Skip to content

Phase 2 Study To Evaluate Safety And Efficacy Of Investigational Drug - PF04937319 In Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled, Dose-ranging, Parallel Group Study To Evaluate Safety And Efficacy Of Pf-04937319 And Sitagliptin On Glycemic Control In Adult Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled On Metformin

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01475461
Enrollment
345
Registered
2011-11-21
Start date
2011-11-30
Completion date
2013-01-31
Last updated
2017-01-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

Phase 2, type 2 diabetes mellitus, PF-04937319

Brief summary

B1621007 is designed to study the safety and efficacy of PF-04937319 in patients with type 2 diabetes

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo

double-dummy placebo tablets administered once-daily for 84-days

DRUGPF-04937319 - 3mg

PF-04937319 3mg administered as tablets once-daily for 84-days

DRUGPF-04937319 - 20mg

PF-04937319 20mg administered as tablets once-daily for 84-days

DRUGPF-04937319 - 50mg

PF-04937319 50mg administered as tablets once-daily for 84-days

DRUGPF-04937319 - 100mg

PF-04937319 100mg administered as tablets once-daily for 84-days

DRUGSitagliptin - 100mg

Sitagliptin 100mg administered as tablets once-daily for 84-days

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients with type 2 diabetes, on metformin, age between 18-55 yrs, male or female

Exclusion criteria

* patients with type 1 diabetes, medically unstable, unacceptable clinical laboratory test results at screening

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 12Baseline (Day 1), Week 12HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin which is measured primarily to identify the average glycemic control over prolonged periods of time. The normal range for the HbA1c test, was identified as less than (\<) 6.5 percent (%) by the study-specific central laboratory used. Change from baseline in percentage of HbA1c in participants were reported.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Baseline (Day 1), Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 14
Percentage of Participants Achieving Less Than 6.5 Percent and Less Than 7 Percent Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Levels at Week 12Week 12HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin which is measured primarily to identify the average glycemic control over prolonged periods of time. The normal range for the HbA1c test, was identified as \<6.5 percent by the study-specific central laboratory used and data are presented in categories of \<6.5 percent and \<7 percent.
Number of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG)DataBaseline (Day 1) up to Week 14Criteria for increase from baseline data: PR interval (percent change of greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 25/50% \[if baseline\>200 then percent change of \>25% counts; if baseline \<=200 then percent change of \>50% counts\]; QRS complex (percent change of \>=50%); QT Fridericia's correction (QTcF) interval (change of \>=30 to \<60 millisecond \[msec\], and change of \>=60 msec).
Number of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataBaseline (Day 1) up to Week 14Participants who met the criteria for increase or decrease in vital signs data were reported. Criteria for increase or decrease from baseline vital signs data: sitting systolic blood pressure (BP) of \>=30 millimeter of mercury (mmHg); sitting diastolic BP of \>=20 mmHg and pulse rate was based on investigator's discretion.
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 2, 4 and 8Baseline(Day 1), Week 2, 4, 8HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin which is measured primarily to identify the average glycemic control over prolonged periods of time. The normal range for the HbA1c test, was identified as \<6.5 percent by the study-specific central laboratory used. Change from baseline in percentage of HbA1c in participants were reported.
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Hypoglycemic Events (HAE) EpisodeBaseline (Day 1) up to Week 14A hypoglycemic event (HAE) was identified by characteristic symptoms or blood glucose levels. HAE is defined as 1 of the given definitions: Characteristic symptoms of HAE with no home glucose monitoring performed where clinical picture included prompt resolution with food intake, subcutaneous glucagon, or intravenous glucose; or characteristic symptoms of HAE with home glucose monitoring measurement =\< 70 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL) using ACCU-CHEK plasma-referenced home glucometers or =\<74 mg/dL using International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) referenced ACCU-CHEK or central laboratory glucometers; or any laboratory glucose value, meeting the following criterion with or without accompanying symptoms: =\<49 mg/dL using ACCU-CHEK plasma-referenced home glucometers or =\<53 mg/dL using IFCC referenced ACCU-CHEK or central laboratory glucometers.
Number of Hypoglycemic Events (HAE) Episodes Per ParticipantBaseline (Day 1) up to Week 14A hypoglycemic event (HAE) was identified by characteristic symptoms or blood glucose levels. Median number of events per participant was reported
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Baseline (Day 1), Week 2, 4, 8 , 12 , 14
Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory ValuesBaseline (Day 1) up to Week 14Hemoglobin,hematocrit,red blood cells(RBC) count:less than \[\<\]0.8\*lower limit of normal\[LLN\],platelets:\<0.5\*LLN/greater than \[\>\]1.75\*upper limit of normal \[ULN\],white blood cells(WBC):\<0.6\*LLN or \>1.5\*ULN,lymphocytes,total neutrophils:\<0.8\*LLN or \>1.2\*ULN, basophils,eosinophil,monocytes:\>1.2\*ULN;aspartate aminotransferase,alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase:\>0.3\*ULN,total protein,albumin:\<0.8\*LLN or \>1.2\*ULN;total bilirubin,direct bilirubin,indirect bilirubin:\>1.5\*ULN;triglycerides,cholesterol:\>1.3\*ULN, HDL:\<0.8\*LLN, LDL:\>1.2\*ULN,blood urea nitrogen,creatinine:\>1.3\*ULN,uric acid:\>1.2\*ULN;sodium: \<0.95\*LLN or \>1.05\*ULN,potassium,chloride,calcium,bicarbonate:\<0.9\*LLN or \>1.1\*ULN;creatine kinase:\>2.0\*ULN;glucose:\<0.6\*LLN or \>1.5\*ULN,urine WBC and RBC:\>= 20/High Power Field \[HPF\]),urine epithelial cells (\>=1 HPF),urine bacteria \>20 high-powered field;qualitative urine glucose,urine blood to Hgb ratio (\>=1);urine(protein,nitrite,mucus,leukocyte \>=1 in urine dipstick test).
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Baseline (Day 1) up to 14 days after last dose (up to 101 days)An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 14 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse events.

