Degeneration of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc
Conditions
Keywords
Degenerative Disc Disease, Symptomatic Degenerative Disc Disease
Brief summary
This study is designed to evaluate the feasibility of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 and absorbable collagen sponge with the tapered interbody fusion device (LT-CAGE® ) for anterior lumbar interbody fusion in patients with degenerative disc disease.
Interventions
rhBMP-2/ACS inserted into Sofamor Danek's LT-CAGE® device.
DEVICEAutograft/LT-CAGE® Device
LT-CAGE® device filled with autogenous bone taken from the patient's iliac crest
Sponsors
Medtronic Spinal and Biologics
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Has degenerative disc disease as noted by back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by radiographic studies. 2. Has no greater than Grade 1 spondylolisthesis utilizing Meyerding's Classification (Meyerding HW, 1932.) 3. Has single level symptomatic degenerative involvement from L2 to S1. 4. Is between the ages of 18 and 65, inclusive, at the time of surgery. 5. Is willing to comply with the study plan and sign the Patient Informed Consent Form. 6. Has not responded to conservative treatment for a period of 5 months. 7. If of child-bearing potential, subject is non-pregnant (documented by a negative Pregnancy test within 72 hours of surgery), non-nursing female who agrees to use adequate contraception for 16 weeks following surgery
Exclusion criteria
1. Has spinal condition other than symptomatic degenerative disc disease at the involved surgical level. 2. Had previous anterior surgical procedures at the involved spinal level. 3. Has a condition which requires postoperative medications that interfere with fusion such as steroids or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. (This does not include low dose aspirin for prophylactic anticoagulation.) 4. Has osteopenia, osteoporosis, or osteomalacia to a degree that spinal instrumentation would be contraindicated. 5. Has circulatory problems, such as thrombophlebitis, lymphedema, or vascular deficiency at the implant site. 6. Has symptomatic cardiac disease. 7. Has presence of active malignancy or history of cancer in the past 5 years. 8. Has overt or active infection. 9. Is obese, i.e., weight greater than 40% over ideal for their age and height. 10. Has fever (temperature \> 101°F oral). 11. Has local inflammatory signs indicative of infection. 12. Has a documented metal allergy or intolerance. 13. Is involved in a worker's compensation or unresolved spinal litigation case. 14. Is mentally incompetent (either documented or in the opinion of the investigator). 15. Has psychogenic magnification of pain (in the opinion of the investigator). 16. Is a prisoner. 17. Is pregnant. 18. Is an alcohol and/or substance abuser. 19. Requires bone growth stimulation in the lumbar spine. 20. Is a tobacco user at the time of surgery. 21. Patient has received drugs which may interfere with bone metabolism within two weeks prior to the planned date of spinal fusion surgery (e.g., steroids or methotrexate). 22. Patient has a history of autoimmune disease (systemic lupus erythematosus or dermatomyositis). 23. The subject has a history of exposure to injectable collagen implants. 24. Patient's history includes hypersensitivity to protein pharmaceuticals (monoclonal antibodies or gamma globulins) or collagen. 25. Patient has received treatment with an investigational therapy within 28 days prior to implantation surgery or such treatment is planned during the 16 weeks following rhBMP-2/ACS implantation. 26. Patient has received any previous exposure to BMP. 27. The patient requires allograft or bone substitute as part of treatment. 28. Patient has history of endocrine or metabolic disorder known to affect osteogenesis (e.g. Paget's disease, renal osteodystrophy, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, or osteogenesis imperfecta). 29. Patient in the physician's opinion, would not be a good candidate for this surgical procedure.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Fusion | 24 month |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Pain Assessment (Oswestry Disability Index, ODI) | 24 month |
| Neurological Status Assessment | 24 month |
| Health status assessment (SF-36) | 24 month |
Outcome results
None listed