Skip to content

EFFECT:Eccentric Fixation From Enhanced Clinical Training

Eccentric Fixation From Enhanced Clinical Training (EFFECT): A Randomised Clinical Trial for Patients With AMD

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01499628
Acronym
EFFECT
Enrollment
200
Registered
2011-12-26
Start date
2011-04-27
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2023-12-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Age Related Macular Degeneration (ARMD)

Brief summary

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of severe visual impairment in the UK, Europe and N America. Low vision patients with AMD have great difficulty reading, which leads to a loss of independence and reduced quality of life. Magnifiers alone do not compensate for loss of central vision in AMD. It has been proposed that special low vision training can improve reading ability in patients with AMD. Training programmes are widely available in the US and Scandinavia, but not in the UK, partly because there is a lack of evidence from Randomised Control Trials (RCT) showing that they are effective. The investigators are conducting a clinical trial comparing the conventional hospital-based low vision service to enhanced rehabilitation programmes that include Eccentric Viewing training. Eccentric viewing training involves teaching patients who have lost their central vision to use a new area of retina for visual tasks. Patients are either taught to improve the use of the part of the retina they naturally start using after their central vision is lost, their so-called preferred retinal locus (PRL), or, alternatively, they are taught to use a different retinal area that is thought to be better suited for everyday visual tasks, the so-called trained retinal locus (TRL). The investigators plan to compare the two types of eccentric viewing training to conventional hospital-based low vision care.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSupervised Reading

Participant attends once a week for three weeks for a 45 minute appointment of supervised reading using appropriate spectacles and/or glasses

BEHAVIORALEVT at the PRL

Eccentric viewing training at the Preferred Retinal Locus (PRL), using reading/target cards. Three 45 minute sessions completed over three weeks.

BEHAVIORALEVT at the TRL

Participant attends once a week for three weeks for a 45 minute appointment of TRL training using the MAIA microperimeter and then further reading using magnifiers and/or spectacles.

Sponsors

British Eye Research Foundation, operating as Fight for Sight
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of age-related macular degeneration * Visual acuity 6/12 to 3/60 inclusive in the better eye * Dense central scotoma confirmed by microperimetry

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who are not fluent in English or are cognitively impaired * Patients with serious hearing impairment * Patients who are hospital inpatients, who are living in nursing homes or are otherwise non-independent * Ocular co-morbidity (other than mild cataract) in the better eye * Recent low vision assessment or eccentric viewing training

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Score on the Massof Activity Inventory - 6 month follow upChange from Baseline in Massof Activity Inventory at 6 month follow up

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Quality of Life (MacDQoL) - Final AssessmentChange from Baseline in Quality of Life (MacDQoL) at Final Assessment
Quality of Life (MacDQoL) - 6 month follow upChange from Baseline in Quality of Life (MacDQoL) at 6 month follow up
Quality of Life (MacDQoL) - 12 month follow upChange from Baseline in Quality of Life (MacDQol) at 12 month follow up
Self-reported health status (EQ-5D) - Final AssessmentChange from Baseline in EQ-5D score at Final Assessment
Self-reported health status (EQ-5D) - 6 month follow upChange from Baseline in EQ-5D score at 6 month follow up
Self-reported health status (EQ-5D) - 12 month follow upChange from Baseline in EQ-5D score at 12 month follow up
Time Trade Off (TTO) - 6 month follow upChange from Baseline in Time Trade Off (TTO) score at 6 month follow up
WHO (Five) Well-Being Index (WBI-5) - Final AssessmentChange from Baseline in WBI-5 score at Final Assessment
WHO (Five) Well-Being Index (WBI-5) - 6 month follow upChange from Baseline in WBI-5 score at 6 month follow up
Reading Speed (ReST) - Final AssessmentChange from Baseline in Reading Speed (ReST) at Final Assessment
Interpersonal Support Evaluation List (ISEL) - Final AssessmentChange from Baseline in Interpersonal Support Evaluation List (ISEL) at Final Assessment
Interpersonal Support Evaluation List (ISEL) - 6 month follow upChange from Baseline in Interpersonal Support Evaluation List (ISEL) at 6 month follow up
Interpersonal Support Evaluation List (ISEL) - 12 month follow upChange from Baseline in Interpersonal Support Evaluation List (ISEL) at 12 month follow up
Acceptance and Self Worth Adjustment Scale (AS-WAS) - Final AssessmentChange from Baseline in Acceptance and Self Worth Adjustment Scale (AS-WAS) at Final Assessment
Acceptance and Self Worth Adjustment Scale (AS-WAS) - 6 month follow upChange from Baseline in Acceptance and Self Worth Adjustment Scale (AS-WAS) at 6 month follow up
Acceptance and Self Worth Adjustment Scale (AS-WAS) - 12 month follow upChange from Baseline in Acceptance and Self Worth Adjustment Scale (AS-WAS) at 12 month follow up
Massof Activity Inventory - Final AssessmentChange from Baseline in Massof Activity Inventory at Final Assessment
Massof Activity Inventory - 12 month follow upChange from Baseline in Massof Activity Inventory at 12 month follow up
WHO (Five) Well-Being Index (WBI-5) - 12 month follow upChange from Baseline in WBI-5 score at 12 month follow up

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026