Skip to content

Factors Associated With Short Withdrawal Time and Polyp Detection Rate During Colonoscopy

Factors Associated With Short Withdrawal Time and Polyp Detection Rate During Colonoscopy

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01487356
Enrollment
802
Registered
2011-12-07
Start date
2008-05-31
Completion date
2009-06-30
Last updated
2011-12-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colon Polyps

Keywords

Colonoscopy, quality assurance, withdrawal time, polyp detection rate

Brief summary

Colonoscopy withdrawal times are a critical element in determining quality of colonoscopy; however, few studies have evaluated specific factors that may influence the duration of withdrawal, and specifically short withdrawal times. Other factors affecting polyp detection rate, one element of quality of colonoscopy, also need further study. By collecting data on hundreds of colonoscopies performed by 9 endoscopists, our goal was to identify factors associated with withdrawal time, inappropriately short withdrawal times, and polyp detection rate during colonoscopy.

Detailed description

Background: Colonoscopy withdrawal times are a critical element in determining quality of colonoscopy; however, few studies have evaluated specific factors that may influence the duration of withdrawal, and specifically short withdrawal times. Other factors affecting polyp detection rate, one element of quality of colonoscopy, also need further study. Objective: To identify factors associated with withdrawal time, inappropriately short withdrawal times, and polyp detection rate during colonoscopy. Design: Data were prospectively collected (05/08-06/09) on 802 colonoscopies conducted by 9 blinded endoscopists, including patient age and sex, indication, colonoscope insertion and withdrawal time, biopsies performed, number/size of polyps and method of resection, bowel preparation quality, time of day, day of week, endoscopist, position of the procedure within the endoscopist's slate, and call status of the endoscopist. Setting: This study was conducted at a single tertiary care hospital, St. Paul's Hospital, in Vancouver, British Columbia.

Interventions

OTHERNo intervention

Colonoscopies were conducted as per the endoscopist's usual practice. No change in protocol was expected.

Sponsors

University of British Columbia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All adult patients undergoing colonoscopy at St. Paul's Hospital in Vancouver, BC.

Exclusion criteria

*

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026