Hepatitis B, Chronic
Conditions
Keywords
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, compensated chronic hepatitis B
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-daily treatment with GSK548470 300 mg in Japanese patients with compensated chronic hepatitis B with poor response to other drugs.
Detailed description
This is a multicenter, open-label study in Japanese patients with compensated chronic hepatitis B with poor response to other drugs in order to evaluate the efficacy and safety of GSK548470 administered at a dose of 300 mg once daily. The target sample size is set at 32 subjects. The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-daily treatment with GSK548470 300 mg in subjects with compensated chronic hepatitis B with poor response to other drugs. The secondary objective is to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of once-daily treatment with GSK548470 300 mg.To evaluate the efficacy and safety of GSK548470 in the study, subjects receiving a combination of lamivudine (LAM) and adefovir pivoxil (ADV) will be switched to a combination of LAM and GSK548470, while subjects on entecavir hydrate (ETV) with or without ADV will be switched to a combination of ETV and GSK548470.
Interventions
Blue tablets containing 300 mg of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* The ability to understand and sign a written informed consent form * 16 to 69 years of age at the time of informed consent * Females of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test and agree to avoidance of pregnancy * Subject must show QTc \<450 millisecond (msec) or \<480msec with Bundle Branch Block * Chronic HBV infection, defined as positive serum HBsAg for at least 6 month * Subjects currently treated with LAM/ADV, ETV or ETV/ADV for greater than 24 weeks * Chronic hepatitis B ; HBV NDA \>= 4 log10 copies/mL, Chronic hepatitis B with cirrhosis ; HBV NDA \>= 3 log10 copies/mL * Serum ALT \<= 10 × ULN * Creatinine clearance \>= 70 mL/min * Haemoglobin \>= 8 g/dL * WBC \>= 1,000 /mm3
Exclusion criteria
* Decompensated liver disease * Co-infection with HIV or HCV * Autoimmune hepatitis rather than chronic hepatitis B * Subject with serious complication * Received or have a plan for solid organ or bone marrow transplantation * Has proximal tubulopathy * History of hypersensitivity to nucleoside and/or nucleotide analogues * Evidence of hepatocellular carcinoma by diagnostic imaging at screening and/or serum α-fetoprotein \> 50 ng/mL at screening * History of HCC * Received any interferon or HB vaccine therapy within 24 weeks prior to initiation * Received overdose NSAIDs, excluding temporary or topical use, within 7 days prior to initiation * Received drugs for injection containing glycyrrhizin as the main component within 4 weeks prior to initiation * Received drugs causing renal impairment, competitors of renal excretion, immunosuppressants, chemotherapeutics and/or corticosteroids within 8 weeks prior to initiation * Participation in another clinical study within 6 months of study entry or planned participation in another clinical study after entry to this study * Woman who is pregnant, lactating, possibly pregnant or planning a pregnancy during the study period * Psychiatry disorder or cognitive disorder that may affect the subject ability to give informed consent or to follow specified study procedures * History of alcohol or drug abuse * Any condition or situation that may interfere with the subject's participation in the study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With HBV DNA Level < 2.1 log10 Copies/mL at Week 24 | Week 24 | The number of participants with serum hepatitis B virus deoxyribonucleic acid (HBV DNA) level \< the lower limit of quantitation (2.1 log10 copies/millilitres\[copies/mL\]) (i.e., the rate of suppression) at Week 24 was summarized. Statistical analysis was not provided for the number of participants achieving HBV DNA \<2.1 log10 copies/mL (at Week 24). Missing values observed during the treatment period was imputed by the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Serum HBV DNA < 2.1 log10 Copies/mL at Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 48 and Week 96 | The number of participants with serum HBV DNA level \< the lower limit of quantitation (2.1 log10 copies/mL) (i.e., the rate of suppression) at Week 48 and Week 96 were summarized. The LOCF method was applied for missing values. |
| Number of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Normalization at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | The number of participants with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 were summarized. ALT normalization is defined as when an ALT value exceeds the upper limit of normal range (ULN) at Baseline and within the normal range at the end of treatment. The LOCF method was applied for missing values. |
| Number of Participants With HBeAg Loss at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | The number of participants achieving hepatitis Be antigen (HBeAg) loss at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 in positive HBeAg participants at Baseline were summarized. Loss of HBeAg is defined as the change of detectable HBeAg from positive to negative. The LOCF method was applied for missing values. |
