Skip to content

A Personalized Reminder Information and Social Management System

Personalized Reminder Information and Social Management System - PRISM

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01497613
Acronym
PRISM
Enrollment
300
Registered
2011-12-22
Start date
2011-02-28
Completion date
2014-05-31
Last updated
2019-01-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Social Isolation, Social Support (Formal and Informal), Well-being/Quality of Life

Keywords

Socialization, Well-being, Quality of Life, Connectivity

Brief summary

Although technology offers great potential for enhancing the health and well-being of older adults, robust studies are needed to quantify the value of technology and further the investigators understanding of barriers to technology access among older adults and of strategies that are effective in removing these barriers. This cross-site randomized field trial will evaluate a simple to use Personalized Reminder Information and Social Management System (PRISM) designed to support social connectivity, memory, skill building and resource access for older adults. The PRISM system (PRISM C condition) will be compared to an notebook information control condition (PRISM B condition). The target population is older adults who live at home alone and are at risk for isolation. The goal of the study is to gather systematic evidence about the value of technology for older adults and to identify factors that affect use and usability, acceptance and technology adoption. The investigators will also gather longitudinal data on the benefits of the system. Participants aged 65 - 85 years (100 per site) will be randomly assigned following baseline assessment to one of two conditions: PRISM C condition where participants receive the technology system or the PRISM B condition only control where participants receive a notebook that includes information similar to that provided in PRISM C (e.g., resource guide). The categories of information provided in the notebook is similar to the features provided on the system. Participants will include males and females who do not have a home computer and who have limited Internet experience. The intervention period is 12 months. A battery of measures that includes demographic information, attitudes towards technology (including computer self-efficacy and computer comfort), technology, computer and Internet experience, functional independence and well-being, emotional well-being social support/isolation, and quality of life will be administered at baseline, and 6 and 12 months post randomization. In addition, the investigators will assess cognitive abilities at baseline and twelve months. The investigators will also gather data regarding technology use and social interactions via a brief telephone interview at 18 months post randomization.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPRISM C: Computer Condition

A specialized computer system designed to support social connectivity and access to resources; knowledge and prospective memory

BEHAVIORALPRISM B: Notebook Condition

Telephone check-in calls and a notebook that contains information about community resources, games; topics of interests to seniors; a calendar and contact list.

Sponsors

University of Miami
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 65+ years * Live alone in the community in an independent residence * Minimum computer and Internet use in the past three months * English speaking * Able to read English at the 6th grade level * Has a telephone * 20/60 Vision with or without correction * Not employed or volunteering more than 5 hrs/week * Does not spend more than 10 hrs./week at a Senior Center or Formal organization * Planning to remain in the area in same living arrangements for duration of intervention period

Exclusion criteria

* Blind or deaf * Cognitively impaired (MMSE) \< 26 * Fuld Object Memory Test \< 20 or 19 * Terminal illness * Severe motor impairment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Social Isolation Measured by Friendship ScaleBaseline and 6th monthMeasures the level of social isolation from baseline to 6th month follow-up. Lower score means less social isolation. Range (0-24) .
Change in Level of Social Support Measured by Social Support ScaleBaseline and 6th monthMeasures the level of social support from baseline to 6th month follow-up. Higher score means more social support. Range (6-36).
Change Overall Well-being Measured by SF-36 Overall Well-being SubscaleBaseline and 6th monthUse the SF-36 scale to measure the overall well-being from baseline to 6th month follow-up. Higher score indicates more peaceful, happy, and calm. Range (0-100)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Computer Interest Measured by Computer Attitude - Interest SubscaleBaseline and 6th month follow-upUse the computer attitude scale to measure the level of computer interest from baseline to 6th month follow-up. Higher score means more interest towards computer. Range (5-25)
Change in Computer Comfort Measured by Computer Attitude - Comfort Subscale .baseline and 6 monthsUse the computer attitude scale to measure the level of computer comfort from baseline to 6th month follow-up. Higher score means more computer comfort. Range (5-25).
Change in Computer Efficacy Measured by Computer Attitude - Efficacy SubscaleBaseline and 6th month follow-upUse the computer attitude scale to measure the level of computer efficacy from baseline to 12th month follow-up. Higher score means more efficacy towards computer. Range (5-25)
Changes in Technology Proficiency Measured by Technology Proficiency Scalebaseline and 6 monthsMeasures the level of technology proficiency from baseline to 6th month follow-up. Higher scores means more computer proficiency. Range (6-30)
Change in Technology Adoption Measured by Technology Acceptance Questionnairebaseline and 6 monthsMeasure the level of technology adoption from baseline to 6th month follow-up. Higher score means more acceptance. Range (6-42)

