Skip to content

Evaluating the Safety and Tolerability of Etravirine in HIV-1 Infected Infants and Children

A Phase I/II, Open-Label Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Antiviral Activity of Etravirine (ETR) in Antiretroviral (ARV) Treatment-Experienced HIV-1 Infected Infants and Children, Aged ≥ 2 Months to < 6 Years

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01504841
Enrollment
26
Registered
2012-01-05
Start date
2013-03-14
Completion date
2020-08-26
Last updated
2021-11-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV Infections

Brief summary

Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) are widely used as part of combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) for infants and children, but NNRTI resistance is increasing, leading to treatment failure. This study tested the safety, tolerability, and dosing levels of etravirine (ETR), a new NNRTI.

Detailed description

Use of NNRTI-based regimens as initial therapy for HIV-infected children is increasing, especially in areas where newborns exposed to HIV-1 receive single-dose nevirapine (NVP) as part of prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) regimens and/or daily NVP for prevention of transmission through breastfeeding. First-generation NNRTIs have a low genetic barrier to the development of resistance; in two of the most widely used NNRTIs, NVP and efavirenz (EFV), even a single amino acid mutation in the virus can lead to a reduction in the drug's effectiveness. Even short-term use of these NNRTIs, including only a single dose of NVP, can cause NNRTI resistance. Second-generation NNRTIs are needed as part of ARV regimens for newly diagnosed infants and children who have been exposed to single-dose NVP or who have failed their current antiretroviral (ARV) regimens. In this study, the second-generation NNRTI ETR was tested for safety, tolerability, and appropriate dosing. Children were assigned to one of three cohorts based on age: * Cohort I: At least 2 but younger than 6 years of age * Cohort II: At least 1 but younger than 2 years of age * Cohort III: At least 2 months but younger than 1 year of age Children in all three cohorts were treatment experienced, defined as being on a failing combination ARV regimen (containing at least 3 ARVs) for at least 8 weeks or having a treatment interruption of at least 4 weeks with a history of virologic failure while on a combination ARV regimen (containing at least 3 ARVs). Children received ETR together with an optimized background regimen (OBR) consisting of at least 2 active agents (a boosted protease inhibitor \[PI\] and at least 1 additional active ARV drug). OBR were based on clinical status, treatment history, resistance data, and availability of appropriate pediatric dosing and formulations. The children received an oral dose of ETR twice daily. Most children had 11 visits: at screening, entry (Day 0), Day 14 (intensive pharmacokinetic \[PK\] visit), and at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 48. Most visits included a physical exam, giving a medical history, discussion of adherence, and blood and urine collection. The screening and intensive PK visits also included an electrocardiogram (ECG). During the intensive PK visit, the child had blood drawn approximately 7 times over 12 hours. After the Week 48 visit, children entered the long-term follow-up phase of the study and have a visit every 12 weeks for up to 5 years. These follow-up visits included giving a medical history and undergoing a physical exam and blood draw.

Interventions

ETR was administered as 25-mg scored tablets and/or 100-mg tablets swallowed whole or dispersed in an appropriate liquid vehicle following a meal. Children took the specified dose orally twice daily within 30 minutes following a meal. Dose was decided according to dosing tables in protocol.

Sponsors

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Lead SponsorNIH

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Months to 6 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Confirmed HIV-1 infection as described in the protocol * NOTE: Children who were born at or sooner than 37 weeks gestational age must be at least 12 weeks of age and at least 46 weeks post-conceptual age at study entry. * HIV-1 RNA viral load greater than 1,000 copies/mL (within the previous 90 days prior to screening) and an HIV-1 RNA viral load greater than 1,000 copies/mL at screening * Treatment-experienced children on a failing combination antiretroviral (ARV) regimen (containing at least three ARVs) for at least 8 weeks; OR, treatment-experienced children on a treatment interruption of at least 4 weeks with a history of virologic failure while on a combination ARV regimen (containing at least three ARVs) * Ability to swallow etravirine (ETR) whole or dispersed in an appropriate liquid * Parent or legal guardian able and willing to provide signed informed consent and to have the child followed at the clinic site * Availability of sufficient active ARV drugs to create an optimized background regimen (OBR) consistent with protocol requirements

