Skip to content

A Study in Indian Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Denosumab

A Six-Month Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Denosumab in Indian Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01495000
Enrollment
250
Registered
2011-12-19
Start date
2012-01-31
Completion date
2013-02-28
Last updated
2014-02-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal

Keywords

India, dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, bone mineral density, denosumab

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if denosumab is effective in increasing bone mineral density at the lumbar spine in Indian postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Interventions

DRUGdenosumab

60mg subcutaneous injection, single dose

DRUGplacebo

placebo subcutaneous injection, single dose

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
55 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Ambulatory Indian postmenopausal women with osteoporosis * greater than 5 years postmenopausal * aged 55 to 75 years old * absolute bone mineral density value consistent with a T-score less than -2.5 and greater than - 4.0 at the either the lumbar spine or total hip, as measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Subjects with a T-score less than or equal to -4.0 are at very high risk for fracture and will be excluded.

Exclusion criteria

* previous or current metabolic bone disease, Paget's or Cushing's disease, or hyperprolactinemia * current hypo- or hyperparathyroidism or hypo- or hyperthyroidism unless on stable thyroid replacement therapy and TSH level meets criteria * rheumatoid arthritis * cirrhosis of the liver or unstable liver disease or ALT or AST greater than or equal to 2.0 times the upper limit of normal, or alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin greater than or equal to 1.5 times the upper limit of normal * medications used to treat osteoporosis, defined for type and duration of use, and including IV and oral bisphosphonates * medications that affect bone metabolism including parathyroid hormone or derivatives; anabolic steroids or testosterone; glucocorticosteroids; systemic hormone replacement therapy; selective estrogen receptor modulators; tibolone, calcitonin, and calcitriol or vitamin D derivatives; other bone active drugs including anticonvulsives (but not benzodiazepines) and heparin; chronic systemic ketoconazole, androgens, ACTH, cinacalcet, aluminum, lithium, protease inhibitors, methotrexate, and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists * malignancy within 5 years except certain resected types * malabsorption syndrome or gastrointestinal disorders associated with malabsorption * abnormal calcium level * vitamin D deficiency * any laboratory abnormality that will prevent the subject from completing the study or interferes with interpretation of study results * oral or dental conditions including current or past history of osteomyelitis or osteonecrosis of the jaw; active dental or jaw condition with requires oral surgery; planned invasive dental procedure; un-healed dental or oral surgery * any disorder that compromises the ability of the subject to give written informed consent or to comply with study procedures * any physical or psychiatric disorder that will prevent the subject from completing the study or interferes with study results * known to have tested positive for HIV * less than two lumbar vertebrae evaluable for DXA measurements * height, weight, or girth that may preclude accurate DXA measurements * drug or alcohol abuse within 12 months that interferes with understanding or completing the study * known sensitivity to mammalian cell-derived drug products * use of an investigational drug or device within 30 days of enrollment or currently receiving other investigational agent(s)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density at the Lumbar Spine at Month 6Baseline and Month 6Bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine was measured by the dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner. The mean percent change from Baseline in BMD was calculated as: (value at Month 6 minus Baseline value) \* 100 / Baseline value. Analysis was performed using an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model with terms for treatment and baseline BMD at the lumbar spine (as a continuous covariate).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Median Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Carboxy-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (s-CTX) and Serum Procollagen Type IN Propeptide (s-PINP) Markers at Months 1, 3, and 6Baseline; Months 1, 3, and 6Blood samples were collected for the measurement of s-CTx and s-PINP, which are used as biomarkers of bone resorption and formation, respectively. The median percent change from Baseline in s-CTX and s-PINP markers at Months 1, 3, and 6 was calculated as: (post-Baseline value minus Baseline value) \* 100 / Baseline value.
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) and Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE)From Baseline up to Month 6An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury with hyperbilirubinaemia. Medical or scientific judgment was to have been exercised in other important medical events. Refer to the general Adverse AE/SAE module for a complete list of AEs and SAEs.
Number of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Months 1, 3, and 6Baseline; Months 1, 3, and 6Vital sign values of potential clinical concern were defined as: change in heart rate \>30 beats per minutes (bpm), change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) \>30 millimeters of mercury (mmHg), and change in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) \>20 mmHg. The number of participants with post-Baseline vital sign values of potential clinical concern who did not have values of potential clinical concern at Baseline are summarized. If the change from Baseline is a decrease greater than the threshold, it is categorized as low. If the change from Baseline is an increase greater than the threshold, it is categorized ad high.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Laboratory Parameter Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 6Month 6The number of participants with laboratory parameter values of potential clinical concern at Month 6 are summarized. The following are the laboratory values of potential clinical concern: alkaline phosphatase, High: \>375 units/Liter (L); aspartate aminotransferase, High: \>165 units/L; creatinine, High: \>159 micromoles (µmol)/L; glucose, Low: \<3 millimoles (mmol)/L; hematocrit, Low: \<0.325; hemoglobin, Low: \<91grams/L; phosphorus, High: \>1.723 mmol/L; potassium, High: \>6.3 mmol/L; sodium, Low: \<130 mmol/L; total neutrophils, Low: \<0.9 10\^9 cells (GI)/L; blood urea nitrogen (BUN), High: \>21mmol/L; uric acid, High: 654 µmol/L.