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PRISM B: Notebook Condition
Telephone check-in calls and a notebook containing similar categories of information as the features on the PRISM C computer system such as a resource guide; games; classroom and information, calendar. PRISM B: Notebook Condition: Telephone check-in calls and a notebook that contains information about community resources, games; topics of interests to seniors; a calendar and contact list.
150
PRISM C: Computer Condition
A computer-based system designed to support socialization and access to resources; knowledge and prospective memory. The system is placed in the homes of those randomized to the condition for 12 months. PRISM C: Computer Condition: A specialized computer system designed to support social connectivity and access to resources; knowledge and prospective memory
150
Total300

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPRISM C: Computer ConditionPRISM B: Notebook ConditionTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
150 Participants150 Participants300 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Continuous76.97 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.3
75.34 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4
76.15 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4
Region of Enrollment
United States
150 participants150 participants150 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
119 Participants115 Participants234 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
31 Participants35 Participants66 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Level of Social Support Measured by Social Support Scale

Measures the level of social support from baseline to 12th month follow-up. Higher score means more social support. Range (6-36).

Time frame: Baseline and 12th month

Population: Some participants did not complete the questionnaire

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PRISM B: Notebook ConditionChange in Level of Social Support Measured by Social Support ScaleBaseline24.90 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.9
PRISM B: Notebook ConditionChange in Level of Social Support Measured by Social Support Scale12th month follow-up25.66 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7
PRISM C: Computer ConditionChange in Level of Social Support Measured by Social Support ScaleBaseline25.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.9
PRISM C: Computer ConditionChange in Level of Social Support Measured by Social Support Scale12th month follow-up26.55 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.2
Primary

Change in Level of Social Support Measured by Social Support Scale

Measures the level of social support from baseline to 6th month follow-up. Higher score means more social support. Range (6-36).

Time frame: Baseline and 6th month

Population: Some participants did not complete the questionnaire

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PRISM B: Notebook ConditionChange in Level of Social Support Measured by Social Support ScaleBaseline24.90 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.9
PRISM B: Notebook ConditionChange in Level of Social Support Measured by Social Support Scale6th month follow-up23.98 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.9
PRISM C: Computer ConditionChange in Level of Social Support Measured by Social Support ScaleBaseline25.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.9
PRISM C: Computer ConditionChange in Level of Social Support Measured by Social Support Scale6th month follow-up26.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.2
Primary

Change in Social Isolation Measured by Friendship Scale

Measures the level of social isolation from baseline to 6th month follow-up. Lower score means less social isolation. Range (0-24) .

Time frame: Baseline and 6th month

Population: Some participants did not complete the questionnaire. 149 participants from PRISM B and 133 from PRISM C contributed to at least one of the two time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PRISM B: Notebook ConditionChange in Social Isolation Measured by Friendship ScaleBaseline18.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.1
PRISM B: Notebook ConditionChange in Social Isolation Measured by Friendship Scale6th month follow-up18.94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.3
PRISM C: Computer ConditionChange in Social Isolation Measured by Friendship ScaleBaseline19.72 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
PRISM C: Computer ConditionChange in Social Isolation Measured by Friendship Scale6th month follow-up20.27 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
Primary

Change in Social Isolation Measured by Friendship Scale

Measures the level of social isolation from baseline to 12th month follow-up. Lower score means less social isolation. Range (0-24) .

