Social Isolation, Social Support (Formal and Informal), Well-being/Quality of Life
Conditions
Keywords
Socialization, Well-being, Quality of Life, Connectivity
Brief summary
Although technology offers great potential for enhancing the health and well-being of older adults, robust studies are needed to quantify the value of technology and further the investigators understanding of barriers to technology access among older adults and of strategies that are effective in removing these barriers. This cross-site randomized field trial will evaluate a simple to use Personalized Reminder Information and Social Management System (PRISM) designed to support social connectivity, memory, skill building and resource access for older adults. The PRISM system (PRISM C condition) will be compared to an notebook information control condition (PRISM B condition). The target population is older adults who live at home alone and are at risk for isolation. The goal of the study is to gather systematic evidence about the value of technology for older adults and to identify factors that affect use and usability, acceptance and technology adoption. The investigators will also gather longitudinal data on the benefits of the system. Participants aged 65 - 85 years (100 per site) will be randomly assigned following baseline assessment to one of two conditions: PRISM C condition where participants receive the technology system or the PRISM B condition only control where participants receive a notebook that includes information similar to that provided in PRISM C (e.g., resource guide). The categories of information provided in the notebook is similar to the features provided on the system. Participants will include males and females who do not have a home computer and who have limited Internet experience. The intervention period is 12 months. A battery of measures that includes demographic information, attitudes towards technology (including computer self-efficacy and computer comfort), technology, computer and Internet experience, functional independence and well-being, emotional well-being social support/isolation, and quality of life will be administered at baseline, and 6 and 12 months post randomization. In addition, the investigators will assess cognitive abilities at baseline and twelve months. The investigators will also gather data regarding technology use and social interactions via a brief telephone interview at 18 months post randomization.
Interventions
A specialized computer system designed to support social connectivity and access to resources; knowledge and prospective memory
Telephone check-in calls and a notebook that contains information about community resources, games; topics of interests to seniors; a calendar and contact list.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* 65+ years * Live alone in the community in an independent residence * Minimum computer and Internet use in the past three months * English speaking * Able to read English at the 6th grade level * Has a telephone * 20/60 Vision with or without correction * Not employed or volunteering more than 5 hrs/week * Does not spend more than 10 hrs./week at a Senior Center or Formal organization * Planning to remain in the area in same living arrangements for duration of intervention period
Exclusion criteria
* Blind or deaf * Cognitively impaired (MMSE) \< 26 * Fuld Object Memory Test \< 20 or 19 * Terminal illness * Severe motor impairment
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Social Isolation Measured by Friendship Scale | Baseline and 6th month | Measures the level of social isolation from baseline to 6th month follow-up. Lower score means less social isolation. Range (0-24) . |
| Change in Level of Social Support Measured by Social Support Scale | Baseline and 6th month | Measures the level of social support from baseline to 6th month follow-up. Higher score means more social support. Range (6-36). |
| Change Overall Well-being Measured by SF-36 Overall Well-being Subscale | Baseline and 6th month | Use the SF-36 scale to measure the overall well-being from baseline to 6th month follow-up. Higher score indicates more peaceful, happy, and calm. Range (0-100) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Computer Interest Measured by Computer Attitude - Interest Subscale | Baseline and 6th month follow-up | Use the computer attitude scale to measure the level of computer interest from baseline to 6th month follow-up. Higher score means more interest towards computer. Range (5-25) |
| Change in Computer Comfort Measured by Computer Attitude - Comfort Subscale . | baseline and 6 months | Use the computer attitude scale to measure the level of computer comfort from baseline to 6th month follow-up. Higher score means more computer comfort. Range (5-25). |
| Change in Computer Efficacy Measured by Computer Attitude - Efficacy Subscale | Baseline and 6th month follow-up | Use the computer attitude scale to measure the level of computer efficacy from baseline to 12th month follow-up. Higher score means more efficacy towards computer. Range (5-25) |
| Changes in Technology Proficiency Measured by Technology Proficiency Scale | baseline and 6 months | Measures the level of technology proficiency from baseline to 6th month follow-up. Higher scores means more computer proficiency. Range (6-30) |
| Change in Technology Adoption Measured by Technology Acceptance Questionnaire | baseline and 6 months | Measure the level of technology adoption from baseline to 6th month follow-up. Higher score means more acceptance. Range (6-42) |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| PRISM B: Notebook Condition Telephone check-in calls and a notebook containing similar categories of information as the features on the PRISM C computer system such as a resource guide; games; classroom and information, calendar.