| Number of Participants With HBeAg/HBeAb Seroconversion at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | The number of participants achieving hepatitis Be antigen (HBeAg)/hepatitis B e antibody (HBeAb) seroconversion at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 in positive HBeAg and negative HBeAb participants at Baseline were summarized. Seroconversion to HBeAg is defined as change of detectable antibody to HBeAg from negative to positive. The LOCF method was applied for missing values. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Serum HBV DNA Level at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Baseline and Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | The mean change from Baseline in the hepatitis B virus deoxyribonucleic acid (HBV DNA) level at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 were assessed (HBV DNA values below the lower limit of quantitation \[i.e. 2.1 log10 copies/mL\] for the assay were set to the lower limit minus 0.1 \[i.e. 2.0 log10 copies/mL\]). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method was applied for missing values. |
| Number of Participants Achieving HBsAg/HBsAb Seroconversion at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | The number of participants with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)/hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) seroconversion at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 in positive HBsAg and negative HBsAb participants at Baseline were summarized. HBsAg seroconversion was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBsAg from negative to positive. The LOCF method was applied for missing values. |
| Number of Participants With Virological Breakthrough and Resistance-related Mutations | Screening, Week 24, Week 48, Week 96 and Virological Breakthrough | The number of participants who harbored resistance-related mutations and developed virological breakthrough was summarized. Virological breakthrough defined as HBV DNA level increase \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the treatment nadir were analyzed through end of treatment. Subjects who achieved the HBV-DNA values below lower limit of quantification (LLQ) (\< 2.1 log10 copies/mL) in quantitative analysis at Week 96 were also considered negative in drug-resistance without implementation of genotypic analysis. Lamivudine (LAM), adefovir pivoxil (ADV), and entecavir hydrate (ETV) resistance-related mutations were analyzed at Screening (i.e. Baseline), Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 in participants with HBV DNA level above the lower limit of detection. Virologic breakthrough was defined as 1.0 log10 or greater increases in serum HBV DNA levels from on-treatment nadir. The LOCF method was applied for missing values. |
| Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBsAg Category at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | The number of participants achieving each indicated hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) category (HBsAg \<80, 80 to 800, 800 to 8000, 8000 to 80000, \>=80000) (kilo international unit per liter \[KIU/L\]) by study visit was summarized. |
| Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBcrAg Category at Baseline,Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | The number of participants achieving each indicated hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) category (HBcrAg \<3.0 log10, 3.0 to 4.0 log10, 4.0 to 5.0 log10, 5.0 to 6.0 log10, \>=6.0 log10) (kilo units per liter \[KU/L\]) by study visit was summarized. The LOCF method was applied for missing values. |
| Number of Participants Achieving HBsAg Loss at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | The number of participants with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 in positive HBsAg participants at Baseline were summarized. Loss of HBsAg is defined as change of detectable HBsAg from positive to negative. The LOCF method was applied for missing values. |
Countries
Japan
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
A total of 34 participants (13 participants in the Lamivudine \[LAM\]/ Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF\] group and 21 participants in the Entecavir \[ETV\]/TDF group) were enrolled in the study
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg Participants received a single, Open-Label (OL) Lamivudine (LAM) 100 milligram (mg) tablet once daily (OD) and a single, OL tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) 300 mg tablet OD for 96 weeks. | 13 |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg Participants received a single, OL entecavir (ETV) 0.5 mg tablet OD and a single, OL TDF 300 mg tablet OD for 96 weeks. | 21 |
| Total | 34 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Protocol defined stopping criteria | 1 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 52.1 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.57 | 50.3 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.18 | 51.0 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.52 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian-Japanese Heritage | 13 Participants | 21 Participants | 34 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 5 Participants | 4 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 8 Participants | 17 Participants | 25 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 12 / 13 | 17 / 21 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 1 / 13 | 2 / 21 |
Outcome results
Number of Participants With HBV DNA Level < 2.1 log10 Copies/mL at Week 24
The number of participants with serum hepatitis B virus deoxyribonucleic acid (HBV DNA) level \< the lower limit of quantitation (2.1 log10 copies/millilitres\[copies/mL\]) (i.e., the rate of suppression) at Week 24 was summarized. Statistical analysis was not provided for the number of participants achieving HBV DNA \<2.1 log10 copies/mL (at Week 24). Missing values observed during the treatment period was imputed by the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method.
