Skip to content

Shunt Outcomes of Post-Hemorrhagic Hydrocephalus

Shunt Outcomes of Post-Hemorrhagic Hydrocephalus: A Network Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01480349
Acronym
SOPHH
Enrollment
146
Registered
2011-11-28
Start date
2011-01-10
Completion date
2016-05-10
Last updated
2017-12-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post-Hemorrhagic Hydrocephalus

Keywords

Post-Hemorrhagic Hydrocephalus, Intraventricular Hemorrhage, Low Birth Weight Premature Infants

Brief summary

This multicenter, prospective pilot study will compare the effectiveness of two established procedures used in the treatment of post-hemorrhagic hydrocephalus in very low birth weight infants, specifically ventricular reservoirs and subgaleal shunts. The study is being conducted by the Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network (HCRN), a network established to conduct multi-institutional clinical trials on pediatric hydrocephalus.

Detailed description

Intraventricular hemorrhage and post-hemorrhagic hydrocephalus remain a leading cause of mortality and long-term morbidity in premature infants. The two most common temporary cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion procedures are the ventriculosubgaleal shunt (SGS) and an implanted ventricular reservoir (RES) for intermittent CSF removal. These methods are physiologically very different and their comparative effectiveness in treating hydrocephalus and possibly reducing the need for an eventual permanent CSF shunt is currently not known. The goal of this pilot study is to obtain information critical for planning and executing a future randomized trial comparing SGS and RES. Specifically, this pilot study will establish inclusion criteria, define the primary outcome, and standardize the interventions in preparation for initiating a comparative trial between the SGS and RES procedures. In addition, the importance of examining the neurodevelopmental outcomes for these patients has been recognized within the neurosurgical and neuropsychological settings. Therefore, the scope of this study has been extended to include an examination of the neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 to 22 months and at 36 to 42 months in patients who undergo BSID-III testing at their clinical centers.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Utah
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 180 Days
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* premature neonates with birth weights less than 1500 grams * Grade III or IV intraventricular hemorrhage * Fronto-occipital horn ratio greater than or equal to 0.50

Exclusion criteria

* Less than 72 hour life expectancy from other medical problems

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Specific Aim I: Proportion of temporization5 yearsThe proportion of all infants entering the study who meet the criteria for surgical temporization.
Specific Aim 2: Conversion proportion5 yearsThe proportion of all infants with SGS or RES who met criteria for conversion to permanent shunt.
Specific Aim 3: Surgery Checklist Scores5 yearsSurgery checklist scores of individual surgeon performance in standardized procedures.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Protocol adherence5 yearsProtocol adherence by network, center, surgeon, decision rubric, and individual decision data points.
CSF Infection5 yearsIncidence of CSF infection while on the protocol.
Neurodevelopmental Outcomes7 yearsSubscores from the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, version III (BSID-III) to include cognitive, language and motor subtests will be obtained for patients undergoing BSID-III testing at 18-22 and 36-42 months of age.

Countries

Canada, United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026