Skip to content

Adding Liraglutide to High Dose Insulin: Breaking the Cycle

Adding Liraglutide to High Dose Insulin: Breaking the Cycle

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01505673
Enrollment
71
Registered
2012-01-06
Start date
2012-01-31
Completion date
2016-06-30
Last updated
2018-01-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

Insulin, Glucagon-like peptide, Liraglutide, Beta-Cell, pancreatic steatosis, hepatic steatosis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the addition of liraglutide 1.8 mg/day to a high-dose insulin regimen (\>1.8 units/kg/day) in patients with uncontrolled (HbA1c \>7.5%) type 2 diabetes mellitus will improve blood sugar control. It also evaluates the effect of liraglutide on liver and pancreatic fat content, explores the mechanism of blood sugar improvement by assessing weight and pancreatic hormone release, and assesses blood pressure, lipid profile, and liver function. Finally it will look at patient quality of life and safety.

Detailed description

Type 2 diabetes is a progressive disease with incessant beta-cell dysfunction that often ultimately requires insulin treatment. Patients requiring high insulin dosages represent a particular treatment challenge and often have uncontrolled glycemia despite progressive dose increases and are especially prone to insulin related lipotoxicity and weight gain. Glucagon-like peptide agonists (GLP-1) such as liraglutide have many actions that position them to break the vicious cycle in this population through the following mechanisms: (1) weight loss; (2) improved hepatic steatosis; (3) improved pancreatic steatosis; (4) decreased glucagon levels; (5) improved beta-cell function. The purpose of the study is to demonstrate that liraglutide is both effective and safe when added to a high dose insulin treatment regimen. Liraglutide will improve glycemic control, weight, metabolic parameters, as well as patient satisfaction, with minimal adverse events. The study also proposes to study the mechanisms through which such improvements might occur, especially beta-cell function, glucagon levels, and hepatic and pancreatic fat content.

Interventions

DRUGLiraglutide

Liraglutdie 1.8mg injected subcutaneously from pen device once daily for 6-months

DRUGSaline

Placebo injection of 1.8mg saline once daily for 6-months

Sponsors

Novo Nordisk A/S
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Ildiko Lingvay
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Type 2 diabetes mellitus * Insulin dose of \>1.8 units/kg/day (represents total daily insulin dose, regardless of formulation, regimen, number of daily shots) * HbA1c ≥ 7.5% and ≤ 11% * Age ≥ 18 * Stable comorbidities on stable treatment regimens * Stable dose of all oral hypoglycemics for ≥ 3 months prior to enrollment * Ability to provide informed consent before any trial-related activities