Change From Baseline in Albumin/Globulin Ratio and Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)/Creatinine Ratio at Month 6Baseline and Month 6Blood samples were collected for the measurement of albumin/globulin ratio and BUN/creatinine ratio values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Albumin, Hemoglobin, Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin Concentration (Conc.), and Total Protein at Month 6Baseline and Month 6Blood samples were collected for the measurement of albumin, hemoglobin, mean corpuscle hemoglobin concentration, and total protein values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Amino Transferase, Aspartate Amino Transferase, Creatinine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Month 6Baseline and Month 6Blood samples were collected for the measurement of alkaline phosphatase, alanine amino transferase, aspartate amino transferase, creatinine kinase, gamma glutamyl transferase, and lactate dehydrogenase values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Total Neutrophils, Platelet Count, and White Blood Cell Count Month 6Baseline and Month 6Blood samples were collected for the measurement of basophil, eosinophil, lymphocyte, monocyte, segmented neutrophil, total neutrophil, platelet count, and white blood cell count values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in BMD at the Total Hip, Femoral Neck, and Trochanter at Month 6Baseline and Month 6BMD at the total hip, femoral neck, and trochanter was measured by the DXA scanner. The mean percent change from Baseline in BMD was calculated as: (value at Month 6 minus Baseline value) \* 100 / Baseline value. Analysis was performed using an ANCOVA model with terms for treatment and corresponding Baseline BMD (as a continuous covariate).
Change From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, and Very Low-density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6Baseline and Month 6Blood samples were collected for the measurement of calcium corrected, calcium, chloride, glucose, potassium, magnesium, sodium, phosphorus inorganic, triglyceride, urea/BUN, and VLDL cholesterol calculation values. Change from Baseline was calcualted as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Hematocrit at Month 6Baseline and Month 6Blood samples were collected for the measurement of hematocrit values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minuse the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin at Month 6Baseline and Month 6Blood samples were collected for the measurement of hemoglobin values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscular Volume at Month 6Baseline and Month 6Blood samples were collected for the measurement of mean corpuscular volume values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Red Blood Cell Count at Month 6Baseline and Month 6Blood samples were collected for the measurement of red blood cell count values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Red Cell Distribution Width at Month 6Baseline and Month 6Blood samples were collected for the measurement of red cell distribution width values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.
Number of Participants With Positive and Negative Results for Anti-body Formation to Denosumab at Month 6Month 6The number of participants with positive and negative results for both neutralizing antibodies to denosumab and for binding antibodies to denosumab at Month 6 are summarized.
Change From Baseline in Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine, and Uric Acid at Month 6Baseline and Month 6Blood samples were collected for the measurement of direct bilirubin, indirect bilirubin, total bilirubin, creatinine, and uric acid values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.

Countries

India

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

The study consisted of a Screening Phase of up to 2.5 months and a 6-month Double-blind Treatment Phase. A total of 551 participants (par.) were screened; 303 par. were screen failures, and 250 par. were randomized (2 par. were considered to be screen failures; however, these par. were randomized, 1 to each treatment group).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Denosumab 60 mg
Participants received denosumab 60 milligrams (mg) administered as a single subcutaneous (SC) injection at the start of the Double-blind Treatment Phase. All participants received daily oral supplementation of elemental calcium (at least 1000 mg) and vitamin D (at least 400 international units \[IU\]).
124
Placebo
Participants received placebo administered as a single subcutaneous injection at the start of the Double-blind Treatment Phase. All participants received daily oral supplementation of elemental calcium (at least 1000 mg) and vitamin D (at least 400 IU).
126
Total250

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up22
Overall StudyProtocol Violation10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1010

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDenosumab 60 mgPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous62.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1
62.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.85
62.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.96
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - Central/South Asian Heritage
124 participants126 participants250 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
124 Participants126 Participants250 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 1243 / 126
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 1243 / 126

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density at the Lumbar Spine at Month 6

Bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine was measured by the dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner. The mean percent change from Baseline in BMD was calculated as: (value at Month 6 minus Baseline value) \* 100 / Baseline value. Analysis was performed using an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model with terms for treatment and baseline BMD at the lumbar spine (as a continuous covariate).

