Skip to content

Comparison of a New Formulation of Insulin Glargine With Lantus in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on Basal Plus Mealtime Insulin

6-Month, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, Parallel-group Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of a New Formulation of Insulin Glargine and Lantus® Both Plus Mealtime Insulin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With a 6-month Safety Extension Period

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01499082
Acronym
EDITION I
Enrollment
807
Registered
2011-12-26
Start date
2011-12-31
Completion date
2013-09-30
Last updated
2022-03-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Brief summary

Primary Objective: * To compare the efficacy of insulin glargine new formulation and Lantus in terms of change in HbA1c from baseline to endpoint (scheduled month 6) in adult participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus Secondary Objectives: * To compare the efficacy of insulin glargine new formulation and Lantus in terms of occurrence of nocturnal Hypoglycemia

Detailed description

The maximum study duration was up to approximately 58 weeks per participant, consisting of: * up to 2 week screening period * 6-month comparative efficacy and safety treatment period * 6-month comparative safety extension period * 4-week safety follow-up period in a subset of participants * a 3-month administration substudy period starting after completion of the 6-month study period for participants willing to in a subset of participants randomized to HOE901-U300

Interventions

HOE901-U300 (new insulin glargine 300 units per milliliter \[U/mL\]) subcutaneous (SC) injection once daily (evening) for 12 months on top of mealtime insulin analogue. Dose titration seeking fasting plasma glucose 4.4-5.6 millimole per liter (mmol/L) (80 - 100 milligram per deciliter \[mg/dL\]). After 6 months participants were proposed to participate to the administration substudy and to receive either HOE901-U300 once daily at intervals of 24 +/- 3 hours (adaptable dosing intervals) or to continue once daily injections of HOE901-U300 every 24 hours (fixed dosing intervals) up to Month 9.

Lantus (HOE901-U100, insulin glargine 100 U/mL) SC injection once daily (evening) for 12 months on top of mealtime insulin analogue. Dose titration seeking fasting plasma glucose 4.4-5.6 mmol/L (80 - 100 mg/dL).

Sponsors

Sanofi
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

: * Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus * Substudy inclusion criteria: * Completion of the 6-month study period in main study (Visit 10) * Randomized and treated with insulin glargine new formulation during the 6-month treatment period (Baseline - month 6)

Exclusion criteria

* Age less than (\<) 18 years * HbA1c \<7.0% or greater than (\>) 10% at screening * Diabetes other than type 2 diabetes mellitus * Less than 1 year on basal plus mealtime insulin and self-monitoring of blood glucose * Any contraindication to use of insulin glargine as defined in the national product label * Participants using human regular insulin as mealtime insulin in the last 3 months before screening visit * Use of an insulin pump in the last 6 months before screening visit * Initiation of new glucose-lowering agents and/or weight loss drugs in the last 3 months before screening visit * History or presence of significant diabetic retinopathy or macular edema likely to require laser or injectable drugs or surgical treatment during the study period * Pregnant or breast-feeding women or women who intend to become pregnant during the study period * Substudy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Month 6 EndpointBaseline, Month 6

