Skip to content

Nut Allergy Study: Double-blind Challenge and Oral Desensitization

Nut Allergy Study: Improving Diagnosis And Treatment Of Nut Allergy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01502878
Enrollment
102
Registered
2012-01-02
Start date
2011-05-31
Completion date
2016-03-31
Last updated
2016-09-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nut Allergy

Keywords

Nut allergy, Double-blind placebo-controlled (DBPC) oral nut challenge, Nut oral immunotherapy (OIT), Nut oral desensitization

Brief summary

Nut sensitization in skin prick tests is common in areas, including Finland, where birch pollen is abundant. However, sensitization to nuts in skin prick test does not predict the possibility of allergic symptoms when nuts are ingested. In this study the investigators launch and perform double-blind placebo-controlled nut challenges and oral desensitization/ protocol to those with serious symptoms in the challenge. The efficacy and safety of the new oral desensitization program is the primary outcome. The effect of oral desensitization on bronchial hyperreactivity, eosinophilic airway inflammation, and quality of life are secondary outcomes.

Detailed description

The investigators aim to improve nut allergy diagnosis by launching a new double-blind placebo-controlled nut (peanut, hazel nut, cashew) challenge protocol. The investigators also launch a specific oral tolerance induction (SOTI) protocol to nuts in serious nut allergy. This study takes place in the Helsinki University Skin and Allergy Hospital between May 2011 and December 2015. Inclusion criteria: age 6 to 18 years and suspected nut allergy (unclear anaphylaxis possibly caused by nuts, skin prick test to nuts ≥ 10 mm or specific-IgE ≥ 20 kU/L and have never eaten nuts, or avoids nuts and does not dare try nuts at home). Patients having uncontrolled asthma or other lung disease, having cardiovascular disease or other systemic disease, using beta-blockers, and having poor compliance, are excluded. Methods:The investigators perform skin prick tests to peanut, tree nuts and seeds, take a blood sample before the double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFC), and measure total IgE and specific-IgE to birch, peanut, hazel nut, allergen components Ara h 1, 2, 3, and 8, and Cor a 1 and 8. Then the serum samples are kept frozen for further component and immunologic analyses. The investigators put iv before the challenge. In DBPCFC the patients receive 5 mg, 50 mg, 200mg, and 1000mg nut protein mixt with placebo, or placebo every 30 minutes. The severity of the allergic reaction is estimated using a modified severity scale. The probability of severe/moderate reaction at low (\<0.7 kU/L) and at increased (\>0.7 kU/L) Ara h 2 and 8 concentrations is the primary end-point in the DBPCFC. The investigators also correlate the concentrations of Ara h 2 with the severity score. Patients with moderate or severe reaction in the challenge will be offered desensitization therapy SOTI using(pea)nut flour mixed with milk-free margarine. The first dose of 0.1 mg nut protein is given at hospital part of the up-dosing is made at home every 2 weeks. The patient takes an antihistamine 1 hour before each daily dose. An epinephrine autoinjector and prednisolone tablets are also prescribed for emergency use. The desensitization protocol takes 28 weeks and is personalized when needed. Exercise is avoided 1 hour following each dose. Before and after the SOTI the investigators measure food related quality of life using standardized questionnaires, and perform metacholine challenge and measure exhaled nitric oxid. After the SOTI the investigators take blood samples and perform DBPCFC again.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTNut challenge

Nut powder made from non-roasted nuts and roasted banana mixed with oats yoghurt or chocolate pudding

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTNut challenge: Placebo

Dried banana mixed with oat yoghurt or chocolate pudding

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTNut oral desensitization

Roasted peanut powder mixed with milk- and soy-free margarine

Sponsors

Helsinki University Central Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* sensitization in skin prick test or in serum nut-specific IgE * unknown anaphylaxis suspected caused by nuts * never eaten nuts * if challenge positive with serious symptoms, OIT

Exclusion criteria

* active asthma and low lung function, * pregnancy, cardiovascular or other disease that might worsen during the challenge and OIT

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy of nut oral desensitization7 monthsChange from baseline in the amount of nut (mg) tolerated in a double-blind placebo-controlled oral challenge at 1 month after the 6-month oral desensitization therapy.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety of nut oral desensitization therapy7 monthsNumber of participants with adverse events as a measure of safety and tolerability
Effect of the treatment on quality of life7 monthsChange from baseline in Quality of life questionnaire square before and after the oral desensitization therapy
Effect of the treatment on bronchial hyperreactivity and airway inflammation1 yearChange from baseline in bronchial hyperreactivity in metacholine challenge and in eosinophilic airway inflammation measured by multiple channel exhaled nitric oxid
Effect of the treatment on eosinophilic airway inflammation1 yearChange from baseline in exhaled nitric oxid concentration

Countries

Finland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026