Skip to content

Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement by Otorhinolaryngologist

Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement by Otorhinolaryngologist: a Single Institution Experience

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01476241
Enrollment
292
Registered
2011-11-22
Start date
2005-09-30
Completion date
2011-10-31
Last updated
2011-11-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dysphagia

Brief summary

The investigators main endpoint was focused on the analysis of the type, rate and the impact of different clinical parameters on the complications of the PEG tube placements performed at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery since October 2008. In addition, the investigators aimed to compare the results with a historic cohort patient group (September 2005 - October 2008) sent to the Department of Surgery for PEG tube placement in order to evaluate the results of the changed routine.

Detailed description

We retrospectively reviewed a cohort of patients that had undergone PEG tube placement from October 2008 until October 2010 at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital (HUCH), Helsinki, Finland, with a health care district currently including approximately 1.5 million inhabitants. Hospital surgical and discharge registries were used to identify the patients. Medical records were studied and details collected on the patients' age, sex, preoperative condition, preoperative laboratory parameters, coexisting medical diagnoses (Charlson Comorbidity Index, CCI (Hall 2004)), indication and date for PEG tube placement, complications, the time of PEG use, follow-up time, and clinical status at last follow up. The study period was aimed to run from PEG tube placement to the last clinical evaluation (minimum 12 months) or the time of death. These results were compared with those from a historic cohort group of patients with the PEG tube placed in the Department of Surgery, HUCH, Helsinki, Finland from September 2005 until October 2008.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPEG tube placement

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy

Sponsors

University of Helsinki
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ENT patient with PEG tube placement

Exclusion criteria

* electrolyte imbalance * coagulation imbalance * morbid obesity (BMI \> 40 kg/m2) * large volume ascites * previous gastrectomy * sepsis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complications and mortality12 months follow-up timeComplication * Minor * Major Mortality * Procedure related * \< 7 days * 7-30 days * 30 days * Overall

Countries

Finland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026