 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Creatinine phosphokinase | 11 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | At least 1 PCS abnormal hematology value | 30 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | White blood cells - low | 6 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | White blood cells - high | 4 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Hemoglobin | 10 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Hematocrit | 19 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Platelets | 1 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Absolute neutrophil count | 7 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | At least 1 PCS abnormal urinalysis value | 94 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Blood (hemoglobin) | 40 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Glucose | 17 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Ketones | 7 participants |
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
Counts represent the number of participants with potentially clinically significant ECG abnormalities as assessed by the investigator.
Time frame: Week 16 or endpoint
Population: Safety analysis set
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | 0 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | 1 participants |
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values
Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) vital sign values during any of the treatment period exams. Significance criteria * Heart rate - high: \>100 and increase of \>= 30 beats/minute (bpm) * Sitting systolic blood pressure - high: \>160 and increase of \>=30 mmHg * Sitting systolic blood pressure - low: \<90 and decrease of \>=30 mmHg * Sitting diastolic blood pressure - high: \>100 and increase of \>=12 mmHg * Sitting diastolic blood pressure - low: \<50 and decrease of \>=12 mmHg * Body temperature - high: \>100.5° Fahrenheit or 38.1° Celsius and increase of \>2° * Body temperature - low: \<96.5° Fahrenheit or \<35.8° Celsius
Time frame: Week 4 to Week 28
Population: Safety analysis set of participants with assessments
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | At least 1 PCS abnormality | 7 participants |
| Placebo | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Heart rate | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Sitting systolic blood pressure - high | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Sitting systolic blood pressure - low | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Sitting diastolic blood pressure - high | 2 participants |
| Placebo | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Sitting diastolic blood pressure - low | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Body temperature - high | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Body temperature - low | 2 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Body temperature - low | 25 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | At least 1 PCS abnormality | 43 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Sitting diastolic blood pressure - high | 3 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Heart rate | 4 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Body temperature - high | 2 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Sitting systolic blood pressure - high | 6 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Sitting diastolic blood pressure - low | 2 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Sitting systolic blood pressure - low | 4 participants |