PRISM B: Notebook Condition: Telephone check-in calls and a notebook that contains information about community resources, games; topics of interests to seniors; a calendar and contact list. | 150 |
| PRISM C: Computer Condition A computer-based system designed to support socialization and access to resources; knowledge and prospective memory. The system is placed in the homes of those randomized to the condition for 12 months.
PRISM C: Computer Condition: A specialized computer system designed to support social connectivity and access to resources; knowledge and prospective memory | 150 |
| Total | 300 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | PRISM C: Computer Condition | PRISM B: Notebook Condition | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 150 Participants | 150 Participants | 300 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 76.97 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.3 | 75.34 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4 | 76.15 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4 |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 150 participants | 150 participants | 150 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 119 Participants | 115 Participants | 234 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 31 Participants | 35 Participants | 66 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |
Outcome results
Change in Level of Social Support Measured by Social Support Scale
Measures the level of social support from baseline to 12th month follow-up. Higher score means more social support. Range (6-36).
Time frame: Baseline and 12th month
Population: Some participants did not complete the questionnaire
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRISM B: Notebook Condition | Change in Level of Social Support Measured by Social Support Scale | Baseline | 24.90 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.9 |
| PRISM B: Notebook Condition | Change in Level of Social Support Measured by Social Support Scale | 12th month follow-up | 25.66 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7 |
| PRISM C: Computer Condition | Change in Level of Social Support Measured by Social Support Scale | Baseline | 25.33 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.9 |
| PRISM C: Computer Condition | Change in Level of Social Support Measured by Social Support Scale | 12th month follow-up | 26.55 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.2 |
Change in Level of Social Support Measured by Social Support Scale
Measures the level of social support from baseline to 6th month follow-up. Higher score means more social support. Range (6-36).
Time frame: Baseline and 6th month
Population: Some participants did not complete the questionnaire
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRISM B: Notebook Condition | Change in Level of Social Support Measured by Social Support Scale | Baseline | 24.90 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.9 |
| PRISM B: Notebook Condition | Change in Level of Social Support Measured by Social Support Scale | 6th month follow-up | 23.98 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.9 |
| PRISM C: Computer Condition | Change in Level of Social Support Measured by Social Support Scale | Baseline | 25.33 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.9 |
| PRISM C: Computer Condition | Change in Level of Social Support Measured by Social Support Scale | 6th month follow-up | 26.12 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.2 |
Change in Social Isolation Measured by Friendship Scale
Measures the level of social isolation from baseline to 6th month follow-up. Lower score means less social isolation. Range (0-24) .
Time frame: Baseline and 6th month
Population: Some participants did not complete the questionnaire. 149 participants from PRISM B and 133 from PRISM C contributed to at least one of the two time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRISM B: Notebook Condition | Change in Social Isolation Measured by Friendship Scale | Baseline | 18.75 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.1 |
| PRISM B: Notebook Condition | Change in Social Isolation Measured by Friendship Scale | 6th month follow-up | 18.94 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.3 |
| PRISM C: Computer Condition | Change in Social Isolation Measured by Friendship Scale | Baseline | 19.72 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.7 |
| PRISM C: Computer Condition | Change in Social Isolation Measured by Friendship Scale | 6th month follow-up | 20.27 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.7 |
Change in Social Isolation Measured by Friendship Scale
Measures the level of social isolation from baseline to 12th month follow-up. Lower score means less social isolation. Range (0-24) .