Exclusion criteria

* Type 1 diabetes mellitus * Any contraindication to the MRI procedure (metallic implants, severe claustrophobia, pregnancy, unable to lie still on a hard table for the duration of the procedure, weight above 400 lb - limit of the MRI table, magnet's inner circumference smaller than the largest body circumference) * History of any pancreatic disease as it might interfere with the pancreatic TG measurement (i.e. pancreatitis, tumors, cysts, type 1 diabetes, any pancreatic surgery) * End Stage Renal Disease on dialysis due to increased risk of hypoglycemia, and possible interference with accurate measurement of HbA1c * Incretin therapy (any GLP-1 agonist or DPP-IV inhibitor) * Unstable or decompensated comorbidities * Personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma or MEN-2 syndrome * Severe gastroparesis * Pregnancy, breast feeding, intention to become pregnant, or not using adequate contraceptive measures * Organ transplant recipient or waiting list candidate * Steroid use (current or potential use during the trial) * Known/suspected allergy to trial medication, excipients, or related products * Contraindications to study medications, worded specifically as stated in the product's prescribing information * Non-English speaking volunteers since no interpreters are available and the safety of the volunteers could be jeopardized if adequate and reliable communication is not possible.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Glycemic Control Measured by HbA1c6-monthsHbA1c (%)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Weight6-months
Beta-Cell Function6-monthsFasting Glucose as a Measure of Beta-Cell Function
Glucagon6-monthsMeasured during mixed meal challenge test.
Total Daily Insulin Dose6-monthsThe 3 days average of the total daily dose of insulin used within 3 consecutive days prior office visit 6 month.
Number of Daily Injections6-monthsThe 3 days average of the number of daily injections performed within 3 consecutive days prior office visit 6 month.
Blood Pressure6-months
Lipid Profile6-months
Liver Function Blood Test6-months
Hypoglycemic Events6-monthsReported as hypoglycemic events per month by patient as any blood glucose \<70 mg/dl or symptoms of hypoglycemia with blood glucose \>70 mg/dl
Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - General Health Perception6-monthsGeneral health perception was measured at randomization and 6 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a Likert scale score of 1-5, where 1 = excellent; 2 = very good; 3 = good; 4 = fair; 5 = poor.
Matsuda Index as a Measure of Beta Cell Function6 monthsThe Matsuda index is a measure of insulin sensitivity and has no minimum/maximum values. Index values are calculated as 500,000/square root of ((fasting glucose x fasting c-peptide x 333) x (mean 120 min post-meal glucose x mean 120 min post-meal c-peptide x 333)). Higher/lower values = better/worse insulin sensitivity.
Beta-cell Function6 MonthsAUC c-peptide
Pancreatic and Hepatic Triglyceride Content6-monthsLiver Triglyceride and Pancreatic Triglyceride
AUC Glucose6 months
Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Current Health Perception6 monthsCurrent health perception was measured at randomization and 6 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a Likert scale score of 1-5, where 1 = much better than 3 months ago; 2 - Somewhat better now than 3 months ago; 3 - About the same; 4 - Somewhat worse now than 3 months ago; 5 Much worse now than 3 months ago.
Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Treatment Satisfaction6 monthsQuality of Life Survey (QoL) - treatment satisfactionTreatment satisfaction was measured at randomization and 6 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a Likert scale score of 1-5, where 1 - very satisfied; 2 - moderately satisfied; 3 - neither satisfied nor dissatisfied; 4 - moderately dissatisfied; 5 - very dissatisfied.
Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Treatment Impact6 monthsTreatment impact was measured at randomization and 6 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a Likert scale score of 1-5, where 1 - very satisfied; 2 - moderately satisfied; 3 - neither satisfied nor dissatisfied; 4 - moderately dissatisfied; 5 - very dissatisfied.
Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Social or Vocational Worry6 monthsSocial or vocational worry was measured at randomization and 6 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a Likert scale score of 0-5, where 0 - does not apply; 1 - never; 2 - seldom; 3 - sometimes; 4 - often; 5 - all of the time.
Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Hypoglycemia Fear6 monthsHypoglycemia fear was measured at randomization and 6 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a Likert scale score of 1-5, where 1 - never worry; 2 - rarely water; 3 - sometimes worry; 4 - often worry; 5 - very often worry.
Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Glycemia Control Perception6 monthsGlycemia control perception was measured at randomization and 6 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a scale score of 1-7, where 1 - extremely controlled and 7 - not at all controlled.
Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Lifestyle Flexibility6 monthsLifestyle flexibility was measured at randomization and 6 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a Likert scale score of 1 to 5, where 1 - a great deal of choice; 2 - a lot of choice; 3 - some choice; 4 - a little choice; 5 - no choice.
Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Social Stigma6 monthsSocial stigma was measured at randomization and 6 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a Likert scale score of 1 to 5, where 1 strongly agree; 2 - somewhat agree; 3 - neither agree nor disagree; 4 - somewhat disagree; 5 - strongly disagree.
Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Satisfaction With Insulin Treatment6 monthsSatisfaction with insulin treatment was measured at randomization and 6 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a scale score of 1 to 7, where 1 extremely satisfied to 7 - not at all satisfied.
Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Willingness to Continue Insulin Treatment6 monthsWillingness to continue insulin treatment was measured at randomization and 6 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a scale score of 1 to 7, where 1 extremely willing to 7 - not at all willing.
Ratio (AUC C-peptide/AUC Glucose)6 months

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Liraglutide
Liraglutide: Liraglutdie 1.8mg injected subcutaneously from pen device once daily for 6-months
35
Saline Injection
Saline: Placebo injection of 1.8mg saline once daily for 6-months
36
Total71

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSaline InjectionLiraglutideTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
36 Participants35 Participants71 Participants
Age, Continuous55.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6
52.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1
54.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4
Region of Enrollment
United States
34 Participants32 Participants66 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
22 Participants23 Participants45 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants12 Participants26 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 350 / 36
other
Total, other adverse events
14 / 3514 / 36
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 356 / 36

Outcome results

Primary

Glycemic Control Measured by HbA1c

HbA1c (%)

Time frame: 6-months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LiraglutideGlycemic Control Measured by HbA1c7.9 Percent HbA1cStandard Deviation 1.1
Saline InjectionGlycemic Control Measured by HbA1c8.9 Percent HbA1cStandard Deviation 1.3
Secondary

AUC Glucose

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LiraglutideAUC Glucose71747 mg/(dL/min)Standard Deviation 22141
Saline InjectionAUC Glucose79278 mg/(dL/min)Standard Deviation 29416
Secondary

Beta-cell Function

AUC c-peptide

Time frame: 6 Months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LiraglutideBeta-cell Function1234.6 ug/(L/min)Standard Deviation 588.6
Saline InjectionBeta-cell Function922.9 ug/(L/min)Standard Deviation 470.5
Secondary

