Skip to content

Cosmetic and Functional Outcomes After Breast Conserving Surgery

The Effect of Tumor - Breast Volume Ratio on Cosmetic and Functional Outcomes in Breast Conserving Surgery Patients; a Prospective Cohort Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01496001
Enrollment
300
Registered
2011-12-21
Start date
2011-03-31
Completion date
2015-01-31
Last updated
2015-10-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Keywords

Early unilateral breast cancer

Brief summary

The initial aesthetic and functional conditions are recorded with the help of the Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale (BCTOS),an international validated questionnaire, and the Breast Cancer Conservative Treatment - cosmetic results (BCCT.core) validated computer software, allowing for comparison. Determination of the initial quality of life is measured with the European Organisation of Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life Questionnaire number C30-BR23 (EORTC QoL C30-BR23). Patients then undergo surgical treatment according to institutional protocols. Following conventional marking of the orientation of the specimen, it is measured by an analytical scale. Histological examination of the specimen will record the largest diameters, and parameters of the lymph nodes, according to the institutional protocol. On the 4th week following surgery, assuming that wound healing is completed, patients' data are again recorded in BCTOS, BCCT.core and EORTC QoL C30-BR23. A third set of data are gained after completion of adjuvant radiotherapy, on the 8th postoperative month. Magnetic resonance imaging is performed to assess the volume of the contralateral breast. Tumor - breast volume ratio is calculated, and matched up with cosmetic results in each quadrant, threshold value in the quadrants, above of which it is not advisable to perform conventional breast conserving surgery due to poor outcomes.

Interventions

PROCEDURELumpectomy, axillary block dissection, breast conserving surgery

Wide excision of primary tumor (using 1 cm surgical margins). Minimally invasive biopsy of the sentinel lymph node.

OTHERRadiotherapy

Adjuvant radiotherapy carried out by institutional protocols.

Sponsors

National Institute of Oncology, Hungary
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
No minimum to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* early breast cancer * unilateral tumor * tumor size is less than 3 cm

Exclusion criteria

* age over 70 * malignant invasive tumor in the past * pregnancy * previous surgical treatment of the breast or axilla * central breast tumor sizing \<3 cm * a need for mastectomy * tumor size \>3 cm measured by mammography or physical examination * surgical excisions resulting in positive margins * surgical or radiotherapeutic complication

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary outcome is the determination of the critical tumor / breast volume ratio in each quadrant, above of which number breast conserving surgery could not offer adequate cosmetic and functional results.8 monthsData of eligible patients are recorded by the study physicians on a locally developed questionnaire. Digital photos are taken of each patient producing a frontal and two side views. Images are processed by the BCCT.core software (Breast Cancer Conservation Treatment. cosmetic results). Magnetic resonance imaging is implemented and used to calculate breast volume with the help of Amira 5.1 software (Visage Imaging GmbH)trial version. Excised tumor is measured by a validated analytical scale.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessing the clinical applicability of the Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale (BCTOS).8 months for each patientInitial cosmetic and functional status is recorded by using the validated BCTOS and the BCCT.core software. Patients then undergo surgical procedure according to institutional protocols. On the 4th postoperative week, patients status is recorded by BCTOS, BCTOS.core, EORTC QoL C30-BR23. After adjuvant radiotherapy (according to institutional protocols), in the 8th postoperative month, cosmetic and functional status and quality of life are assessed again with the same methods, and MR images are taken.
Assessing the relationship between cosmetic+functional results and quality of life.8 months for each patientInitial cosmetic and functional status is recorded by using the validated BCTOS and the BCCT.core software. Initial quality of life is assessed by the validated EORTC QoL C30-BR23. Patients then undergo surgical procedure according to institutional protocols. On the 4th postoperative week, patients status is recorded by BCTOS, BCTOS.core, EORTC QoL C30-BR23. After adjuvant radiotherapy (according to institutional protocols), in the 8th postoperative month, cosmetic and functional status and quality of life are assessed again with the same methods, and MR images are taken.
Assessing the effect of surgical intervention on cosmetic+functional results and quality of life.During 8 postoperative monthsInitial cosmetic and functional status is recorded by using the validated BCTOS and the BCCT.core software. Initial quality of life is assessed by the validated EORTC QoL C30-BR23. Patients then undergo surgical procedure according to institutional protocols. On the 4th postoperative week, patients status is recorded by BCTOS, BCTOS.core, EORTC QoL C30-BR23. After adjuvant radiotherapy (according to institutional protocols), in the 8th postoperative month, cosmetic and functional status and quality of life are assessed again with the same methods, and MR images are taken.
Assessing the effect of radiotherapeutical intervention on cosmetic+functional results and quality of life.During 8 postoperative monthsInitial cosmetic and functional status is recorded by using the validated BCTOS and the BCCT.core software. Initial quality of life is assessed by the validated EORTC QoL C30-BR23. Patients then undergo surgical procedure according to institutional protocols. On the 4th postoperative week, patients status is recorded by BCTOS, BCTOS.core, EORTC QoL C30-BR23. After adjuvant radiotherapy (according to institutional protocols), in the 8th postoperative month, cosmetic and functional status and quality of life are assessed again with the same methods, and MR images are taken.
Assessing the clinical applicability of the European Organisation of Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life Questionnaire C30-BR23 (EORTC QoL C30-BR23) validated questionnaire.8 monthsInitial quality of life is assessed by the validated EORTC QoL C30-BR23. Patients then undergo surgical procedure according to institutional protocols. On the 4th postoperative week, patients status is recorded by BCTOS, BCTOS.core, EORTC QoL C30-BR23. After adjuvant radiotherapy (according to institutional protocols), in the 8th postoperative month, cosmetic and functional status and quality of life are assessed again with the same methods, and MR images are taken.
Assessing the clinical applicability of the BCCT.core software.8 monthsInitial cosmetic and functional status is recorded by using the validated BCTOS and the BCCT.core software. Patients then undergo surgical procedure according to institutional protocols. On the 4th postoperative week, patients status is recorded by BCTOS, BCTOS.core, EORTC QoL C30-BR23. After adjuvant radiotherapy (according to institutional protocols), in the 8th postoperative month, cosmetic and functional status and quality of life are assessed again with the same methods, and MR images are taken.

Countries

Hungary

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026