Skip to content

Comparing Lipiodol/Ethanol With Drug-eluting Beads (DEB) for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Prospective Study Comparing Lipiodol Plus Ethanol Solution Compared With Drug-Eluting Beads for Trans-arterial Chemoembolization of Liver in Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01489410
Enrollment
0
Registered
2011-12-09
Start date
2012-10-31
Completion date
2014-03-31
Last updated
2017-08-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Brief summary

Chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma lesions is an accepted and frequently used method for the palliative or curative treatment of these lesions. These attempts are being made to make these patients a better candidate for liver transplant or to provide palliation for their condition.

Detailed description

This is a randomized prospective study with two arms, Drug-Eluting Beads with doxorubicin (DEB) and lipiodol ethanol mixture (LEM), with the goal to show non-inferiority of LEM, which if true will facilitate a simple alternative to DEBs. Patients will be randomized to one arm of the study and will remain in that arm if they need to have more embolization in the future. Both of the mentioned methods (DEB and LEM) fall within the standard of care.

Interventions

DRUGDrug-Eluting Beads (DEB) with Doxorubicin

One treatment of Drug-Eluting Beads (DEB) with Doxorubicin administered to the liver through a groin puncture site and delivered through the vessels that feed the liver (per standard of care).

DRUGLipiodol Ethanol Mixture

One treatment of Lipiodol Ethanol Mixture (LEM) is administered to the liver through a groin puncture site and delivered through the vessels that feed the liver (per standard of care).

Sponsors

University of Minnesota
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Child-Pugh class A or B * Biopsy proven HCC or hypervascular mass per European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) criteria * Patient not a candidate for surgical resection or percutaneous ablation * age \> 18 years old and able to consent

Exclusion criteria

* Child-Pugh class C * Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score \>16 * Extrahepatic disease * Bilateral or main portal vein thrombus * Total bilirubin \> 2.2 * Serum albumin \< 2.6 * Life expectancy \< 2 months * Uncorrected INR \> 2 * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status \> 2 * Tumor burden \> 50% liver volume * Hepatofugal portal venous flow

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients with Post-Embolization SyndromeWeek 6 Post InterventionCount of patients with post-embolizaation syndrome reported which includes fatigue, anorexia, nausea, fever.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Quality of LifeBaseline and Week 6 After InterventionChanges (noted as a score of 0 \[not at all\] to 4 \[very much\]; total score ranges from 1-180) in the different aspects of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary (FACT-Hep) quality of life questionnaire (a 45-item self-report instrument designed to measure health-related quality of life in patients with hepatobiliary cancers).
Comparison of Liver Function Tests ResultsDay 0 and Week 6 Post InterventionList of results for alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), albumin (Alb), alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALKP), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Cr), glomerular filtration rate (GFR), Bilirubin (T, D), platelets (Plt), international normalized ratio (INR - prothrombin time), Child-Pugh score.
Patients with Encephalopathy After EmbolizationWeek 6 Post InterventionCount of patients who had encephalopathy after embolization.
Number of Patients with Successful Liver TransplantWeek 6 After Intervention
Overall SurvivalWeek 6 After InterventionDetermined by date of death or date censored.
Imaging ResponseWeek 6 Post InterventionDetermined by European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) criteria a set of non-invasive criteria for HCC in cirrhotic patients. The diagnosis is established if two imaging modalities (US, CT, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) show a coincidental nodule with arterial hypervascularization regardless of AFP levels, or if a single modality shows a lesion when the AFP levels are more than 400 ng/ml. Histologic diagnosis is required if the patient is non-cirrhotic or if the lesions are smaller than 2 cm.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026