Time frame: Baseline and 12th month
Population: Some participants did not complete the questionnaire. 149 participants from PRISM B and 150 from PRISM C contributed to at least one of the two time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRISM B: Notebook Condition | Change in Social Isolation Measured by Friendship Scale | Baseline | 18.75 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.1 |
| PRISM B: Notebook Condition | Change in Social Isolation Measured by Friendship Scale | 12th month follow-up | 19.50 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.9 |
| PRISM C: Computer Condition | Change in Social Isolation Measured by Friendship Scale | Baseline | 19.72 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.7 |
| PRISM C: Computer Condition | Change in Social Isolation Measured by Friendship Scale | 12th month follow-up | 20.24 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.6 |
Change Overall Well-being Measured by SF-36 Overall Well-being Subscale
Use the SF-36 scale to measure the overall well-being from baseline to 6th month follow-up. Higher score indicates more peaceful, happy, and calm. Range (0-100)
Time frame: Baseline and 6th month
Population: Some participants did not complete the questionnaire. 149 participants from PRISM B and 149 from PRISM C contributed to at least one of the two time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRISM B: Notebook Condition | Change Overall Well-being Measured by SF-36 Overall Well-being Subscale | Baseline | 78.17 units in scale | Standard Deviation 16.1 |
| PRISM B: Notebook Condition | Change Overall Well-being Measured by SF-36 Overall Well-being Subscale | 6th month follow-up | 77.60 units in scale | Standard Deviation 18.2 |
| PRISM C: Computer Condition | Change Overall Well-being Measured by SF-36 Overall Well-being Subscale | Baseline | 80.38 units in scale | Standard Deviation 18.2 |
| PRISM C: Computer Condition | Change Overall Well-being Measured by SF-36 Overall Well-being Subscale | 6th month follow-up | 82.12 units in scale | Standard Deviation 16.8 |
Change Overall Well-being Measured by SF-36 Overall Well-being Subscale
Use the SF-36 to measure the overall well-being from baseline to 12th month follow-up. Higher score means more peaceful, happy and calm. Range (0-100).
Time frame: Baseline and 12th month
Population: Some participants did not complete the questionnaire. 149 participants from PRISM B and 149 from PRISM C contributed to at least one of the two time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRISM B: Notebook Condition | Change Overall Well-being Measured by SF-36 Overall Well-being Subscale | Baseline | 78.17 units in scale | Standard Deviation 16.1 |
| PRISM B: Notebook Condition | Change Overall Well-being Measured by SF-36 Overall Well-being Subscale | 12th month follow-up | 75.78 units in scale | Standard Deviation 17.8 |
| PRISM C: Computer Condition | Change Overall Well-being Measured by SF-36 Overall Well-being Subscale | Baseline | 80.38 units in scale | Standard Deviation 18.2 |
| PRISM C: Computer Condition | Change Overall Well-being Measured by SF-36 Overall Well-being Subscale | 12th month follow-up | 76.43 units in scale | Standard Deviation 19.6 |
Change in Computer Comfort Measured by Computer Attitude - Comfort Subscale .
Use the computer attitude scale to measure the level of computer comfort from baseline to 6th month follow-up. Higher score means more computer comfort. Range (5-25).
Time frame: baseline and 6 months
Population: Some participants did not complete the questionnaire. 148 participants from PRISM B and 149 from PRISM C contributed to at least one of the two time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRISM B: Notebook Condition | Change in Computer Comfort Measured by Computer Attitude - Comfort Subscale . | Baseline | 16.64 units in scale | Standard Deviation 4.2 |
| PRISM B: Notebook Condition | Change in Computer Comfort Measured by Computer Attitude - Comfort Subscale . | 6th month follow-up | 16.45 units in scale | Standard Deviation 4.1 |
| PRISM C: Computer Condition | Change in Computer Comfort Measured by Computer Attitude - Comfort Subscale . | Baseline | 16.74 units in scale | Standard Deviation 4.2 |
| PRISM C: Computer Condition | Change in Computer Comfort Measured by Computer Attitude - Comfort Subscale . | 6th month follow-up | 18.32 units in scale | Standard Deviation 4.5 |
Change in Computer Comfort Measured by Computer Attitude - Comfort Subscale .
