Skip to content

Tecemotide (L-BLP25) in Rectal Cancer

A Multi-center, Randomized, Open-label, Mechanism of Action Trial on the Biological Effects of the Therapeutic Cancer Vaccine Stimuvax® (L-BLP25) in Rectal Cancer Subjects Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01507103
Acronym
SPRINT
Enrollment
124
Registered
2012-01-10
Start date
2012-02-29
Completion date
2014-06-30
Last updated
2017-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rectal Cancer

Keywords

Tecemotide (L-BLP25), Cyclophosphamide (CPA), Mode of action, Neoplasms, Neoplasms by Site, Carcinomas, Antineoplastic Agents, Neoadjuvant, Radiotherapy Pharmacologic Actions, Immunosuppressive Agents, Immunologic Function, Therapeutic Uses, Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action

Brief summary

The objective of this mechanistic study is to determine the impact of tecemotide (L-BLP25) administration on the mucinous glycoprotein 1 - (MUC1) specific immune response in subjects with newly diagnosed rectal cancer who are eligible for neoadjuvant therapy. Tecemotide (L-BLP25) is designed to induce an immune response that may lead to immune rejection of tumor tissues that aberrantly express MUC1 antigen. MUC1 is highly expressed in all colorectal cancers and since the adaptive immune system plays a role in the prognosis of rectal cancer, it is reasonable to speculate that tecemotide (L-BLP25) administration might boost the tumor-specific immune response and increase the number of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs).

Interventions

Subjects will receive 8 consecutive weekly subcutaneous vaccinations with 806 microgram (mcg) of tecemotide (L-BLP25) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, which will be administered concomitantly with the chemoradiotherapy, followed by a 9th subcutaneous injection 7 to 11 days prior to surgery.

A single intravenous infusion of 300 milligram per square meter (mg/m\^2) (to a maximum 600 mg) of CPA will be given 3 days before the first tecemotide (L-BLP25) administration.

OTHERChemoradiotherapy

Radiotherapy of 45-52 grays (Gy) will be applied 5 times per week, over a minimum period of 5 weeks. Capecitabine at a dose of 825 mg/m\^2, twice daily or equivalent dose of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) will be given orally, starting at the first day of radiotherapy and given 5 to 7 days per week during the time of radiotherapy.

Sponsors

Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male and female subjects with histologically documented resectable rectal adenocarcinoma in Stage 2-4 2. Availability of tumor biopsy sufficient for immunological analysis 3. Indication to receive neoadjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy consisting of a radiation dose of 45-52 Gy and capecitabine 825 mg/m\^2 orally twice daily. The use of an equivalent schedule based on 5-FU is acceptable 4. Magnetic resonance imaging small pelvis / computed tomography thorax/abdomen (or X-ray thorax) to document absence of metastatic disease. Imaging must not be older than 6 weeks prior to randomization 5. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 6. Written informed consent 7. Greater than or equal to (\>=) 18 years of age

Exclusion criteria

1. Previous chemotherapy and/or previous radiotherapy of the pelvic region 2. Relapsing disease 3. Previous vaccination with any MUC1 vaccine and other therapeutic cancer vaccines 4. Previous organ transplantation (bone marrow or solid organs) 5. Subjects with metastatic disease (except for solitary, resectable liver or lung metastases) 6. Inadequate hematological function (that is, platelet count less than 140\*10\^9 per liter \[/L\], or white blood cell less than 2.5\*10\^9/L, or hemoglobin less than 90 gram per liter). Clinically significant hepatic dysfunction (that is alanine aminotransferase greater than 2.5\*upper limit of normal \[ULN\], or aspartate aminotransferase greater than 2.5\*ULN, or bilirubin greater than 1.5\*ULN). Inadequate renal function (that is serum creatinine greater than 1.5\*ULN) 7. Autoimmune diseases 8. Recognized immunodeficiency disease including cellular immunodeficiencies, hypogammaglobulinemia or dysgammaglobulinemia; subjects who have hereditary or congenital immunodeficiencies 9. Clinically significant cardiac disease, for example, New York Heart Association Classes III-IV; uncontrolled angina, uncontrolled arrhythmia or uncontrolled hypertension, myocardial infarction in the previous 6 months as confirmed by medical history and an electrocardiogram 10. Other protocol defined