Exclusion criteria

* Evidence of phenotypic resistance to ETR at screening (phenotypic cutoffs of greater than 10 for loss of sensitivity for cohorts I, II, III) * Known history of HIV-2 infection in child or child's mother * Diagnosis of a new Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Stage C (per 1994 Revised Classification System for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection in Children Less than 13 Years of Age) criteria or opportunistic or bacterial infection diagnosed within 30 days prior to screening and not considered clinically stable * Prior history of malignancy * Any clinically significant diseases (other than HIV infection) or clinically significant findings during the screening medical history or physical examination that in the investigator's opinion would place the child at an unacceptable risk of injury, render the child unable to meet the requirements of the protocol, compromise the outcome of this study, or lead to the child being ineligible for participation * Current Grade 3 or higher of any of the following laboratory toxicities at screening: neutrophil count, hemoglobin, platelets, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), lipase, or serum creatinine. * Current or anticipated use of any disallowed medications (listed in the protocol) * Child's family is unlikely to adhere to the study procedures or keep appointments or is planning to relocate to a non-IMPAACT study site during the study * History of nonadherence with ARV medications that in the investigator's opinion could affect the ability of the child to comply with the protocol/procedures * Child is currently participating, or has participated within the previous 30 days prior to screening, in a study with a compound or device that is not commercially available * Grade 3 or higher QTc or PR interval prolongation from the electrocardiogram (ECG) at screening. More information on this criterion can be found in the protocol.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Termination From Treatment Due to a Suspected Adverse Drug Reaction (SADR)From baseline to occurrence of event, up to Week 48.Number (%) of participants who discontinued treatment due to a suspected adverse drug reaction (SADR) by Cohort.
Adverse Events (AEs) of Grade 3 or Higher SeverityFrom baseline to occurrence of event, up to Week 48.Number (%) of participants who experienced a Grade 3 or higher severity adverse event through Week 48 by Cohort, with Clopper-Pearson confidence intervals.
DeathFrom baseline to occurrence of event, up to Week 48.Number (%) of deaths on study by Cohort.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve Over 12 Hours of ETRPre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, and 12 hours post-dose measured at intensive PK visit (within 7-10 days after last dose of study drug administration)Geometric Mean (Standard Deviation) of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve over 12 hours (AUC12h) of ETR.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Optimized Background Regimen Due to Virologic FailureMeasured at entry and at Weeks 8, 12, 24, and 48Number (%) of participants who initiated a change in their optimized background regimen (OBR) due to virologic failure, by Cohort.
AEs of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Judged to be at Least Possibly Attributable to the Study MedicationsFrom baseline to occurrence of event, up to Week 48.Number (%) of Participants with AEs of Grade 3 or higher severity judged, by the Study Team, to be at least possibly attributable to the study medications by Cohort, including Clopper-Pearson confidence intervals.
New Onset Opportunistic Infection (OI) or AIDS DiagnosisFrom baseline to occurrence of event, up to Week 48.Number (%) of participants with a new onset opportunistic infection (OI) or AIDS diagnosis, by Cohort.
Decline in Absolute CD4 Percent of Greater Than 5 Percent Any Time After 12 Weeks of TherapyMeasured at baseline and at Weeks 12, 24, and 48Number (%) of participants with a \>5% decline in absolute CD4 percent from baseline at weeks 12, 24, and 48, by Cohort, including Clopper-Pearson confidence intervals.
HIV-1 RNA Virologic Failure Status at Weeks 24 and 48Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Number (%) of participants with confirmed Virologic Failure, defined as: failure to suppress plasma HIV-1 RNA to fewer than 400 copies/ml and failure to achieve at least a 2-log10 reduction (from baseline) in HIV-1 RNA at Weeks 24 or 48, by Cohort, with Clopper-Pearson confidence intervals. The initial HIV-1 RNA results that met the Virologic Failure definition were each confirmed by a second result obtained within 1 to 4 weeks of the initial result obtained at Week 24 and/or 48.
Treatment Discontinued Due to Toxicity or Virologic FailureFrom baseline to occurrence of event, up to Week 48.Number (%) of participants who discontinued study treatment (ETR) due to a toxicity or Virologic Failure (VF), by Cohort.

