Skip to content

Pharmacokinetics-based Mycophenolate Mofetil Dosing for GVHD Prevention

A Pilot Study of Pharmacokinetics-based Mycophenolate Mofetil Dosing for Graft-Versus-Host-Disease Prophylaxis in Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01487577
Enrollment
19
Registered
2011-12-07
Start date
2010-06-30
Completion date
2016-01-31
Last updated
2016-06-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Allogeneic Blood and Marrow Transplantation (BMT), Graft Versus Host Disease

Keywords

Allogeneic blood and marrow transplantation (BMT), Graft versus host disease, Mycophenolate mofetil, Pharmacokinetics

Brief summary

Bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is used to successfully treat high-risk forms of leukemia, lymphoma, and other childhood cancers that were once considered incurable. A major barrier to the application of this life-saving treatment is acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) which develops in approximately 30-80% of patients and is a leading cause of death from transplant complications. Current GVHD prevention methods are not very efficacious and lead to unacceptable side effects. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), an anti-rejection medication used in solid organ transplants, has shown great promise in BMT recipients. The effectiveness of MMF depends on blood levels of mycophenolic acid (MPA, the active form of MMF). Different patients have been found to have different blood levels of MPA when they are given the same dose of MMF. The purpose of this study is to study a novel method of giving MMF based on its metabolism (pharmacokinetics) to achieve desired blood levels of MPA for prevention of GVHD. Non-invasive ways of monitoring the drug exposure will also be studied. The ultimate goal of this study is to improve approaches to GVHD prevention and improve outcomes of BMT in children.

Detailed description

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains a major barrier to the success of allogeneic blood and marrow transplant (BMT) therapy. Acute GVHD is seen in 30-80% of patients and once established, often responds poorly to therapy and is associated with chronic disease and increased risk of death. Although combination of methotrexate (MTX) and a calcineurin inhibitor has been the standard of care for more than a quarter of a century, there is little consensus on the most effective and least toxic approach to GVHD prevention. MTX use is associated with painful mucositis, delay in engraftment and potential pulmonary toxicity. For cord blood transplants, commonly, a calcineurin inhibitor is used with corticosteroids and antithymocyte globulin. Steroid therapy is frequently complicated by high rates of infection, hyperglycemia and hypertension. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), whose metabolite mycophenolic acid (MPA) inhibits proliferation of lymphocytes, is approved for prevention of organ transplant rejection. MMF in combination with CsA is widely used for GVHD prevention in patients receiving reduced-intensity conditioning BMT. It has also been successfully used in primary and salvage therapy of acute GVHD. In myeloablative transplants, while the GVHD outcomes appear comparable, this regimen appears to have superior toxicity profile in comparison to CsA and MTX with faster hematopoietic engraftment and reduced severity and duration of mucositis. One challenge with MMF use in BMT recipients is a significantly lower MPA exposure in the immediate post-conditioning period when compared to organ transplant recipients. This has been shown in a number of pharmacokinetics studies including our preliminary data on pediatric myeloablative transplants. Low total and unbound MPA trough concentrations are associated with higher rates of acute GVHD and graft rejection, and lower response rates in treatment of acute GVHD. There is also poor correlation between MPA trough concentration and area under the concentration curve (AUC). While most previous studies have used fixed MMF dosing, one recent study in adults has shown feasibility of AUC-based individualized MMF dosing. This protocol is based on the premise that optimization of MPA exposure in the immediate post-transplant phase will lead to better acute GVHD prevention. It will study an AUC-based targeting of MMF in pediatric patients undergoing myeloablative allogeneic BMT. We propose a novel continuous infusion method for MMF administration to achieve total MPA steady state concentration. Salient findings emerging from this study will be examined and in replicate cohorts of pediatric and adult patients undergoing allo-BMT.

