Skip to content

Making Decisions About Depression Medications

Translation of Comparative Effectiveness of Depression Medications Into Practice

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01502891
Acronym
iADAPT
Enrollment
301
Registered
2012-01-02
Start date
2011-12-31
Completion date
2013-10-31
Last updated
2015-12-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Depression

Keywords

Comparative Effectiveness Research, Decision Support Techniques, Decision Making

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the Depression Medication Choice decision aid is effective in involving patients with depression in making deliberate choices when considering medication treatment.

Detailed description

To determine the ability of decision aids to effectively translate a depression comparative effectiveness research (CER) review into practice, the investigators have developed a literacy-sensitive depression treatment decision aid, DEPRESSION MEDICATION CHOICE, which adapts the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)'s Effective Healthcare comparative effectiveness review and associated patient guide about antidepressant medicines to satisfy the needs of clinicians, patients, and other major stakeholders. The investigators will conduct a randomized study to estimate the effect of the decision aid on patient knowledge, patient involvement in decision making and decision-making quality, and on three and six-month measures of medication adherence and mental health, when compared with usual care.

Interventions

OTHERDecision Aid

The decision aid, Depression Medication Choice, uses plain language and is designed to enhance patient understanding and satisfy the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) requirements for a safe and unbiased decision aid.

Sponsors

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
CollaboratorFED
Victor Montori
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Presumed diagnosis of depression (PHQ-9 of 10 or greater) * As judged by clinician, need to initiate drug treatment for depression * Identify primary care clinician as main depression provider * Agree to be available for follow-up survey 6 months after treatment decision

Exclusion criteria

* Has prior diagnosis of bipolar disorder * Has major communication barrier (severe hearing/vision impairment, dementia, cannot communicate with clinician in same language)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of Decision MakingImmediately following each patient's index visit and before they leave the clinic on that day, typically within 10 minutes of completing the clinical encounter.A modified Decisional Conflict Scale will be used to ascertain decisional quality and satisfaction with decision making. The OPTION scale will be used to assess patient involvement in decision-making by reviewing video recordings of primary care visits with inter-rater reliability. Satisfaction with decision making will be assessed also by using two specific questions that require patients to assess the extent to which they would want for themselves and recommend to others similar decision support like what they received during the visit.
Knowledge TransferImmediately following each patient's index visit and before they leave the clinic on that day, typically within 10 minutes of completing the clinical encounter.Questions have been crafted to assess knowledge about depression treatment contained in the decision aid. These questions use a response format true/false/unsure, and are to be answered with full access to the decision aids since they are not a test of recall, but of 'use of information.'

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reach and Fidelity of Use of Decision AidsAt end of study (approximately 2 years)Reach will be estimated by the proportion of the eligible patients who received the intervention of the entire eligible population allocated to its use. Fidelity will be determined using a checklist for each encounter to determine the proportion of visits in which more than \>80% of decision aid items were delivered.
Medication Adherence to AntidepressantsSix months post-prescriptionInvestigators will obtain pharmacy records to determine anti-depressant use, adherence, and persistence based on prescription refills.
Depression ControlAt six months post index visitInvestigators will assess patients at baseline, 3 and 6 months using the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) to measure the extent to which their depressed symptoms changed over time.
Clinician Satisfaction with Decision AidsImmediately following each patient's index visit and before they leave the clinic on that day, typically within 10 minutes of completing the clinical encounter.Investigators will survey clinicians at the end of each index visit with a standardized clinician satisfaction questionnaire.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 23, 2026