Time frame: Baseline and 12th month

Population: Some participants did not complete the questionnaire. 149 participants from PRISM B and 150 from PRISM C contributed to at least one of the two time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PRISM B: Notebook ConditionChange in Social Isolation Measured by Friendship ScaleBaseline18.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.1
PRISM B: Notebook ConditionChange in Social Isolation Measured by Friendship Scale12th month follow-up19.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.9
PRISM C: Computer ConditionChange in Social Isolation Measured by Friendship ScaleBaseline19.72 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
PRISM C: Computer ConditionChange in Social Isolation Measured by Friendship Scale12th month follow-up20.24 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.6
Primary

Change Overall Well-being Measured by SF-36 Overall Well-being Subscale

Use the SF-36 scale to measure the overall well-being from baseline to 6th month follow-up. Higher score indicates more peaceful, happy, and calm. Range (0-100)

Time frame: Baseline and 6th month

Population: Some participants did not complete the questionnaire. 149 participants from PRISM B and 149 from PRISM C contributed to at least one of the two time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PRISM B: Notebook ConditionChange Overall Well-being Measured by SF-36 Overall Well-being SubscaleBaseline78.17 units in scaleStandard Deviation 16.1
PRISM B: Notebook ConditionChange Overall Well-being Measured by SF-36 Overall Well-being Subscale6th month follow-up77.60 units in scaleStandard Deviation 18.2
PRISM C: Computer ConditionChange Overall Well-being Measured by SF-36 Overall Well-being SubscaleBaseline80.38 units in scaleStandard Deviation 18.2
PRISM C: Computer ConditionChange Overall Well-being Measured by SF-36 Overall Well-being Subscale6th month follow-up82.12 units in scaleStandard Deviation 16.8
Primary

Change Overall Well-being Measured by SF-36 Overall Well-being Subscale

Use the SF-36 to measure the overall well-being from baseline to 12th month follow-up. Higher score means more peaceful, happy and calm. Range (0-100).

Time frame: Baseline and 12th month

Population: Some participants did not complete the questionnaire. 149 participants from PRISM B and 149 from PRISM C contributed to at least one of the two time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PRISM B: Notebook ConditionChange Overall Well-being Measured by SF-36 Overall Well-being SubscaleBaseline78.17 units in scaleStandard Deviation 16.1
PRISM B: Notebook ConditionChange Overall Well-being Measured by SF-36 Overall Well-being Subscale12th month follow-up75.78 units in scaleStandard Deviation 17.8
PRISM C: Computer ConditionChange Overall Well-being Measured by SF-36 Overall Well-being SubscaleBaseline80.38 units in scaleStandard Deviation 18.2
PRISM C: Computer ConditionChange Overall Well-being Measured by SF-36 Overall Well-being Subscale12th month follow-up76.43 units in scaleStandard Deviation 19.6
Secondary

Change in Computer Comfort Measured by Computer Attitude - Comfort Subscale .

Use the computer attitude scale to measure the level of computer comfort from baseline to 6th month follow-up. Higher score means more computer comfort. Range (5-25).

Time frame: baseline and 6 months

Population: Some participants did not complete the questionnaire. 148 participants from PRISM B and 149 from PRISM C contributed to at least one of the two time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PRISM B: Notebook ConditionChange in Computer Comfort Measured by Computer Attitude - Comfort Subscale .Baseline16.64 units in scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
PRISM B: Notebook ConditionChange in Computer Comfort Measured by Computer Attitude - Comfort Subscale .6th month follow-up16.45 units in scaleStandard Deviation 4.1
PRISM C: Computer ConditionChange in Computer Comfort Measured by Computer Attitude - Comfort Subscale .Baseline16.74 units in scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
PRISM C: Computer ConditionChange in Computer Comfort Measured by Computer Attitude - Comfort Subscale .6th month follow-up18.32 units in scaleStandard Deviation 4.5
Secondary

Change in Computer Comfort Measured by Computer Attitude - Comfort Subscale .