Countries

Brazil, South Africa, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The first participant was enrolled March 2013, and the final participant was enrolled June 2017. Participants were accrued from a total of 11 sites across Brazil, South Africa, and the USA.

Pre-assignment details

Participants were stratified into the 3 Cohorts by age group and not randomized. There were no eligibility violations or errors to cohort assignments.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort I: Treatment Experienced, 2 to 6 Years of Age
Children in this arm were at least 2 but younger than 6 years of age; they received the study drug etravirine (ETR) together with an optimized background regimen (OBR) consisting of one active boosted protease inhibitor (PI) and at least one other active antiretroviral (ARV) drug. Etravirine (ETR): ETR was administered as 25-mg scored tablets and/or 100-mg tablets swallowed whole or dispersed in an appropriate liquid vehicle following a meal. Children took the specified dose orally twice daily within 30 minutes following a meal. Dose was decided according to dosing tables in protocol.
11
Cohort II: Treatment Experienced, 1 to 2 Years of Age
Children in this arm were at least 1 but younger than 2 years of age; they received ETR together with an OBR consisting of one active boosted PI and at least one other active ARV drug. Etravirine (ETR): ETR was administered as 25-mg scored tablets and/or 100-mg tablets swallowed whole or dispersed in an appropriate liquid vehicle following a meal. Children took the specified dose orally twice daily within 30 minutes following a meal. Dose was decided according to dosing tables in protocol.
4
Cohort III: Treatment Experienced, 2 Months to 1 Year of Age
Children in this arm were at least 2 months but younger than 1 year of age; they received ETR together with an OBR consisting of one active boosted PI and at least one other active ARV drug. Etravirine (ETR): ETR was administered as 25-mg scored tablets and/or 100-mg tablets swallowed whole or dispersed in an appropriate liquid vehicle following a meal. Children took the specified dose orally twice daily within 30 minutes following a meal. Dose was decided according to dosing tables in protocol.
0
Total15

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject110

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohort II: Treatment Experienced, 1 to 2 Years of AgeTotalCohort I: Treatment Experienced, 2 to 6 Years of Age
Age, Continuous1 years3.5 years4 years
CD4 Count
200 - <350 cells/mm^3
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
CD4 Count
350 - <500 cells/mm^3
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
CD4 Count
>=500 cells/mm^3
3 Participants11 Participants8 Participants
CD4 Count
50 - <200 cells/mm^3
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
CD4 Percent
<= 14 %
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
CD4 Percent
>14 - <25 %
1 Participants6 Participants5 Participants
CD4 Percent
>= 25 %
2 Participants7 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants5 Participants4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants6 Participants4 Participants
Plasma HIV RNA
10,000 - < 25,000 copies/ml
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Plasma HIV RNA
25,000 - < 50,000 copies/ml
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Plasma HIV RNA
400 - <5,000 copies/ml
1 Participants5 Participants4 Participants
Plasma HIV RNA
<400 copies/ml
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Plasma HIV RNA
>=50,000 copies/ml
1 Participants5 Participants4 Participants
Plasma HIV RNA
5,000 - <10,000 copies/ml
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants12 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
1 participants4 participants3 participants
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
2 participants8 participants6 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
1 participants3 participants2 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants7 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants8 Participants5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 200 / 6
other
Total, other adverse events
20 / 206 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 203 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Adverse Events (AEs) of Grade 3 or Higher Severity

Number (%) of participants who experienced a Grade 3 or higher severity adverse event through Week 48 by Cohort, with Clopper-Pearson confidence intervals.