Use the computer attitude scale to measure the level of computer comfort from baseline to 12th month follow-up. Higher score means more computer comfort. Range (5-25)
Time frame: baseline and 12 months
Population: Some participants did not complete the questionnaire. 148 participants from PRISM B and 149 from PRISM C contributed to at least one of the two time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRISM B: Notebook Condition | Change in Computer Comfort Measured by Computer Attitude - Comfort Subscale . | Baseline | 16.64 units in scale | Standard Deviation 4.2 |
| PRISM B: Notebook Condition | Change in Computer Comfort Measured by Computer Attitude - Comfort Subscale . | 12th month follow-up | 16.35 units in scale | Standard Deviation 3.8 |
| PRISM C: Computer Condition | Change in Computer Comfort Measured by Computer Attitude - Comfort Subscale . | Baseline | 16.74 units in scale | Standard Deviation 4.2 |
| PRISM C: Computer Condition | Change in Computer Comfort Measured by Computer Attitude - Comfort Subscale . | 12th month follow-up | 18.87 units in scale | Standard Deviation 4.5 |
Change in Computer Efficacy Measured by Computer Attitude - Efficacy Subscale
Use the computer attitude scale to measure the level of computer efficacy from baseline to 12th month follow-up. Higher score means more efficacy towards computer. Range (5-25)
Time frame: Baseline and 12th month follow-up
Population: Some participants did not complete the questionnaire. 148 participants from PRISM B and 149 from PRISM C contributed to at least one of the two time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRISM B: Notebook Condition | Change in Computer Efficacy Measured by Computer Attitude - Efficacy Subscale | Baseline | 20.21 units in scale | Standard Deviation 3.2 |
| PRISM B: Notebook Condition | Change in Computer Efficacy Measured by Computer Attitude - Efficacy Subscale | 12th month follow-up | 19.68 units in scale | Standard Deviation 3.3 |
| PRISM C: Computer Condition | Change in Computer Efficacy Measured by Computer Attitude - Efficacy Subscale | Baseline | 20.3 units in scale | Standard Deviation 2.9 |
| PRISM C: Computer Condition | Change in Computer Efficacy Measured by Computer Attitude - Efficacy Subscale | 12th month follow-up | 20.83 units in scale | Standard Deviation 3 |
Change in Computer Efficacy Measured by Computer Attitude - Efficacy Subscale
Use the computer attitude scale to measure the level of computer efficacy from baseline to 12th month follow-up. Higher score means more efficacy towards computer. Range (5-25)
Time frame: Baseline and 6th month follow-up
Population: Some participants did not complete the questionnaire. 148 participants from PRISM B and 149 from PRISM C contributed to at least one of the two time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRISM B: Notebook Condition | Change in Computer Efficacy Measured by Computer Attitude - Efficacy Subscale | Baseline | 20.21 units in scale | Standard Deviation 3.2 |
| PRISM B: Notebook Condition | Change in Computer Efficacy Measured by Computer Attitude - Efficacy Subscale | 6th month follow-up | 19.62 units in scale | Standard Deviation 3.4 |
| PRISM C: Computer Condition | Change in Computer Efficacy Measured by Computer Attitude - Efficacy Subscale | Baseline | 20.30 units in scale | Standard Deviation 2.9 |
| PRISM C: Computer Condition | Change in Computer Efficacy Measured by Computer Attitude - Efficacy Subscale | 6th month follow-up | 21.02 units in scale | Standard Deviation 2.7 |
Change in Computer Interest Measured by Computer Attitude - Interest Subscale
Use the computer attitude scale to measure the level of computer interest from baseline to 6th month follow-up. Higher score means more interest towards computer. Range (5-25)
Time frame: Baseline and 6th month follow-up
Population: Some participants did not complete the questionnaire. 148 participants from PRISM B and 149 from PRISM C contributed to at least one of the two time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRISM B: Notebook Condition | Change in Computer Interest Measured by Computer Attitude - Interest Subscale | Baseline | 20.60 units in scale | Standard Deviation 3.2 |
| PRISM B: Notebook Condition | Change in Computer Interest Measured by Computer Attitude - Interest Subscale | 6th month follow-up | 19.64 units in scale | Standard Deviation 3.8 |
| PRISM C: Computer Condition | Change in Computer Interest Measured by Computer Attitude - Interest Subscale | Baseline | 20.46 units in scale | Standard Deviation 3.4 |
| PRISM C: Computer Condition | Change in Computer Interest Measured by Computer Attitude - Interest Subscale | 6th month follow-up | 21.20 units in scale | Standard Deviation 2.9 |
Change in Computer Interest Measured by Computer Attitude - Interest Subscale
Use the computer attitude scale to measure the level of computer interest from baseline to 12th month follow-up. Higher score means more interest towards computer. Range (5-25)
Time frame: Baseline and 12th month follow-up
Population: Some participants did not complete the questionnaire. 148 participants from PRISM B and 149 from PRISM C contributed to at least one of the two time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRISM B: Notebook Condition | Change in Computer Interest Measured by Computer Attitude - Interest Subscale | Baseline | 20.60 units in scale | Standard Deviation 3.2 |