Use the computer attitude scale to measure the level of computer comfort from baseline to 12th month follow-up. Higher score means more computer comfort. Range (5-25)

Time frame: baseline and 12 months

Population: Some participants did not complete the questionnaire. 148 participants from PRISM B and 149 from PRISM C contributed to at least one of the two time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PRISM B: Notebook ConditionChange in Computer Comfort Measured by Computer Attitude - Comfort Subscale .Baseline16.64 units in scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
PRISM B: Notebook ConditionChange in Computer Comfort Measured by Computer Attitude - Comfort Subscale .12th month follow-up16.35 units in scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
PRISM C: Computer ConditionChange in Computer Comfort Measured by Computer Attitude - Comfort Subscale .Baseline16.74 units in scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
PRISM C: Computer ConditionChange in Computer Comfort Measured by Computer Attitude - Comfort Subscale .12th month follow-up18.87 units in scaleStandard Deviation 4.5
Secondary

Change in Computer Efficacy Measured by Computer Attitude - Efficacy Subscale

Use the computer attitude scale to measure the level of computer efficacy from baseline to 12th month follow-up. Higher score means more efficacy towards computer. Range (5-25)

Time frame: Baseline and 12th month follow-up

Population: Some participants did not complete the questionnaire. 148 participants from PRISM B and 149 from PRISM C contributed to at least one of the two time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PRISM B: Notebook ConditionChange in Computer Efficacy Measured by Computer Attitude - Efficacy SubscaleBaseline20.21 units in scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
PRISM B: Notebook ConditionChange in Computer Efficacy Measured by Computer Attitude - Efficacy Subscale12th month follow-up19.68 units in scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
PRISM C: Computer ConditionChange in Computer Efficacy Measured by Computer Attitude - Efficacy SubscaleBaseline20.3 units in scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
PRISM C: Computer ConditionChange in Computer Efficacy Measured by Computer Attitude - Efficacy Subscale12th month follow-up20.83 units in scaleStandard Deviation 3
Secondary

Change in Computer Efficacy Measured by Computer Attitude - Efficacy Subscale

Use the computer attitude scale to measure the level of computer efficacy from baseline to 12th month follow-up. Higher score means more efficacy towards computer. Range (5-25)

Time frame: Baseline and 6th month follow-up

Population: Some participants did not complete the questionnaire. 148 participants from PRISM B and 149 from PRISM C contributed to at least one of the two time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PRISM B: Notebook ConditionChange in Computer Efficacy Measured by Computer Attitude - Efficacy SubscaleBaseline20.21 units in scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
PRISM B: Notebook ConditionChange in Computer Efficacy Measured by Computer Attitude - Efficacy Subscale6th month follow-up19.62 units in scaleStandard Deviation 3.4
PRISM C: Computer ConditionChange in Computer Efficacy Measured by Computer Attitude - Efficacy SubscaleBaseline20.30 units in scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
PRISM C: Computer ConditionChange in Computer Efficacy Measured by Computer Attitude - Efficacy Subscale6th month follow-up21.02 units in scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Secondary

Change in Computer Interest Measured by Computer Attitude - Interest Subscale

Use the computer attitude scale to measure the level of computer interest from baseline to 6th month follow-up. Higher score means more interest towards computer. Range (5-25)

Time frame: Baseline and 6th month follow-up

Population: Some participants did not complete the questionnaire. 148 participants from PRISM B and 149 from PRISM C contributed to at least one of the two time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PRISM B: Notebook ConditionChange in Computer Interest Measured by Computer Attitude - Interest SubscaleBaseline20.60 units in scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
PRISM B: Notebook ConditionChange in Computer Interest Measured by Computer Attitude - Interest Subscale6th month follow-up19.64 units in scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
PRISM C: Computer ConditionChange in Computer Interest Measured by Computer Attitude - Interest SubscaleBaseline20.46 units in scaleStandard Deviation 3.4
PRISM C: Computer ConditionChange in Computer Interest Measured by Computer Attitude - Interest Subscale6th month follow-up21.20 units in scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Secondary

Change in Computer Interest Measured by Computer Attitude - Interest Subscale

Use the computer attitude scale to measure the level of computer interest from baseline to 12th month follow-up. Higher score means more interest towards computer. Range (5-25)