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With At Least One Severe and/or Confirmed Nocturnal Hypoglycemia From Start of Week 9 to Month 6 EndpointWeek 9 Up to Month 6Nocturnal hypoglycemia was hypoglycemia that occurred between 00:00 and 05:59 hours (clock time), regardless the participant was awake or woke up because of the event. Severe hypoglycemia was an event that required assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. Confirmed hypoglycemia was an event associated with plasma glucose less than or equal to (\<=) 3.9 millimoles per liter (mmol/L) (70 milligram per deciliter \[mg/dL\]).
Change in Average Preinjection Self-Monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG) From Baseline to Month 6 EndpointBaseline, Month 6Pre-injection SMPG was measured within 30 minutes prior to the injection of the study drug. Average was assessed by the mean of at least 3 SMPG calculated over the 7 days preceding the assessment visit.
Change in Variability of Preinjection SMPG From Baseline to Month 6 EndpointBaseline, Month 6Pre-injection SMPG was measured within 30 minutes prior to the injection of the study drug. Variability was assessed by the mean of coefficient of variation calculated as 100 multiplied by (standard deviation/mean) over at least 3 SMPG measured during the 7 days preceding the assessment visit.
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c <7% at Month 6 EndpointMonth 6
Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Month 6 EndpointBaseline, Month 6
Change in 8-Point SMPG Profiles Per Time Point From Baseline to Month 6 EndpointBaseline, Month 6Change in each time-point of 8-point SMPG profile: 03:00 hours (clock time) at night; before and 2 hours after breakfast; before and 2 hours after lunch; before and 2 hours after dinner; and at bedtime.
Change in Daily Basal Insulin Dose From Baseline to Month 6 EndpointBaseline, Month 6
Change in Treatment Satisfaction Score Using The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQs) From Baseline to Month 6 EndpointBaseline, Month 6DTSQ is a validated measure to assess how satisfied participants with diabetes are with their treatment and how they perceive hyper- and hypoglycemia. It consists of 8 questions which are answered on a Likert scale from 0 to 6. DTSQ treatment satisfaction score is the sum of question 1 and 4-8 scores and ranges between 0 and 36, where higher scores indicate more treatment satisfaction.
Percentage of Participants With Hypoglycemia (All and Nocturnal) Events From Baseline up to Month 12Up to Month 12Hypoglycemia events were Severe hypoglycemia (an event that required assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions); Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia (typical symptoms of hypoglycemia with plasma glucose level of \<=3.9 mmol/L \[70 mg/dL\]); Asymptomatic hypoglycemia (no typical symptoms of hypoglycemia but plasma glucose level \<=3.9 mmol/L); Probable symptomatic hypoglycemia (an event during which symptoms of hypoglycemia were not accompanied by a plasma glucose determination, but was presumably caused by a plasma glucose level \<=3.9 mmol/L, symptoms treated with oral carbohydrate without a test of plasma glucose); Relative hypoglycemia (an event during which the person with diabetes reported any of the typical symptoms of hypoglycemia, and interpreted the symptoms as indicative of hypoglycemia, but plasma glucose level \>3.9 mmol/L); Severe and/or confirmed a hypoglycemia (plasma glucose \<=3.9 mmol/L).
Percentage of Participants With FPG <5.6 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL) at Month 6 EndpointMonth 6

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in HbA1c From Month 6 to Month 9Month 6 Up to Month 9Substudy comparing fixed dosing regimen (every 24 hours) vs. adaptive dosing regimen (every 24 +/- 3 hours) in a subset of participants randomized to HOE901-U300 and treated for 6 months.

Countries

Canada, Czechia, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Latvia, Mexico, Netherlands, Romania, South Africa, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 1177 participants were screened, of whom 370 participants were screen failure and 807 participants were randomized.

Pre-assignment details

Following the main 6 month treatment period, eligible participants previously using HOE901-U300 were randomized (1:1) in a substudy and continued with fixed-dosing (every 24 hours) or started a adaptable-dosing (at intervals of 24 +/- 3 hours) regimen for 3 Months (Month 6 to 9).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
HOE901-U300
HOE901-U300 SC injection once daily for 12 months on top of mealtime insulin.
404
Lantus
Lantus SC injection once daily for 12 months on top of mealtime insulin.
403
Total807

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event1216
Overall StudyDiverse Reasons1814
Overall StudyHypoglycemia23
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy11
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up13
Overall StudyProtocol Violation68
Overall StudyRandomized but not Treated01
Overall StudySite Closure for Noncompliance52

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHOE901-U300LantusTotal
Age, Continuous60.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5
59.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
60.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
Basal Insulin Daily Dose0.668 units per kilogram (U/kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.263
0.667 units per kilogram (U/kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.241
0.668 units per kilogram (U/kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.252
Body Mass Index (BMI)36.6 kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.8
36.6 kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.1
36.6 kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4
Duration of Diabetes15.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2
16.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8
15.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5
Glycated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)
Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8%
260 participants259 participants519 participants
Glycated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)
Less Than (<) 8%
144 participants144 participants288 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
187 Participants193 Participants380 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
217 Participants210 Participants427 Participants
Total Insulin Daily Dose1.194 U/kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.483
1.200 U/kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.448
1.197 U/kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.466

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
131 / 404132 / 402
serious
Total, serious adverse events
53 / 40462 / 402

Outcome results

Primary

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Month 6 Endpoint

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat population: all randomized participants who received at least (\>=)1 dose, had baseline and \>=1 post-baseline assessment of any efficacy variable, irrespective of compliance. Number of participants analyzed = participants with baseline and Week 6 HbA1c assessment. Missing data imputed using last observation carried forward.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
HOE901-U300Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Month 6 Endpoint-0.83 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Error 0.06
LantusChange in HbA1c From Baseline to Month 6 Endpoint-0.83 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Error 0.061
Comparison: Analysis was performed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, strata of screening HbA1c (\<8.0 and \>=8.0%), and country as fixed effects and using the HbA1c baseline value as a covariate.95% CI: [-0.112, 0.107]
Secondary