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Tumor Immune Response Evaluated by Immunohistochemical (IHC) Analysis of Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs) at Week 14 (Post-surgery)Baseline and Week 14 (post-surgery)Tumor biopsy samples were collected prior to baseline and after the surgery. The TILs were evaluated in 3 of the most abundant high-power fields (x40) per sample and the mean value considered (after excluding the lowest and the highest value). The tumor immune response was calculated as number of TILs divided by 100 tumor cells.
Immunological Response to Treatment in Relation to Microsatellite Instability (MSI) Status: Number of Subjects Per MSI Category18 weeksA potential association between MSI status (present or absent) and the primary endpoints (difference from baseline to surgery in CD8+ and CD8+/GrB+ T cell infiltration) was evaluated. Determination of mismatch repair protein (MRP)-expression (hMLH1, hMSH2, hMSH6 and hPMS2) was performed for the detection of the MSI-H-phenotype by IHC and/or on tumor deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sample using 5 microsatellite markers (BAT-25, BAT-26, NR-21, NR-24 and MONO-27).
Change From Baseline in Interferon (IFN)-Gamma Secretion of Mononuclear Cells in Response to MUC1 by Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Spot (ELISpot) at Post-baselineBaseline, Week 5, Week 13 (pre-surgery), and Week 18 (end-of trial)IFN-gamma secretion of mononuclear cells in response to MUC1 was to be measured by ELISpot. The maximal post-baseline value out of Week 5, Week 11-13 (pre-surgery), and Week 16-18 (follow-up / end-of trial) was evaluated in comparison to Baseline.
Change From Baseline in IFN-gamma Secretion of Mononuclear Cells in Response to Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) by ELISpot at Post-baselineBaseline, Week 5, Week 13 (pre-surgery), and Week 18 (end-of trial)IFN-gamma secretion of mononuclear cells in response to CEA was to be measured by ELISpot. The maximal post-baseline value out of Week 5, Week 11-13 (pre-surgery), and Week 16-18 (follow-up / end-of trial) was evaluated in comparison to Baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Peritumoral Immune Response at Week 14 (Post-surgery)Baseline and Week 14 (post-surgery)Immunological changes in the tumor microenvironment were evaluated based on IHC expression of CD3+, CD4+, and Ki67+CD3+ T cells; regulatory T cells (FOXP3+) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (CD33+CD14-); other immune cells such as NK cells (CD3-CD57+), B cells (CD20+), macrophages (CD68+), and dendritic cells (S100+). Peritumoral immune response was calculated as number of lymphoid cells at the margin of the tumor or in the tumor bed (if there is complete pathological response).
Change From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)Baseline and Week 18 (follow-up / end-of trial)Immunological changes in peripheral blood were evaluated based on fluorescence analysis cell sorter phenotypic characterization of T cells (CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+) and of markers of activation and proliferation (CD27, BTLA); and regulatory cells such as CD3+CD4+ (or CD8+) CD45RA+CD25+FoxP3+CD127 T cells. Immunological Response in peripheral blood was measured on a continuous scale.

Countries

Netherlands

Participant flow

Recruitment details

First/last participant (informed consent): Feb 2012/Dec 2013. Study completion date: Jun 2014.

Pre-assignment details

Enrolled: 140 screened for eligibility; 16 excluded (mainly due to non-fulfillment of inclusion or exclusion criteria), 124 subjects randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)+CPA
Single dose of cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m\^2 to a maximum of 600 mg) was administered intravenously, 3 days prior to the start of vaccination, followed by weekly subcutaneous vaccinations with tecemotide (L-BLP25) (actual delivered dose was 806 mcg) administered concomitantly with chemotherapy for 8 weeks, followed by a 9th subcutaneous vaccination 7 to 11 days prior to surgery.
39
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)
Weekly subcutaneous vaccinations with tecemotide (L-BLP25) (actual delivered dose was 806 mcg) administered concomitantly with chemotherapy for 8 weeks, followed by a 9th subcutaneous vaccination 7 to 11 days prior to surgery.
41
Chemoradiotherapy
Radiotherapy of 45-52 Gy will be applied 5 times per week, over a minimum period of 5 weeks. Capecitabine at a dose of 825 mg/m\^2, twice daily or equivalent dose of 5-FU will be given orally, starting at the first day of radiotherapy and given 5 to 7 days per week during the time of radiotherapy.
42
Total122