Time frame: Baseline and 12th month follow-up

Population: Some participants did not complete the questionnaire. 148 participants from PRISM B and 149 from PRISM C contributed to at least one of the two time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PRISM B: Notebook ConditionChange in Computer Interest Measured by Computer Attitude - Interest SubscaleBaseline20.60 units in scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
PRISM B: Notebook ConditionChange in Computer Interest Measured by Computer Attitude - Interest Subscale12th month follow-up19.94 units in scaleStandard Deviation 3.4
PRISM C: Computer ConditionChange in Computer Interest Measured by Computer Attitude - Interest SubscaleBaseline20.46 units in scaleStandard Deviation 3.4
PRISM C: Computer ConditionChange in Computer Interest Measured by Computer Attitude - Interest Subscale12th month follow-up21.07 units in scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
Secondary

Change in Technology Adoption Measured by Technology Acceptance Questionnaire

Measures the level of technology adoption from baseline to 12th month follow-up. Higher score means more acceptance. Range (6-42)

Time frame: baseline and 12 months

Population: Some participants did not answer the questionnaire. 149 participants from PRISM B and 149 from PRISM C contributed to at least one of the two time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PRISM B: Notebook ConditionChange in Technology Adoption Measured by Technology Acceptance QuestionnaireBaseline34.76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.4
PRISM B: Notebook ConditionChange in Technology Adoption Measured by Technology Acceptance Questionnaire12th month follow-up33.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.6
PRISM C: Computer ConditionChange in Technology Adoption Measured by Technology Acceptance QuestionnaireBaseline34.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.4
PRISM C: Computer ConditionChange in Technology Adoption Measured by Technology Acceptance Questionnaire12th month follow-up32.28 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8
Secondary

Change in Technology Adoption Measured by Technology Acceptance Questionnaire

Measure the level of technology adoption from baseline to 6th month follow-up. Higher score means more acceptance. Range (6-42)

Time frame: baseline and 6 months

Population: Some participants did not complete the questionnaire. 149 participants from PRISM B and 149 from PRISM C contributed to at least one of the two time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PRISM B: Notebook ConditionChange in Technology Adoption Measured by Technology Acceptance QuestionnaireBaseline34.76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.4
PRISM B: Notebook ConditionChange in Technology Adoption Measured by Technology Acceptance Questionnaire6th month follow-up33.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.2
PRISM C: Computer ConditionChange in Technology Adoption Measured by Technology Acceptance QuestionnaireBaseline34.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.4
PRISM C: Computer ConditionChange in Technology Adoption Measured by Technology Acceptance Questionnaire6th month follow-up32.82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.1
Secondary

Changes in Technology Proficiency Measured by Technology Proficiency Scale

Measures the level of technology proficiency from baseline to 12th month follow-up. A higher score means more computer proficiency. Range (6-30)

Time frame: baseline and 12 months

Population: Some participants did not complete the questionnaire. 148 participants from PRISM B and 147 from PRISM C contributed to at least one of the two time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PRISM B: Notebook ConditionChanges in Technology Proficiency Measured by Technology Proficiency ScaleBaseline10.31 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.7
PRISM B: Notebook ConditionChanges in Technology Proficiency Measured by Technology Proficiency Scale12th month follow-up11.44 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.1
PRISM C: Computer ConditionChanges in Technology Proficiency Measured by Technology Proficiency ScaleBaseline9.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.1
PRISM C: Computer ConditionChanges in Technology Proficiency Measured by Technology Proficiency Scale12th month follow-up18.42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.6
Secondary

Changes in Technology Proficiency Measured by Technology Proficiency Scale

Measures the level of technology proficiency from baseline to 6th month follow-up. Higher scores means more computer proficiency. Range (6-30)

Time frame: baseline and 6 months

Population: Some participants did not complete the questionnaire. 148 participants from PRISM B and 147 from PRISM C contributed to at least one of the two time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PRISM B: Notebook ConditionChanges in Technology Proficiency Measured by Technology Proficiency ScaleBaseline10.31 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.7
PRISM B: Notebook ConditionChanges in Technology Proficiency Measured by Technology Proficiency Scale6th month follow-up11.56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5
PRISM C: Computer ConditionChanges in Technology Proficiency Measured by Technology Proficiency ScaleBaseline9.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.1
PRISM C: Computer ConditionChanges in Technology Proficiency Measured by Technology Proficiency Scale6th month follow-up17.65 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026