Countries

Hungary, India, Philippines, Romania, Slovakia, South Africa, Taiwan, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Total 615 participants were consented,of which 376 participants entered to run-in period to receive sponsor provided Metformin, 345 participants then randomized to study treatment,of these 335 were treated. Results were collected for 335 participants as data from 1 site (10 participants) were excluded due to major good clinical practice violations.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Placebo matched to PF-04937319 tablet orally once daily and placebo matched to sitagliptin tablet orally once daily along with background metformin 500 mg immediate release tablets or as per standard clinical practice, for 12 weeks.
57
PF-04937319 3 mg
PF-04937319 3 mg tablet orally once daily along with background metformin 500 mg immediate release tablets or as per standard clinical practice, for 12 weeks.
57
PF-04937319 20 mg
PF-04937319 20 mg tablet orally once daily along with background metformin 500 mg immediate release tablets or as per standard clinical practice, for 12 weeks.
54
PF-04937319 50 mg
PF-04937319 50 mg tablet orally once daily along with background metformin 500 mg immediate release tablets or as per standard clinical practice, for 12 weeks.
56
PF-04937319 100 mg
PF-04937319 100 mg tablet orally once daily along with background metformin 500 mg immediate release tablets or as per standard clinical practice, for 12 weeks.
56
Sitagliptin 100 mg
Sitagliptin 100 mg tablet orally once daily along with background metformin 500 mg immediate release tablets or as per standard clinical practice, for 12 weeks.
55
Total335

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006
Run-in PeriodLost to Follow-up7000000
Run-in PeriodNot meet eligibility criteria16000000
Run-in PeriodOther3000000
Run-in PeriodProtocol Violation4000000
Run-in PeriodWithdrawal by Subject11000000
Treatment PeriodAdverse Event0001000
Treatment PeriodDeath0001000
Treatment PeriodLack of Efficacy0202110
Treatment PeriodLost to Follow-up0323121
Treatment PeriodMedication Error0001000
Treatment PeriodOther0100000
Treatment PeriodProtocol Violation0100001
Treatment PeriodWithdrawal by Subject0220220

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboPF-04937319 3 mgPF-04937319 20 mgPF-04937319 50 mgPF-04937319 100 mgSitagliptin 100 mgTotal
Age, Customized
>=18 to =<44 years
15 Participants17 Participants14 Participants15 Participants15 Participants17 Participants93 Participants
Age, Customized
>=45 to =<64 years
42 Participants40 Participants40 Participants41 Participants41 Participants38 Participants242 Participants
Gender
Female
21 Participants29 Participants22 Participants23 Participants26 Participants22 Participants143 Participants
Gender
Male
36 Participants28 Participants32 Participants33 Participants30 Participants33 Participants192 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
37 / 37619 / 5719 / 5719 / 5416 / 5624 / 5618 / 55
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 3761 / 570 / 571 / 540 / 561 / 560 / 55