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicChemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)+CPAChemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)ChemoradiotherapyTotal
Age, Continuous61.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.74
62.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.12
60.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.77
61.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.84
Gender
Female
9 Participants14 Participants10 Participants33 Participants
Gender
Male
30 Participants27 Participants32 Participants89 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
38 / 3941 / 4141 / 42
serious
Total, serious adverse events
10 / 3910 / 4112 / 42

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in IFN-gamma Secretion of Mononuclear Cells in Response to Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) by ELISpot at Post-baseline

IFN-gamma secretion of mononuclear cells in response to CEA was to be measured by ELISpot. The maximal post-baseline value out of Week 5, Week 11-13 (pre-surgery), and Week 16-18 (follow-up / end-of trial) was evaluated in comparison to Baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 5, Week 13 (pre-surgery), and Week 18 (end-of trial)

Population: Data were not analyzed as no acceptable ELISpot assay is available

Primary

Change From Baseline in Interferon (IFN)-Gamma Secretion of Mononuclear Cells in Response to MUC1 by Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Spot (ELISpot) at Post-baseline

IFN-gamma secretion of mononuclear cells in response to MUC1 was to be measured by ELISpot. The maximal post-baseline value out of Week 5, Week 11-13 (pre-surgery), and Week 16-18 (follow-up / end-of trial) was evaluated in comparison to Baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 5, Week 13 (pre-surgery), and Week 18 (end-of trial)

Population: Data were not analyzed as no acceptable ELISpot assay is available

Primary

Change From Baseline in Tumor Immune Response Evaluated by Immunohistochemical (IHC) Analysis of Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs) at Week 14 (Post-surgery)

Tumor biopsy samples were collected prior to baseline and after the surgery. The TILs were evaluated in 3 of the most abundant high-power fields (x40) per sample and the mean value considered (after excluding the lowest and the highest value). The tumor immune response was calculated as number of TILs divided by 100 tumor cells.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 14 (post-surgery)