Interventions

DRUGMycophenolate mofetil

Based on individual pharmacokinetics data, mycophenolate mofetil will be administered by continuous infusion to target a desired AUC exposure

Sponsors

University of Pittsburgh
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Months to 21 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients must be between 6 months and 21 years of age. * Recipients of an allogeneic blood and marrow transplant (BMT). * Stem cell sources should be bone marrow or umbilical cord blood. * Bone marrow or cord blood unit: Sibling should be HLA matched at A, B and DRB1 loci. Unrelated cord blood unit should be at a minimum 4/6 matched at allele level on HLA A, B and DRB1 loci. Unrelated donor should be HLA allele level matched at A, B, C and DRB1 loci. * Minimum prefreezing nucleated cell dose for cord blood units: 3x10\^7/kg for malignant diseases and 5x10\^7/kg for nonmalignant diseases. * Conditioning regimen must be myeloablative in intensity. Examples include but are not limited to Cy/TBI, BuCy 200, etc. * Patients ≥ 16 years old must have a Karnofsky score ≥ 70%, and patients \< 16 years old must have a Lansky score ≥ 70%. * Renal: Creatinine clearance or radioisotope GFR ≥ 70 mL/min/1.73 m2. * Hepatic: Total bilirubin ≤ 2.5 mg/dL unless the increase in bilirubin is attributable to Gilbert's syndrome; and SGOT (AST), SGPT (ALT), and Alkaline Phosphatase \< 5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) for age. * Cardiac: Left ventricular ejection fraction at rest \> 40%, or shortening fraction \> 26%, by echocardiogram or radionuclide scan. * Pulmonary: FEV1, FVC, and DLCO (diffusion capacity) \> 50% of predicted (corrected for hemoglobin); if unable to perform pulmonary function tests, then O2 saturation \> 92% of room air.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with a known hypersensitivity to MMF. * Prior autologous or allogeneic BMT \< 12 months prior to enrollment. * Mismatched related donor. * Mismatched unrelated marrow donor. * Peripheral blood stem cell source. * Reduced intensity conditioning. * Uncontrolled bacterial, viral, fungal or other infection. * Evidence of HIV infection or HIV positive serology. * Requirement of supplemental oxygen. * Patients who are pregnant (B-hCG positive) or breastfeeding. All females of 11 years of age or older and/or who have begun menstruating will be screened for hCG by either urinalysis or a blood sample in order to screen for pregnancy status, as per institutional BMT policy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Toxicities Scored According to the CTCAE Version 4.0.100 days
Number of Participants With Acute Grade II-IV GVHD, Acute Grade III-IV GVHD, and Chronic GVHD.1 yearAcute GVHD will be graded according to the Modified Glucksberg Staging Criteria. Chronic GVHD will be graded according to NIH Chronic GVHD Consensus Guidelines.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Who Experienced Nonrelapse Mortality.1 year
Number of Participants in Overall Survival.1 year
Number of Participants With Neutrophil and Platelet Engraftment.100 daysNeutrophil and platelet engraftment definitions as defined by the CIBMTR Data Management Manual.
Pharmacokinetic Analysis of MMF Clearance to Evaluate MMF Dose Relationships to Drug Exposure.100 daysPharmacokinetic analysis includes, but is not limited to, clearance.
Pharmacokinetic Analysis of MMF Steady State Concentration to Evaluate MMF Dose Relationships to Drug Exposure.100 daysPharmacokinetic analysis includes, but is not limited to, steady-state concentrations.
Pharmacokinetic Analysis of MMF AUC to Evaluate MMF Dose Relationships to Drug Exposure.100 daysPharmacokinetic analysis includes, but is not limited to, area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC).
Number of Participants Who Experienced Relapse.1 year

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Candidates are identified through the investigators' clinical practice.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Mycophenolate Mofetil
Pharmacokinetics-based targeting of mycophenolate mofetil Mycophenolate mofetil: Based on individual pharmacokinetics data, mycophenolate mofetil will be administered by continuous infusion to target a desired AUC exposure
19
Total19

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyBecame ineligible after signing consent1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMycophenolate Mofetil
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
16 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
15 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
19 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 18
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 18

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Acute Grade II-IV GVHD, Acute Grade III-IV GVHD, and Chronic GVHD.

Acute GVHD will be graded according to the Modified Glucksberg Staging Criteria. Chronic GVHD will be graded according to NIH Chronic GVHD Consensus Guidelines.