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 12

HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin which is measured primarily to identify the average glycemic control over prolonged periods of time. The normal range for the HbA1c test, was identified as less than (\<) 6.5 percent (%) by the study-specific central laboratory used. Change from baseline in percentage of HbA1c in participants were reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants for whom data was summarized for this measure and 'n' signifies participants evaluable at given time points for each group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 12Baseline (n=50,55,48,55,53,53)8.01 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.099
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 12Change at Week 12 (n=46,52,45,52,50,53)-0.42 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.821
PF-04937319 3 mgChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 12Baseline (n=50,55,48,55,53,53)8.00 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.031
PF-04937319 3 mgChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 12Change at Week 12 (n=46,52,45,52,50,53)-0.33 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.793
PF-04937319 20 mgChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 12Baseline (n=50,55,48,55,53,53)7.80 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.965
PF-04937319 20 mgChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 12Change at Week 12 (n=46,52,45,52,50,53)-0.53 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.919
PF-04937319 50 mgChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 12Baseline (n=50,55,48,55,53,53)8.15 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.002
PF-04937319 50 mgChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 12Change at Week 12 (n=46,52,45,52,50,53)-0.59 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.988
PF-04937319 100 mgChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 12Baseline (n=50,55,48,55,53,53)8.31 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.043
PF-04937319 100 mgChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 12Change at Week 12 (n=46,52,45,52,50,53)-0.80 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.955
SitagliptinChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 12Baseline (n=50,55,48,55,53,53)7.89 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.022
SitagliptinChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 12Change at Week 12 (n=46,52,45,52,50,53)-0.79 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.859
Comparison: Week 12: Treatment difference and 80 percent(%) confidence interval (CI) were based on least squares (LS) mean. A mixed model repeated measure (MMRM) analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant. Null hypothesis stated there was no difference between PF 04937319 and placebo, alternative hypothesis stated PF 04937319 was superior to placebo.p-value: 0.520680% CI: [-0.21, 0.23]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 12: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant. Null hypothesis stated there was no difference between PF 04937319 and placebo, alternative hypothesis stated PF 04937319 was superior to placebop-value: 0.164580% CI: [-0.4, 0.05]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 12: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant. Null hypothesis stated there was no difference between PF 04937319 and placebo, alternative hypothesis stated PF 04937319 was superior to placebo.p-value: 0.159280% CI: [-0.39, 0.05]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 12: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant. Null hypothesis stated there was no difference between PF 04937319 and placebo, alternative hypothesis stated PF 04937319 was superior to placebo.p-value: 0.004980% CI: [-0.68, -0.23]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 12: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant. Null hypothesis stated there was no difference between PF 04937319 and placebo, alternative hypothesis stated PF 04937319 was superior to placebo.p-value: 0.006880% CI: [-0.65, -0.21]t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 2, 4, 8 , 12 , 14