Population: Immunomonitoring analysis set included all subjects for whom at least the baseline ELISpot blood and tumor sample, tumor sample at surgery and pre-surgery ELISpot blood drawing are available and whose tumor biopsy at baseline is MUC1-positive. Within the data table, n=number of subjects analyzed for each category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)+CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline in Tumor Immune Response Evaluated by Immunohistochemical (IHC) Analysis of Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs) at Week 14 (Post-surgery)CD8+ (n=23, 27, 26)0.609 TILs per 100 tumor cellsStandard Deviation 5.4241
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)+CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline in Tumor Immune Response Evaluated by Immunohistochemical (IHC) Analysis of Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs) at Week 14 (Post-surgery)CD8+/GrB+ (n=23, 27, 26)0.565 TILs per 100 tumor cellsStandard Deviation 3.1646
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)Change From Baseline in Tumor Immune Response Evaluated by Immunohistochemical (IHC) Analysis of Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs) at Week 14 (Post-surgery)CD8+ (n=23, 27, 26)0.543 TILs per 100 tumor cellsStandard Deviation 4.5009
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)Change From Baseline in Tumor Immune Response Evaluated by Immunohistochemical (IHC) Analysis of Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs) at Week 14 (Post-surgery)CD8+/GrB+ (n=23, 27, 26)0.216 TILs per 100 tumor cellsStandard Deviation 2.4187
ChemoradiotherapyChange From Baseline in Tumor Immune Response Evaluated by Immunohistochemical (IHC) Analysis of Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs) at Week 14 (Post-surgery)CD8+ (n=23, 27, 26)1.538 TILs per 100 tumor cellsStandard Deviation 3.9509
ChemoradiotherapyChange From Baseline in Tumor Immune Response Evaluated by Immunohistochemical (IHC) Analysis of Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs) at Week 14 (Post-surgery)CD8+/GrB+ (n=23, 27, 26)0.936 TILs per 100 tumor cellsStandard Deviation 2.7649
Comparison: Category: CD8+ The difference between baseline and surgical tumor samples was analysed and compared across the 3 treatment arms (effect estimate for Arm A vs Arm C) based on an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model. Difference from baseline = Surgery value-Baseline value. Adjustment was based on ANCOVA model with treatment arm as factor and baseline value as covariate. No interaction included. Pairwise tests have been performed to compare Arm A with Arm C, Arm B with Arm C, and Arm A with Arm Bp-value: 0.79495% CI: [-0.72, 0.65]type III SS F-test
Comparison: Category: CD8+ The difference between baseline and surgical tumor samples was analysed and compared across the 3 treatment arms (effect estimate for Arm B vs Arm C) based on an ANCOVA model. Difference from baseline = Surgery value-Baseline value. Adjustment was based on ANCOVA model with treatment arm as factor and baseline value as covariate. No interaction included. Pairwise tests have been performed to compare Arm A with Arm C, Arm B with Arm C, and Arm A with Arm Bp-value: 0.79495% CI: [-0.82, 0.43]type III SS F-test
Comparison: Category: CD8+ The difference between baseline and surgical tumor samples was analysed and compared across the 3 treatment arms (effect estimate for Arm A vs Arm B) based on an ANCOVA model. Difference from baseline = Surgery value-Baseline value. Adjustment was based on ANCOVA model with treatment arm as factor and baseline value as covariate. No interaction included. Pairwise tests have been performed to compare Arm A with Arm C, Arm B with Arm C, and Arm A with Arm Bp-value: 0.79495% CI: [-0.49, 0.82]type III SS F-test
Comparison: Category: CD8+/GrB+ The difference between baseline and surgical tumor samples was analysed and compared across the 3 treatment arms (effect estimate for Arm A vs Arm C) based on an ANCOVA model. Difference from baseline = Surgery value-Baseline value. Adjustment was based on ANCOVA model with treatment arm as factor and baseline value as covariate. No interaction included. Pairwise tests have been performed to compare Arm A with Arm C, Arm B with Arm C, and Arm A with Arm Bp-value: 0.65495% CI: [-0.52, 0.57]type III SS F-test
Comparison: Category: CD8+/GrB+ The difference between baseline and surgical tumor samples was analysed and compared across the 3 treatment arms (effect estimate for Arm B vs Arm C) based on an ANCOVA model. Difference from baseline = Surgery value-Baseline value. Adjustment was based on ANCOVA model with treatment arm as factor and baseline value as covariate. No interaction included. Pairwise tests have been performed to compare Arm A with Arm C, Arm B with Arm C, and Arm A with Arm Bp-value: 0.65495% CI: [-0.69, 0.31]type III SS F-test
Comparison: Category: CD8+/GrB+ The difference between baseline and surgical tumor samples was analysed and compared across the 3 treatment arms (effect estimate for Arm A vs Arm B) based on an ANCOVA model. Difference from baseline = Surgery value-Baseline value. Adjustment was based on ANCOVA model with treatment arm as factor and baseline value as covariate. No interaction included. Pairwise tests have been performed to compare Arm A with Arm C, Arm B with Arm C, and Arm A with Arm Bp-value: 0.65495% CI: [-0.31, 0.74]type III SS F-test
Primary

Immunological Response to Treatment in Relation to Microsatellite Instability (MSI) Status: Number of Subjects Per MSI Category

A potential association between MSI status (present or absent) and the primary endpoints (difference from baseline to surgery in CD8+ and CD8+/GrB+ T cell infiltration) was evaluated. Determination of mismatch repair protein (MRP)-expression (hMLH1, hMSH2, hMSH6 and hPMS2) was performed for the detection of the MSI-H-phenotype by IHC and/or on tumor deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sample using 5 microsatellite markers (BAT-25, BAT-26, NR-21, NR-24 and MONO-27).

