Skip to content

Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Tralokinumab in Patients With Active, Moderate-to-severe Ulcerative Colitis

A Phase IIa, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-arm, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tralokinumab (CAT-354), a Recombinant Human Monoclonal Antibody Directed Against Interleukin-13 (IL-13), as add-on Therapy, on Clinical Response in Patients With Active, Moderate-to-severe, Ulcerative Colitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01482884
Enrollment
147
Registered
2011-12-01
Start date
2012-03-31
Completion date
2013-06-30
Last updated
2016-04-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ulcerative Colitis

Keywords

tralokinumab, inflammatory bowel disease, moderate to severe ulcerative colitis

Brief summary

The study is designed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of tralokinumab as compared to placebo. Investigational product will be administered as subcutaneous injection. All patients will continue background therapy for ulcerative colitis as per local standards of care in addition to investigational product.

Detailed description

A phase IIa, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm, multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tralokinumab (CAT-354), a recombinant human monoclonal antibody directed against interleukin-13 (IL-13), as add-on therapy, on clinical response in patients with active, moderate-to-severe, ulcerative colitis

Interventions

DRUGtralokinumab

2 sc injections of every 2 weeks for 12 weeks.

DRUGplacebo

2 sc injections of every 2 weeks for 12 weeks.

Sponsors

MedImmune Ltd
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
AstraZeneca
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosed ulcerative colitis at least 90 days prior randomisation. * Men or women age 18 - 75 years. * Non-hospitalized patients with moderate-severe ulcerative colitis treated with stable background UC therapy (e.g. containing 5-aminosalicylates, and/or low dose of glucocorticosteroids, and/or purine analogue) prior to randomization. * Females of childbearing potential who are sexually active with a nonsterilized male partner must use highly effective contraception from Day1. * Nonsterilized males or sterilized males who are ≤1 year post-vasectomy who are sexually active with a female partner of childbearing potential must use a highly effective method of contraception.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant or breastfeeding women. * History of colostomy. * Current diagnosis of indeterminate colitis, Crohn's disease, ischemic colitis, fulminant colitis and/or toxic megacolon and patients with ulcerative colitis limited to the rectum (ulcerative proctitis). * Hepatitis B, C or HIV. * History of cancer.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Response at Week 8 Based on Mayo ScoreEight week treatment periodClinical response was measured as a decrease in Mayo score of ≥3 points from baseline, decrease in the total Mayo score from baseline ≥30 percentage and a decrease in the sub score for rectal bleeding ≥1 or absolute sub score for rectal bleeding of 0 or 1 point. Mayo score is sum of four sub-scores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings and the physician's global assessment. The total Mayo score ranges from 0-12, with higher scores indicating a more severe disease.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mucosal Healing at Week 8 Based on Mayo ScoreEight week treatment periodImprovement of the endoscopy sub score (from the Mayo score) from 3 or 2 to 0 or 1 point, or from 1 to 0 points.
Clinical Remission at Week 8 Based on Mayo ScoreEight week treatment periodParticipants were classified as in remission if Mayo score of ≤2 with no individual sub score exceeding 1 point. Mayo score is sum of four sub-scores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings and the physician's global assessment. The total Mayo score ranges from 0-12, with higher scores indicating a more severe disease.
Change From Baseline in Partial Mayo ScoreFrom baseline to Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24.The partial Mayo score is the sum of the three sub-score areas: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and the physician's global assessment.The partial Mayo score ranges from 0-9, with higher scores indicating a more severe disease. Change from baseline: Mayo score at each post-baseline timepoint (week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24) minus the Mayo score at baseline.
Change From Baseline in Modified Riley ScoreEight week treatment periodModified Riley score is biopsy grade which range from 0-5; where 0: Normal mucosa, 1: Infiltration of lymphocytes and plasma cells in the lamina propria, 2: Infiltration of neutrophils and eosinophils in the lamina propria, 3: Infiltration of neutrophils in the epithelium, 4: Crypt destruction, 5: Erosion and/or ulceration.
Change in Mayo Score From Baseline to Week 8Eight week treatment periodMayo score is sum of four sub-scores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings and the physician's global assessment. The total Mayo score ranges from 0-12, with higher scores indicating a more severe disease. Change from baseline: Mayo score at week 8 minus the Mayo score at baseline.
Change From Baseline in AlbuminFrom baseline to Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24.
Change From Baseline in CalprotectinFrom baseline to Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24.
Serum Concentration of TralokinumabPre-dose sampling at baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24.
ImmunogenicityPre-dose sampling at baseline, Week 8, 12, 16, and 24.Incidence of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) to tralokinumab in serum.
Change From Baseline in C - Reactive ProteinFrom baseline to Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24.