Population: Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, 'N' signifies participants for whom data was collected for this measure and n=participants who were evaluable at given time points for each group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Baseline (n=55, 55, 50, 56, 54, 55)86.446 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 19.1859
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 2 (n=54, 55, 49, 56, 53, 55)-0.239 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 0.7264
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 4 (n=51, 55, 49, 55, 53, 53)-0.704 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.5651
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 8 (n=49, 53, 45, 52, 50, 52)-0.823 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.675
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 12 (n=47, 52, 45, 52, 50, 53)-0.804 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 2.0119
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 14 (n=44, 52, 44, 52, 50, 53)-0.588 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 2.0994
PF-04937319 3 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 2 (n=54, 55, 49, 56, 53, 55)0.435 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 5.2348
PF-04937319 3 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 8 (n=49, 53, 45, 52, 50, 52)-0.003 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 5.0869
PF-04937319 3 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 14 (n=44, 52, 44, 52, 50, 53)0.011 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 0.6634
PF-04937319 3 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Baseline (n=55, 55, 50, 56, 54, 55)87.865 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 23.7732
PF-04937319 3 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 4 (n=51, 55, 49, 55, 53, 53)0.214 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 5.1426
PF-04937319 3 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 12 (n=47, 52, 45, 52, 50, 53)-0.142 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 4.8928
PF-04937319 20 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 14 (n=44, 52, 44, 52, 50, 53)-0.613 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 0.3149
PF-04937319 20 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 12 (n=47, 52, 45, 52, 50, 53)-0.455 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.9213
PF-04937319 20 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 8 (n=49, 53, 45, 52, 50, 52)-0.510 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.7467
PF-04937319 20 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 4 (n=51, 55, 49, 55, 53, 53)-0.192 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.4649
PF-04937319 20 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Baseline (n=55, 55, 50, 56, 54, 55)88.371 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 17.3923
PF-04937319 20 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 2 (n=54, 55, 49, 56, 53, 55)-0.052 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.057
PF-04937319 50 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 8 (n=49, 53, 45, 52, 50, 52)-0.270 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.6559
PF-04937319 50 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 2 (n=54, 55, 49, 56, 53, 55)-0.283 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.052
PF-04937319 50 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 4 (n=51, 55, 49, 55, 53, 53)-0.203 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.7609
PF-04937319 50 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 14 (n=44, 52, 44, 52, 50, 53)-0.492 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 0.2823
PF-04937319 50 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 12 (n=47, 52, 45, 52, 50, 53)-0.352 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.8121
PF-04937319 50 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Baseline (n=55, 55, 50, 56, 54, 55)88.066 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 20.3446
PF-04937319 100 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Baseline (n=55, 55, 50, 56, 54, 55)91.239 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 21.2731
PF-04937319 100 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 12 (n=47, 52, 45, 52, 50, 53)-0.623 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.9647
PF-04937319 100 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 2 (n=54, 55, 49, 56, 53, 55)-0.053 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 0.901
PF-04937319 100 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 4 (n=51, 55, 49, 55, 53, 53)-0.374 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.2083
PF-04937319 100 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 8 (n=49, 53, 45, 52, 50, 52)-0.475 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.4374
PF-04937319 100 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 14 (n=44, 52, 44, 52, 50, 53)-0.916 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 0.3743
SitagliptinChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 8 (n=49, 53, 45, 52, 50, 52)-0.702 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.6095
SitagliptinChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 4 (n=51, 55, 49, 55, 53, 53)-0.353 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.1598
SitagliptinChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 12 (n=47, 52, 45, 52, 50, 53)-0.917 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.9591
SitagliptinChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 14 (n=44, 52, 44, 52, 50, 53)-1.172 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 0.285
SitagliptinChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 2 (n=54, 55, 49, 56, 53, 55)-0.384 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.1041
SitagliptinChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Baseline (n=55, 55, 50, 56, 54, 55)87.025 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 21.2567
Comparison: Week 2: Treatment difference and 80 percent (%) confidence interval (CI) were based on least squares (LS) mean. A mixed model repeated measure (MMRM) analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.091380% CI: [0.18, 1.34]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 2: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.523680% CI: [-0.3, 0.89]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 2: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.924480% CI: [-0.53, 0.62]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 2: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.506680% CI: [-0.28, 0.88]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 2: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.894780% CI: [-0.64, 0.52]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 4: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.057780% CI: [0.3, 1.52]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 4: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.301280% CI: [-0.12, 1.14]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 4: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.316580% CI: [-0.13, 1.09]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 4: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.519180% CI: [-0.31, 0.93]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 4: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.510780% CI: [-0.3, 0.93]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 8: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.105480% CI: [0.17, 1.42]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 8: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.534180% CI: [-0.33, 0.96]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 8: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.278280% CI: [-0.1, 1.15]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 8: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.533180% CI: [-0.32, 0.94]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 8: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.90780% CI: [-0.57, 0.68]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 12: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.175780% CI: [0.04, 1.35]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 12: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.408380% CI: [-0.24, 1.11]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 12: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.31580% CI: [-0.14, 1.17]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 12: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.663180% CI: [-0.44, 0.89]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 12: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.869480% CI: [-0.74, 0.57]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 14: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.203180% CI: [0, 1.4]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 14: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.713780% CI: [-0.52, 0.93]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 14: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.68180% CI: [-0.48, 0.92]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 14: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.692180% CI: [-0.92, 0.49]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 14 (Follow-up): Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.370280% CI: [-1.19, 0.21]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 14