Time frame: From baseline to occurrence of event, up to Week 48.

Population: Analysis population is defined as having been treated exclusively on the final dose determined to be optimal for a given cohort without adjustments and having either completed 48 weeks of exposure to the study drug or been classified as a safety failure, due to a study drug related adverse event occurring during the first 48 weeks of treatment.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort I: Treatment Experienced, 2 to 6 Years of AgeAdverse Events (AEs) of Grade 3 or Higher SeverityExperienced a grade 3+ AE4 Participants
Cohort I: Treatment Experienced, 2 to 6 Years of AgeAdverse Events (AEs) of Grade 3 or Higher SeverityDid not experience a grade 3+ AE7 Participants
Cohort II: Treatment Experienced, 1 to 2 Years of AgeAdverse Events (AEs) of Grade 3 or Higher SeverityExperienced a grade 3+ AE4 Participants
Cohort II: Treatment Experienced, 1 to 2 Years of AgeAdverse Events (AEs) of Grade 3 or Higher SeverityDid not experience a grade 3+ AE0 Participants
95% CI: [10.9, 69.2]
95% CI: [39.8, 100]
Primary

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve Over 12 Hours of ETR

Geometric Mean (Standard Deviation) of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve over 12 hours (AUC12h) of ETR.

Time frame: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, and 12 hours post-dose measured at intensive PK visit (within 7-10 days after last dose of study drug administration)

Population: Analysis population is defined as having been treated exclusively on the final dose determined to be optimal for a given cohort without adjustments and having either completed 48 weeks of exposure to the study drug or been classified as a safety failure. They must also be considered PK evaluable by the study team; 1 Participant in Cohort 1 is not.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort I: Treatment Experienced, 2 to 6 Years of AgeArea Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve Over 12 Hours of ETR5512.85 ng*h/mLStandard Deviation 3615.36
Cohort II: Treatment Experienced, 1 to 2 Years of AgeArea Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve Over 12 Hours of ETR4821.76 ng*h/mLStandard Deviation 3167.11
Primary

Death

Number (%) of deaths on study by Cohort.

Time frame: From baseline to occurrence of event, up to Week 48.

Population: Analysis population is defined as having been treated exclusively on the final dose determined to be optimal for a given cohort without adjustments and having either completed 48 weeks of exposure to the study drug or been classified as a safety failure, due to a study drug related adverse event occurring during the first 48 weeks of treatment.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort I: Treatment Experienced, 2 to 6 Years of AgeDeathDeaths0 Participants
Cohort I: Treatment Experienced, 2 to 6 Years of AgeDeathLive participants11 Participants
Cohort II: Treatment Experienced, 1 to 2 Years of AgeDeathDeaths0 Participants
Cohort II: Treatment Experienced, 1 to 2 Years of AgeDeathLive participants4 Participants
Primary

Termination From Treatment Due to a Suspected Adverse Drug Reaction (SADR)

Number (%) of participants who discontinued treatment due to a suspected adverse drug reaction (SADR) by Cohort.

Time frame: From baseline to occurrence of event, up to Week 48.

Population: Analysis population is defined as having been treated exclusively on the final dose determined to be optimal for a given cohort without adjustments and having either completed 48 weeks of exposure to the study drug or been classified as a safety failure, due to a study drug related adverse event occurring during the first 48 weeks of treatment.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort I: Treatment Experienced, 2 to 6 Years of AgeTermination From Treatment Due to a Suspected Adverse Drug Reaction (SADR)Discontinued treatment due to a SADR1 Participants
Cohort I: Treatment Experienced, 2 to 6 Years of AgeTermination From Treatment Due to a Suspected Adverse Drug Reaction (SADR)Did not discontinue treatment due to a SADR10 Participants
Cohort II: Treatment Experienced, 1 to 2 Years of AgeTermination From Treatment Due to a Suspected Adverse Drug Reaction (SADR)Discontinued treatment due to a SADR0 Participants
Cohort II: Treatment Experienced, 1 to 2 Years of AgeTermination From Treatment Due to a Suspected Adverse Drug Reaction (SADR)Did not discontinue treatment due to a SADR4 Participants
Secondary

AEs of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Judged to be at Least Possibly Attributable to the Study Medications

Number (%) of Participants with AEs of Grade 3 or higher severity judged, by the Study Team, to be at least possibly attributable to the study medications by Cohort, including Clopper-Pearson confidence intervals.