Time frame: Week 24
Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) Population: all participants who received at least one dose of investigational product (IP) and had at least one efficacy assessment after the start of study treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With HBV DNA Level < 2.1 log10 Copies/mL at Week 24 | 8 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With HBV DNA Level < 2.1 log10 Copies/mL at Week 24 | 12 participants |
Mean Change From Baseline in Serum HBV DNA Level at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96
The mean change from Baseline in the hepatitis B virus deoxyribonucleic acid (HBV DNA) level at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 were assessed (HBV DNA values below the lower limit of quantitation \[i.e. 2.1 log10 copies/mL\] for the assay were set to the lower limit minus 0.1 \[i.e. 2.0 log10 copies/mL\]). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method was applied for missing values.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96
Population: FAS Population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Serum HBV DNA Level at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 24 | -2.72 log10 copies/mL |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Serum HBV DNA Level at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 48 | -2.88 log10 copies/mL |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Serum HBV DNA Level at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 96 | -3.02 log10 copies/mL |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Serum HBV DNA Level at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 24 | -3.33 log10 copies/mL |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Serum HBV DNA Level at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 48 | -3.50 log10 copies/mL |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Serum HBV DNA Level at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 96 | -3.50 log10 copies/mL |
Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBcrAg Category at Baseline,Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96
The number of participants achieving each indicated hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) category (HBcrAg \<3.0 log10, 3.0 to 4.0 log10, 4.0 to 5.0 log10, 5.0 to 6.0 log10, \>=6.0 log10) (kilo units per liter \[KU/L\]) by study visit was summarized. The LOCF method was applied for missing values.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96
Population: FAS Population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBcrAg Category at Baseline,Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBcrAg <3.0 Log KU/L, Week 48 | 0 Participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBcrAg Category at Baseline,Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBcrAg >=6.0 Log KU/L, Baseline | 12 Participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBcrAg Category at Baseline,Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBcrAg 3.0-4.0 Log KU/L, Week 48 | 1 Participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBcrAg Category at Baseline,Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBcrAg 5.0-6.0 Log KU/L, Week 24 | 1 Participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBcrAg Category at Baseline,Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBcrAg 4.0-5.0 Log KU/L, Week 48 | 0 Participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBcrAg Category at Baseline,Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBcrAg <3.0 Log KU/L, Week 24 | 0 Participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBcrAg Category at Baseline,Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBcrAg 5.0-6.0 Log KU/L, Week 48 | 2 Participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBcrAg Category at Baseline,Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBcrAg 3.0-4.0 Log KU/L, Baseline | 0 Participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBcrAg Category at Baseline,Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBcrAg >=6.0 Log KU/L, Week 48 | 10 Participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBcrAg Category at Baseline,Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBcrAg 3.0-4.0 Log KU/L, Week 24 | 0 Participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBcrAg Category at Baseline,Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBcrAg <3.0 Log KU/L, Week 96 | 0 Participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBcrAg Category at Baseline,Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBcrAg 4.0-5.0 Log KU/L, Baseline | 0 Participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBcrAg Category at Baseline,Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBcrAg 3.0-4.0 Log KU/L, Week 96 | 1 Participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBcrAg Category at Baseline,Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBcrAg 4.0-5.0 Log KU/L, Week 24 | 1 Participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBcrAg Category at Baseline,Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBcrAg 4.0-5.0 Log KU/L, Week 96 | 0 Participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBcrAg Category at Baseline,Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBcrAg 5.0-6.0 Log KU/L, Baseline | 1 Participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBcrAg Category at Baseline,Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBcrAg 5.0-6.0 Log KU/L, Week 96 | 3 Participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBcrAg Category at Baseline,Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBcrAg >=6.0 Log KU/L, Week 24 | 11 Participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBcrAg Category at Baseline,Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBcrAg >=6.0 Log KU/L, Week 96 | 9 Participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBcrAg Category at Baseline,Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBcrAg <3.0 Log KU/L, Baseline | 0 Participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBcrAg Category at Baseline,Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBcrAg >=6.0 Log KU/L, Week 96 | 17 Participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBcrAg Category at Baseline,Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBcrAg 5.0-6.0 Log KU/L, Week 24 | 1 Participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBcrAg Category at