Skip to content

Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) Driven Stepping in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury

FES Driven Stepping in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01479777
Enrollment
12
Registered
2011-11-24
Start date
2011-04-30
Completion date
2012-04-30
Last updated
2014-09-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spinal Cord Injury

Keywords

Spinal Cord Injury, Functional electrical stimulation, Rehabilitation

Brief summary

The research is being done to find out if Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) stepping can improve the function of people with spinal cord injury that paralyzes.

Detailed description

Muscles to cause the weakened or paralyzed muscles to contract and produce a stepping motion of the legs. The FES stepping in this study will be done through a device called the RT600 FES Stepper (RT600).

Interventions

DEVICEFES Stepping (RT600 from Restorative Therapies, INC.)

You will be transferred to the RT600 device and secured in a support harness. We will place your legs onto the RT600 device and secure them with straps. Electrodes (pads that stick to the skin) will be placed on your skin on your legs, buttock, stomach, and back. The pads will be connected to a stimulator box through a wire. We will then start the stepping motor and stimulate your muscles with electric current. This will cause your legs to step. You will do this for 1 hour.

Sponsors

Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger, Inc.
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male, Female, age 18-65, all ethnic groups * Spinal Cord Injury, traumatic and non-traumatic * C1-T12 neurological level * ASIA class A-D * Chronic injury \> 6 months from the injury * Visible motor response to FES stimulation (visible muscle contraction evoked with electrical stimulation) * Subjects are medically stable, with no recent (1 month or less) inpatient admission for acute medical or surgical issues * Subjects are able to comply with procedures and follow-up

Exclusion criteria

* Concurrent lower motor neuron disease such as peripheral neuropathy that would exclude lower extremity electrical excitability * History of inability to tolerate electrical stimulation * Cardiovascular disease as defined by previous myocardial infarction, unstable angina, requirement for anti platelet agents, congestive heart failure, or stroke NYHA Class III or IV, history of arrhythmia with hemodynamic instability * Uncontrolled hypertension (resting systolic BP \> 160mmHg or diastolic BP \>100mmHg consistently) * Presence of a pacemaker, an implanted defibrillator or certain other implanted electronic or metallic devices other than baclofen pumps * Unstable long bone fractures of the lower extremities * Presence of stage III or greater skin ulcerations that would preclude application of stimulating pads * Malignancy * History of epileptic seizures * Women who are pregnant * Active drug or alcohol use or dependence that, in the opinion of the site investigator, would interfere with adherence to study requirements * Fractures less than 6 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Motor and Sensory Scores of the ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS)Baseline, 8 weeksChange in motor, pin prick, and light touch score components of the ASIA Impairment scale (AIS) after 8 weeks of stepping FES in persons with spinal cord injury. The AIS evaluates motor and sensory function and comprises motor (min 0, max 100), pin prick (min 0, max 112), and light touch (min 0, max 112) scores. Higher scores represent better functional outcome. AIS Classificatrion: A = Complete: No motor or sensory function is preserved in the sacral segments S4-S5. B = Incomplete: Sensory but not motor function is preserved below the neurological level and includes the sacral segments S4-S5. C = Incomplete: Motor function is preserved below the neurological level, and more than half of key muscles below the neurological level have a muscle grade less than 3. D = Incomplete: Motor function is preserved below the neurological level, and at least half of key muscles below the neurological level have a muscle grade of 3 or more. E = Normal: motor and sensory function are normal.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Heart RateBaseline, 8 weeksChange in heart rate following 8 weeks of FES. Change in heart rate from baseline was computed from week 8 parameters.
Change in Systolic Blood PressureBaseline, 8 weeksChange in systolic blood pressure following 8 weeks. Change in systolic blood pressure from baseline was computed from week 8 parameters.
Change in Diastolic Plood PressureBaseline, 8 weeksChange in distolic blood pressure following 8 weeks. Change in diastolic blood pressure from baseline was computed from week 8 parameters.
Change in Rate of Perceived ExertionBaseline, 8 weeksChange in rate of perceived exertion (RPE) following 8 weeks of FES. Change in rate of perceived exertion (RPE) from baseline was computed from week 8 parameters. The RPE scale is a 15 point scale ranging from 6 to 20 points. Higher scores indicate greater exertion.
Change in Vital CapacityBaseline, 8 weeksChange in vital capacity following 8 weeks of FES. Change in vital capacity from baseline was computed from week 8 parameters.
Change in Peak Cough FlowBaseline, 8 weeksChange in cough flow following 8 weeks of FES. Change in peak cough flow from baseline was computed from week 8 parameters.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
FES Stepping
FES Stepping, twice a week, for 8 weeks.
12
Total12

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyPhysician Decision2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFES Stepping
Age, Continuous37 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Motor and Sensory Scores of the ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS)

Change in motor, pin prick, and light touch score components of the ASIA Impairment scale (AIS) after 8 weeks of stepping FES in persons with spinal cord injury. The AIS evaluates motor and sensory function and comprises motor (min 0, max 100), pin prick (min 0, max 112), and light touch (min 0, max 112) scores. Higher scores represent better functional outcome. AIS Classificatrion: A = Complete: No motor or sensory function is preserved in the sacral segments S4-S5. B = Incomplete: Sensory but not motor function is preserved below the neurological level and includes the sacral segments S4-S5. C = Incomplete: Motor function is preserved below the neurological level, and more than half of key muscles below the neurological level have a muscle grade less than 3. D = Incomplete: Motor function is preserved below the neurological level, and at least half of key muscles below the neurological level have a muscle grade of 3 or more. E = Normal: motor and sensory function are normal.

Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
FES SteppingChange in Motor and Sensory Scores of the ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS)Upper Extremity Motor Score1.0 scores on AIS Scale
FES SteppingChange in Motor and Sensory Scores of the ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS)Lower Extremity Motor Score2.7 scores on AIS Scale
FES SteppingChange in Motor and Sensory Scores of the ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS)Light Touch2.4 scores on AIS Scale
FES SteppingChange in Motor and Sensory Scores of the ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS)Pin prick-1.2 scores on AIS Scale
Secondary

Change in Diastolic Plood Pressure

Change in distolic blood pressure following 8 weeks. Change in diastolic blood pressure from baseline was computed from week 8 parameters.

Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
FES SteppingChange in Diastolic Plood Pressure1.8 mmHg
Secondary

Change in Heart Rate

Change in heart rate following 8 weeks of FES. Change in heart rate from baseline was computed from week 8 parameters.

Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
FES SteppingChange in Heart Rate-3.3 beats per minute
Secondary

Change in Peak Cough Flow

Change in cough flow following 8 weeks of FES. Change in peak cough flow from baseline was computed from week 8 parameters.

Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
FES SteppingChange in Peak Cough Flow-6 liters/minute
Secondary

Change in Rate of Perceived Exertion

Change in rate of perceived exertion (RPE) following 8 weeks of FES. Change in rate of perceived exertion (RPE) from baseline was computed from week 8 parameters. The RPE scale is a 15 point scale ranging from 6 to 20 points. Higher scores indicate greater exertion.

Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
FES SteppingChange in Rate of Perceived Exertion-0.64 scores on RPE scale
Secondary

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure

Change in systolic blood pressure following 8 weeks. Change in systolic blood pressure from baseline was computed from week 8 parameters.

Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
FES SteppingChange in Systolic Blood Pressure1.1 mmHg
Secondary

Change in Vital Capacity

Change in vital capacity following 8 weeks of FES. Change in vital capacity from baseline was computed from week 8 parameters.

Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
FES SteppingChange in Vital Capacity-0.29 litres

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026