Time frame: From baseline to occurrence of event, up to Week 48.

Population: Analysis population is defined as having been treated exclusively on the final dose determined to be optimal for a given cohort without adjustments and having either completed 48 weeks of exposure to the study drug or been classified as a safety failure, due to a study drug related adverse event occurring during the first 48 weeks of treatment.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort I: Treatment Experienced, 2 to 6 Years of AgeAEs of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Judged to be at Least Possibly Attributable to the Study MedicationsHad a grade 3+ AE related to study drug2 Participants
Cohort I: Treatment Experienced, 2 to 6 Years of AgeAEs of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Judged to be at Least Possibly Attributable to the Study MedicationsHad no grade 3+ AE related to study drug9 Participants
Cohort II: Treatment Experienced, 1 to 2 Years of AgeAEs of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Judged to be at Least Possibly Attributable to the Study MedicationsHad a grade 3+ AE related to study drug0 Participants
Cohort II: Treatment Experienced, 1 to 2 Years of AgeAEs of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Judged to be at Least Possibly Attributable to the Study MedicationsHad no grade 3+ AE related to study drug4 Participants
95% CI: [2.5, 51.8]
95% CI: [0, 60.2]
Secondary

Change in Optimized Background Regimen Due to Virologic Failure

Number (%) of participants who initiated a change in their optimized background regimen (OBR) due to virologic failure, by Cohort.

Time frame: Measured at entry and at Weeks 8, 12, 24, and 48

Population: Analysis population is defined as having been treated exclusively on the final dose determined to be optimal for a given cohort without adjustments and having either completed 48 weeks of exposure to the study drug or been classified as a safety failure, due to a study drug related adverse event occurring during the first 48 weeks of treatment.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort I: Treatment Experienced, 2 to 6 Years of AgeChange in Optimized Background Regimen Due to Virologic FailureChanged OBR due to Virologic Failure0 Participants
Cohort I: Treatment Experienced, 2 to 6 Years of AgeChange in Optimized Background Regimen Due to Virologic FailureDid not change OBR due to Virologic Failure11 Participants
Cohort II: Treatment Experienced, 1 to 2 Years of AgeChange in Optimized Background Regimen Due to Virologic FailureChanged OBR due to Virologic Failure0 Participants
Cohort II: Treatment Experienced, 1 to 2 Years of AgeChange in Optimized Background Regimen Due to Virologic FailureDid not change OBR due to Virologic Failure4 Participants
Secondary

Decline in Absolute CD4 Percent of Greater Than 5 Percent Any Time After 12 Weeks of Therapy

Number (%) of participants with a \>5% decline in absolute CD4 percent from baseline at weeks 12, 24, and 48, by Cohort, including Clopper-Pearson confidence intervals.