Baseline,Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBcrAg <3.0 Log KU/L, Baseline | 0 Participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBcrAg Category at Baseline,Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBcrAg 4.0-5.0 Log KU/L, Baseline | 1 Participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBcrAg Category at Baseline,Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBcrAg 5.0-6.0 Log KU/L, Baseline | 0 Participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBcrAg Category at Baseline,Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBcrAg >=6.0 Log KU/L, Baseline | 19 Participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBcrAg Category at Baseline,Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBcrAg <3.0 Log KU/L, Week 24 | 0 Participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBcrAg Category at Baseline,Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBcrAg 3.0-4.0 Log KU/L, Week 24 | 1 Participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBcrAg Category at Baseline,Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBcrAg 4.0-5.0 Log KU/L, Week 24 | 1 Participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBcrAg Category at Baseline,Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBcrAg >=6.0 Log KU/L, Week 24 | 18 Participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBcrAg Category at Baseline,Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBcrAg <3.0 Log KU/L, Week 48 | 0 Participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBcrAg Category at Baseline,Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBcrAg 3.0-4.0 Log KU/L, Week 48 | 1 Participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBcrAg Category at Baseline,Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBcrAg 4.0-5.0 Log KU/L, Week 48 | 1 Participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBcrAg Category at Baseline,Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBcrAg 5.0-6.0 Log KU/L, Week 48 | 1 Participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBcrAg Category at Baseline,Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBcrAg >=6.0 Log KU/L, Week 48 | 18 Participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBcrAg Category at Baseline,Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBcrAg <3.0 Log KU/L, Week 96 | 0 Participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBcrAg Category at Baseline,Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBcrAg 3.0-4.0 Log KU/L, Week 96 | 1 Participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBcrAg Category at Baseline,Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBcrAg 4.0-5.0 Log KU/L, Week 96 | 1 Participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBcrAg Category at Baseline,Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBcrAg 5.0-6.0 Log KU/L, Week 96 | 2 Participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBcrAg Category at Baseline,Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBcrAg 3.0-4.0 Log KU/L, Baseline | 1 Participants |
Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBsAg Category at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96
The number of participants achieving each indicated hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) category (HBsAg \<80, 80 to 800, 800 to 8000, 8000 to 80000, \>=80000) (kilo international unit per liter \[KIU/L\]) by study visit was summarized.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96
Population: FAS Population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBsAg Category at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBsAg <80 KIU/L, Week 48 | 0 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBsAg Category at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBsAg >=80,000 KIU/L, Baseline | 0 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBsAg Category at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBsAg 80-800 KIU/L, Week 48 | 3 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBsAg Category at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBsAg <80 KIU/L, Baseline | 0 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBsAg Category at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBsAg 800-8000 KIU/L, Week 48 | 5 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBsAg Category at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBsAg <80 KIU/L, Week 24 | 0 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBsAg Category at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBsAg 8000-80,000 KIU/L, Week 48 | 5 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBsAg Category at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBsAg 800-8000 KIU/L, Baseline | 6 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBsAg Category at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBsAg >=80,000 KIU/L, Week 48 | 0 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBsAg Category at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBsAg 800-8000 KIU/L, Week 24 | 5 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBsAg Category at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBsAg <80 KIU/L, Week 96 | 0 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBsAg Category at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBsAg 80-800 KIU/L, Week 24 | 3 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBsAg Category at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBsAg 80-800 KIU/L, Week 96 | 4 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBsAg Category at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBsAg 8000-80,000 KIU/L, Week 24 | 5 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBsAg Category at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBsAg 800-8000 KIU/L, Week 96 | 6 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBsAg Category at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBsAg 8000-80,000 KIU/L, Baseline | 6 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBsAg Category at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBsAg 8000-80,000 KIU/L, Week 96 | 3 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBsAg Category at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBsAg >=80,000 KIU/L, Week 24 | 0 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBsAg Category at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBsAg >=80,000 KIU/L, Week 96 | 0 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBsAg Category at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBsAg 80-800 KIU/L, Baseline | 1 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBsAg Category at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBsAg >=80,000 KIU/L, Week 96 | 0 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBsAg Category at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBsAg <80 KIU/L, Baseline | 0 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBsAg Category at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBsAg 80-800 KIU/L, Baseline | 0 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBsAg Category at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBsAg 800-8000 KIU/L, Baseline | 12 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBsAg Category at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBsAg 8000-80,000 KIU/L, Baseline | 8 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBsAg Category at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBsAg >=80,000 KIU/L, Baseline | 1 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBsAg Category at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBsAg 80-800 KIU/L, Week 24 | 0 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBsAg Category at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBsAg 800-8000 KIU/L, Week 24 | 15 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBsAg Category at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBsAg 8000-80,000 KIU/L, Week 24 | 6 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBsAg Category at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBsAg >=80,000 KIU/L, Week 24 | 0 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBsAg Category at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBsAg <80 KIU/L, Week 48 | 0 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBsAg Category at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBsAg 80-800 KIU/L, Week 48 | 1 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBsAg Category at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBsAg 800-8000 KIU/L, Week 48 | 14 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBsAg Category at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBsAg 8000-80,000 KIU/L, Week 48 | 6 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBsAg Category at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBsAg >=80,000 KIU/L, Week 48 | 0 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBsAg Category at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBsAg <80 KIU/L, Week 96 | 0 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBsAg Category at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBsAg 80-800 KIU/L, Week 96 | 3 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBsAg Category at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBsAg 800-8000 KIU/L, Week 96 | 13 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBsAg Category at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBsAg 8000-80,000 KIU/L, Week 96 | 5 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving Each Indicated HBsAg Category at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | HBsAg <80 KIU/L, Week 24 | 0 participants |
Number of Participants Achieving HBsAg/HBsAb Seroconversion at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96
The number of participants with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)/hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) seroconversion at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 in positive HBsAg and negative HBsAb participants at Baseline were summarized. HBsAg seroconversion was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBsAg from negative to positive. The LOCF method was applied for missing values.
Time frame: Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96
Population: FAS Population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving HBsAg/HBsAb Seroconversion at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 24 | 0 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving HBsAg/HBsAb Seroconversion at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 48 | 0 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving HBsAg/HBsAb Seroconversion at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 96 | 0 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving HBsAg/HBsAb Seroconversion at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 24 | 0 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving HBsAg/HBsAb Seroconversion at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 48 | 0 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving HBsAg/HBsAb Seroconversion at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 96 | 0 participants |
Number of Participants Achieving HBsAg Loss at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96
The number of participants with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 in positive HBsAg participants at Baseline were summarized. Loss of HBsAg is defined as change of detectable HBsAg from positive to negative. The LOCF method was applied for missing values.
Time frame: Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96
Population: FAS Population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving HBsAg Loss at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 24 | 0 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving HBsAg Loss at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 48 | 0 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving HBsAg Loss at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 96 | 0 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving HBsAg Loss at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 24 | 0 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving HBsAg Loss at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 48 | 0 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants Achieving HBsAg Loss at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 96 | 0 participants |
Number of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Normalization at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96
The number of participants with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 were summarized. ALT normalization is defined as when an ALT value exceeds the upper limit of normal range (ULN) at Baseline and within the normal range at the end of treatment. The LOCF method was applied for missing values.
