Skip to content

Bevacizumab Versus Ranibizumab for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema

Bevacizumab Versus Ranibizumab for Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01487629
Acronym
IBERA-DME
Enrollment
53
Registered
2011-12-07
Start date
2010-04-30
Completion date
2012-09-30
Last updated
2011-12-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Retinopathy, Macular Edema

Keywords

Diabetic Retinopathy, Macular Edema, Bevacizumab, Ranibizumab

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the morphological and visual acuity outcomes associated with 1.5 mg bevacizumab versus 0.5 ranibizumab intravitreal injections for treatment of diabetic macular edema.

Interventions

DRUGBevacizumab

Bevacizumab, 1.5 mg, intravitreal, throughout the study

DRUGRanibizumab

Ranibizumab, 0.5 mg, intravitreal, throughout the study

Sponsors

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
University of Sao Paulo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Center-involving Diabetic macular edema unresponsive to LASER therapy performed at least 3 moths prior to inclusion; * Best corrected visual acuity equal or worse than 20/40 and better than 20/800; * Central subfield macular thickness greater than 300 µm

Exclusion criteria

* Aphakia * High-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy * Previous treatment for DME in the past three months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Central subfield macular thickness (CSFT) changeMonthly from baseline to Week 48Central subfield macular thickness (CSFT) measured with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Best-corrected visual acuity changeMonthly from baseline to week 48Best-corrected visual acuity using ETDRS charts

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026