Time frame: Baseline and Month 6

Population: Intent-to-Treat Efficacy (ITTE) Population: all randomized participants who received one dose of study medication, and who had a Baseline measure and at least one post-Baseline efficacy measure during the Double-blind Treatment Phase. Only participants with BMD values at both Baseline and Month 6 were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 60 mgMean Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density at the Lumbar Spine at Month 64.26 percent changeStandard Error 0.413
PlaceboMean Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density at the Lumbar Spine at Month 61.20 percent changeStandard Error 0.403
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [1.91, 4.19]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Albumin/Globulin Ratio and Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)/Creatinine Ratio at Month 6

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of albumin/globulin ratio and BUN/creatinine ratio values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 6

Population: ITT Population. Only participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Albumin/Globulin Ratio and Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)/Creatinine Ratio at Month 6Albumin/globulin ratio0.025 ratioStandard Deviation 0.1446
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Albumin/Globulin Ratio and Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)/Creatinine Ratio at Month 6BUN/creatinine ratio-5.896 ratioStandard Deviation 18.0195
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Albumin/Globulin Ratio and Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)/Creatinine Ratio at Month 6Albumin/globulin ratio0.018 ratioStandard Deviation 0.1518
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Albumin/Globulin Ratio and Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)/Creatinine Ratio at Month 6BUN/creatinine ratio-1.860 ratioStandard Deviation 19.84
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Albumin, Hemoglobin, Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin Concentration (Conc.), and Total Protein at Month 6

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of albumin, hemoglobin, mean corpuscle hemoglobin concentration, and total protein values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 6

Population: ITT Population. Only participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different parameters, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects the entire ITT Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Albumin, Hemoglobin, Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin Concentration (Conc.), and Total Protein at Month 6Albumin, n=106, 1140.689 grams per liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 2.447
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Albumin, Hemoglobin, Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin Concentration (Conc.), and Total Protein at Month 6Mean corpuscle hemoglobin conc., n=106, 1072.321 grams per liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 9.8653
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Albumin, Hemoglobin, Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin Concentration (Conc.), and Total Protein at Month 6Hemoglobin, n=106, 1072.236 grams per liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 6.2891
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Albumin, Hemoglobin, Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin Concentration (Conc.), and Total Protein at Month 6Total protein, n=106, 1140.585 grams per liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 3.8219
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Albumin, Hemoglobin, Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin Concentration (Conc.), and Total Protein at Month 6Hemoglobin, n=106, 1071.925 grams per liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 8.4927
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Albumin, Hemoglobin, Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin Concentration (Conc.), and Total Protein at Month 6Albumin, n=106, 1140.746 grams per liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 2.902
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Albumin, Hemoglobin, Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin Concentration (Conc.), and Total Protein at Month 6Total protein, n=106, 1140.886 grams per liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 4.1621
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Albumin, Hemoglobin, Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin Concentration (Conc.), and Total Protein at Month 6Mean corpuscle hemoglobin conc., n=106, 1071.607 grams per liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 10.0196
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Amino Transferase, Aspartate Amino Transferase, Creatinine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Month 6

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of alkaline phosphatase, alanine amino transferase, aspartate amino transferase, creatinine kinase, gamma glutamyl transferase, and lactate dehydrogenase values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 6