Beta-Cell Function

Fasting C-peptide as a Measure of Beta-Cell Function

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LiraglutideBeta-Cell Function2.48 microgram/LStandard Deviation 1.18
Saline InjectionBeta-Cell Function1.75 microgram/LStandard Deviation 1.19
Secondary

Beta-Cell Function

Fasting Glucose as a Measure of Beta-Cell Function

Time frame: 6-months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LiraglutideBeta-Cell Function179 mg/dLStandard Deviation 75
Saline InjectionBeta-Cell Function197 mg/dLStandard Deviation 98
Secondary

Blood Pressure

Time frame: 6-months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LiraglutideBlood PressureSystolic134 mmHgStandard Deviation 18
LiraglutideBlood PressureDiastolic80.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 13.7
Saline InjectionBlood PressureSystolic135 mmHgStandard Deviation 17
Saline InjectionBlood PressureDiastolic74.3 mmHgStandard Deviation 9.7
Secondary

Glucagon

Measured during mixed meal challenge test.

Time frame: 6-months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LiraglutideGlucagon107.3 pg/mLStandard Deviation 44.5
Saline InjectionGlucagon93.8 pg/mLStandard Deviation 37.8
Secondary

Hypoglycemic Events

Reported as hypoglycemic events per month by patient as any blood glucose \<70 mg/dl or symptoms of hypoglycemia with blood glucose \>70 mg/dl

Time frame: 6-months

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
LiraglutideHypoglycemic Events1.1 events per month per patient
Saline InjectionHypoglycemic Events0.7 events per month per patient
Secondary

Lipid Profile

Time frame: 6-months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LiraglutideLipid ProfileTotal cholesterol154 mg/dLStandard Deviation 41
LiraglutideLipid ProfileLDL83.9 mg/dLStandard Deviation 37.2
LiraglutideLipid ProfileHDL36.6 mg/dLStandard Deviation 9.8
Saline InjectionLipid ProfileTotal cholesterol152 mg/dLStandard Deviation 42
Saline InjectionLipid ProfileLDL76.3 mg/dLStandard Deviation 28.4
Saline InjectionLipid ProfileHDL37.6 mg/dLStandard Deviation 9.9
Secondary

Liver Function Blood Test

Time frame: 6-months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LiraglutideLiver Function Blood TestALT25.8 U/LStandard Deviation 13.5
LiraglutideLiver Function Blood TestAST26.4 U/LStandard Deviation 17.6
Saline InjectionLiver Function Blood TestALT36.0 U/LStandard Deviation 43.7
Saline InjectionLiver Function Blood TestAST32.1 U/LStandard Deviation 30
Secondary

Matsuda Index as a Measure of Beta Cell Function

The Matsuda index is a measure of insulin sensitivity and has no minimum/maximum values. Index values are calculated as 500,000/square root of ((fasting glucose x fasting c-peptide x 333) x (mean 120 min post-meal glucose x mean 120 min post-meal c-peptide x 333)). Higher/lower values = better/worse insulin sensitivity.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
LiraglutideMatsuda Index as a Measure of Beta Cell Function2.88 index
Saline InjectionMatsuda Index as a Measure of Beta Cell Function3.12 index
Secondary

Number of Daily Injections

The 3 days average of the number of daily injections performed within 3 consecutive days prior office visit 6 month.

Time frame: 6-months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LiraglutideNumber of Daily Injections3.7 number/dayStandard Deviation 1.4
Saline InjectionNumber of Daily Injections3.8 number/dayStandard Deviation 1.3
Secondary

Pancreatic and Hepatic Triglyceride Content

Liver Triglyceride and Pancreatic Triglyceride

Time frame: 6-months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LiraglutidePancreatic and Hepatic Triglyceride ContentLiver Triglyceride12.3 Percent TriglycerideStandard Deviation 5.8
LiraglutidePancreatic and Hepatic Triglyceride ContentPancreatic Triglyceride12.53 Percent TriglycerideStandard Deviation 8.13
Saline InjectionPancreatic and Hepatic Triglyceride ContentLiver Triglyceride12.2 Percent TriglycerideStandard Deviation 7.8
Saline InjectionPancreatic and Hepatic Triglyceride ContentPancreatic Triglyceride14.64 Percent TriglycerideStandard Deviation 9.25
Secondary

Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Current Health Perception

Current health perception was measured at randomization and 6 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a Likert scale score of 1-5, where 1 = much better than 3 months ago; 2 - Somewhat better now than 3 months ago; 3 - About the same; 4 - Somewhat worse now than 3 months ago; 5 Much worse now than 3 months ago.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LiraglutideQuality of Life Survey (QoL) - Current Health Perception2.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Saline InjectionQuality of Life Survey (QoL) - Current Health Perception2.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Secondary

Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - General Health Perception

General health perception was measured at randomization and 6 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a Likert scale score of 1-5, where 1 = excellent; 2 = very good; 3 = good; 4 = fair; 5 = poor.