Change in 8-Point SMPG Profiles Per Time Point From Baseline to Month 6 Endpoint

Change in each time-point of 8-point SMPG profile: 03:00 hours (clock time) at night; before and 2 hours after breakfast; before and 2 hours after lunch; before and 2 hours after dinner; and at bedtime.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6

Population: mITT Population. Here, n = participants with Baseline and Month 6 8-point SMPG assessment separately for each analysed time point. Missing data imputed using last observation carried forward.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
HOE901-U300Change in 8-Point SMPG Profiles Per Time Point From Baseline to Month 6 Endpoint03:00 at Night Plasma Glucose (n=333,323)-0.98 mmol/LStandard Error 0.248
HOE901-U300Change in 8-Point SMPG Profiles Per Time Point From Baseline to Month 6 EndpointPre-Breakfast Plasma Glucose (n=343,333)-1.19 mmol/LStandard Error 0.189
HOE901-U300Change in 8-Point SMPG Profiles Per Time Point From Baseline to Month 6 Endpoint2 Hours After Breakfast Plasma Glucose (n=335,326)-1.60 mmol/LStandard Error 0.241
HOE901-U300Change in 8-Point SMPG Profiles Per Time Point From Baseline to Month 6 EndpointPre-Lunch Plasma Glucose (n=337,331)-1.05 mmol/LStandard Error 0.213
HOE901-U300Change in 8-Point SMPG Profiles Per Time Point From Baseline to Month 6 Endpoint2 Hours After Lunch Plasma Glucose (n=336,325)-0.64 mmol/LStandard Error 0.28
HOE901-U300Change in 8-Point SMPG Profiles Per Time Point From Baseline to Month 6 EndpointPre-Dinner Plasma Glucose (n=338,333)-0.47 mmol/LStandard Error 0.261
HOE901-U300Change in 8-Point SMPG Profiles Per Time Point From Baseline to Month 6 Endpoint2 Hours After Dinner Plasma Glucose (n=331,327)-0.96 mmol/LStandard Error 0.298
HOE901-U300Change in 8-Point SMPG Profiles Per Time Point From Baseline to Month 6 EndpointBedtime Plasma Glucose (n=324, 325)-0.88 mmol/LStandard Error 0.324
LantusChange in 8-Point SMPG Profiles Per Time Point From Baseline to Month 6 EndpointBedtime Plasma Glucose (n=324, 325)-0.91 mmol/LStandard Error 0.326
LantusChange in 8-Point SMPG Profiles Per Time Point From Baseline to Month 6 Endpoint03:00 at Night Plasma Glucose (n=333,323)-1.16 mmol/LStandard Error 0.251
LantusChange in 8-Point SMPG Profiles Per Time Point From Baseline to Month 6 Endpoint2 Hours After Lunch Plasma Glucose (n=336,325)-0.63 mmol/LStandard Error 0.282
LantusChange in 8-Point SMPG Profiles Per Time Point From Baseline to Month 6 EndpointPre-Breakfast Plasma Glucose (n=343,333)-1.49 mmol/LStandard Error 0.19
LantusChange in 8-Point SMPG Profiles Per Time Point From Baseline to Month 6 Endpoint2 Hours After Dinner Plasma Glucose (n=331,327)-1.17 mmol/LStandard Error 0.298
LantusChange in 8-Point SMPG Profiles Per Time Point From Baseline to Month 6 Endpoint2 Hours After Breakfast Plasma Glucose (n=335,326)-1.90 mmol/LStandard Error 0.243
LantusChange in 8-Point SMPG Profiles Per Time Point From Baseline to Month 6 EndpointPre-Dinner Plasma Glucose (n=338,333)-0.37 mmol/LStandard Error 0.26
LantusChange in 8-Point SMPG Profiles Per Time Point From Baseline to Month 6 EndpointPre-Lunch Plasma Glucose (n=337,331)-1.23 mmol/LStandard Error 0.216
Secondary

Change in Average Preinjection Self-Monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG) From Baseline to Month 6 Endpoint

Pre-injection SMPG was measured within 30 minutes prior to the injection of the study drug. Average was assessed by the mean of at least 3 SMPG calculated over the 7 days preceding the assessment visit.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6