Time frame: Measured at baseline and at Weeks 12, 24, and 48

Population: Analysis population is defined as having been treated exclusively on the final dose determined to be optimal for a given cohort without adjustments and having either completed 48 weeks of exposure to the study drug or been classified as a safety failure, due to a study drug related adverse event occurring during the first 48 weeks of treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort I: Treatment Experienced, 2 to 6 Years of AgeDecline in Absolute CD4 Percent of Greater Than 5 Percent Any Time After 12 Weeks of TherapyWeek 12>5% decline in CD4 % from baseline1 Participants
Cohort I: Treatment Experienced, 2 to 6 Years of AgeDecline in Absolute CD4 Percent of Greater Than 5 Percent Any Time After 12 Weeks of TherapyWeek 12Increase or <5% decline in CD4 % from baseline10 Participants
Cohort I: Treatment Experienced, 2 to 6 Years of AgeDecline in Absolute CD4 Percent of Greater Than 5 Percent Any Time After 12 Weeks of TherapyWeek 24>5% decline in CD4 % from baseline1 Participants
Cohort I: Treatment Experienced, 2 to 6 Years of AgeDecline in Absolute CD4 Percent of Greater Than 5 Percent Any Time After 12 Weeks of TherapyWeek 24Increase or <5% decline in CD4 % from baseline10 Participants
Cohort I: Treatment Experienced, 2 to 6 Years of AgeDecline in Absolute CD4 Percent of Greater Than 5 Percent Any Time After 12 Weeks of TherapyWeek 48>5% decline in CD4 % from baseline2 Participants
Cohort I: Treatment Experienced, 2 to 6 Years of AgeDecline in Absolute CD4 Percent of Greater Than 5 Percent Any Time After 12 Weeks of TherapyWeek 48Increase or <5% decline in CD4 % from baseline9 Participants
Cohort II: Treatment Experienced, 1 to 2 Years of AgeDecline in Absolute CD4 Percent of Greater Than 5 Percent Any Time After 12 Weeks of TherapyWeek 48>5% decline in CD4 % from baseline2 Participants
Cohort II: Treatment Experienced, 1 to 2 Years of AgeDecline in Absolute CD4 Percent of Greater Than 5 Percent Any Time After 12 Weeks of TherapyWeek 12>5% decline in CD4 % from baseline2 Participants
Cohort II: Treatment Experienced, 1 to 2 Years of AgeDecline in Absolute CD4 Percent of Greater Than 5 Percent Any Time After 12 Weeks of TherapyWeek 24Increase or <5% decline in CD4 % from baseline3 Participants
Cohort II: Treatment Experienced, 1 to 2 Years of AgeDecline in Absolute CD4 Percent of Greater Than 5 Percent Any Time After 12 Weeks of TherapyWeek 12Increase or <5% decline in CD4 % from baseline2 Participants
Cohort II: Treatment Experienced, 1 to 2 Years of AgeDecline in Absolute CD4 Percent of Greater Than 5 Percent Any Time After 12 Weeks of TherapyWeek 48Increase or <5% decline in CD4 % from baseline2 Participants
Cohort II: Treatment Experienced, 1 to 2 Years of AgeDecline in Absolute CD4 Percent of Greater Than 5 Percent Any Time After 12 Weeks of TherapyWeek 24>5% decline in CD4 % from baseline1 Participants
Comparison: Week 12 time point.95% CI: [0.2, 41.3]
Comparison: Week 12 time point.95% CI: [6.8, 93.2]
Comparison: Week 24 time point.95% CI: [0.2, 41.3]
Comparison: Week 24 time point.95% CI: [0.6, 80.6]
Comparison: Week 48 time point.95% CI: [2.3, 51.8]
Comparison: Week 48 time point.95% CI: [6.8, 93.2]
Secondary

HIV-1 RNA Virologic Failure Status at Weeks 24 and 48

Number (%) of participants with confirmed Virologic Failure, defined as: failure to suppress plasma HIV-1 RNA to fewer than 400 copies/ml and failure to achieve at least a 2-log10 reduction (from baseline) in HIV-1 RNA at Weeks 24 or 48, by Cohort, with Clopper-Pearson confidence intervals. The initial HIV-1 RNA results that met the Virologic Failure definition were each confirmed by a second result obtained within 1 to 4 weeks of the initial result obtained at Week 24 and/or 48.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48