Time frame: Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96
Population: Biochemically Evaluable Population (BEP): all participants who received at least one dose of investigational product and with an abnormal ALT at Baseline. The population for the analysis of ALT normalization was all participants with an ALT value \> ULN at Baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Normalization at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 24 | 3 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Normalization at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 48 | 3 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Normalization at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 96 | 3 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Normalization at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 24 | 6 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Normalization at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 48 | 5 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Normalization at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 96 | 6 participants |
Number of Participants With HBeAg/HBeAb Seroconversion at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96
The number of participants achieving hepatitis Be antigen (HBeAg)/hepatitis B e antibody (HBeAb) seroconversion at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 in positive HBeAg and negative HBeAb participants at Baseline were summarized. Seroconversion to HBeAg is defined as change of detectable antibody to HBeAg from negative to positive. The LOCF method was applied for missing values.
Time frame: Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96
Population: FAS Population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With HBeAg/HBeAb Seroconversion at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 24 | 0 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With HBeAg/HBeAb Seroconversion at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 48 | 0 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With HBeAg/HBeAb Seroconversion at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 96 | 0 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With HBeAg/HBeAb Seroconversion at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 24 | 0 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With HBeAg/HBeAb Seroconversion at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 48 | 0 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With HBeAg/HBeAb Seroconversion at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 96 | 0 participants |
Number of Participants With HBeAg Loss at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96
The number of participants achieving hepatitis Be antigen (HBeAg) loss at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 in positive HBeAg participants at Baseline were summarized. Loss of HBeAg is defined as the change of detectable HBeAg from positive to negative. The LOCF method was applied for missing values.
Time frame: Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96
Population: FAS Population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With HBeAg Loss at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 24 | 0 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With HBeAg Loss at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 48 | 1 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With HBeAg Loss at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 96 | 1 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With HBeAg Loss at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 24 | 0 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With HBeAg Loss at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 48 | 0 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With HBeAg Loss at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 96 | 0 participants |
Number of Participants With Serum HBV DNA < 2.1 log10 Copies/mL at Week 48 and Week 96
The number of participants with serum HBV DNA level \< the lower limit of quantitation (2.1 log10 copies/mL) (i.e., the rate of suppression) at Week 48 and Week 96 were summarized. The LOCF method was applied for missing values.
Time frame: Week 48 and Week 96
Population: FAS Population.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With Serum HBV DNA < 2.1 log10 Copies/mL at Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 48 | 9 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With Serum HBV DNA < 2.1 log10 Copies/mL at Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 96 | 10 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With Serum HBV DNA < 2.1 log10 Copies/mL at Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 96 | 14 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With Serum HBV DNA < 2.1 log10 Copies/mL at Week 48 and Week 96 | Week 48 | 12 participants |
Number of Participants With Virological Breakthrough and Resistance-related Mutations
The number of participants who harbored resistance-related mutations and developed virological breakthrough was summarized. Virological breakthrough defined as HBV DNA level increase \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the treatment nadir were analyzed through end of treatment. Subjects who achieved the HBV-DNA values below lower limit of quantification (LLQ) (\< 2.1 log10 copies/mL) in quantitative analysis at Week 96 were also considered negative in drug-resistance without implementation of genotypic analysis. Lamivudine (LAM), adefovir pivoxil (ADV), and entecavir hydrate (ETV) resistance-related mutations were analyzed at Screening (i.e. Baseline), Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 in participants with HBV DNA level above the lower limit of detection. Virologic breakthrough was defined as 1.0 log10 or greater increases in serum HBV DNA levels from on-treatment nadir. The LOCF method was applied for missing values.