Countries

Czechia, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

147/111 patients were enrolled/randomized from 31 centres in 6 European countries. The first patient was enrolled on 26 March 2012, and the last patient completed the study on 24 June 2013.

Pre-assignment details

Participants were enrolled for a period of 3 weeks.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Tralokinumab
Tralokinumab 300 mg was administered during study as two subcutaneous 150 mg injections every 2 weeks for 12 weeks starting from Visit 2.
56
Placebo
Placebo was administered during study as two subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks for 12 weeks starting from Visit 2.
55
Total111

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event21
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy01
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up22
Overall StudyMedical decision due to lack of efficacy01
Overall StudyProtocol Violation10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject813

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTralokinumabPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous42.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.54
40.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.26
41.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.39
Duration of disease9.22 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.523
7.78 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.664
8.51 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.585
Glucocorticosteroid-refractory status
No
53 Participants46 Participants99 Participants
Glucocorticosteroid-refractory status
Unknown
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Glucocorticosteroid-refractory status
Yes
3 Participants8 Participants11 Participants
Mayo score at baseline8.36 Scores on scale8.33 Scores on scale8.34 Scores on scale
Partial Mayo score at baseline5.91 Scores on scale5.85 Scores on scale5.88 Scores on scale
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian (Other than Chinese And Japanese)
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Applicable
35 Participants40 Participants75 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
17 Participants13 Participants30 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
54 Participants54 Participants108 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
29 Participants29 Participants58 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
27 Participants26 Participants53 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
35 / 5536 / 55
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 557 / 55

Outcome results

Primary

Clinical Response at Week 8 Based on Mayo Score

Clinical response was measured as a decrease in Mayo score of ≥3 points from baseline, decrease in the total Mayo score from baseline ≥30 percentage and a decrease in the sub score for rectal bleeding ≥1 or absolute sub score for rectal bleeding of 0 or 1 point. Mayo score is sum of four sub-scores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings and the physician's global assessment. The total Mayo score ranges from 0-12, with higher scores indicating a more severe disease.

Time frame: Eight week treatment period

Population: The full analysis set consist of all randomised participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TralokinumabClinical Response at Week 8 Based on Mayo Score37.5 Percentage of responders
PlaceboClinical Response at Week 8 Based on Mayo Score32.7 Percentage of responders
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the proportion of participants responding on tralokinumab is less than or equal to the proportion of participants responding on placebo.p-value: 0.406295% CI: [-13, 22.5]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Albumin

Time frame: From baseline to Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24.

Population: The full analysis set consist of all randomised participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TralokinumabChange From Baseline in AlbuminWeek 40.0 g/LFull Range 0.31
TralokinumabChange From Baseline in AlbuminWeek 80.8 g/LFull Range 0.29
TralokinumabChange From Baseline in AlbuminWeek 120.3 g/LFull Range 0.34
TralokinumabChange From Baseline in AlbuminWeek 160.5 g/LFull Range 0.34
TralokinumabChange From Baseline in AlbuminWeek 201.1 g/LFull Range 0.33
TralokinumabChange From Baseline in AlbuminWeek 241.2 g/LFull Range 0.35
PlaceboChange From Baseline in AlbuminWeek 200.1 g/LFull Range 0.37
PlaceboChange From Baseline in AlbuminWeek 4-0.7 g/LFull Range 0.31
PlaceboChange From Baseline in AlbuminWeek 160.4 g/LFull Range 0.37
PlaceboChange From Baseline in AlbuminWeek 8-0.2 g/LFull Range 0.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in AlbuminWeek 240.2 g/LFull Range 0.38
PlaceboChange From Baseline in AlbuminWeek 12-0.4 g/LFull Range 0.36
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Calprotectin

Time frame: From baseline to Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24.