Population: ITT Population. Only participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different parameters, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects the entire ITT Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Amino Transferase, Aspartate Amino Transferase, Creatinine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Month 6Alkaline phosphatase, n=106, 114-18.179 International units per liter (IU/L)Standard Deviation 25.0207
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Amino Transferase, Aspartate Amino Transferase, Creatinine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Month 6Alanine amino transferase, n=106, 1142.481 International units per liter (IU/L)Standard Deviation 10.2421
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Amino Transferase, Aspartate Amino Transferase, Creatinine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Month 6Aspartate amino transferase, 106, 1132.755 International units per liter (IU/L)Standard Deviation 10.9465
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Amino Transferase, Aspartate Amino Transferase, Creatinine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Month 6Creatinine kinase, n=106, 1146.170 International units per liter (IU/L)Standard Deviation 51.2968
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Amino Transferase, Aspartate Amino Transferase, Creatinine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Month 6Gamma glutamyl transferase, n=106, 1142.915 International units per liter (IU/L)Standard Deviation 12.8346
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Amino Transferase, Aspartate Amino Transferase, Creatinine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Month 6Lactate dehydrogenase, n=106, 1132.764 International units per liter (IU/L)Standard Deviation 25.2811
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Amino Transferase, Aspartate Amino Transferase, Creatinine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Month 6Gamma glutamyl transferase, n=106, 114-0.754 International units per liter (IU/L)Standard Deviation 13.8433
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Amino Transferase, Aspartate Amino Transferase, Creatinine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Month 6Alkaline phosphatase, n=106, 114-3.684 International units per liter (IU/L)Standard Deviation 41.442
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Amino Transferase, Aspartate Amino Transferase, Creatinine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Month 6Creatinine kinase, n=106, 11411.175 International units per liter (IU/L)Standard Deviation 63.0331
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Amino Transferase, Aspartate Amino Transferase, Creatinine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Month 6Alanine amino transferase, n=106, 1140.035 International units per liter (IU/L)Standard Deviation 15.664
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Amino Transferase, Aspartate Amino Transferase, Creatinine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Month 6Lactate dehydrogenase, n=106, 1130.434 International units per liter (IU/L)Standard Deviation 36.7389
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Amino Transferase, Aspartate Amino Transferase, Creatinine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Month 6Aspartate amino transferase, 106, 113-0.965 International units per liter (IU/L)Standard Deviation 16.9226
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Total Neutrophils, Platelet Count, and White Blood Cell Count Month 6

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of basophil, eosinophil, lymphocyte, monocyte, segmented neutrophil, total neutrophil, platelet count, and white blood cell count values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 6

Population: ITT Population. Only participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different parameters, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects the entire ITT Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Total Neutrophils, Platelet Count, and White Blood Cell Count Month 6Basophils, n=104, 1030.001 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 0.0221
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Total Neutrophils, Platelet Count, and White Blood Cell Count Month 6Eosinophils, n=104, 103-0.076 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 0.2794
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Total Neutrophils, Platelet Count, and White Blood Cell Count Month 6Lymphocytes, n=104, 103-0.065 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 0.6044
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Total Neutrophils, Platelet Count, and White Blood Cell Count Month 6Monocytes, n=104, 1030.000 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 0.1204
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Total Neutrophils, Platelet Count, and White Blood Cell Count Month 6Segmented neutrophils, n=104, 103-0.290 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 1.6142
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Total Neutrophils, Platelet Count, and White Blood Cell Count Month 6Total neutrophils, n=104, 103-0.297 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 1.6099
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Total Neutrophils, Platelet Count, and White Blood Cell Count Month 6Platelet count, n=103, 1053.117 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 38.5322
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Total Neutrophils, Platelet Count, and White Blood Cell Count Month 6White blood cell count, n=104, 103-0.436 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 1.6614
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Total Neutrophils, Platelet Count, and White Blood Cell Count Month 6White blood cell count, n=104, 103-0.160 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 1.7629
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Total Neutrophils, Platelet Count, and White Blood Cell Count Month 6Basophils, n=104, 103-0.001 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 0.0262
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Total Neutrophils, Platelet Count, and White Blood Cell Count Month 6Segmented neutrophils, n=104, 103-0.129 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 1.7405
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Total Neutrophils, Platelet Count, and White Blood Cell Count Month 6Eosinophils, n=104, 103-0.001 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 0.3414
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Total Neutrophils, Platelet Count, and White Blood Cell Count Month 6Platelet count, n=103, 1057.533 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 36.5761
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Total Neutrophils, Platelet Count, and White Blood Cell Count Month 6Lymphocytes, n=104, 103-0.056 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 0.7476
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Total Neutrophils, Platelet Count, and White Blood Cell Count Month 6Total neutrophils, n=104, 103-0.135 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 1.7343
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Segmented Neutrophils, Total Neutrophils, Platelet Count, and White Blood Cell Count Month 6Monocytes, n=104, 1030.032 10^9 cells per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 0.1727
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, and Very Low-density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of calcium corrected, calcium, chloride, glucose, potassium, magnesium, sodium, phosphorus inorganic, triglyceride, urea/BUN, and VLDL cholesterol calculation values. Change from Baseline was calcualted as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 6