Population: FAS: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, 'N' signifies participants for whom data was summarized for this measure and 'n' signifies participants who were evaluable at given time points for each group. Data for Week 1 had not been reported because as per protocol it was not intended to be collected.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Baseline (n=56, 56, 52, 56, 55, 55)168.3 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 42.99
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 2 (n=54, 56, 50, 56, 54, 55)-5.2 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 26.22
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 4 (n=52, 56, 51, 55, 54, 53)-1.8 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 31.25
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 8 (n=50, 54, 47, 52, 51, 52)-3.1 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 37.03
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 12 (n=48, 53, 47, 52, 51, 53)-7.5 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 31.21
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 14 (n=45, 53, 46, 52, 51, 53)-5.9 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 33.18
PF-04937319 3 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 2 (n=54, 56, 50, 56, 54, 55)0.7 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 26.21
PF-04937319 3 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 8 (n=50, 54, 47, 52, 51, 52)0.7 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 26.83
PF-04937319 3 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 14 (n=45, 53, 46, 52, 51, 53)-3.5 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 28.43
PF-04937319 3 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Baseline (n=56, 56, 52, 56, 55, 55)159.8 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 40.43
PF-04937319 3 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 4 (n=52, 56, 51, 55, 54, 53)-0.3 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 23.21
PF-04937319 3 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 12 (n=48, 53, 47, 52, 51, 53)-2.5 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 28.58
PF-04937319 20 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 14 (n=45, 53, 46, 52, 51, 53)-3.1 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 32.62
PF-04937319 20 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 12 (n=48, 53, 47, 52, 51, 53)-3.8 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 31.62
PF-04937319 20 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 8 (n=50, 54, 47, 52, 51, 52)-2.5 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 27.49
PF-04937319 20 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 4 (n=52, 56, 51, 55, 54, 53)-0.2 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 21.29
PF-04937319 20 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Baseline (n=56, 56, 52, 56, 55, 55)155.1 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 37.74
PF-04937319 20 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 2 (n=54, 56, 50, 56, 54, 55)-3.2 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 19.67
PF-04937319 50 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 8 (n=50, 54, 47, 52, 51, 52)-15.2 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 32.29
PF-04937319 50 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 2 (n=54, 56, 50, 56, 54, 55)-6.8 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 32.84
PF-04937319 50 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 4 (n=52, 56, 51, 55, 54, 53)-8.3 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 34.02
PF-04937319 50 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 14 (n=45, 53, 46, 52, 51, 53)-1.0 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 34.37
PF-04937319 50 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 12 (n=48, 53, 47, 52, 51, 53)-10.8 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 37.51
PF-04937319 50 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Baseline (n=56, 56, 52, 56, 55, 55)166.1 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 42.56
PF-04937319 100 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Baseline (n=56, 56, 52, 56, 55, 55)164.8 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 41.14
PF-04937319 100 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 12 (n=48, 53, 47, 52, 51, 53)3.5 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 41.74
PF-04937319 100 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 2 (n=54, 56, 50, 56, 54, 55)-10.8 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 25.73
PF-04937319 100 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 4 (n=52, 56, 51, 55, 54, 53)-9.6 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 29.3
PF-04937319 100 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 8 (n=50, 54, 47, 52, 51, 52)-6.5 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 29.5
PF-04937319 100 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 14 (n=45, 53, 46, 52, 51, 53)10.2 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 38.62
SitagliptinChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 8 (n=50, 54, 47, 52, 51, 52)-15.4 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 25.98
SitagliptinChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 4 (n=52, 56, 51, 55, 54, 53)-19.3 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 26.33
SitagliptinChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 12 (n=48, 53, 47, 52, 51, 53)-12.9 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 31.97
SitagliptinChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 14 (n=45, 53, 46, 52, 51, 53)-2.6 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 36.41
SitagliptinChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Change at Week 2 (n=54, 56, 50, 56, 54, 55)-13.6 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 23.75
SitagliptinChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14Baseline (n=56, 56, 52, 56, 55, 55)160.7 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 35.87
Comparison: Week 2: Treatment difference and 80 percent(%) confidence interval (CI) were based on least squares (LS) mean. A mixed model repeated measure (MMRM) analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.72480% CI: [-3.32, 9.07]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 2: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.360880% CI: [-8.13, 4.59]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 2: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.251180% CI: [-9.42, 2.95]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 2: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.067380% CI: [-13.51, -1.05]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 2: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.010680% CI: [-17.44, -5]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 4: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.412780% CI: [-7.73, 5.47]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 4: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.360480% CI: [-8.64, 4.87]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 4: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.07780% CI: [-13.96, -0.74]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 4: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.045180% CI: [-15.43, -2.15]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 4: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.000180% CI: [-26.57, -13.23]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 8: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.578380% CI: [-6.08, 8.3]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 8: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.360480% CI: [-9.5, 5.36]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 8: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.016180% CI: [-19.36, -4.88]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 8: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.218580% CI: [-11.68, 2.87]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 8: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.003480% CI: [-22.67, -8.16]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 12: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.572780% CI: [-7.03, 9.37]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 12: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.496180% CI: [-8.51, 8.38]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 12: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.261680% CI: [-12.33, 4.14]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 12: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.919780% CI: [0.79, 17.34]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 12: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.08680% CI: [-16.98, -0.54]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 14: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.513280% CI: [-8.1, 8.53]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 14: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.65680% CI: [-5.89, 11.26]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 14: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.828580% CI: [-2.17, 14.52]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 14: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.992580% CI: [7.59, 24.36]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 14: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.60180% CI: [-6.67, 10]t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 2, 4 and 8

HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin which is measured primarily to identify the average glycemic control over prolonged periods of time. The normal range for the HbA1c test, was identified as \<6.5 percent by the study-specific central laboratory used. Change from baseline in percentage of HbA1c in participants were reported.

