Skip to content

Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA): Early Load Versus Load Late

Randomized Comparison of Quality of Life and Functional Patients Undergoing Total Hip Replacement Uncemented. Load Early X Load Late

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01495546
Acronym
Latearly
Enrollment
45
Registered
2011-12-20
Start date
2011-12-31
Completion date
2012-12-31
Last updated
2012-09-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Keywords

total hip arthroplasty, THA, prosthesis type Lepine

Brief summary

In Brazil, several hip surgeries performed, especially total knee arthroplasty, which represents 1.5 million procedures (Penedo, New, 2007). The rehabilitation of these individuals is slow with respect to the march because it requires an aid and not to use the operated leg as support for three weeks, according to conventional methods. After the third week, the support becomes part and after that period (sixth week), the support becomes total. Therefore, and in order to provide better quality of life, the goal of this work is to compare the march in 40 patients divided into two groups of 20 subjects each. In the control group, the treatment approach is the traditional, i.e., without immediate loading, while the other charge will be applied immediately in the operated limb. In order to verify the possible gain in the quality of life of these patients, the SF-36 will be applied. The march will be assessed with the Time Up and Go test and the force platform and the Harris Hip score analyze the function of the hip. Individuals will receive such care at the Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hospital das Clinicas, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (IOT - HC - USP). The results of comparisons between the two groups and the clinical findings obtained will be subjected to appropriate statistical tests, guided by the principles of evidence-based clinical practice, seeking to facilitate and improve the lives of these individuals so they can move freely.

Interventions

Patients stepping down immediately after THA

OTHERLate loading

Patients stepping down after three weeks of HTA

Sponsors

University of Sao Paulo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients served by the institution with THA without cement; * BMI less than 40, ie, present in most class II obesity; * Patients with diseases such as osteoarthritis and osteonecrosis of the femoral head; * Absence of systemic involvement; * Patients with prosthetic type Lépine.

Exclusion criteria

* Bilateral arthroplasty; * Partial arthroplasty; * Arthroplasties for review; * Cemented arthroplasties; * Surgical complications.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recovery time after THAUntil 6 weeksPatients will be evaluated in the following periods: THA pre-surgery, the third day post-surgery THA, third and sixth week post-surgery THA, third and sixth months after surgery THA

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Primary ContactGisele P Mantelli
gpmantelli@yahoo.com.br55 11 3069-6442

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026