Population: mITT population. Missing data imputed using last observation carried forward. Number of participants analyzed = participants with baseline and Month 6 pre-injection SMPG assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
HOE901-U300Change in Average Preinjection Self-Monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG) From Baseline to Month 6 Endpoint-0.90 mmol/LStandard Error 0.182
LantusChange in Average Preinjection Self-Monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG) From Baseline to Month 6 Endpoint-0.84 mmol/LStandard Error 0.182
Comparison: Change in pre-injection SMPG was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with treatment, strata of screening HbA1c (\<8.0 and \>=8.0%), and country as fixed effects and using the pre-injection SMPG baseline value as a covariate. A test for superiority of HOE901-U300 over Lantus was to be performed one-sided at level alpha = 0.025 if previous analysis for nocturnal hypoglycemia was significant.p-value: 0.690995% CI: [-0.383, 0.254]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Daily Basal Insulin Dose From Baseline to Month 6 Endpoint

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6

Population: mITT Population. Number of participants analyzed = participants with Baseline and Month 6 basal insulin dose assessment. Missing data imputed using last observation carried forward.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
HOE901-U300Change in Daily Basal Insulin Dose From Baseline to Month 6 Endpoint0.28 U/kgStandard Error 0.017
LantusChange in Daily Basal Insulin Dose From Baseline to Month 6 Endpoint0.19 U/kgStandard Error 0.017
Secondary

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Month 6 Endpoint

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6

Population: mITT Population. Number of participants analyzed = participants with baseline and Month 6 FPG assessment. Missing data imputed using last observation carried forward.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
HOE901-U300Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Month 6 Endpoint-1.29 mmol/LStandard Error 0.191
LantusChange in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Month 6 Endpoint-1.38 mmol/LStandard Error 0.192
Secondary

Change in Treatment Satisfaction Score Using The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQs) From Baseline to Month 6 Endpoint

DTSQ is a validated measure to assess how satisfied participants with diabetes are with their treatment and how they perceive hyper- and hypoglycemia. It consists of 8 questions which are answered on a Likert scale from 0 to 6. DTSQ treatment satisfaction score is the sum of question 1 and 4-8 scores and ranges between 0 and 36, where higher scores indicate more treatment satisfaction.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6

Population: mITT Population. Number of participants analyzed = participants with Baseline and Month 6 DTSQ assessment. Missing data imputed using last observation carried forward.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
HOE901-U300Change in Treatment Satisfaction Score Using The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQs) From Baseline to Month 6 Endpoint2.32 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
LantusChange in Treatment Satisfaction Score Using The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQs) From Baseline to Month 6 Endpoint2.24 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.313
Secondary

Change in Variability of Preinjection SMPG From Baseline to Month 6 Endpoint

Pre-injection SMPG was measured within 30 minutes prior to the injection of the study drug. Variability was assessed by the mean of coefficient of variation calculated as 100 multiplied by (standard deviation/mean) over at least 3 SMPG measured during the 7 days preceding the assessment visit.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6

Population: mITT population. Missing data imputed using last observation carried forward. Number of participants analyzed = participants with baseline and Month 6 pre-injection SMPG assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
HOE901-U300Change in Variability of Preinjection SMPG From Baseline to Month 6 Endpoint-1.10 percentage of meanStandard Error 1.222
LantusChange in Variability of Preinjection SMPG From Baseline to Month 6 Endpoint-1.08 percentage of meanStandard Error 1.222
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With At Least One Severe and/or Confirmed Nocturnal Hypoglycemia From Start of Week 9 to Month 6 Endpoint

Nocturnal hypoglycemia was hypoglycemia that occurred between 00:00 and 05:59 hours (clock time), regardless the participant was awake or woke up because of the event. Severe hypoglycemia was an event that required assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. Confirmed hypoglycemia was an event associated with plasma glucose less than or equal to (\<=) 3.9 millimoles per liter (mmol/L) (70 milligram per deciliter \[mg/dL\]).