Time frame: Baseline(Day 1), Week 2, 4, 8

Population: FAS: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, 'N' signifies participants for whom data was summarized for this measure and 'n' signifies participants who were evaluable at given time points for each group. Data for Week 2 had not been reported because as per protocol it was not intended to be collected.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 2, 4 and 8Change at Week 4 (n= 50, 55, 48, 55, 53, 53)-0.20 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.397
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 2, 4 and 8Change at Week 8 (n=48, 53, 45, 52, 50, 51)-0.36 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.664
PF-04937319 3 mgChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 2, 4 and 8Change at Week 4 (n= 50, 55, 48, 55, 53, 53)-0.24 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.568
PF-04937319 3 mgChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 2, 4 and 8Change at Week 8 (n=48, 53, 45, 52, 50, 51)-0.32 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.781
PF-04937319 20 mgChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 2, 4 and 8Change at Week 4 (n= 50, 55, 48, 55, 53, 53)-0.32 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.52
PF-04937319 20 mgChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 2, 4 and 8Change at Week 8 (n=48, 53, 45, 52, 50, 51)-0.46 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.803
PF-04937319 50 mgChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 2, 4 and 8Change at Week 4 (n= 50, 55, 48, 55, 53, 53)-0.35 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.601
PF-04937319 50 mgChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 2, 4 and 8Change at Week 8 (n=48, 53, 45, 52, 50, 51)-0.50 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.848
PF-04937319 100 mgChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 2, 4 and 8Change at Week 4 (n= 50, 55, 48, 55, 53, 53)-0.50 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.47
PF-04937319 100 mgChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 2, 4 and 8Change at Week 8 (n=48, 53, 45, 52, 50, 51)-0.86 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.726
SitagliptinChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 2, 4 and 8Change at Week 4 (n= 50, 55, 48, 55, 53, 53)-0.52 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.503
SitagliptinChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 2, 4 and 8Change at Week 8 (n=48, 53, 45, 52, 50, 51)-0.77 percentage of hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.699
Comparison: Week 8: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.002180% CI: [-0.61, -0.23]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 4: Treatment difference and 80 percent(%) confidence interval (CI) were based on least squares (LS) mean. A mixed model repeated measure (MMRM) analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.343480% CI: [-0.16, 0.09]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 4: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline, as the covariates, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.089280% CI: [-0.27, -0.01]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 4: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline, as the covariates, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.082680% CI: [-0.26, -0.01]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 4: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline, as the covariates, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.003180% CI: [-0.4, -0.15]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 4: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.000580% CI: [-0.45, -0.2]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 8: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.513380% CI: [-0.18, 0.19]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 8: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.187380% CI: [-0.33, 0.06]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 8: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as the covariate, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.21280% CI: [-0.3, 0.07]t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Week 8: Treatment difference and 80% CI were based on LS mean. MMRM analysis was performed with treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline, as the covariates, time was repeated for participant.p-value: 0.000180% CI: [-0.73, -0.35]t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Number of Hypoglycemic Events (HAE) Episodes Per Participant

A hypoglycemic event (HAE) was identified by characteristic symptoms or blood glucose levels. Median number of events per participant was reported

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14

Population: Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, 'N' signifies participants for whom data was collected for this measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboNumber of Hypoglycemic Events (HAE) Episodes Per Participant0 events per participant
PF-04937319 3 mgNumber of Hypoglycemic Events (HAE) Episodes Per Participant0 events per participant
PF-04937319 20 mgNumber of Hypoglycemic Events (HAE) Episodes Per Participant0 events per participant
PF-04937319 50 mgNumber of Hypoglycemic Events (HAE) Episodes Per Participant0 events per participant
PF-04937319 100 mgNumber of Hypoglycemic Events (HAE) Episodes Per Participant0 events per participant
SitagliptinNumber of Hypoglycemic Events (HAE) Episodes Per Participant0 events per participant
Sitagliptin 100 mgNumber of Hypoglycemic Events (HAE) Episodes Per Participant0 events per participant
Secondary

Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Values

Hemoglobin,hematocrit,red blood cells(RBC) count:less than \[\<\]0.8\*lower limit of normal\[LLN\],platelets:\<0.5\*LLN/greater than \[\>\]1.75\*upper limit of normal \[ULN\],white blood cells(WBC):\<0.6\*LLN or \>1.5\*ULN,lymphocytes,total neutrophils:\<0.8\*LLN or \>1.2\*ULN, basophils,eosinophil,monocytes:\>1.2\*ULN;aspartate aminotransferase,alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase:\>0.3\*ULN,total protein,albumin:\<0.8\*LLN or \>1.2\*ULN;total bilirubin,direct bilirubin,indirect bilirubin:\>1.5\*ULN;triglycerides,cholesterol:\>1.3\*ULN, HDL:\<0.8\*LLN, LDL:\>1.2\*ULN,blood urea nitrogen,creatinine:\>1.3\*ULN,uric acid:\>1.2\*ULN;sodium: \<0.95\*LLN or \>1.05\*ULN,potassium,chloride,calcium,bicarbonate:\<0.9\*LLN or \>1.1\*ULN;creatine kinase:\>2.0\*ULN;glucose:\<0.6\*LLN or \>1.5\*ULN,urine WBC and RBC:\>= 20/High Power Field \[HPF\]),urine epithelial cells (\>=1 HPF),urine bacteria \>20 high-powered field;qualitative urine glucose,urine blood to Hgb ratio (\>=1);urine(protein,nitrite,mucus,leukocyte \>=1 in urine dipstick test).