Population: Analysis population is defined as having been treated exclusively on the final dose determined to be optimal for a given cohort without adjustments and having either completed 48 weeks of exposure to the study drug or been classified as a safety failure, due to a study drug related adverse event occurring during the first 48 weeks of treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort I: Treatment Experienced, 2 to 6 Years of AgeHIV-1 RNA Virologic Failure Status at Weeks 24 and 48Week 24Virologic Failure2 Participants
Cohort I: Treatment Experienced, 2 to 6 Years of AgeHIV-1 RNA Virologic Failure Status at Weeks 24 and 48Week 24No Virologic Failure9 Participants
Cohort I: Treatment Experienced, 2 to 6 Years of AgeHIV-1 RNA Virologic Failure Status at Weeks 24 and 48Week 48Virologic Failure3 Participants
Cohort I: Treatment Experienced, 2 to 6 Years of AgeHIV-1 RNA Virologic Failure Status at Weeks 24 and 48Week 48No Virologic Failure8 Participants
Cohort II: Treatment Experienced, 1 to 2 Years of AgeHIV-1 RNA Virologic Failure Status at Weeks 24 and 48Week 48No Virologic Failure1 Participants
Cohort II: Treatment Experienced, 1 to 2 Years of AgeHIV-1 RNA Virologic Failure Status at Weeks 24 and 48Week 24Virologic Failure1 Participants
Cohort II: Treatment Experienced, 1 to 2 Years of AgeHIV-1 RNA Virologic Failure Status at Weeks 24 and 48Week 48Virologic Failure3 Participants
Cohort II: Treatment Experienced, 1 to 2 Years of AgeHIV-1 RNA Virologic Failure Status at Weeks 24 and 48Week 24No Virologic Failure3 Participants
Comparison: Week 24 time point.95% CI: [2.3, 51.8]
Comparison: Week 24 time point.95% CI: [0.6, 80.6]
Comparison: Week 48 time point.95% CI: [6, 61]
Comparison: Week 48 time point.95% CI: [19.4, 99.4]
Secondary

New Onset Opportunistic Infection (OI) or AIDS Diagnosis

Number (%) of participants with a new onset opportunistic infection (OI) or AIDS diagnosis, by Cohort.

Time frame: From baseline to occurrence of event, up to Week 48.

Population: Analysis population is defined as having been treated exclusively on the final dose determined to be optimal for a given cohort without adjustments and having either completed 48 weeks of exposure to the study drug or been classified as a safety failure, due to a study drug related adverse event occurring during the first 48 weeks of treatment.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort I: Treatment Experienced, 2 to 6 Years of AgeNew Onset Opportunistic Infection (OI) or AIDS DiagnosisHad a new OI0 Participants
Cohort I: Treatment Experienced, 2 to 6 Years of AgeNew Onset Opportunistic Infection (OI) or AIDS DiagnosisHad no new OIs11 Participants
Cohort II: Treatment Experienced, 1 to 2 Years of AgeNew Onset Opportunistic Infection (OI) or AIDS DiagnosisHad a new OI0 Participants
Cohort II: Treatment Experienced, 1 to 2 Years of AgeNew Onset Opportunistic Infection (OI) or AIDS DiagnosisHad no new OIs4 Participants
Secondary

Treatment Discontinued Due to Toxicity or Virologic Failure

Number (%) of participants who discontinued study treatment (ETR) due to a toxicity or Virologic Failure (VF), by Cohort.

Time frame: From baseline to occurrence of event, up to Week 48.

Population: Analysis population is defined as having been treated exclusively on the final dose determined to be optimal for a given cohort without adjustments and having either completed 48 weeks of exposure to the study drug or been classified as a safety failure, due to a study drug related adverse event occurring during the first 48 weeks of treatment.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort I: Treatment Experienced, 2 to 6 Years of AgeTreatment Discontinued Due to Toxicity or Virologic FailureDiscontinued Treatment due to VF1 Participants
Cohort I: Treatment Experienced, 2 to 6 Years of AgeTreatment Discontinued Due to Toxicity or Virologic FailureDid not discontinue treatment due to VF10 Participants
Cohort II: Treatment Experienced, 1 to 2 Years of AgeTreatment Discontinued Due to Toxicity or Virologic FailureDiscontinued Treatment due to VF0 Participants
Cohort II: Treatment Experienced, 1 to 2 Years of AgeTreatment Discontinued Due to Toxicity or Virologic FailureDid not discontinue treatment due to VF4 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026