Skip to content

An Evaluation of a Web-based Intervention Program for Parents and Teens to Promote Safe Driving

An Evaluation of a Web-based Intervention Program for Parents and Teens to Promote Safe Driving

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01498575
Enrollment
1024
Registered
2011-12-23
Start date
2011-12-31
Completion date
2013-12-31
Last updated
2015-03-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Novice Teen Driver Training

Keywords

Teen driving, Behind the wheel practice driving, Parent supervision

Brief summary

The long-term goal of this research is to increase safe driving among novice teen drivers by increasing the quantity, quality and diversity of driving practice while accompanied by an adult. In order to achieve the long term goal of the study, the investigators have developed a web-based intervention program known as Teen Driving Plan (TDP) intended to support high quality driving practice.

Detailed description

Motor vehicle crashes remain the number one cause of death among teens in the United States. Teen drivers (ages 16 to 19) are four times more likely to be involved in fatal crashes than adult drivers (ages 25 to 69). Inexperience is a fundamental factor in the high crash rate for novice teens. Safe and skilled driving is a complex task that involves behaviors (e.g., skills and actions) that vary and become increasingly challenging with increasing speed, unsafe road conditions and other hazards of the driving environment. Because teens are at their lowest lifetime risk of crashing when accompanied by an adult, adult-supervised practice provides a safe way for teens to gain needed experience under a variety of driving conditions. Unfortunately, few teens receive sufficient quantity, quality and diversity of adult-supervised practice prior to licensure. The objective of the proposed research is to compare how the driving training process and the results of that training process differ between a group of young learning permit holders in families that have access to TDP (the intervention group) from the training process and the results of that process in an otherwise similar group of teens in families with no TDP access (the control group). The investigators hypothesize that teens given access to TDP will demonstrate greater competence and safety in a standardized on-road driving assessment than teens with no TDP access.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALTeen driving plan

Web-based intervention designed to facilitate parent supervised practice driving with novice teen driver.

Sponsors

State Farm Insurance Co.
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Bryn Mawr Rehabilitation Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
GFK Knowledge Networks
CollaboratorOTHER
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Teen 16 or 17 years of age who holds a Pennsylvania (PA) learner permit, or plans to obtain a learner permit in \< 1 month. * Parent(s) or legal guardian(s) of a teen with his or her learner permit. * Internet connection at home and other technical requirements to launch web program if needed.

Exclusion criteria

* Non-English speaking. * Teen has practiced more than 5 hours behind the wheel or has taken more than 5 practice drives with a supervising adult prior to enrollment. * Teen has received formal behind-the-wheel driver education instruction prior to enrollment with a certified driving instructor at a professional driver education company or in his/her school. * Pregnant female teen subjects. * Teen requires handicapped placard or license plate in order to drive.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Late Driving Performance in On-road Assessment (ODA) Test24 weeks after enrollmentThe primary outcome was driving performance as measured by the teens completion of the standardized and validated ODA 24 weeks after enrollment. Certified professional driving evaluators blinded to randomization status terminated the ODA if they determined that the teen could not safely complete it. Criteria for termination included: (1) a driver action or inaction requiring evaluator intervention to prevent a collision; (2) a driving task requiring assistance from the evaluator to be performed safely; (3) violation of a traffic law; (4) evasive action needed by another vehicle or a pedestrian to avoid a collision; or (5) a subjective assessment by the evaluator that the teenager could not continue safely. We examined the teens ability to complete the ODA as measured by the number of terminations.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

From December 2011 to August 2012, participants were recruited from 5 sources: (1) local high schools; (2) The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) primary care practices; (3) local licensing centers; (4) community events; and (5) targeted ads in online venues. Fliers, letters, and ads describing the study were distributed via these channels.

Pre-assignment details

A subset of the teens were assigned to complete the On Road Driving (ODA) assessment. Study participation lasted from 6-36 months based on licensure status - all dyads participated in the study for 6 months, after which participation continued until teens obtained their junior driver's license (up to a max of 36 months from enrollment).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Teen Driving Plan
Access to web-based driving intervention Teen driving plan: Web-based intervention designed to facilitate parent supervised practice driving with novice teen driver.
610
Usual Practice
Use of typical supervised practice driving resources
414
Total1,024

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
On the Road Driving Assessment (ODA)Protocol Violation2318
On the Road Driving Assessment (ODA)Withdrawal by Subject196
Overall SampleWithdrawal by Subject6014

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTeen Driving PlanUsual PracticeTotal
Age, Customized
Parents (n=295, 204)
48.4 years48.9 years48.5 years
Age, Customized
Teens (n=315, 210)
16.2 years16.3 years16.2 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
14 Participants9 Participants23 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
591 Participants402 Participants993 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
5 Participants3 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
11 Participants17 Participants28 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
68 Participants46 Participants114 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
5 Participants4 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
9 Participants4 Participants13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
516 Participants342 Participants858 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
385 Participants278 Participants663 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
225 Participants136 Participants361 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 6100 / 414
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 6100 / 414

Outcome results

Primary

Late Driving Performance in On-road Assessment (ODA) Test

The primary outcome was driving performance as measured by the teens completion of the standardized and validated ODA 24 weeks after enrollment. Certified professional driving evaluators blinded to randomization status terminated the ODA if they determined that the teen could not safely complete it. Criteria for termination included: (1) a driver action or inaction requiring evaluator intervention to prevent a collision; (2) a driving task requiring assistance from the evaluator to be performed safely; (3) violation of a traffic law; (4) evasive action needed by another vehicle or a pedestrian to avoid a collision; or (5) a subjective assessment by the evaluator that the teenager could not continue safely. We examined the teens ability to complete the ODA as measured by the number of terminations.

Time frame: 24 weeks after enrollment

Population: 512 teen-parent dyads were eligible and agreed to participate. Of these, 217 teens were scheduled to complete the ODA (128 were randomized to Teen Driving Plan (TDP), 89 to Usual Practice). Participant attrition over the time of the study resulted in 151 teens (86 TDP and 65 control) completing the 24-week ODA.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Teen Driving Plan (TDP)Late Driving Performance in On-road Assessment (ODA) Test5 Participants
Usual Practice (Control)Late Driving Performance in On-road Assessment (ODA) Test10 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026