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14

Population: Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, 'N' signifies participants for whom data was collected for this measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Values46 participants
PF-04937319 3 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Values49 participants
PF-04937319 20 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Values45 participants
PF-04937319 50 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Values46 participants
PF-04937319 100 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Values53 participants
SitagliptinNumber of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Values43 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs Data

Participants who met the criteria for increase or decrease in vital signs data were reported. Criteria for increase or decrease from baseline vital signs data: sitting systolic blood pressure (BP) of \>=30 millimeter of mercury (mmHg); sitting diastolic BP of \>=20 mmHg and pulse rate was based on investigator's discretion.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14

Population: Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, 'N' signifies participants for whom data was collected for this measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataIncrease in systolic BP (>=30 mmHg)1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataIncrease in diastolic BP (>=20 mmHg)1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataDecrease in systolic BP (>=30 mmHg)1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataDecrease in diastolic BP (>=20 mmHg)2 participants
PF-04937319 3 mgNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataDecrease in systolic BP (>=30 mmHg)2 participants
PF-04937319 3 mgNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataIncrease in diastolic BP (>=20 mmHg)4 participants
PF-04937319 3 mgNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataIncrease in systolic BP (>=30 mmHg)2 participants
PF-04937319 3 mgNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataDecrease in diastolic BP (>=20 mmHg)1 participants
PF-04937319 20 mgNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataDecrease in diastolic BP (>=20 mmHg)6 participants
PF-04937319 20 mgNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataDecrease in systolic BP (>=30 mmHg)1 participants
PF-04937319 20 mgNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataIncrease in diastolic BP (>=20 mmHg)0 participants
PF-04937319 20 mgNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataIncrease in systolic BP (>=30 mmHg)2 participants
PF-04937319 50 mgNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataIncrease in systolic BP (>=30 mmHg)1 participants
PF-04937319 50 mgNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataDecrease in diastolic BP (>=20 mmHg)1 participants
PF-04937319 50 mgNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataIncrease in diastolic BP (>=20 mmHg)1 participants
PF-04937319 50 mgNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataDecrease in systolic BP (>=30 mmHg)1 participants
PF-04937319 100 mgNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataDecrease in systolic BP (>=30 mmHg)2 participants
PF-04937319 100 mgNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataDecrease in diastolic BP (>=20 mmHg)3 participants
PF-04937319 100 mgNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataIncrease in diastolic BP (>=20 mmHg)4 participants
PF-04937319 100 mgNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataIncrease in systolic BP (>=30 mmHg)3 participants
SitagliptinNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataIncrease in diastolic BP (>=20 mmHg)2 participants
SitagliptinNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataDecrease in systolic BP (>=30 mmHg)1 participants
SitagliptinNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataDecrease in diastolic BP (>=20 mmHg)1 participants
SitagliptinNumber of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs DataIncrease in systolic BP (>=30 mmHg)2 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG)Data

Criteria for increase from baseline data: PR interval (percent change of greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 25/50% \[if baseline\>200 then percent change of \>25% counts; if baseline \<=200 then percent change of \>50% counts\]; QRS complex (percent change of \>=50%); QT Fridericia's correction (QTcF) interval (change of \>=30 to \<60 millisecond \[msec\], and change of \>=60 msec).

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14

Population: Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, 'N' signifies participants for whom data was collected for this measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG)DataPR interval: Percent change of >=25/50%0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG)DataQRS interval: Percent change of >=50%0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG)DataQTcF interval: Change of >=30 to <60 msec7 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG)DataQTcF interval: Change of >=60 msec1 participants
PF-04937319 3 mgNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG)DataQTcF interval: Change of >=30 to <60 msec5 participants
PF-04937319 3 mgNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG)DataQRS interval: Percent change of >=50%1 participants
PF-04937319 3 mgNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG)DataPR interval: Percent change of >=25/50%1 participants
PF-04937319 3 mgNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG)DataQTcF interval: Change of >=60 msec0 participants
PF-04937319 20 mgNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG)DataQTcF interval: Change of >=60 msec0 participants
PF-04937319 20 mgNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG)DataQTcF interval: Change of >=30 to <60 msec3 participants
PF-04937319 20 mgNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG)DataQRS interval: Percent change of >=50%1 participants
PF-04937319 20 mgNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG)DataPR interval: Percent change of >=25/50%0 participants
PF-04937319 50 mgNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG)DataPR interval: Percent change of >=25/50%0 participants
PF-04937319 50 mgNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG)DataQTcF interval: Change of >=60 msec1 participants
PF-04937319 50 mgNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG)DataQRS interval: Percent change of >=50%1 participants
PF-04937319 50 mgNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG)DataQTcF interval: Change of >=30 to <60 msec3 participants
PF-04937319 100 mgNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG)DataQTcF interval: Change of >=30 to <60 msec3 participants
PF-04937319 100 mgNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG)DataQTcF interval: Change of >=60 msec2 participants
PF-04937319 100 mgNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG)DataQRS interval: Percent change of >=50%1 participants
PF-04937319 100 mgNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG)DataPR interval: Percent change of >=25/50%1 participants
SitagliptinNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG)DataQRS interval: Percent change of >=50%1 participants
SitagliptinNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG)DataQTcF interval: Change of >=30 to <60 msec7 participants
SitagliptinNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG)DataQTcF interval: Change of >=60 msec0 participants
SitagliptinNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG)DataPR interval: Percent change of >=25/50%2 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 14 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse events.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to 14 days after last dose (up to 101 days)