Population: ITT Population. Only participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different parameters, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects the entire ITT Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, and Very Low-density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6Glucose, n=106, 113-0.571 millimoles per liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 2.2401
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, and Very Low-density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6Sodium, n=106, 114-0.472 millimoles per liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 2.2979
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, and Very Low-density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6Chloride, n=106, 114-0.802 millimoles per liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 3.0376
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, and Very Low-density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6Phosphorus inorganic, n=106, 114-0.052 millimoles per liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 0.2047
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, and Very Low-density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6Potassium, n=106, 1130.140 millimoles per liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 0.4581
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, and Very Low-density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6Triglycerides, n=106, 114-0.305 millimoles per liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 0.7413
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, and Very Low-density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6Calcium, n=106, 1130.012 millimoles per liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 0.1194
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, and Very Low-density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6Urea/BUN, n=106, 114-0.283 millimoles per liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 1.1423
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, and Very Low-density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6Magnesium, n=106, 1140.009 millimoles per liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 0.0718
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, and Very Low-density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6VLDL cholesterol calculation, n=103, 109-0.131 millimoles per liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 0.3178
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, and Very Low-density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6Calcium corrected, n=12, 240.015 millimoles per liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 0.0573
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, and Very Low-density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6VLDL cholesterol calculation, n=103, 109-0.105 millimoles per liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 0.3504
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, and Very Low-density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6Calcium corrected, n=12, 240.008 millimoles per liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 0.0755
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, and Very Low-density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6Calcium, n=106, 1130.033 millimoles per liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 0.1069
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, and Very Low-density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6Chloride, n=106, 114-0.895 millimoles per liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 3.0552
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, and Very Low-density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6Glucose, n=106, 113-0.303 millimoles per liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 2.6346
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, and Very Low-density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6Potassium, n=106, 1130.158 millimoles per liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 0.4118
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, and Very Low-density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6Magnesium, n=106, 1140.009 millimoles per liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 0.0614
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, and Very Low-density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6Sodium, n=106, 114-0.395 millimoles per liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 2.5921
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, and Very Low-density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6Phosphorus inorganic, n=106, 114-0.012 millimoles per liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 0.1674
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, and Very Low-density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6Triglycerides, n=106, 114-0.263 millimoles per liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 0.8433
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Calcium Corrected, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Triglycerides, Urea/BUN, and Very Low-density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Cholesterol Calculation at Month 6Urea/BUN, n=106, 1140.114 millimoles per liter (MMOL/L)Standard Deviation 2.2032
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine, and Uric Acid at Month 6

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of direct bilirubin, indirect bilirubin, total bilirubin, creatinine, and uric acid values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 6

Population: ITT Population. Only participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different parameters, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects the entire ITT Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine, and Uric Acid at Month 6Indirect bilirubin, n=105, 1120.210 micromoles per liter (UMOL/L)Standard Deviation 2.7305
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine, and Uric Acid at Month 6Creatinine, n=106, 1142.337 micromoles per liter (UMOL/L)Standard Deviation 11.8458
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine, and Uric Acid at Month 6Total bilirubin, n=106, 1140.358 micromoles per liter (UMOL/L)Standard Deviation 2.8659
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine, and Uric Acid at Month 6Uric acid, n=106, 114-2.642 micromoles per liter (UMOL/L)Standard Deviation 60.6677
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine, and Uric Acid at Month 6Direct bilirubin, n=105, 1120.152 micromoles per liter (UMOL/L)Standard Deviation 1.1667
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine, and Uric Acid at Month 6Uric acid, n=106, 114-6.316 micromoles per liter (UMOL/L)Standard Deviation 61.9058
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine, and Uric Acid at Month 6Direct bilirubin, n=105, 1120.089 micromoles per liter (UMOL/L)Standard Deviation 1.2122
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine, and Uric Acid at Month 6Indirect bilirubin, n=105, 112-0.054 micromoles per liter (UMOL/L)Standard Deviation 2.205
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine, and Uric Acid at Month 6Total bilirubin, n=106, 1140.000 micromoles per liter (UMOL/L)Standard Deviation 2.2102
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine, and Uric Acid at Month 6Creatinine, n=106, 1143.041 micromoles per liter (UMOL/L)Standard Deviation 13.1471
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Hematocrit at Month 6

