Skip to content

Lens Wearing Experience and Biocompatibility of a Marketed Multi-Purpose Disinfecting Solution in Silicone Hydrogel and Soft Contact Lens Wearers

Lens Wearing Experience and Biocompatibility of a Marketed Multi-Purpose Disinfecting Solution in Silicone Hydrogel and Soft Contact Lens Wearers

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01484938
Enrollment
175
Registered
2011-12-05
Start date
2011-02-28
Completion date
2011-05-31
Last updated
2012-10-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Refractive Error

Keywords

Soft contact lenses, Multi-purpose solution, Corneal staining

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to describe mean differences in corneal staining (type and area) for OPTI-FREE PureMoist Multi-Purpose Disinfecting Solution (MPDS) at Day 30 compared to Baseline (Day 0).

Interventions

DEVICEOPTI-FREE PureMoist

Commercially marketed multi-purpose contact lens solution for cleaning, rinsing, disinfecting/storing, and reinserting contact lenses

Sponsors

Alcon Research
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years or older * Soft contact lens wear on a daily wear basis * Able to wear contact lenses for at least 8 hours * Generally healthy and have normal ocular health * Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply

Exclusion criteria

* No use of additional lens cleaners * No known sensitivities to any ingredient in the test article * No history of ocular surgery/trauma within the last six months * Other protocol-defined

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline (Day 0) in Average Corneal Staining Area at Day 30Baseline (Day 0), Day 30Percentage corneal staining was assessed by the investigator for each of five regions of the cornea; i.e., four quadrants plus central. The investigator instilled flourescein dye and examined the cornea with a slit lamp, i.e., biomicroscope and yellow filter. Percentage corneal staining was recorded in increments of ten, and the percentages of the five regions were averaged together.
Mean Change From Baseline (Day 0) in Total Corneal Staining Type at Day 30Baseline (Day 0), Day 30Corneal staining type was assessed by the investigator for each of five regions of the cornea, i.e., four quadrants plus central. The investigator instilled flourescein dye and examined the cornea with a slit lamp, i.e., biomicroscope and yellow filter. Corneal staining type was recorded on a 5-point scale for each region: 0=none; 1=micropunctate; 2=macropunctate; 3=coalesced macropunctate; 4=patch (\>/= 1 mm). The five regions were summed, for a summed total range of 0-20.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited from 3 study centers in the Netherlands, 3 study centers in Sweden, and 1 study center in Australia.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
OPTI-FREE
Multi-purpose contact lens solution used for cleaning, rinsing, disinfecting/storing, and reinserting contact lenses, per protocol-specified regimen.
175
Total175

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event2
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1
Overall StudyNoncompliance1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOPTI-FREE
Age Continuous37.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.66
Region of Enrollment
Australia
28 participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
72 participants
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
75 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
111 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
64 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 175
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 175

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change From Baseline (Day 0) in Average Corneal Staining Area at Day 30

Percentage corneal staining was assessed by the investigator for each of five regions of the cornea; i.e., four quadrants plus central. The investigator instilled flourescein dye and examined the cornea with a slit lamp, i.e., biomicroscope and yellow filter. Percentage corneal staining was recorded in increments of ten, and the percentages of the five regions were averaged together.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 30

Population: Intent to treat. All subjects who were enrolled in the study and completed at least one on-regimen study visit were evaluable for intent-to-treat analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OPTI-FREEMean Change From Baseline (Day 0) in Average Corneal Staining Area at Day 30-5.04 Percentage of corneal stainingStandard Deviation 16.119
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline (Day 0) in Total Corneal Staining Type at Day 30

Corneal staining type was assessed by the investigator for each of five regions of the cornea, i.e., four quadrants plus central. The investigator instilled flourescein dye and examined the cornea with a slit lamp, i.e., biomicroscope and yellow filter. Corneal staining type was recorded on a 5-point scale for each region: 0=none; 1=micropunctate; 2=macropunctate; 3=coalesced macropunctate; 4=patch (\>/= 1 mm). The five regions were summed, for a summed total range of 0-20.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 30

Population: Intent to treat. All subjects who were enrolled in the study and completed at least one on-regimen study visit were evaluable for intent-to-treat analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OPTI-FREEMean Change From Baseline (Day 0) in Total Corneal Staining Type at Day 30-0.82 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.777

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026