Skip to content

Switch to Tenofovir Versus Continue Lamivudine/Adefovir Treatment in Lamivudine-resistance Chronic Hepatitis B Patients

Randomized Trial of Switch to Tenofovir Versus Continue Lamivudine/Adefovir Treatment in Lamivudine-resistance Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Who Have Undergone Lamivudine/Adefovir Add-on Treatment

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01491295
Enrollment
160
Registered
2011-12-13
Start date
2012-09-30
Completion date
2019-12-31
Last updated
2016-04-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Hepatitis B

Keywords

Lamivudine, adefovir add on treatment, tenofovir, chronic hepatitis B

Brief summary

1. Adefovir add-on therapy is superior to switching to adefovir monotherapy or entecavir 1mg monotherapy for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with lamivudine resistance (LAM-R) 2. Long-term adefovir add-on therapy was effective for viral suppression. However, the economic burden for such dual antiviral therapy is heavy because of infinite treatment. 3. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is a potent antiviral agent. TDF demonstrated potent antiviral efficacy in a subset of lamivudine experienced HBeAg-positive patients. TDF is also superior to ADV in HBeAg-negative and HBeAg-positive treatment-naive patients. 4. Theoretically, TDF can replace LAM/ADV when viral suppression has been achieved by LAM/ADV combination treatment in LAM-R CHB patients.

Detailed description

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a partially double-stranded DNA virus. HBV infection can induce a spectrum of disease ranging from asymptomatic infection to severe chronic liver diseases, including cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Chronic HBV infection is also a major cause of HCC in Taiwan. Over 350 millions people worldwide are chronically infected with HBV. Lamivudine was the first marketing and is the first-line oral anti-viral agent for the therapy of chronic hepatitis B. Infinite nucleoside analogue therapy may be needed for long-term viral suppression especially in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B. The initial randomized studies demonstrated the clinical benefit and safety of lamivudine in both hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and -negative chronic hepatitis B patients. But as high as 20% of the cases under 1-year lamivudine treatment developed genotypic resistance, which defined as the presence of YMDD mutation on the HBV polymerase region. Genotypic resistance is almost always associated with virological breakthrough and exacerbation of liver function. Long-term lamivudine therapy was reported increase HBeAg seroconversion and provided clinical improvement in ALT levels. However, in a four-year follow-up study, YMDD-variant HBV was detected in as high as 67% of patients under lamivudine treatment. Several clinical studies have proven that adefovir add-on therapy is superior to switching to adefovir monotherapy or entecavir 1mg monotherapy for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with lamivudine resistance (LAM-R). Currently, AASLD and EASL guidelines recommend adefovir add-on therapy as a standard treatment for LAM-R CHB patients. Long-term adefovir add-on therapy was effective for viral suppression (8). However, the economic burden for such dual antiviral therapy is heavy because of infinite treatment. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is a potent antiviral agent. TDF and ETV are recommended oral first-line therapies for CHB. TDF demonstrated potent antiviral efficacy in a subset of lamivudine experienced HBeAg-positive patients. TDF is also superior to ADV in HBeAg-negative and HBeAg-positive treatment-naive patients. Theoretically, TDF can replace LAM/ADV when viral suppression has been achieved by LAM/ADV combination treatment in LAM-R CHB patients. This clinical trial is a proof of concept study to evaluate the efficacy of switching to TDF monotherapy in such patients.

Interventions

DRUGTenofovir disoproxil fumarate

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300mg QD for 36 months (adjust dosage according to renal function)

Lamivudine 100mg QD for 36 months (adjust dosage according to renal function) Adefovir 10mg QD for 36 months (adjust dosage according to renal function)

Sponsors

Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
China Medical University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Chi Mei Medical Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Chiayi Christian Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* HBsAg-positive for more than 6 months (HBeAg-positive or HBeAg-negative). * Age \> 20 y/o. * Under lamivudine/adefovir treatment for more than 1 year due to previous lamivudine resistance (LAM-R), current HBV DNA is undetectable (\< 20 IU/ml) during enrollment.

Exclusion criteria

* HCV, HIV, HDV coinfection. * Uncontrolled HCC, malignancy or decompensated liver cirrhosis (CTP score ≥ 7). * Uremia patients or Creatinine ≥ 2 mg/dl.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Incidence of virological breakthrough (defined as HBV DNA > 100 IU/ml)Sustained viral suppression after switching to TDF for 36 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
HBeAg seroconversion (for HBeAg-positive patients)HBeAg seroconversion rate at 1, 2 and 3 years
Incidence of HBsAg lossIncidence of HBsAg loss at 1-, 2-, and 3 -years

Countries

Taiwan

Contacts

Primary ContactYi-Hsiang Huang, MD, PhD
yhhuang@vghtpe.gov.tw886-2-28712121

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026