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of hematocrit values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minuse the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 6

Population: ITT Population. Only participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Hematocrit at Month 60.004 proportion of RBCs in bloodStandard Deviation 0.0204
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hematocrit at Month 60.004 proportion of RBCs in bloodStandard Deviation 0.0264
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin at Month 6

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of hemoglobin values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 6

Population: ITT Population. Only participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin at Month 60.407 picogramsStandard Deviation 0.8613
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin at Month 60.260 picogramsStandard Deviation 1.2787
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscular Volume at Month 6

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of mean corpuscular volume values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 6

Population: ITT Population. Only participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Mean Corpuscular Volume at Month 60.623 femtolitersStandard Deviation 2.9775
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Mean Corpuscular Volume at Month 60.327 femtolitersStandard Deviation 3.5309
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Red Blood Cell Count at Month 6

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of red blood cell count values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 6

Population: ITT Population. Only participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Red Blood Cell Count at Month 60.016 10^12 cells per liter (TI/L)Standard Deviation 0.2575
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Red Blood Cell Count at Month 60.034 10^12 cells per liter (TI/L)Standard Deviation 0.3034
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Red Cell Distribution Width at Month 6

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of red cell distribution width values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 6

Population: ITT Population. Only participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Red Cell Distribution Width at Month 60.065 percentageStandard Deviation 1.2126
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Red Cell Distribution Width at Month 6-0.121 percentageStandard Deviation 1.2735
Secondary

Mean Percent Change From Baseline in BMD at the Total Hip, Femoral Neck, and Trochanter at Month 6

BMD at the total hip, femoral neck, and trochanter was measured by the DXA scanner. The mean percent change from Baseline in BMD was calculated as: (value at Month 6 minus Baseline value) \* 100 / Baseline value. Analysis was performed using an ANCOVA model with terms for treatment and corresponding Baseline BMD (as a continuous covariate).

Time frame: Baseline and Month 6

Population: ITTE Population. Only participants with BMD values at both Baseline and Month 6 were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 60 mgMean Percent Change From Baseline in BMD at the Total Hip, Femoral Neck, and Trochanter at Month 6Total Hip2.02 percent changeStandard Error 0.27
Denosumab 60 mgMean Percent Change From Baseline in BMD at the Total Hip, Femoral Neck, and Trochanter at Month 6Femoral Neck2.69 percent changeStandard Error 0.407
Denosumab 60 mgMean Percent Change From Baseline in BMD at the Total Hip, Femoral Neck, and Trochanter at Month 6Trochanter2.49 percent changeStandard Error 0.366
PlaceboMean Percent Change From Baseline in BMD at the Total Hip, Femoral Neck, and Trochanter at Month 6Total Hip0.32 percent changeStandard Error 0.271
PlaceboMean Percent Change From Baseline in BMD at the Total Hip, Femoral Neck, and Trochanter at Month 6Femoral Neck0.40 percent changeStandard Error 0.409
PlaceboMean Percent Change From Baseline in BMD at the Total Hip, Femoral Neck, and Trochanter at Month 6Trochanter0.69 percent changeStandard Error 0.368
Secondary

Median Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Carboxy-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (s-CTX) and Serum Procollagen Type IN Propeptide (s-PINP) Markers at Months 1, 3, and 6

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of s-CTx and s-PINP, which are used as biomarkers of bone resorption and formation, respectively. The median percent change from Baseline in s-CTX and s-PINP markers at Months 1, 3, and 6 was calculated as: (post-Baseline value minus Baseline value) \* 100 / Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline; Months 1, 3, and 6