Time frame: Screening, Week 24, Week 48, Week 96 and Virological Breakthrough
Population: FAS Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With Virological Breakthrough and Resistance-related Mutations | ADV resistance-related mutations,Screening,n=13,21 | 4 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With Virological Breakthrough and Resistance-related Mutations | Virological breakthrough, through end of study n=0 | 0 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With Virological Breakthrough and Resistance-related Mutations | LAM resistance-related mutations,Screening,n=13,21 | 11 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With Virological Breakthrough and Resistance-related Mutations | ETV resistance-related mutations,Screening,n=13,21 | 6 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With Virological Breakthrough and Resistance-related Mutations | LAM resistance-related mutations, Week 24, n=5, 9 | 4 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With Virological Breakthrough and Resistance-related Mutations | ADV resistance-related mutations, Week 24, n=5, 9 | 2 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With Virological Breakthrough and Resistance-related Mutations | ETV resistance-related mutations, Week 24, n=5, 9 | 1 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With Virological Breakthrough and Resistance-related Mutations | LAM resistance-related mutations, Week 48, n= 3, 9 | 2 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With Virological Breakthrough and Resistance-related Mutations | ADV resistance-related mutations, Week 48, n= 3, 9 | 1 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With Virological Breakthrough and Resistance-related Mutations | ETV resistance-related mutations, Week 48, n= 3, 9 | 1 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With Virological Breakthrough and Resistance-related Mutations | LAM resistance-related mutations, Week 96, n= 2, 7 | 2 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With Virological Breakthrough and Resistance-related Mutations | ADV resistance-related mutations, Week 96, n= 2, 7 | 1 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With Virological Breakthrough and Resistance-related Mutations | ETV resistance-related mutations, Week 96, n= 2, 7 | 2 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With Virological Breakthrough and Resistance-related Mutations | LAM resistance-related mutations, VB, n=0,1 | 0 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With Virological Breakthrough and Resistance-related Mutations | ADV resistance-related mutations, VB, n=0,1 | 0 participants |
| LAM 100 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With Virological Breakthrough and Resistance-related Mutations | ETV resistance-related mutations, VB, n=0,1 | 0 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With Virological Breakthrough and Resistance-related Mutations | ETV resistance-related mutations, VB, n=0,1 | 1 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With Virological Breakthrough and Resistance-related Mutations | ADV resistance-related mutations, Week 48, n= 3, 9 | 0 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With Virological Breakthrough and Resistance-related Mutations | Virological breakthrough, through end of study n=0 | 1 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With Virological Breakthrough and Resistance-related Mutations | ETV resistance-related mutations, Week 96, n= 2, 7 | 6 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With Virological Breakthrough and Resistance-related Mutations | LAM resistance-related mutations,Screening,n=13,21 | 17 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With Virological Breakthrough and Resistance-related Mutations | ADV resistance-related mutations,Screening,n=13,21 | 0 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With Virological Breakthrough and Resistance-related Mutations | ETV resistance-related mutations, Week 48, n= 3, 9 | 7 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With Virological Breakthrough and Resistance-related Mutations | ETV resistance-related mutations,Screening,n=13,21 | 16 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With Virological Breakthrough and Resistance-related Mutations | ADV resistance-related mutations, VB, n=0,1 | 0 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With Virological Breakthrough and Resistance-related Mutations | LAM resistance-related mutations, Week 24, n=5, 9 | 8 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With Virological Breakthrough and Resistance-related Mutations | LAM resistance-related mutations, Week 96, n= 2, 7 | 6 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With Virological Breakthrough and Resistance-related Mutations | ADV resistance-related mutations, Week 24, n=5, 9 | 0 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With Virological Breakthrough and Resistance-related Mutations | LAM resistance-related mutations, VB, n=0,1 | 1 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With Virological Breakthrough and Resistance-related Mutations | ETV resistance-related mutations, Week 24, n=5, 9 | 8 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With Virological Breakthrough and Resistance-related Mutations | ADV resistance-related mutations, Week 96, n= 2, 7 | 0 participants |
| ETV 0.5 mg/TDF 300 mg | Number of Participants With Virological Breakthrough and Resistance-related Mutations | LAM resistance-related mutations, Week 48, n= 3, 9 | 7 participants |