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Mycophenolate MofetilNumber of Participants With Acute Grade II-IV GVHD, Acute Grade III-IV GVHD, and Chronic GVHD.Acute grade II-IV GVHD6 participants
Mycophenolate MofetilNumber of Participants With Acute Grade II-IV GVHD, Acute Grade III-IV GVHD, and Chronic GVHD.Acute grade III-IV GVHD4 participants
Mycophenolate MofetilNumber of Participants With Acute Grade II-IV GVHD, Acute Grade III-IV GVHD, and Chronic GVHD.Chronic GVHD2 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Toxicities Scored According to the CTCAE Version 4.0.

Time frame: 100 days

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Mycophenolate MofetilNumber of Participants With Grade ≥3 Toxicities Scored According to the CTCAE Version 4.0.0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants in Overall Survival.

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Mycophenolate MofetilNumber of Participants in Overall Survival.15 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Experienced Nonrelapse Mortality.

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Mycophenolate MofetilNumber of Participants Who Experienced Nonrelapse Mortality.0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Experienced Relapse.

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Mycophenolate MofetilNumber of Participants Who Experienced Relapse.4 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Neutrophil and Platelet Engraftment.

Neutrophil and platelet engraftment definitions as defined by the CIBMTR Data Management Manual.

Time frame: 100 days

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Mycophenolate MofetilNumber of Participants With Neutrophil and Platelet Engraftment.Incidence of neutrophil engraftment18 participants
Mycophenolate MofetilNumber of Participants With Neutrophil and Platelet Engraftment.Incidence of platelet engraftment15 participants
Secondary

Pharmacokinetic Analysis of MMF AUC to Evaluate MMF Dose Relationships to Drug Exposure.

Pharmacokinetic analysis includes, but is not limited to, area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC).

Time frame: 100 days

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Mycophenolate MofetilPharmacokinetic Analysis of MMF AUC to Evaluate MMF Dose Relationships to Drug Exposure.AUC, Intermittent PO dosing36.1 mcg*hr/mL
Mycophenolate MofetilPharmacokinetic Analysis of MMF AUC to Evaluate MMF Dose Relationships to Drug Exposure.AUC, Intermittent IV dosing46.5 mcg*hr/mL
Mycophenolate MofetilPharmacokinetic Analysis of MMF AUC to Evaluate MMF Dose Relationships to Drug Exposure.AUC, Continuous infusion40.1 mcg*hr/mL
Secondary

Pharmacokinetic Analysis of MMF Clearance to Evaluate MMF Dose Relationships to Drug Exposure.

Pharmacokinetic analysis includes, but is not limited to, clearance.

Time frame: 100 days

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Mycophenolate MofetilPharmacokinetic Analysis of MMF Clearance to Evaluate MMF Dose Relationships to Drug Exposure.Clearance, Intermittent IV dosing10.2 mL/min/kg
Mycophenolate MofetilPharmacokinetic Analysis of MMF Clearance to Evaluate MMF Dose Relationships to Drug Exposure.Clearance, Continuous infusion15.1 mL/min/kg
Mycophenolate MofetilPharmacokinetic Analysis of MMF Clearance to Evaluate MMF Dose Relationships to Drug Exposure.Clearance, Intermittent PO dosing10.9 mL/min/kg
Secondary

Pharmacokinetic Analysis of MMF Steady State Concentration to Evaluate MMF Dose Relationships to Drug Exposure.

Pharmacokinetic analysis includes, but is not limited to, steady-state concentrations.

Time frame: 100 days

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Mycophenolate MofetilPharmacokinetic Analysis of MMF Steady State Concentration to Evaluate MMF Dose Relationships to Drug Exposure.Steady-state concentration, Intermittent IV dosing1.9 mcg/mL
Mycophenolate MofetilPharmacokinetic Analysis of MMF Steady State Concentration to Evaluate MMF Dose Relationships to Drug Exposure.Steady-state concentration, Continuous infusion1.7 mcg/mL
Mycophenolate MofetilPharmacokinetic Analysis of MMF Steady State Concentration to Evaluate MMF Dose Relationships to Drug Exposure.Steady-state concentration, Intermittent PO dosing1.5 mcg/mL

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026