Time frame: 18 weeks

Population: Immunomonitoring analysis set included all subjects for whom at least the baseline ELISpot blood and tumor sample, tumor sample at surgery and pre-surgery ELISpot blood drawing are available and whose tumor biopsy at baseline is MUC1-positive.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)+CyclophosphamideImmunological Response to Treatment in Relation to Microsatellite Instability (MSI) Status: Number of Subjects Per MSI CategoryNo25 subjects
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)+CyclophosphamideImmunological Response to Treatment in Relation to Microsatellite Instability (MSI) Status: Number of Subjects Per MSI CategoryYes2 subjects
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)Immunological Response to Treatment in Relation to Microsatellite Instability (MSI) Status: Number of Subjects Per MSI CategoryNo32 subjects
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)Immunological Response to Treatment in Relation to Microsatellite Instability (MSI) Status: Number of Subjects Per MSI CategoryYes1 subjects
ChemoradiotherapyImmunological Response to Treatment in Relation to Microsatellite Instability (MSI) Status: Number of Subjects Per MSI CategoryNo30 subjects
ChemoradiotherapyImmunological Response to Treatment in Relation to Microsatellite Instability (MSI) Status: Number of Subjects Per MSI CategoryYes0 subjects
Comparison: Category: CD8+ The difference in T cell infiltration from baseline to surgery was analysed and compared across the 3 treatment arms (effect estimate for Arm A vs Arm C) based on an ANCOVA model. Difference from baseline = Surgery value-Baseline value. Adjustment was based on ANCOVA model with treatment arm as factor and baseline value and MSI category as covariates. No interaction included. Pairwise tests have been performed to compare Arm A with Arm C, Arm B with Arm C, and Arm A with Arm B.p-value: 0.92195% CI: [-0.73, 0.67]type III SS F-test
Comparison: Category: CD8+ The difference in T cell infiltration from baseline to surgery was analysed and compared across the 3 treatment arms (effect estimate for Arm B vs Arm C) based on an ANCOVA model. Difference from baseline = Surgery value-Baseline value. Adjustment was based on ANCOVA model with treatment arm as factor and baseline value and MSI category as covariates. No interaction included. Pairwise tests have been performed to compare Arm A with Arm C, Arm B with Arm C, and Arm A with Arm B.p-value: 0.92195% CI: [-0.83, 0.44]type III SS F-test
Comparison: Category: CD8+ The difference in T cell infiltration from baseline to surgery was analysed and compared across the 3 treatment arms (effect estimate for Arm A vs Arm B) based on an ANCOVA model. Difference from baseline = Surgery value-Baseline value. Adjustment was based on ANCOVA model with treatment arm as factor and baseline value and MSI category as covariates. No interaction included. Pairwise tests have been performed to compare Arm A with Arm C, Arm B with Arm C, and Arm A with Arm B.p-value: 0.92195% CI: [-0.5, 0.83]type III SS F-test
Comparison: Category:CD8+/GrB+ The difference in T cell infiltration from baseline to surgery was analysed and compared across the 3 treatment arms (effect estimate for Arm A vs Arm C) based on an ANCOVA model. Difference from baseline=Surgery value-Baseline value. Adjustment was based on ANCOVA model with treatment arm as factor and baseline value and MSI category as covariates. No interaction included. Pairwise tests have been performed to compare Arm A with Arm C, Arm B with Arm C, and Arm A with Arm B.p-value: 0.8995% CI: [-0.54, 0.58]type III SS F-test
Comparison: Category:CD8+/GrB+ The difference in T cell infiltration from baseline to surgery was analysed and compared across the 3 treatment arms (effect estimate for Arm B vs Arm C) based on an ANCOVA model. Difference from baseline=Surgery value-Baseline value. Adjustment was based on ANCOVA model with treatment arm as factor and baseline value and MSI category as covariates. No interaction included. Pairwise tests have been performed to compare Arm A with Arm C, Arm B with Arm C, and Arm A with Arm B.p-value: 0.8995% CI: [-0.7, 0.31]type III SS F-test
Comparison: Category:CD8+/GrB+ The difference in T cell infiltration from baseline to surgery was analysed and compared across the 3 treatment arms (effect estimate for Arm A vs Arm B) based on an ANCOVA model. Difference from baseline=Surgery value-Baseline value. Adjustment was based on ANCOVA model with treatment arm as factor and baseline value and MSI category as covariates. No interaction included. Pairwise tests have been performed to compare Arm A with Arm C, Arm B with Arm C, and Arm A with Arm B.p-value: 0.8995% CI: [-0.32, 0.74]type III SS F-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)

Immunological changes in peripheral blood were evaluated based on fluorescence analysis cell sorter phenotypic characterization of T cells (CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+) and of markers of activation and proliferation (CD27, BTLA); and regulatory cells such as CD3+CD4+ (or CD8+) CD45RA+CD25+FoxP3+CD127 T cells. Immunological Response in peripheral blood was measured on a continuous scale.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 18 (follow-up / end-of trial)

