Skip to content

Observational Study of Rapid Sequence Intubation Drug Delivery Using Intraosseous and Intravenous Access.

An Observational Study of Intubating Conditions Comparing Intraosseous Vascular Access With Peripheral Intravenous Access for Drug Delivery in Rapid Sequence Intubation

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01486407
Enrollment
4
Registered
2011-12-06
Start date
2012-02-29
Completion date
2012-12-31
Last updated
2026-01-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Airway Control

Keywords

Airway management

Brief summary

This study will evaluate using intraosseous vascular access and intravenous vascular access to give patients the necessary medications to perform rapid sequence intubation, for patients with airway difficulties. The investigators think the device operator will find the intraosseous and intravenous routes equal for drug delivery.

Detailed description

This observational study will evaluate the intubating conditions of patients receiving rapid sequence intubation when receiving paralytic drug delivery via intravenous or intraosseous vascular access from the perspective of the medical professional performing rapid sequence intubation. The investigators believe that medical professionals will find equal intubating conditions for intravenous and intraosseous drug delivery.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Vidacare Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Requires rapid sequence intubation * Succinylcholine is chosen paralytic agent * Intravenous (IV) or Intraosseous (IO) access has been established for rapid sequence intubation * For IV access patients, their rapid sequence intubation case is the next occurring IV rapid sequence intubation case following an enrolled IO Rapid Sequence Intubation (RSI) case.

Exclusion criteria

* Vascular access other than IV or IO has been established

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time From First Drug Delivery to Operator-perceived Sufficient Relaxation to Perform Endotracheal Tube Placementduring rapid sequence intubation procedure, average expected time frame 30 minutesTime measured in seconds from first drug delivery to the time of operator-perceived sufficient relaxation to perform endotracheal tube placement
Intubation Difficulty Scaleduring rapid sequence intubation procedure, average expected time frame 30 minutesIntubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) provides a numerical Total score describing the difficulty of the intubation procedure based upon the summation of the following individual sub-scores: number of attempts (each additional attempt adds (+)1 point, minimum score=0, no maximum), number of operators (each additional +1 point, minimum score=0, no maximum), use of alternative techniques (each alternative technique +1 point, minimum score=0, no maximum), cormack grade for first oral attempt (measures the quality of the view of the larynx using grades 1 - 4 where higher number means poorer visibility; successful blind intubation=0. minimum score=0, maximum=4), lifting force required (normal=0 or increased=1), laryngeal pressure (not applied=0 or applied=1), vocal cord mobility (abduction=0 or adduction=1). Total IDS minimum score=0, no maximum score. Score 0=Easy; Score 1 - 5 =slight difficulty; Score \>5 =moderate to major difficulty Score infinite =Failed/Impossible intubation
Operator Satisfaction With Intubating Conditions Using Visual Analog Scaleduring rapid sequence intubation procedure, average expected time frame 30 minutesOperator reported level of satisfaction with intubating conditions regarding adequacy of sedation and adequacy of muscular relaxation. This is reported using a 100 mm visual analog scale from 0 - 100 where higher numbers indicate greater satisfaction.
Failure Rate of Endotracheal Intubation and Requirement for Alternative Airway Management Methodsduring rapid sequence intubation procedure, average time frame 30 minutesFailure rate of endotracheal intubation and requirement for alternative airway management methods

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Short-term Catheter Related Complications for Each Techniqueduring emergency department stay, average time frame 24 hoursIncidence of short-term catheter related complications for each technique (IO vs IV)

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intravenous (IV) Drug Delivery
patients on whom intravenous vascular access has been established for the purpose of rapid sequence intubation drug delivery.
2
Intraosseous (IO) Drug Delivery
Patients on whom intraosseous vascular access has been established for rapid sequence intubation drug delivery.
2
Total4

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIntraosseous (IO) Drug DeliveryTotalIntravenous (IV) Drug Delivery
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Age, Continuous41 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 56.57
40.25 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 32.88
39.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.36
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
2 participants4 participants2 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 20 / 2
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 20 / 2
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 20 / 2

Outcome results

Primary

Failure Rate of Endotracheal Intubation and Requirement for Alternative Airway Management Methods

Failure rate of endotracheal intubation and requirement for alternative airway management methods

Time frame: during rapid sequence intubation procedure, average time frame 30 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Intravenous (IV) Drug DeliveryFailure Rate of Endotracheal Intubation and Requirement for Alternative Airway Management Methods0 Participants
Intraosseous (IO) Drug DeliveryFailure Rate of Endotracheal Intubation and Requirement for Alternative Airway Management Methods0 Participants
Primary

Intubation Difficulty Scale

Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) provides a numerical Total score describing the difficulty of the intubation procedure based upon the summation of the following individual sub-scores: number of attempts (each additional attempt adds (+)1 point, minimum score=0, no maximum), number of operators (each additional +1 point, minimum score=0, no maximum), use of alternative techniques (each alternative technique +1 point, minimum score=0, no maximum), cormack grade for first oral attempt (measures the quality of the view of the larynx using grades 1 - 4 where higher number means poorer visibility; successful blind intubation=0. minimum score=0, maximum=4), lifting force required (normal=0 or increased=1), laryngeal pressure (not applied=0 or applied=1), vocal cord mobility (abduction=0 or adduction=1). Total IDS minimum score=0, no maximum score. Score 0=Easy; Score 1 - 5 =slight difficulty; Score \>5 =moderate to major difficulty Score infinite =Failed/Impossible intubation

Time frame: during rapid sequence intubation procedure, average expected time frame 30 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intravenous (IV) Drug DeliveryIntubation Difficulty Scale1.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
Intraosseous (IO) Drug DeliveryIntubation Difficulty Scale2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.41
Primary

Operator Satisfaction With Intubating Conditions Using Visual Analog Scale

Operator reported level of satisfaction with intubating conditions regarding adequacy of sedation and adequacy of muscular relaxation. This is reported using a 100 mm visual analog scale from 0 - 100 where higher numbers indicate greater satisfaction.

Time frame: during rapid sequence intubation procedure, average expected time frame 30 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intravenous (IV) Drug DeliveryOperator Satisfaction With Intubating Conditions Using Visual Analog Scale95.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.01
Intraosseous (IO) Drug DeliveryOperator Satisfaction With Intubating Conditions Using Visual Analog Scale92.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.35
Primary

Time From First Drug Delivery to Operator-perceived Sufficient Relaxation to Perform Endotracheal Tube Placement

Time measured in seconds from first drug delivery to the time of operator-perceived sufficient relaxation to perform endotracheal tube placement

Time frame: during rapid sequence intubation procedure, average expected time frame 30 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intravenous (IV) Drug DeliveryTime From First Drug Delivery to Operator-perceived Sufficient Relaxation to Perform Endotracheal Tube Placement62.5 secondsStandard Deviation 2.12
Intraosseous (IO) Drug DeliveryTime From First Drug Delivery to Operator-perceived Sufficient Relaxation to Perform Endotracheal Tube Placement45 secondsStandard Deviation 21.21
Secondary

Incidence of Short-term Catheter Related Complications for Each Technique

Incidence of short-term catheter related complications for each technique (IO vs IV)

Time frame: during emergency department stay, average time frame 24 hours

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intravenous (IV) Drug DeliveryIncidence of Short-term Catheter Related Complications for Each Technique0 complications
Intraosseous (IO) Drug DeliveryIncidence of Short-term Catheter Related Complications for Each Technique0 complications

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026