Skip to content

Pilot Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Vitamin D on Melanocyte Biomarkers

Pilot Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Vitamin D on Melanocyte Biomarkers

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01477463
Enrollment
24
Registered
2011-11-22
Start date
2012-09-30
Completion date
2014-05-31
Last updated
2016-12-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Melanoma, Skin

Keywords

quality of life

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the signaling pathways and changes in gene expression in melanocytes of subjects with a history of non-melanoma skin cancer who are exposed to oral vitamin D. If vitamin D is found to inhibit a signaling pathway involved in the development of melanoma such as BRAF, a protein involved in cell proliferation, then oral vitamin D could be explored further as a chemoprevention for melanoma skin cancer.

Detailed description

Background: Vitamin D is an important hormone that has multiple genetic effects in different tissue types that are mediated by signaling through the vitamin D receptor. Recent studies have shown that vitamin D signaling results in decreased innate immunity and increased adaptive immunity. Multiple epidemiologic studies have suggested that vitamin D may play a role in decreasing the risk of developing multiple types of cancer, including skin cancer. In the context of the relative success of novel immune-related therapies including PD1 inhibitors, which improves immuno-surveillance, and ipilimumab, which suppresses T cell response, there is increased promise for treatment strategies that activate innate immunity. This led us to ask the question of whether vitamin D could increase immune surveillance for melanoma via increased activity of the adaptive immune system. Prior studies performed by our group and others have suggested that vitamin D may play a role in decreasing melanoma risk. An epidemiologic study from the Women's Health Initiative showed that women with a prior history of NMSC who received calcium and vitamin D supplementation had a lower risk of subsequently developing melanoma. At the same time, women with a lower serum vitamin D level had a higher risk of developing melanoma. Furthermore, a recent clinical study showed that vitamin D supplementation increases serum vitamin D levels and ultimately results in increased vitamin D receptor signaling in benign nevi. Taken together, this findings led us to ask whether oral vitamin D supplementation could impact immune signaling in benign nevi and potentially underpin a theoretical chemo-preventive role for vitamin D in melanoma.

Interventions

DRUGVitamin D3

4,000 IU oral vitamin D3

Sponsors

National Institutes of Health (NIH)
CollaboratorNIH
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)
CollaboratorNIH
Stanford University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age 18 - 75 2. Female 3. White race/ethnicity 4. With history of non-melanoma skin cancer 5. Has 12-16 moles upon skin examination 6. Consents to 6-12 moles biopsies over 2-3 clinic visits (2-4 months) 7. Consents to ingesting oral vitamin D3 or placebo daily for 2-4 months 8. Consents to abstaining from other multivitamins during study 9. Consents to research use of their tissue and blood samples 10. Agrees to apply a sunscreen of SPF 45 during study -

Exclusion criteria

1. History or current evidence of hyperparathyroidism, hypercalcemia, renal calculi, or other renal disease. 2. History or current evidence of malabsorptive illnesses, such as IBD, or liver disease that would impair uptake or metabolism of vitamin D. 3. History or current evidence of hyperthyroidism that would increase metabolism of vitamin D. 4. History or current evidence of immunosuppression (cancer, autoimmune disease) or taking immunosuppressive drugs. 5. Currently taking medications that would affect metabolism of vitamin D (anticonvulsants, corticosteroids, H2-receptor antagonists). 6. Currently taking medications that predispose to hypercalcemia (digoxin, lithium, thiazide diuretics) or other electrolyte disturbances (aluminum hydroxide) 7. Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Genes That Showed Changes in Expression After Vitamin D Treatment2 yearsNormal cells have a complex series of molecular signals that allow communication between cells and to the cell nucleus. These signals work together to control one or more cell functions, such as cell division or cell death. Abnormal signaling activity caused by changes in gene expression can lead to cancer. An understanding of abnormal signaling, both in the tumor and in normal tissues, may lead to new therapies in cancer patients. We wish to identify changes in molecular signaling that occur in the development of melanoma that might be suppressed in benign nevi (moles) in response to vitamin D supplementation.
Number of Genes Differentialy Regulated in Melanoma That Showed Changes in Expression After Vitamin D Treatment2 yearsWe utilized a prior gene expression study that compared malignant melanoma cells to benign nevi (moles) and identified over 2300 genes that were differentially regulated in melanoma compared to benign nevi. There were approximately 270 genes in our data set that showed changes in expression after vitamin D treatment. We wish to identify overlap between these two groups.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Vitamin D Toxicity2 yearsserum 25(OH)D for
Incidence of Hypercalcemia for Vitamin D Toxicity2 yearsCalcium levels

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm A: Vitamin D
4,000 IU oral vitamin D3 Vitamin D3: 4,000 IU oral vitamin D3
18
Arm B: Placebo
Placebo - subjects may cross over to vitamin D treatment after placebo treatment is complete
6
Total24

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm A: Vitamin DArm B: PlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous56.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6
55.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7
56.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
Gender
Female
18 Participants6 Participants24 Participants
Gender
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
18 participants6 participants24 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 180 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 180 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Genes Differentialy Regulated in Melanoma That Showed Changes in Expression After Vitamin D Treatment

We utilized a prior gene expression study that compared malignant melanoma cells to benign nevi (moles) and identified over 2300 genes that were differentially regulated in melanoma compared to benign nevi. There were approximately 270 genes in our data set that showed changes in expression after vitamin D treatment. We wish to identify overlap between these two groups.

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
All Patients Treated With Vitamin D3Number of Genes Differentialy Regulated in Melanoma That Showed Changes in Expression After Vitamin D Treatment47 number of genes
Primary

Number of Genes That Showed Changes in Expression After Vitamin D Treatment

Normal cells have a complex series of molecular signals that allow communication between cells and to the cell nucleus. These signals work together to control one or more cell functions, such as cell division or cell death. Abnormal signaling activity caused by changes in gene expression can lead to cancer. An understanding of abnormal signaling, both in the tumor and in normal tissues, may lead to new therapies in cancer patients. We wish to identify changes in molecular signaling that occur in the development of melanoma that might be suppressed in benign nevi (moles) in response to vitamin D supplementation.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: All subjects treated with vitamin D3.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
All Patients Treated With Vitamin D3Number of Genes That Showed Changes in Expression After Vitamin D Treatment270 number of genes
Secondary

Incidence of Hypercalcemia for Vitamin D Toxicity

Calcium levels

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
All Patients Treated With Vitamin D3Incidence of Hypercalcemia for Vitamin D Toxicity0 participants
Arm B: PlaceboIncidence of Hypercalcemia for Vitamin D Toxicity0 participants
Secondary

Vitamin D Toxicity

serum 25(OH)D for

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All Patients Treated With Vitamin D3Vitamin D Toxicity47.11 ng/mlStandard Deviation 14.5
Arm B: PlaceboVitamin D Toxicity29.83 ng/mlStandard Deviation 4.02

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026