Skip to content

Safety & Efficacy of Subretinal Implants for Partial Restoration of Vision in Blind Patients

Safety & Efficacy of Subretinal Implants for Partial Restoration of Vision in Blind Patients: A Prospective Mono- & Multicenter Clinical Study Based on Randomized Intra-individual Implant Activation in Degenerative Retinal Disease Patients.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01497379
Enrollment
2
Registered
2011-12-22
Start date
2011-10-31
Completion date
2015-01-31
Last updated
2017-03-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Retinal Degeneration, Retinitis Pigmentosa

Keywords

Hereditary retinal, degeneration outer, retinal layers, photoreceptor rods cones, Retinitis pigmentosa, blindness, reading ability, retina implant, subretinal

Brief summary

Patients who are legally blind, caused by retinal degeneration of photoreceptor rods & cones (e.g. Retinitis pigmentosa), receive a subretinal implant to restore vision partially.

Interventions

PROCEDUREsurgical implantation of subretinal device

surgical implantation of subretinal device

Sponsors

Retina Implant AG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 78 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Hereditary retinal degeneration of the outer retinal layers i.e. photoreceptor rods & cones. * Pseudophakia * Angiography shows retinal vessels adequately perfused, despite pathological RP condition. * Age between 18 and 78 years. * Blindness (at least monocular) i.e. visual functions not appropriate for localization of objects, self sustained navigation and orientation (impaired light localization or worse). * Ability to read normal print in earlier life, optically corrected without magnifying glass. * Willing and able to give written informed consent in accordance to EN ISO 14155 (section 6.7) and local legislation prior to participation in the study. Able to perform the study during the full time period of one year

Exclusion criteria

* Period of appropriate visual functions \< 12 years / lifetime. * Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) shows significant retina edema &/or scar tissue within target region for implant. * Retina detected as too thin to expect required rest-functionality of inner retina as shown via Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). * Lack of inner-retinal function, as determined by Electrically Evoked Phosphenes (EEP). * Heavy clumped pigmentation at posterior pole * Any other ophthalmologic disease with relevant effect upon visual function (e.g. glaucoma, optic neuropathies, trauma, diabetic retinopathy, retinal detachment). * Amblyopia reported earlier in life on eye to be implanted * Systemic diseases that might imply considerable risks with regard to the surgical interventions and anaesthesia (e.g. cardiovascular/ pulmonary diseases, severe metabolic diseases). * Neurological and/or psychiatric diseases (e.g. M. Parkinson, epilepsy, depression). * Hyperthyroidism or hypersensitivity to iodine * Women who are pregnant or nursing, or women of childbearing potential who are not willing to use a medically acceptable means of birth control for the duration of the study, or women unwilling to perform a pregnancy test before entering the study. * Participation in another interventional clinical trial within the past 30 days.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety1 yeartreatment shows no permanent damage of function and structures that have been functional before surgery and no permanent damage to health and/or well being of patients
Efficacy1 yearActivities of Daily Living & Mobility are significantly improved with implant-ON versus OFF, as shown via tests: * Activities of Daily Living tasks or * Recognition tasks or * Mobility or * a combination of the above

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety1 yearPatient long term safety: * stability of implant function * stability of body structure & function related to implant system
Efficacy1 yearVisual Acuity / Light-perception and/or Object-recognition are significantly improved with implant-ON versus OFF as shown via: * FrACT or * BaLM or * Grating test (e.g. BaGA) and/or Quality of life * Quality of life (questionnaire) or * a combination of the above

Countries

Hong Kong

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026