Population: Immunomonitoring analysis set included all subjects for whom at least the baseline ELISpot blood and tumor sample, tumor sample at surgery and pre-surgery ELISpot blood drawing are available and whose tumor biopsy at baseline is MUC1-positive. Within the data table, n=number of subjects analysed for each category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)+CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3+CD56+CD16+CCR7+ (n=26,30,24)-1.341 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 4.1442
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)+CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3+CD56+CD16-Granzyme B+ (n=26,30,24)0.479 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 1.6943
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)+CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3-CD56+CD16+GranzymeB+ (n=26,30,24)-0.013 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 0.1051
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)+CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)Lymphs Tube 3 (n=27,30,25)-0.994 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 0.4545
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)+CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3-CD56+CD16+/LY (n=26,30,24)0.277 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 0.5448
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)+CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3-CD56+CD16+Granzyme B+/LY (n=26,30,24)0.264 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 0.5885
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)+CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3+CD4+BTLA4+ (n=26,30,24)0.063 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 1.4413
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)+CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3-CD19+BTLA4+ (n=27,29,23)-0.030 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 0.0489
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)+CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3+CD4+CD127+FoxP3-CD45RA-CD25+CTLA4+(n=27,29,24)0.711 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 1.3825
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)+CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3+CD56+CD16+CD107a+ (n=26,30,24)-1.216 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 4.5484
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)+CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)Lymphs Tube 2 (n=27,30,25)-1.024 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 0.4392
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)+CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3+CD56+CD16+Granzyme B+/LY (n=26,30,24)0.243 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 0.6969
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)+CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3-CD56+CD16+Perforin+/LY (n=26,30,24)0.226 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 0.5669
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)+CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3+CD56+CD16+Perforin+/LY (n=26,30,24)0.240 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 0.6997
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)+CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)Background corrected CD3+CD4+IFNg+ (n=21,27,21)0.058 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 0.9767
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)+CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3-CD56+CD16-CD107a+ (n=26,30,24)0.216 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 1.201
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)+CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3+CD4+CD27+ (n=26,30,24)-0.181 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 0.1848
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)+CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3+CD8+CD127+FoxP3-CD25-CD45RA+CTLA4-(n=27,29,24)-0.604 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 0.8102
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)+CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3+CD8+CD127-FoxP3-CD45RA-CD25+CTLA4+(n=27,29,24)0.050 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 0.3933
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)+CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3-CD56+CD16+Perforin+ (n=26,30,24)-0.050 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 0.0769
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)Change From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3+CD56+CD16+Granzyme B+/LY (n=26,30,24)-0.201 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 1.0731
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)Change From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3-CD56+CD16+GranzymeB+ (n=26,30,24)-0.046 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 0.1259
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)Change From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3-CD56+CD16+Perforin+ (n=26,30,24)-0.033 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 0.1868
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)Change From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3+CD4+CD27+ (n=26,30,24)-0.135 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 0.1521
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)Change From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3-CD56+CD16+Granzyme B+/LY (n=26,30,24)0.047 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 1.2787
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)Change From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3-CD56+CD16+Perforin+/LY (n=26,30,24)0.058 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 1.2902
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)Change From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3-CD56+CD16-CD107a+ (n=26,30,24)-0.318 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 1.5863
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)Change From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3+CD8+CD127-FoxP3-CD45RA-CD25+CTLA4+(n=27,29,24)0.152 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 0.5386
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)Change From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3+CD56+CD16-Granzyme B+ (n=26,30,24)-0.241 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 0.9628
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)Change From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3-CD56+CD16+/LY (n=26,30,24)0.090 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 1.2968
