Skip to content

Effect of Transmagnetic Stimulation on Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM)

The Effect of Transmagnetic Stimulation on Descending Pain Modulation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01501045
Enrollment
94
Registered
2011-12-29
Start date
2011-01-31
Completion date
2017-11-06
Last updated
2019-03-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Headache, Migraine

Keywords

TMS, CPM, headache, migraine, EEG, psychophysics

Brief summary

While some indications of the neural circuits involved in the Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) process are now available, there is still need to clarify what parts of the brain are essential for this process, whether the spino-brainstem loop is largely sufficient to explain CPM or whether other cerebral and spinal regions such as frontal, somatosensory and other cortical regions contribute substantially. Whereas mere observation of correlation between these circuits while activated by brain imaging is still of considerable interest, direct experimental manipulations by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) could even establish insights into causal relationships.

Detailed description

rTMS of different intensities, frequencies and location will be applied during CPM to evaluate the central mechanisms of pain modulation, their location and role in pain reduction through enhancement or suppression of activity in the relevant brain regions. In other words, cortical regions that may be implicated in CPM will be determined by augmenting or interrupting their activity via rTMSapplied to the areas under investigation. The regions will be the pain network sites, which are assumed to control the top-down influence on CPM and are superficial enough to be stimulated by the magnetic coil. These include primarily DLPFC (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex) and OFC (orbitofrontal cortex), with possible later addition of other relevant sites such as ACC (anterior cortex cinguli), insula and somatosensory cortices, etc. Since rTMS may be administered in a manner that either reduces or enhances the excitability of the stimulated cortical region, it should be possible to clarify the inhibitory or excitatory role of these regions in the CPM process. In summary, the planned studies should allow for identifying the cortical regions of the descending pain system, which are critical as starting points for the top-down modulation of CPM.

Interventions

DEVICETMS system MagPro x100, Tonica Elektronik A/S, Denmark

repeated TMS (rTMS)

Sponsors

German Research Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Rambam Health Care Campus
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* age 18-70 * males and females * right handed

Exclusion criteria

* metal in brain/skull * cardiac pacemaker * cohlear implants * history of head trauma * history of epilepsy or seizures * pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain scores as measured by pain numerical scale (NPS)1 weekTMS directed to pain inhibitory cortical areas will evoke pain reduction
Amplitude of pain-evoked potentials1 weekChange in pain evoked potentials will be assessed before and after the TMS

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
conditioned pain modulation (CPM)1 weekChange in the efficiency of CPM will be assessed in response to TMS

Countries

Israel

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026