Skip to content

A Phase 3 Study in Participants With Moderate to Severe Psoriasis

A Multicenter Study With a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Induction Dosing Period Followed by a Randomized Maintenance Dosing Period and a Long- Term Extension Period to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of LY2439821 in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01474512
Acronym
UNCOVER-1
Enrollment
1296
Registered
2011-11-18
Start date
2011-11-16
Completion date
2018-09-20
Last updated
2019-10-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Psoriasis

Brief summary

This study will assess the safety and efficacy of LY2439821 compared to placebo in participants with moderate to severe, chronic plaque psoriasis.

Interventions

DRUG80 mg Ixekizumab Dosing Regimens 1, 2, and 3

Administered SC

DRUGPlacebo

Administered SC

Sponsors

Eli Lilly and Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Present with chronic plaque psoriasis based on a confirmed diagnosis of chronic psoriasis vulgaris for at least 6 months prior to randomization * At least 10% Body Surface Area (BSA) of Psoriasis at screening and at randomization * Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) score of at least 3 and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score of at least 12 at screening and at randomization * Candidate for phototherapy and/or systemic therapy * Men must agree to use a reliable method of birth control during the study * Women must agree to use birth control or remain abstinent during the study and for at least 12 weeks after stopping treatment

Exclusion criteria

* Pustular, erythrodermic, and/or guttate forms of psoriasis * History of drug-induced psoriasis * Clinically significant flare of psoriasis during the 12 weeks prior to randomization * Concurrent or recent use of any biologic agent * Received systemic psoriasis therapy \[such as psoralen and ultraviolet A (PUVA) light therapy\] or phototherapy within the previous 4 weeks; or had topical psoriasis treatment within the previous 2 weeks prior to randomization * Cannot avoid excessive sun exposure or use of tanning booths for at least 4 weeks prior to randomization and during the study * Have participated in any study with interleukin (IL)-17 antagonists, including LY2439821 * Serious disorder or illness other than plaque psoriasis * Serious infection within the last 3 months * Breastfeeding or nursing (lactating) women.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) of 0 or 1 (Efficacy of Ixekizumab in Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Ps Measure: sPGA)Week 12The sPGA is the physician's determination of the participant's Ps lesions overall at a given time point. Lesions were categorized by descriptions for induration, erythema, and scaling. Participants Ps were assessed as 0 (clear), 1 (minimal), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (severe), or 5 (very severe). An sPGA responder was defined as having a post-baseline sPGA score of 0 or 1 with at least a 2-point improvement from baseline.
Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥75% Improvement in Ps Area and Severity Index (PASI75) (Efficacy of Ixekizumab in Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis Measure: PASI)Week 12The PASI combines the extent of body surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, trunk, arms, and legs). For each region the percent area of skin involved was estimated from 0 (0%) to 6 (90%-100%) and severity was estimated by clinical signs of erythema, induration and scaling with a scores range from 0 (no involvement) to 4 (severe involvement). Each area is scored separately and the scores then combined for the final PASI. Final PASI calculated as: sum of severity parameters for each region \* area score \* weighing factor \[head (0.1), upper limbs (0.2), trunk (0.3), lower limbs (0.4)\]. Overall scores range from 0 (no Ps) to 72 (the most severe disease). Participants achieving PASI75 were defined as having an improvement of ≥75% in the PASI score compared to baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Maintaining sPGA 0 or 1 After Re-Randomization at Start of Maintenance Dosing PeriodWeek 60The sPGA is the physician's determination of the participant's Ps lesions overall at a given time point. Lesions were categorized by descriptions for induration, erythema, and scaling. Participants Ps were assessed as 0 (clear), 1 (minimal), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (severe), or 5 (very severe).
Percentage of Participants With Itch Numeric Rating Scale (Itch NRS) Score ≥4 Point Reduction From BaselineBaseline, Week 12The Itch NRS is a participant-administered, 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 (no itch) and 10 (worst itch imaginable). Overall severity of a participant's itching from Ps is indicated by circling the number that best describes the worst level of itching in the past 24 hours.
Change From Baseline in Dermatology-Specific Quality of Life Index (DLQI) ScoreBaseline, Week 12DLQI is a participant-administered, 10-question, validated, quality-of-life questionnaire that covers 6 domains, including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work and school, personal relationships, and treatment. Response categories include 0 (not at all), 1 (a little), 2 (a lot), and 3 (very much) and unanswered (not relevant) responses were scored as 0. Total scores range from 0 to 30, with higher score indicating greater quality of life is impairment. A 5-point change from baseline is considered clinically relevant. Least squares (LS) mean change from baseline was calculated using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM).
Change From Baseline in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI)Baseline, Week 12The NAPSI is a numeric, reproducible, objective tool for evaluation of fingernail Ps. This scale is used to evaluate the severity of fingernail bed Ps and fingernail matrix Ps by area of involvement in the fingernail unit. The fingernail is divided with imaginary horizontal and longitudinal lines into quadrants. Each fingernail is given a score for fingernail bed Ps 0 (none) to 4 (Ps in 4 quadrants of the fingernail) and fingernail matrix Ps 0 (none) to 4 (Ps in 4 quadrants of the matrix), depending on the presence (score of 1) or absence (score of 0) of any of the features of fingernail bed or matrix Ps in each quadrant. The NAPSI score of a fingernail is the sum of scores in fingernail bed and fingernail matrix from each quadrant (maximum of 8). Each fingernail is evaluated, then the sum of all fingernails equals the total NAPSI score with a range from 0 to 80 with higher scores indicating more severe psoriasis. LS mean change from baseline was calculated using MMRM.