Population: ITTE Population. Only participants with s-CTX and s-PINP values at both Baseline and Months 1, 3, and 6 were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed at different time points/for different parameters, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects the entire ITTE Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Denosumab 60 mgMedian Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Carboxy-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (s-CTX) and Serum Procollagen Type IN Propeptide (s-PINP) Markers at Months 1, 3, and 6s-CTx, Month 1, n=112, 121-80.61 percent change
Denosumab 60 mgMedian Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Carboxy-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (s-CTX) and Serum Procollagen Type IN Propeptide (s-PINP) Markers at Months 1, 3, and 6s-CTx, Month 3, n=107, 113-82.43 percent change
Denosumab 60 mgMedian Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Carboxy-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (s-CTX) and Serum Procollagen Type IN Propeptide (s-PINP) Markers at Months 1, 3, and 6s-CTx, Month 6, n=105, 113-62.5 percent change
Denosumab 60 mgMedian Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Carboxy-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (s-CTX) and Serum Procollagen Type IN Propeptide (s-PINP) Markers at Months 1, 3, and 6s-PINP, Month 1, n=110, 120-34.55 percent change
Denosumab 60 mgMedian Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Carboxy-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (s-CTX) and Serum Procollagen Type IN Propeptide (s-PINP) Markers at Months 1, 3, and 6s-PINP, Month 3, n=107, 111-78.08 percent change
Denosumab 60 mgMedian Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Carboxy-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (s-CTX) and Serum Procollagen Type IN Propeptide (s-PINP) Markers at Months 1, 3, and 6s-PINP, Month 6, n=104, 113-63.41 percent change
PlaceboMedian Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Carboxy-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (s-CTX) and Serum Procollagen Type IN Propeptide (s-PINP) Markers at Months 1, 3, and 6s-PINP, Month 3, n=107, 111-27.87 percent change
PlaceboMedian Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Carboxy-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (s-CTX) and Serum Procollagen Type IN Propeptide (s-PINP) Markers at Months 1, 3, and 6s-CTx, Month 1, n=112, 121-17.01 percent change
PlaceboMedian Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Carboxy-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (s-CTX) and Serum Procollagen Type IN Propeptide (s-PINP) Markers at Months 1, 3, and 6s-PINP, Month 1, n=110, 120-13.62 percent change
PlaceboMedian Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Carboxy-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (s-CTX) and Serum Procollagen Type IN Propeptide (s-PINP) Markers at Months 1, 3, and 6s-CTx, Month 3, n=107, 113-18.97 percent change
PlaceboMedian Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Carboxy-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (s-CTX) and Serum Procollagen Type IN Propeptide (s-PINP) Markers at Months 1, 3, and 6s-PINP, Month 6, n=104, 113-25.81 percent change
PlaceboMedian Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Carboxy-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (s-CTX) and Serum Procollagen Type IN Propeptide (s-PINP) Markers at Months 1, 3, and 6s-CTx, Month 6, n=105, 113-28.82 percent change
Secondary

Number of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Months 1, 3, and 6

Vital sign values of potential clinical concern were defined as: change in heart rate \>30 beats per minutes (bpm), change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) \>30 millimeters of mercury (mmHg), and change in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) \>20 mmHg. The number of participants with post-Baseline vital sign values of potential clinical concern who did not have values of potential clinical concern at Baseline are summarized. If the change from Baseline is a decrease greater than the threshold, it is categorized as low. If the change from Baseline is an increase greater than the threshold, it is categorized ad high.

Time frame: Baseline; Months 1, 3, and 6

Population: ITT Population. Only participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed at different time points/for different parameters, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects the entire ITT Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Months 1, 3, and 6DBP, Month 1: High, n=122, 1251 participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Months 1, 3, and 6DBP, Month 1: Low, n=122, 1251 participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Months 1, 3, and 6DBP, Month 3: High, n=117, 1202 participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Months 1, 3, and 6DBP, Month 3: Low, n=117, 1200 participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Months 1, 3, and 6DBP, Month 6: Low, n=111, 1140 participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Months 1, 3, and 6SBP, Month 1: Low, n=122, 1251 participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Months 1, 3, and 6SBP, Month 3: High, n=117, 1201 participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Months 1, 3, and 6SBP, Month 3: Low, n=117, 1201 participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Months 1, 3, and 6SBP, Month 6: Low, n=111, 1142 participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Months 1, 3, and 6Heart Rate, Month 3: Low, n=117, 1200 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Months 1, 3, and 6SBP, Month 3: Low, n=117, 1203 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Months 1, 3, and 6DBP, Month 1: High, n=122, 1252 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Months 1, 3, and 6SBP, Month 1: Low, n=122, 1252 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Months 1, 3, and 6DBP, Month 1: Low, n=122, 1254 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Months 1, 3, and 6Heart Rate, Month 3: Low, n=117, 1201 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Months 1, 3, and 6DBP, Month 3: High, n=117, 1200 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Months 1, 3, and 6SBP, Month 3: High, n=117, 1201 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Months 1, 3, and 6DBP, Month 3: Low, n=117, 1202 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Months 1, 3, and 6SBP, Month 6: Low, n=111, 1143 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Months 1, 3, and 6DBP, Month 6: Low, n=111, 1143 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) and Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE)

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury with hyperbilirubinaemia. Medical or scientific judgment was to have been exercised in other important medical events. Refer to the general Adverse AE/SAE module for a complete list of AEs and SAEs.