Time frame: Week 9 Up to Month 6

Population: Modified intent-to-treat population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HOE901-U300Percentage of Participants With At Least One Severe and/or Confirmed Nocturnal Hypoglycemia From Start of Week 9 to Month 6 Endpoint36.1 percentage of participants
LantusPercentage of Participants With At Least One Severe and/or Confirmed Nocturnal Hypoglycemia From Start of Week 9 to Month 6 Endpoint46.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: A one-sided test (at alpha=0.025) for superiority of HOE901-U300 over Lantus was to be performed in case the non-inferiority of HOE901-U300 vs Lantus for the primary endpoint was demonstrated. Analysis was performed using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) method with treatment as a factor and stratified on strata of screening HbA1c (\<8.0 and \>=8.0%).p-value: 0.004595% CI: [0.67, 0.93]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With FPG <5.6 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL) at Month 6 Endpoint

Time frame: Month 6

Population: mITT Population. Number of participants analyzed = participants with Month 6 FPG assessment. Missing data imputed using last observation carried forward.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HOE901-U300Percentage of Participants With FPG <5.6 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL) at Month 6 Endpoint26.5 percentage of participants
LantusPercentage of Participants With FPG <5.6 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL) at Month 6 Endpoint23.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With HbA1c <7% at Month 6 Endpoint

Time frame: Month 6

Population: mITT Population. Number of participants analyzed = participants with baseline and Month 6 HbA1c assessment. Missing data imputed using last observation carried forward.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HOE901-U300Percentage of Participants With HbA1c <7% at Month 6 Endpoint39.6 percentage of participants
LantusPercentage of Participants With HbA1c <7% at Month 6 Endpoint40.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Hypoglycemia (All and Nocturnal) Events From Baseline up to Month 12

Hypoglycemia events were Severe hypoglycemia (an event that required assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions); Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia (typical symptoms of hypoglycemia with plasma glucose level of \<=3.9 mmol/L \[70 mg/dL\]); Asymptomatic hypoglycemia (no typical symptoms of hypoglycemia but plasma glucose level \<=3.9 mmol/L); Probable symptomatic hypoglycemia (an event during which symptoms of hypoglycemia were not accompanied by a plasma glucose determination, but was presumably caused by a plasma glucose level \<=3.9 mmol/L, symptoms treated with oral carbohydrate without a test of plasma glucose); Relative hypoglycemia (an event during which the person with diabetes reported any of the typical symptoms of hypoglycemia, and interpreted the symptoms as indicative of hypoglycemia, but plasma glucose level \>3.9 mmol/L); Severe and/or confirmed a hypoglycemia (plasma glucose \<=3.9 mmol/L).

