Skip to content

Comfort Evaluation of Non-Invasive Respiratory Monitor Interfaces

Comfort Evaluation of Non-Invasive Respiratory Monitor Interfaces

Status
Completed
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01494844
Enrollment
30
Registered
2011-12-19
Start date
2011-06-30
Completion date
2011-09-30
Last updated
2013-08-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Respiratory Device Comfort

Keywords

Patient Monitoring, Capnography, Human Engineering

Brief summary

This research study will test the comfort of two noninvasive respiratory monitoring sensors (the connection to a monitor worn by a person-not the monitor). The two sensors, Masimo Rainbow Acoustic Monitoring sensor and Oridion Smart Capnoline Plus H sensor, are cleared by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and currently used in the clinical setting. People who enter into the study will wear the two interfaces, one after the other, for 20 minutes each (10 minutes with a small flow of air to the nostrils and 10 minutes without) and rate the comfort of each with a seven question survey. A total of 30 participants will be recruited.

Interventions

DEVICERespiratory monitor patient interface.

Wear each interface for 20 minutes

Sponsors

Oridion
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 49 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Normal body temperature * Between the ages of 19-65 years * Self-report as feeling to be in typical health * No skin irritation face or neck where a sensor would be placed. * School of Health Professions student

Exclusion criteria

* Any injury or condition that would affect assessment of comfort.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comfort Rating Self-Report Instrument5 MinutesA seven-question written instrument constructed in the style of descriptive analogue to evaluate multiple facets of device comfort. Answer choices allow either ordinal ranking (one requires a ranking on a continuous time scale).

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026