Population: Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs37 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs0 participants
PF-04937319 3 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs19 participants
PF-04937319 3 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs1 participants
PF-04937319 20 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs19 participants
PF-04937319 20 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs0 participants
PF-04937319 50 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs19 participants
PF-04937319 50 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs1 participants
PF-04937319 100 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs16 participants
PF-04937319 100 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs0 participants
SitagliptinNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs24 participants
SitagliptinNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs1 participants
Sitagliptin 100 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs18 participants
Sitagliptin 100 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs0 participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Less Than 6.5 Percent and Less Than 7 Percent Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Levels at Week 12

HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin which is measured primarily to identify the average glycemic control over prolonged periods of time. The normal range for the HbA1c test, was identified as \<6.5 percent by the study-specific central laboratory used and data are presented in categories of \<6.5 percent and \<7 percent.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: FAS: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, 'N' signifies participants for whom data was summarized for this measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Less Than 6.5 Percent and Less Than 7 Percent Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Levels at Week 12<6.5 percent12.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Less Than 6.5 Percent and Less Than 7 Percent Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Levels at Week 12<7 percent22.9 percentage of participants
PF-04937319 3 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving Less Than 6.5 Percent and Less Than 7 Percent Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Levels at Week 12<6.5 percent9.4 percentage of participants
PF-04937319 3 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving Less Than 6.5 Percent and Less Than 7 Percent Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Levels at Week 12<7 percent26.4 percentage of participants
PF-04937319 20 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving Less Than 6.5 Percent and Less Than 7 Percent Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Levels at Week 12<6.5 percent19.1 percentage of participants
PF-04937319 20 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving Less Than 6.5 Percent and Less Than 7 Percent Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Levels at Week 12<7 percent42.6 percentage of participants
PF-04937319 50 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving Less Than 6.5 Percent and Less Than 7 Percent Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Levels at Week 12<6.5 percent15.4 percentage of participants
PF-04937319 50 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving Less Than 6.5 Percent and Less Than 7 Percent Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Levels at Week 12<7 percent30.8 percentage of participants
PF-04937319 100 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving Less Than 6.5 Percent and Less Than 7 Percent Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Levels at Week 12<6.5 percent17.6 percentage of participants
PF-04937319 100 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving Less Than 6.5 Percent and Less Than 7 Percent Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Levels at Week 12<7 percent39.2 percentage of participants
SitagliptinPercentage of Participants Achieving Less Than 6.5 Percent and Less Than 7 Percent Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Levels at Week 12<6.5 percent32.1 percentage of participants
SitagliptinPercentage of Participants Achieving Less Than 6.5 Percent and Less Than 7 Percent Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Levels at Week 12<7 percent56.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Hypoglycemic Events (HAE) Episode

A hypoglycemic event (HAE) was identified by characteristic symptoms or blood glucose levels. HAE is defined as 1 of the given definitions: Characteristic symptoms of HAE with no home glucose monitoring performed where clinical picture included prompt resolution with food intake, subcutaneous glucagon, or intravenous glucose; or characteristic symptoms of HAE with home glucose monitoring measurement =\< 70 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL) using ACCU-CHEK plasma-referenced home glucometers or =\<74 mg/dL using International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) referenced ACCU-CHEK or central laboratory glucometers; or any laboratory glucose value, meeting the following criterion with or without accompanying symptoms: =\<49 mg/dL using ACCU-CHEK plasma-referenced home glucometers or =\<53 mg/dL using IFCC referenced ACCU-CHEK or central laboratory glucometers.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14

Population: Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, 'N' signifies participants for whom data was collected for this measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With at Least 1 Hypoglycemic Events (HAE) Episode0 percentage of participants
PF-04937319 3 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 1 Hypoglycemic Events (HAE) Episode0 percentage of participants
PF-04937319 20 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 1 Hypoglycemic Events (HAE) Episode0 percentage of participants
PF-04937319 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 1 Hypoglycemic Events (HAE) Episode1 percentage of participants
PF-04937319 100 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 1 Hypoglycemic Events (HAE) Episode0 percentage of participants
SitagliptinPercentage of Participants With at Least 1 Hypoglycemic Events (HAE) Episode2 percentage of participants
Sitagliptin 100 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 1 Hypoglycemic Events (HAE) Episode1 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026