Time frame: Up to Month 12

Population: Safety population: all participants randomized and exposed to at least one dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered. In the event of participants having received treatments different from those assigned according to the randomization schedule, safety analyses were conducted according to treatment received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
HOE901-U300Percentage of Participants With Hypoglycemia (All and Nocturnal) Events From Baseline up to Month 12Any Hypoglycemia Event: All Hypoglycemia87.4 percentage of participants
HOE901-U300Percentage of Participants With Hypoglycemia (All and Nocturnal) Events From Baseline up to Month 12Severe Hypoglycemia: All Hypoglycemia6.7 percentage of participants
HOE901-U300Percentage of Participants With Hypoglycemia (All and Nocturnal) Events From Baseline up to Month 12Documented Symptomatic: All Hypoglycemia74.8 percentage of participants
HOE901-U300Percentage of Participants With Hypoglycemia (All and Nocturnal) Events From Baseline up to Month 12Asymptomatic: All Hypoglycemia70.5 percentage of participants
HOE901-U300Percentage of Participants With Hypoglycemia (All and Nocturnal) Events From Baseline up to Month 12Probable Symptomatic: All Hypoglycemia5.7 percentage of participants
HOE901-U300Percentage of Participants With Hypoglycemia (All and Nocturnal) Events From Baseline up to Month 12Relative: All Hypoglycemia15.8 percentage of participants
HOE901-U300Percentage of Participants With Hypoglycemia (All and Nocturnal) Events From Baseline up to Month 12Severe and/or Confirmed: All Hypoglycemia85.9 percentage of participants
HOE901-U300Percentage of Participants With Hypoglycemia (All and Nocturnal) Events From Baseline up to Month 12Any Hypoglycemia Event: Nocturnal Hypoglycemia55.4 percentage of participants
HOE901-U300Percentage of Participants With Hypoglycemia (All and Nocturnal) Events From Baseline up to Month 12Severe Hypoglycemia: Nocturnal2.5 percentage of participants
HOE901-U300Percentage of Participants With Hypoglycemia (All and Nocturnal) Events From Baseline up to Month 12Documented Symptomatic: Nocturnal Hypoglycemia44.6 percentage of participants
HOE901-U300Percentage of Participants With Hypoglycemia (All and Nocturnal) Events From Baseline up to Month 12Asymptomatic: Nocturnal Hypoglycemia29.2 percentage of participants
HOE901-U300Percentage of Participants With Hypoglycemia (All and Nocturnal) Events From Baseline up to Month 12Probable Symptomatic: Nocturnal Hypoglycemia2.2 percentage of participants
HOE901-U300Percentage of Participants With Hypoglycemia (All and Nocturnal) Events From Baseline up to Month 12Relative: Nocturnal Hypoglycemia5.0 percentage of participants
HOE901-U300Percentage of Participants With Hypoglycemia (All and Nocturnal) Events From Baseline up to Month 12Severe and/or Confirmed: Nocturnal Hypoglycemia54.5 percentage of participants
LantusPercentage of Participants With Hypoglycemia (All and Nocturnal) Events From Baseline up to Month 12Asymptomatic: Nocturnal Hypoglycemia31.1 percentage of participants
LantusPercentage of Participants With Hypoglycemia (All and Nocturnal) Events From Baseline up to Month 12Any Hypoglycemia Event: All Hypoglycemia92.0 percentage of participants
LantusPercentage of Participants With Hypoglycemia (All and Nocturnal) Events From Baseline up to Month 12Any Hypoglycemia Event: Nocturnal Hypoglycemia66.2 percentage of participants
LantusPercentage of Participants With Hypoglycemia (All and Nocturnal) Events From Baseline up to Month 12Severe Hypoglycemia: All Hypoglycemia7.5 percentage of participants
LantusPercentage of Participants With Hypoglycemia (All and Nocturnal) Events From Baseline up to Month 12Relative: Nocturnal Hypoglycemia10.0 percentage of participants
LantusPercentage of Participants With Hypoglycemia (All and Nocturnal) Events From Baseline up to Month 12Documented Symptomatic: All Hypoglycemia82.8 percentage of participants
LantusPercentage of Participants With Hypoglycemia (All and Nocturnal) Events From Baseline up to Month 12Severe Hypoglycemia: Nocturnal3.2 percentage of participants
LantusPercentage of Participants With Hypoglycemia (All and Nocturnal) Events From Baseline up to Month 12Asymptomatic: All Hypoglycemia73.4 percentage of participants
LantusPercentage of Participants With Hypoglycemia (All and Nocturnal) Events From Baseline up to Month 12Probable Symptomatic: Nocturnal Hypoglycemia2.7 percentage of participants
LantusPercentage of Participants With Hypoglycemia (All and Nocturnal) Events From Baseline up to Month 12Probable Symptomatic: All Hypoglycemia8.5 percentage of participants
LantusPercentage of Participants With Hypoglycemia (All and Nocturnal) Events From Baseline up to Month 12Documented Symptomatic: Nocturnal Hypoglycemia57.2 percentage of participants
LantusPercentage of Participants With Hypoglycemia (All and Nocturnal) Events From Baseline up to Month 12Relative: All Hypoglycemia21.1 percentage of participants
LantusPercentage of Participants With Hypoglycemia (All and Nocturnal) Events From Baseline up to Month 12Severe and/or Confirmed: Nocturnal Hypoglycemia64.7 percentage of participants
LantusPercentage of Participants With Hypoglycemia (All and Nocturnal) Events From Baseline up to Month 12Severe and/or Confirmed: All Hypoglycemia91.5 percentage of participants
Other Pre-specified

Change in HbA1c From Month 6 to Month 9

Substudy comparing fixed dosing regimen (every 24 hours) vs. adaptive dosing regimen (every 24 +/- 3 hours) in a subset of participants randomized to HOE901-U300 and treated for 6 months.

Time frame: Month 6 Up to Month 9

Population: mITT substudy population. Number of participants analyzed = participants with Month 6 and Month 9 HbA1c assessment. Analysis was planned to be performed for participants enrolled in the substudy and who were receiving HOE901-U300 (Adaptable dosing intervals or Fixed dosing intervals).

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
HOE901-U300Change in HbA1c From Month 6 to Month 90.21 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Error 0.111
LantusChange in HbA1c From Month 6 to Month 90.15 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Error 0.12
Comparison: Analysis was performed using Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment regimen and country as fixed effects and baseline HbA1c value as a covariate.95% CI: [-0.189, 0.298]

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 20, 2026