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)Change From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3-CD19+BTLA4+ (n=27,29,23)-0.028 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 0.055
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)Change From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)Lymphs Tube 2 (n=27,30,25)-0.941 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 0.608
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)Change From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3+CD56+CD16+CD107a+ (n=26,30,24)1.966 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 6.6322
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)Change From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3+CD4+BTLA4+ (n=26,30,24)0.122 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 0.4833
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)Change From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)Lymphs Tube 3 (n=27,30,25)-0.920 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 0.5923
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)Change From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3+CD56+CD16+CCR7+ (n=26,30,24)0.541 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 6.3502
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)Change From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3+CD8+CD127+FoxP3-CD25-CD45RA+CTLA4-(n=27,29,24)-1.062 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 1.1436
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)Change From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)Background corrected CD3+CD4+IFNg+ (n=21,27,21)0.544 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 0.9521
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)Change From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3+CD56+CD16+Perforin+/LY (n=26,30,24)-0.177 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 0.992
Chemoradiotherapy+Tecemotide (L-BLP25)Change From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3+CD4+CD127+FoxP3-CD45RA-CD25+CTLA4+(n=27,29,24)0.674 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 1.2689
ChemoradiotherapyChange From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3-CD56+CD16+Perforin+ (n=26,30,24)-0.088 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 0.2282
ChemoradiotherapyChange From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)Lymphs Tube 3 (n=27,30,25)-0.936 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 0.4746
ChemoradiotherapyChange From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3+CD8+CD127-FoxP3-CD45RA-CD25+CTLA4+(n=27,29,24)-0.012 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 0.5202
ChemoradiotherapyChange From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3+CD4+CD127+FoxP3-CD45RA-CD25+CTLA4+(n=27,29,24)1.035 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 1.4996
ChemoradiotherapyChange From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3+CD56+CD16+CCR7+ (n=26,30,24)-3.390 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 5.1877
ChemoradiotherapyChange From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3-CD56+CD16-CD107a+ (n=26,30,24)0.037 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 1.0191
ChemoradiotherapyChange From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3+CD56+CD16+Perforin+/LY (n=26,30,24)0.101 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 0.7617
ChemoradiotherapyChange From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3+CD8+CD127+FoxP3-CD25-CD45RA+CTLA4-(n=27,29,24)-0.940 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 1.2678
ChemoradiotherapyChange From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3-CD56+CD16+Perforin+/LY (n=26,30,24)0.411 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 0.6019
ChemoradiotherapyChange From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3-CD56+CD16+GranzymeB+ (n=26,30,24)-0.081 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 0.2238
ChemoradiotherapyChange From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)Background corrected CD3+CD4+IFNg+ (n=21,27,21)0.359 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 1.3187
ChemoradiotherapyChange From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3-CD56+CD16+Granzyme B+/LY (n=26,30,24)0.415 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 0.604
ChemoradiotherapyChange From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)Lymphs Tube 2 (n=27,30,25)-0.952 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 0.4761
ChemoradiotherapyChange From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3-CD19+BTLA4+ (n=27,29,23)-0.017 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 0.0352
ChemoradiotherapyChange From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3+CD4+CD27+ (n=26,30,24)-0.099 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 0.1913
ChemoradiotherapyChange From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3+CD56+CD16+CD107a+ (n=26,30,24)-2.752 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 6.479
ChemoradiotherapyChange From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3-CD56+CD16+/LY (n=26,30,24)0.497 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 0.6119
ChemoradiotherapyChange From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3+CD56+CD16+Granzyme B+/LY (n=26,30,24)0.131 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 0.7652
ChemoradiotherapyChange From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3+CD4+BTLA4+ (n=26,30,24)-0.035 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 0.4117
ChemoradiotherapyChange From Baseline in Immunological Response in Peripheral Blood at Week 18 (Follow-up / end-of Trial)CD3+CD56+CD16-Granzyme B+ (n=26,30,24)-0.024 log2 (percentage of T cells)Standard Deviation 0.6623
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Peritumoral Immune Response at Week 14 (Post-surgery)

Immunological changes in the tumor microenvironment were evaluated based on IHC expression of CD3+, CD4+, and Ki67+CD3+ T cells; regulatory T cells (FOXP3+) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (CD33+CD14-); other immune cells such as NK cells (CD3-CD57+), B cells (CD20+), macrophages (CD68+), and dendritic cells (S100+). Peritumoral immune response was calculated as number of lymphoid cells at the margin of the tumor or in the tumor bed (if there is complete pathological response).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 14 (post-surgery)

Population: The pre-specified statistical threshold for reporting of results of planned analysis for either arm or interaction effect was not met in the analysis population. Hence the data was not assessed for the outcome measure.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026