| PRISM B: Notebook Condition | Change in Computer Interest Measured by Computer Attitude - Interest Subscale | 12th month follow-up | 19.94 units in scale | Standard Deviation 3.4 |
| PRISM C: Computer Condition | Change in Computer Interest Measured by Computer Attitude - Interest Subscale | Baseline | 20.46 units in scale | Standard Deviation 3.4 |
| PRISM C: Computer Condition | Change in Computer Interest Measured by Computer Attitude - Interest Subscale | 12th month follow-up | 21.07 units in scale | Standard Deviation 3.2 |
Change in Technology Adoption Measured by Technology Acceptance Questionnaire
Measures the level of technology adoption from baseline to 12th month follow-up. Higher score means more acceptance. Range (6-42)
Time frame: baseline and 12 months
Population: Some participants did not answer the questionnaire. 149 participants from PRISM B and 149 from PRISM C contributed to at least one of the two time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRISM B: Notebook Condition | Change in Technology Adoption Measured by Technology Acceptance Questionnaire | Baseline | 34.76 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.4 |
| PRISM B: Notebook Condition | Change in Technology Adoption Measured by Technology Acceptance Questionnaire | 12th month follow-up | 33.22 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.6 |
| PRISM C: Computer Condition | Change in Technology Adoption Measured by Technology Acceptance Questionnaire | Baseline | 34.70 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.4 |
| PRISM C: Computer Condition | Change in Technology Adoption Measured by Technology Acceptance Questionnaire | 12th month follow-up | 32.28 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8 |
Change in Technology Adoption Measured by Technology Acceptance Questionnaire
Measure the level of technology adoption from baseline to 6th month follow-up. Higher score means more acceptance. Range (6-42)
Time frame: baseline and 6 months
Population: Some participants did not complete the questionnaire. 149 participants from PRISM B and 149 from PRISM C contributed to at least one of the two time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRISM B: Notebook Condition | Change in Technology Adoption Measured by Technology Acceptance Questionnaire | Baseline | 34.76 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.4 |
| PRISM B: Notebook Condition | Change in Technology Adoption Measured by Technology Acceptance Questionnaire | 6th month follow-up | 33.14 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.2 |
| PRISM C: Computer Condition | Change in Technology Adoption Measured by Technology Acceptance Questionnaire | Baseline | 34.70 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.4 |
| PRISM C: Computer Condition | Change in Technology Adoption Measured by Technology Acceptance Questionnaire | 6th month follow-up | 32.82 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.1 |
Changes in Technology Proficiency Measured by Technology Proficiency Scale
Measures the level of technology proficiency from baseline to 12th month follow-up. A higher score means more computer proficiency. Range (6-30)
Time frame: baseline and 12 months
Population: Some participants did not complete the questionnaire. 148 participants from PRISM B and 147 from PRISM C contributed to at least one of the two time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRISM B: Notebook Condition | Changes in Technology Proficiency Measured by Technology Proficiency Scale | Baseline | 10.31 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.7 |
| PRISM B: Notebook Condition | Changes in Technology Proficiency Measured by Technology Proficiency Scale | 12th month follow-up | 11.44 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.1 |
| PRISM C: Computer Condition | Changes in Technology Proficiency Measured by Technology Proficiency Scale | Baseline | 9.87 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.1 |
| PRISM C: Computer Condition | Changes in Technology Proficiency Measured by Technology Proficiency Scale | 12th month follow-up | 18.42 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.6 |
Changes in Technology Proficiency Measured by Technology Proficiency Scale
Measures the level of technology proficiency from baseline to 6th month follow-up. Higher scores means more computer proficiency. Range (6-30)
Time frame: baseline and 6 months
Population: Some participants did not complete the questionnaire. 148 participants from PRISM B and 147 from PRISM C contributed to at least one of the two time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRISM B: Notebook Condition | Changes in Technology Proficiency Measured by Technology Proficiency Scale | Baseline | 10.31 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.7 |
| PRISM B: Notebook Condition | Changes in Technology Proficiency Measured by Technology Proficiency Scale | 6th month follow-up | 11.56 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5 |
| PRISM C: Computer Condition | Changes in Technology Proficiency Measured by Technology Proficiency Scale | Baseline | 9.87 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.1 |
| PRISM C: Computer Condition | Changes in Technology Proficiency Measured by Technology Proficiency Scale | 6th month follow-up | 17.65 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4 |