Skip to content

GlideScope Groove vs. Standard GlideScope: A Non-inferiority Study

Comparison of GlideScope Groove to Standard GlideScope for Orotracheal Intubation: A Non-inferiority Study

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01489605
Enrollment
0
Registered
2011-12-09
Start date
2019-07-31
Completion date
2020-06-30
Last updated
2019-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intubation, Orotracheal

Keywords

Orotracheal intubation, videolaryngoscopy

Brief summary

Patients presenting for elective surgery requiring orotracheal intubation will be randomized to being intubated with either the GlideScope Groove video-laryngoscope or the standard GlideScope video-laryngoscope.

Detailed description

See above. The primary outcome is time to intubation.

Interventions

Patients will be intubated using the GlideScope Groove device. (Verathon)

DEVICEControl: Standard GlideScope

Patients will be intubated using the standard GlideScope. (Verathon)

Sponsors

University of Western Ontario, Canada
CollaboratorOTHER
London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Any adult patient booked for elective surgery requiring orotracheal intubation.

Exclusion criteria

1. Any patient with cervical spine abnormalities. 2. Any patients with known or probable difficult airways. 3. Any patient requiring rapid sequence induction.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of IntubationDay 1Duration of Intubation - Mask removal to ETCO2 confirmation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of traumaDay 1Incidence of trauma
Number of failures to intubateDay 1Number of failures to intubate
Ease of intubationDay 1Ease of intubation as noted by operator (measured on a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale)
Laryngoscopic grade distributionDay 1Laryngoscopic grade distribution according to Cormack and Lehane classification
Sore ThroatDay 3Patients will be surveyed with respect to the incidence of post-operative sore throat.
Use of external laryngeal pressureDay 1Use of external laryngeal pressure

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026