Neck Pain
Conditions
Keywords
Diathermy, Neck Pain
Brief summary
This randomised controlled trial aims to compare the effect of microwave diathermy (continuous and pulsed modes) with sham microwave diathermy in nonspecific chronic neck pain patients. Every patient will also be treated by exercise and transcutaneous electrical neurostimulation (TENS). The primary endpoint is to establish whether the use of microwaves is justified in terms of pain relief or reduction of disability in this patients.
Interventions
Continuous microwave through a great circular electrode, 15 cm from the neck, 20 minutes, 80 watts, 15 sessions in 3 weeks
Pulsed microwaves through a great circular electrode, 15 cm away from the neck, 20 minutes, 80 watts, 15 sessions in 3 weeks
Unplugged microwave generator, great circular electrode, 15 cm away from the neck, 20 minutes, 15 sessions in 3 weeks
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* to be between 18 and 65 years old * to be diagnosed with chronic nonspecific neck pain (i.e. during more than 3 months in the absence of red flags (unexplained weight loss, fever, neurological signs, history of cancer, history of inflammatory conditions...)
Exclusion criteria
* pregnancy * sick leave * litigation * claims because the neck pain.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change from baseline in pain at six months | Baseline. At three weeks. At six months | Pain as measured by visual analogic scale |
| Change from baseline in neck disability at six months | Baseline. At three weeks. At six months | Neck disability as measured by Neck Disability Index and Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire |
| Change from baseline in quality of life at six months | Baseline. At three weeks. At six months | Quality of life as measured by SF-36 questionnaire |