Skip to content

Prospective Randomized Study of PTC and EUS-guided Drainage of the Bile Duct

Prospective Randomized Study of PTC and EUS-guided Drainage of the Bile Duct in Patients With Malignant or Post-operative Jaundice After Failure or Impossibility to Perform Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01499537
Enrollment
65
Registered
2011-12-26
Start date
2011-01-31
Completion date
2016-03-31
Last updated
2016-05-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Jaundice

Keywords

Stenosis of biliary ways

Brief summary

At this time, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) stay the gold standard method to achieve biliary drainage in case of malignant or benign stricture. When ERCP fail or if the major papilla is not suitable, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) is the most commonly used alternative, surgery having higher morbidity and mortality rates, unacceptable especially in palliative situation. Recent developments in interventional endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) allow new endoluminal approaches to pancreatic-biliary structures, such as cysto-enterostomy or pancreatic-enterostomy. More recently were described the possibility to realize EUS-guided biliary drainage, through the duodenal or the gastric wall. Advantages of the EUS-guided approach are to be realizable even the papilla is not suitable endoscopically (duodenal stricture or post-surgical status) and to allow if necessary extra-tumoral non anatomic drainage (hepaticogastrostomy). This technique is actually an alternative to PTBD. In comparison of the PTBD, EUS-guided route seems to have less morbidity and to avoid external biliary drainage. Indeed, the morbidity rate of the percutaneous biliary drainage and the EUS-guided biliary drainage range respectively from 25 to 35% and from 0 to 23%. However, none study compare prospectively both techniques. Aims of this study are to compare the morbidity rate, feasibility and efficacy of these techniques.

Interventions

percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD)

endoscopic ultrasonography guided biliary drainage through the duodenal or the gastric wall

Sponsors

Institut Paoli-Calmettes
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* age \>= 18 * Karnofsky \>= 50% * biliary stenosis (malignant or benign stricture)with failure of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography * signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* isolated biliary stenosis of right hepatic canal * percutaneous biliary drainage \< 10 days * laparotomy \< 10 days * contra-indication to the procedure * pregnant women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Morbidity rate30 daysMorbidity rate during 30 post-operative days

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
efficacy15 daysdecrease of bilirubine \> 50%
feasibilityup to 3 dayssucces or not of the intervention to obtain bilairy drainage
biliary drainage durationup to 1 monthtime between intervention and drain withdrawal
quality of life30 daysQLQ-C30 questionnary at inclusion and at D30

Countries

France, Monaco

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026