Population: The full analysis set consist of all randomised participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TralokinumabChange From Baseline in CalprotectinWeek 16-75.10 ug/gFull Range 0.34
TralokinumabChange From Baseline in CalprotectinWeek 2032.55 ug/gFull Range 0.33
TralokinumabChange From Baseline in CalprotectinWeek 24-136.78 ug/gFull Range 0.35
TralokinumabChange From Baseline in CalprotectinWeek 469.45 ug/gFull Range 0.31
TralokinumabChange From Baseline in CalprotectinWeek 886.47 ug/gFull Range 0.29
TralokinumabChange From Baseline in CalprotectinWeek 12-39.19 ug/gFull Range 0.34
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CalprotectinWeek 8-250.52 ug/gFull Range 0.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CalprotectinWeek 16-338.76 ug/gFull Range 0.37
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CalprotectinWeek 4198.80 ug/gFull Range 0.31
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CalprotectinWeek 20-402.81 ug/gFull Range 0.37
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CalprotectinWeek 1250.31 ug/gFull Range 0.36
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CalprotectinWeek 24-267.58 ug/gFull Range 0.38
Secondary

Change From Baseline in C - Reactive Protein

Time frame: From baseline to Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24.

Population: The full analysis set consist of all randomised participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TralokinumabChange From Baseline in C - Reactive ProteinWeek 24-2.754 mg/LFull Range 0.35
TralokinumabChange From Baseline in C - Reactive ProteinWeek 4-2.755 mg/LFull Range 0.31
TralokinumabChange From Baseline in C - Reactive ProteinWeek 8-1.089 mg/LFull Range 0.29
TralokinumabChange From Baseline in C - Reactive ProteinWeek 12-2.795 mg/LFull Range 0.34
TralokinumabChange From Baseline in C - Reactive ProteinWeek 16-3.490 mg/LFull Range 0.34
TralokinumabChange From Baseline in C - Reactive ProteinWeek 20-4.094 mg/LFull Range 0.33
PlaceboChange From Baseline in C - Reactive ProteinWeek 160.638 mg/LFull Range 0.37
PlaceboChange From Baseline in C - Reactive ProteinWeek 24-1.915 mg/LFull Range 0.38
PlaceboChange From Baseline in C - Reactive ProteinWeek 12-1.974 mg/LFull Range 0.36
PlaceboChange From Baseline in C - Reactive ProteinWeek 40.510 mg/LFull Range 0.31
PlaceboChange From Baseline in C - Reactive ProteinWeek 20-1.467 mg/LFull Range 0.37
PlaceboChange From Baseline in C - Reactive ProteinWeek 80.637 mg/LFull Range 0.3
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Modified Riley Score

Modified Riley score is biopsy grade which range from 0-5; where 0: Normal mucosa, 1: Infiltration of lymphocytes and plasma cells in the lamina propria, 2: Infiltration of neutrophils and eosinophils in the lamina propria, 3: Infiltration of neutrophils in the epithelium, 4: Crypt destruction, 5: Erosion and/or ulceration.

Time frame: Eight week treatment period

Population: The full analysis set consist of all randomised participants however the numbers for the endpoints mentioned for this secondary outcome are lower due to missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
TralokinumabChange From Baseline in Modified Riley Score-0.49 Grade on scaleStandard Error 0.23
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Modified Riley Score-0.74 Grade on scaleStandard Error 0.24
p-value: 0.44995% CI: [-0.41, 0.91]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Partial Mayo Score

The partial Mayo score is the sum of the three sub-score areas: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and the physician's global assessment.The partial Mayo score ranges from 0-9, with higher scores indicating a more severe disease. Change from baseline: Mayo score at each post-baseline timepoint (week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24) minus the Mayo score at baseline.

Time frame: From baseline to Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24.

Population: The full analysis set consist of all randomised participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TralokinumabChange From Baseline in Partial Mayo ScoreWeek 16-2.6 Score on scaleFull Range 0.34
TralokinumabChange From Baseline in Partial Mayo ScoreWeek 4-1.8 Score on scaleFull Range 0.31
TralokinumabChange From Baseline in Partial Mayo ScoreWeek 8-2.4 Score on scaleFull Range 0.29
TralokinumabChange From Baseline in Partial Mayo ScoreWeek 12-2.7 Score on scaleFull Range 0.34
TralokinumabChange From Baseline in Partial Mayo ScoreWeek 20-3.0 Score on scaleFull Range 0.33
TralokinumabChange From Baseline in Partial Mayo ScoreWeek 24-3.0 Score on scaleFull Range 0.35
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Partial Mayo ScoreWeek 20-3.6 Score on scaleFull Range 0.37
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Partial Mayo ScoreWeek 16-3.3 Score on scaleFull Range 0.37
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Partial Mayo ScoreWeek 12-2.6 Score on scaleFull Range 0.36
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Partial Mayo ScoreWeek 4-0.8 Score on scaleFull Range 0.31
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Partial Mayo ScoreWeek 24-3.6 Score on scaleFull Range 0.38
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Partial Mayo ScoreWeek 8-1.7 Score on scaleFull Range 0.3
Secondary

Change in Mayo Score From Baseline to Week 8

Mayo score is sum of four sub-scores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings and the physician's global assessment. The total Mayo score ranges from 0-12, with higher scores indicating a more severe disease. Change from baseline: Mayo score at week 8 minus the Mayo score at baseline.

