Skip to content

Providing Specialty Care to Individuals With Parkinsonism Directly in Their Homes Via Web-based Video Conferencing- A Comparative Effectiveness Study

Providing Specialty Care to Individuals With Parkinsonism Directly in Their Homes Via Web-based Video Conferencing- A Comparative Effectiveness Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01476306
Acronym
TELEMED-PD
Enrollment
20
Registered
2011-11-22
Start date
2011-11-30
Completion date
2012-04-30
Last updated
2017-12-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson Disease

Keywords

feasibility, effectiveness, Parkinson disease care, care via telemedicine

Brief summary

The investigators will conduct a two-arm, parallel group, randomized comparative effectiveness study across two sites to increase specialty access and improve care for individuals with Parkinsonism and their caregivers. Twenty individuals with Parkinsonism will be recruited from Johns Hopkins University and the University of Rochester (approximately ten from each site). They will then be randomized to either continue their usual in-person care with a specialist or to receive care with their specialist via telemedicine in their home. Following an in-person baseline/screening visit, approximately ten individuals in the first arm (virtual house calls) will receive three visits with a movement disorder specialist via telemedicine (using web-based video conferencing) in their home. Approximately ten individuals in the second (control) arm will receive three in-person visits at an academic medical center with the same specialists. Approximately two weeks after the completion of each clinical visit, a nurse or coordinator will call the patient to call to address any questions or ensure appropriate understanding of the recommendation (for both telemedicine and control arms). Overall, the study - consistent with a national priority for comparative effectiveness research - will compare the use of telemedicine to manage Parkinsonism to usual care.

Detailed description

1. Abstract The research's overall objective is to improve care for individuals with Parkinsonism. Parkinsonism is clinically determined as the presence of at least 2 of the following: 1) rest tremor, 2) bradykinesia, 3) cogwheel rigidity, or 4) difficulty with gait or balance. The most common cause of Parkinsonism is Parkinson disease. Parkinson disease is a chronic condition whose burden is growing both in the United States and globally. However, access to specialty care is limited chiefly to urban areas and is frequently inefficient. One way to remove geographic barriers to care is through the use of web-based video conferencing (telemedicine). To evaluate the study's aims, the investigators will conduct a seven-month randomized controlled study of twenty patients with Parkinsonism across two sites to contrast the comparative effectiveness of standard in-person specialty visits versus those conducted via web-based video conferencing (telemedicine). It is hypothesized that these virtual house calls will be feasible, clinically non-inferior to usual care, and economically valuable. This research will expand the geographic scope of specialty care and provide a national model for providing home-based, patient-centered, cost-effective care to those with Parkinsonism anywhere they live. 2. Objectives (include all primary and secondary objectives) The specific objectives of the study are as follows: Aim 1: To evaluate the feasibility of providing specialty care to individuals with Parkinsonism via web-based video conferencing (telemedicine) in their homes by calculating the proportion of specialty visits completed as scheduled. Hypothesis 1: Individuals receiving care via telemedicine in their homes will complete at least 80% of their visits as scheduled. Aim 2: To explore the clinical benefits, as measured by the change from baseline in quality of life as measured by the Parkinson Disease Questionnaire 39 (PDQ-39). Hypothesis 2: In this pilot study, the change in quality of life will be comparable between the two groups. Aim 3: To explore the economic benefit of providing specialty care via telemedicine in the home. Hypothesis 3: For patients and caregivers, travel and labor savings from receiving care in the home will outweigh technology costs for telemedicine visits.

Interventions

OTHERTelemedicine

Patient will receive care using HIPAA-compliant web-based videoconferencing rather than their usual in-patient care.

OTHERUsual care

Patients in this group will receive care as they usually do with the physician.

Sponsors

University of Rochester
CollaboratorOTHER
Johns Hopkins University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The principal eligibility criteria for participants are the following: age greater than 30, clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinsonism, ability to converse in English, ability and willingness to provide informed consent and complete study requirements, and access to a computer with broadband internet.

Exclusion criteria

* The main exclusion criterion is a condition (e.g., prominent psychosis) that in the investigator's judgment would preclude participation in a telemedicine visit. Participants may identify a principal caregiver for optional participation in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility7 monthsPercentage of visits completed as scheduled, number of individuals in telemedicine arm who require in-person visit, number of in-person visits required by individuals in telemedicine arm, proportion of completed telemedicine visits versus in-person visits

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Benefits7 monthsUnified Parkinson Disease Ration Scale (UPDRS) part III, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Hoehn and Yahr, Patient Assessment of Care for Chronic Conditions (PACIC) Survey, Patient satisfaction
Economic impact7 monthsTravel, time, facilities fees

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 23, 2026