Time frame: From Baseline up to Month 6

Population: ITT Population: all participants who received one dose of study medication

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) and Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE)Any AE38 participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) and Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE)Any SAE1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) and Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE)Any AE47 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) and Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE)Any SAE3 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Positive and Negative Results for Anti-body Formation to Denosumab at Month 6

The number of participants with positive and negative results for both neutralizing antibodies to denosumab and for binding antibodies to denosumab at Month 6 are summarized.

Time frame: Month 6

Population: ITT Population. Only participants available at the specified time point were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With Positive and Negative Results for Anti-body Formation to Denosumab at Month 6Neutralizing antibodies, n=0, 0NA participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With Positive and Negative Results for Anti-body Formation to Denosumab at Month 6Binding antibodies, Positive, n=110, 1140 participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With Positive and Negative Results for Anti-body Formation to Denosumab at Month 6Binding antibodies, Negative, n=110, 114110 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Positive and Negative Results for Anti-body Formation to Denosumab at Month 6Neutralizing antibodies, n=0, 0NA participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Positive and Negative Results for Anti-body Formation to Denosumab at Month 6Binding antibodies, Positive, n=110, 1140 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Positive and Negative Results for Anti-body Formation to Denosumab at Month 6Binding antibodies, Negative, n=110, 114114 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With the Indicated Laboratory Parameter Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 6

The number of participants with laboratory parameter values of potential clinical concern at Month 6 are summarized. The following are the laboratory values of potential clinical concern: alkaline phosphatase, High: \>375 units/Liter (L); aspartate aminotransferase, High: \>165 units/L; creatinine, High: \>159 micromoles (µmol)/L; glucose, Low: \<3 millimoles (mmol)/L; hematocrit, Low: \<0.325; hemoglobin, Low: \<91grams/L; phosphorus, High: \>1.723 mmol/L; potassium, High: \>6.3 mmol/L; sodium, Low: \<130 mmol/L; total neutrophils, Low: \<0.9 10\^9 cells (GI)/L; blood urea nitrogen (BUN), High: \>21mmol/L; uric acid, High: 654 µmol/L.

Time frame: Month 6

Population: ITT Population. Only participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed at different time points/for different parameters, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects the entire ITT Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Laboratory Parameter Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 6Alkaline phosphatase: High, n=107, 1140 participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Laboratory Parameter Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 6Aspartate aminotransferase: High, n=107, 1131 participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Laboratory Parameter Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 6Creatinine: High, n=107, 1141 participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Laboratory Parameter Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 6Glucose: Low, n=107, 1141 participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Laboratory Parameter Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 6Hematocrit: Low, n=106, 1111 participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Laboratory Parameter Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 6Hemoglobin: Low, n=106, 1112 participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Laboratory Parameter Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 6Inorganic Phosphorus: High, n=107, 1140 participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Laboratory Parameter Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 6Potassium: High, n=107, 1131 participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Laboratory Parameter Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 6Sodium: Low, n=107, 1140 participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Laboratory Parameter Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 6Total Neutrophils: Low, n=104, 1070 participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Laboratory Parameter Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 6Urea/BUN: High, n=107, 1140 participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Laboratory Parameter Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 6Uric Acid: High, n=107, 1140 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Laboratory Parameter Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 6Urea/BUN: High, n=107, 1141 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Laboratory Parameter Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 6Alkaline phosphatase: High, n=107, 1141 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Laboratory Parameter Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 6Inorganic Phosphorus: High, n=107, 1141 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Laboratory Parameter Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 6Aspartate aminotransferase: High, n=107, 1130 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Laboratory Parameter Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 6Total Neutrophils: Low, n=104, 1072 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Laboratory Parameter Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 6Creatinine: High, n=107, 1141 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Laboratory Parameter Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 6Potassium: High, n=107, 1130 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Laboratory Parameter Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 6Glucose: Low, n=107, 1140 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Laboratory Parameter Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 6Uric Acid: High, n=107, 1141 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Laboratory Parameter Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 6Hematocrit: Low, n=106, 1111 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Laboratory Parameter Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 6Sodium: Low, n=107, 1141 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Laboratory Parameter Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Month 6Hemoglobin: Low, n=106, 1113 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026