Time frame: Eight week treatment period

Population: The full analysis set consist of all randomised participants however the numbers for the endpoints mentioned for this secondary outcome are lower due to missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
TralokinumabChange in Mayo Score From Baseline to Week 8-2.41 Score on scaleStandard Error 0.58
PlaceboChange in Mayo Score From Baseline to Week 8-1.92 Score on scaleStandard Error 0.56
p-value: 0.393795% CI: [-1.63, 0.65]ANCOVA
Secondary

Clinical Remission at Week 8 Based on Mayo Score

Participants were classified as in remission if Mayo score of ≤2 with no individual sub score exceeding 1 point. Mayo score is sum of four sub-scores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings and the physician's global assessment. The total Mayo score ranges from 0-12, with higher scores indicating a more severe disease.

Time frame: Eight week treatment period

Population: The full analysis set consist of all randomised participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TralokinumabClinical Remission at Week 8 Based on Mayo Score17.9 Percentage of participants
PlaceboClinical Remission at Week 8 Based on Mayo Score5.5 Percentage of participants
p-value: 0.032695% CI: [0.7, 24.1]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Immunogenicity

Incidence of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) to tralokinumab in serum.

Time frame: Pre-dose sampling at baseline, Week 8, 12, 16, and 24.

Population: The safety analysis set consist of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)Dispersion
TralokinumabImmunogenicityWeek 120 participants 0.34
TralokinumabImmunogenicityWeek 80 participants 0.29
TralokinumabImmunogenicityWeek 160 participants 0.34
TralokinumabImmunogenicityWeek 240 participants 0.33
TralokinumabImmunogenicitypre-dose at baseline0 participants 0.31
PlaceboImmunogenicityWeek 240 participants
PlaceboImmunogenicitypre-dose at baseline1 participants
PlaceboImmunogenicityWeek 81 participants
PlaceboImmunogenicityWeek 121 participants
PlaceboImmunogenicityWeek 161 participants
Secondary

Mucosal Healing at Week 8 Based on Mayo Score

Improvement of the endoscopy sub score (from the Mayo score) from 3 or 2 to 0 or 1 point, or from 1 to 0 points.

Time frame: Eight week treatment period

Population: The full analysis set consist of all randomised participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TralokinumabMucosal Healing at Week 8 Based on Mayo Score32.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboMucosal Healing at Week 8 Based on Mayo Score20.0 Percentage of participants
p-value: 0.104395% CI: [-4, 28.3]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Serum Concentration of Tralokinumab

Time frame: Pre-dose sampling at baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24.

Population: The safety analysis set consist of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TralokinumabSerum Concentration of TralokinumabWeek 850.2 ug/mlFull Range 0.34
TralokinumabSerum Concentration of TralokinumabWeek 1627.2 ug/mlFull Range 0.33
TralokinumabSerum Concentration of TralokinumabWeek 437.9 ug/mlFull Range 0.29
TralokinumabSerum Concentration of TralokinumabWeek 209.32 ug/mlFull Range 0.35
TralokinumabSerum Concentration of TralokinumabWeek 1248.2 ug/mlFull Range 0.34
TralokinumabSerum Concentration of TralokinumabWeek 243.66 ug/ml
TralokinumabSerum Concentration of Tralokinumabpre-dose at baseline0.00 ug/mlFull Range 0.31
PlaceboSerum Concentration of TralokinumabWeek 24NA ug/ml
PlaceboSerum Concentration of Tralokinumabpre-dose at baselineNA ug/ml
PlaceboSerum Concentration of TralokinumabWeek 4NA ug/ml
PlaceboSerum Concentration of TralokinumabWeek 8NA ug/ml
PlaceboSerum Concentration of TralokinumabWeek 12NA ug/ml
PlaceboSerum Concentration of TralokinumabWeek 16NA ug/ml
PlaceboSerum Concentration of TralokinumabWeek 20NA ug/ml

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026