Time frame: 6-months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LiraglutideQuality of Life Survey (QoL) - General Health Perception3.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Saline InjectionQuality of Life Survey (QoL) - General Health Perception3.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Secondary

Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Glycemia Control Perception

Glycemia control perception was measured at randomization and 6 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a scale score of 1-7, where 1 - extremely controlled and 7 - not at all controlled.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LiraglutideQuality of Life Survey (QoL) - Glycemia Control Perception2.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Saline InjectionQuality of Life Survey (QoL) - Glycemia Control Perception2.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Secondary

Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Hypoglycemia Fear

Hypoglycemia fear was measured at randomization and 6 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a Likert scale score of 1-5, where 1 - never worry; 2 - rarely water; 3 - sometimes worry; 4 - often worry; 5 - very often worry.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LiraglutideQuality of Life Survey (QoL) - Hypoglycemia Fear1.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Saline InjectionQuality of Life Survey (QoL) - Hypoglycemia Fear2.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Secondary

Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Lifestyle Flexibility

Lifestyle flexibility was measured at randomization and 6 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a Likert scale score of 1 to 5, where 1 - a great deal of choice; 2 - a lot of choice; 3 - some choice; 4 - a little choice; 5 - no choice.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LiraglutideQuality of Life Survey (QoL) - Lifestyle Flexibility2.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Saline InjectionQuality of Life Survey (QoL) - Lifestyle Flexibility2.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Secondary

Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Satisfaction With Insulin Treatment

Satisfaction with insulin treatment was measured at randomization and 6 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a scale score of 1 to 7, where 1 extremely satisfied to 7 - not at all satisfied.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LiraglutideQuality of Life Survey (QoL) - Satisfaction With Insulin Treatment1.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Saline InjectionQuality of Life Survey (QoL) - Satisfaction With Insulin Treatment2.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Secondary

Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Social or Vocational Worry

Social or vocational worry was measured at randomization and 6 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a Likert scale score of 0-5, where 0 - does not apply; 1 - never; 2 - seldom; 3 - sometimes; 4 - often; 5 - all of the time.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LiraglutideQuality of Life Survey (QoL) - Social or Vocational Worry1.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Saline InjectionQuality of Life Survey (QoL) - Social or Vocational Worry1.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Secondary

Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Social Stigma

Social stigma was measured at randomization and 6 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a Likert scale score of 1 to 5, where 1 strongly agree; 2 - somewhat agree; 3 - neither agree nor disagree; 4 - somewhat disagree; 5 - strongly disagree.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LiraglutideQuality of Life Survey (QoL) - Social Stigma2.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Saline InjectionQuality of Life Survey (QoL) - Social Stigma2.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Secondary

Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Treatment Impact

Treatment impact was measured at randomization and 6 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a Likert scale score of 1-5, where 1 - very satisfied; 2 - moderately satisfied; 3 - neither satisfied nor dissatisfied; 4 - moderately dissatisfied; 5 - very dissatisfied.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LiraglutideQuality of Life Survey (QoL) - Treatment Impact2.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Saline InjectionQuality of Life Survey (QoL) - Treatment Impact2.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Secondary

Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Treatment Satisfaction

Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - treatment satisfactionTreatment satisfaction was measured at randomization and 6 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a Likert scale score of 1-5, where 1 - very satisfied; 2 - moderately satisfied; 3 - neither satisfied nor dissatisfied; 4 - moderately dissatisfied; 5 - very dissatisfied.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LiraglutideQuality of Life Survey (QoL) - Treatment Satisfaction2.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Saline InjectionQuality of Life Survey (QoL) - Treatment Satisfaction2.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Secondary

Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Willingness to Continue Insulin Treatment

Willingness to continue insulin treatment was measured at randomization and 6 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a scale score of 1 to 7, where 1 extremely willing to 7 - not at all willing.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LiraglutideQuality of Life Survey (QoL) - Willingness to Continue Insulin Treatment1.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Saline InjectionQuality of Life Survey (QoL) - Willingness to Continue Insulin Treatment2.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Secondary

Ratio (AUC C-peptide/AUC Glucose)

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LiraglutideRatio (AUC C-peptide/AUC Glucose)0.019 RatioStandard Deviation 0.01
Saline InjectionRatio (AUC C-peptide/AUC Glucose)0.013 RatioStandard Deviation 0.008
Secondary

Total Daily Insulin Dose

The 3 days average of the total daily dose of insulin used within 3 consecutive days prior office visit 6 month.

Time frame: 6-months

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
LiraglutideTotal Daily Insulin Dose200 IU
Saline InjectionTotal Daily Insulin Dose218 IU
Secondary

Weight

Time frame: 6-months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LiraglutideWeight114 KilogramsStandard Deviation 21
Saline InjectionWeight117 KilogramsStandard Deviation 27

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026