Percent of Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement of PsWeek 12BSA is a physician rating of the percentage of involvement of Ps for each participant. BSA is assessed on a continuous scale from 0% (no involvement) to 100% (full involvement), where 1% corresponds to the size of the participants hand (includes the palm, fingers and thumb). Total BSA is the sum of handprints from the affected areas. LS mean change from baseline was calculated using MMRM.
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index (PSSI)Baseline, Week 12The PSSI is a physician assessment of erythema, induration and desquamation and percent of scalp that is covered with a scores range from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe). The composite score is derived from the sum of scores for erythema, induration, and desquamation multiplied by the score recorded for the extent of the scalp area involved, 1 (\<10%) to 6 (90%-100%) with a total scores range from 0 to 72, with lower scores indicating less severity. LS mean change from baseline was calculated using MMRM.
Percentage of Participants Achieving an sPGA of 0 (Efficacy of Ixekizumab in Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Ps Measure: sPGA)Week 12The sPGA is the physician's determination of the participant's Ps lesions overall at a given time point. Lesions were categorized by descriptions for induration, erythema, and scaling. Participants Ps were assessed as 0 (clear), 1 (minimal), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (severe), or 5 (very severe).
Change From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Reported 16 Items (QIDS-SR16)Baseline, Week 12QIDS-SR16 is a participant-administered, 16-item instrument intended to assess the existence and severity of symptoms of depression. A participant is asked to consider each statement as it relates to the way they have felt for the past 7 days and rate each on a 4-point scale: 0 (best) to 3 (worst). The sum of the 16 items corresponding to 9 depression domains \[sad mood, concentration, self-criticism, suicidal ideation, interest, energy/fatigue, sleep disturbance (initial, middle and late insomnia or hypersomnia), decrease/increase in appetite/weight, and psychomotor agitation/retardation\] to give a single total scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. LS mean change from baseline was calculated using ANCOVA.
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)Baseline, Week 12The SF-36 is a self-reported instrument that measures the participant's health status during the previous 7 days. It comprises 36-items covering 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, role emotional, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and general health. Items are answered on Likert scales of varying lengths. The 8 domains are regrouped in the PCS and MCS scores. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of function and/or better health. LS mean change from baseline was calculated using ANCOVA.
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Severity (PatGA)Baseline, Week 12The PatGA is a single-item self-reported instrument asking the participant to rate the severity of their psoriasis today by circling a number on the numeric rating scale from 0 (Clear = no psoriasis) to 5 (Severe = the worst their psoriasis has ever been). LS mean change from baseline calculated using MMRM.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Palmoplantar PASI (PPASI) of ≥50% (PPASI50), ≥75% (PPASI75), or 100% (PPASI100) ImprovementWeek 12The Palmoplantar PASI is a composite score derived from the sum of scores for erythema, induration, and desquamation \[scores range from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) for each\] multiplied by the score for the extent of palm and sole area involvement \[scores range from 0 (0%) to 6 (90 to100%)\], with a total scores range from 0 to 72. Participants achieving PPASI50, PPASI75 or PASI100 were defined as having an improvement of at least 50%, 90%, or of 100%, respectively, in the PPASI scores compared to baseline.
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss)Weeks 12: Day 84 and Week 24: Day 168
Percentage of Participants With Anti-ixekizumab AntibodiesBaseline through Week 12Percentage of participants with treatment-emergent positive anti-ixekizumab antibodies was summarized by treatment group. Percentage was calculated based on the number of evaluable participants and was calculated by number of participants with treatment-emergent positive anti-ixekizumab antibodies / number of evaluable participants \* 100%.
Change From Baseline in All Scores of the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Questionnaire-Psoriasis (WPAI-PSO) Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments. Measures: Participant Reported Outcomes (PRO)Baseline, Week 12WPAI-PSO is a participant administered, 6-item instrument used to assess the impact of Ps on the productivity impairment within the past 7 days. WPAI-PSO has 4 domains: absenteeism, presenteeism (reduced productivity while at work), an overall work impairment score, and impairment in daily activities performed outside of work. Four scores are derived as percentages: absenteeism, presenteeism (reduced productivity while at work), overall work impairment (absenteeism and presenteeism), and impairment in activities performed outside of work. Percentage is calculated as: each score \* 100 with greater scores indicating greater impairment. LS mean change from baseline was calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA).
Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI 90% (PASI90) or 100% (PASI100) (Efficacy of Ixekizumab in Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Ps Measure: PASI)Week 12The PASI combines the extent of body surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, trunk, arms, and legs). For each region the percent area of skin involved was estimated from 0 (0%) to 6 (90%-100%) and severity was estimated by clinical signs of erythema, induration and scaling with a scores range from 0 (no involvement) to 4 (severe involvement). Each area is scored by itself and the scores were then combined for the final PASI. Final PASI calculated as: sum of severity parameters for each region \* area score \* weighing factor \[head (0.1), upper limbs (0.2), trunk (0.3), lower limbs (0.4)\]. Overall scores range from 0 (no Ps) to 72 (the most severe disease). Participants achieving PASI90 or PASI100 were defined as having an improvement of ≥90% or of 100% respectively in PASI scores compared to baseline.

Countries

Australia, Canada, Denmark, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Poland, Romania, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Induction Period (Week 0 to 12), Maintenance Period (Week 12 to 60); Long term Extension (Week 60 to 264) and Post treatment ( last treatment visit (week 264), or Early Termination Visit (ETV) up to a minimum of 12 weeks following that visit.

Pre-assignment details

Participants received Ixekizumab (ixe) as responders (Resp, sPGA 0/1) in Induction (IND) re-randomized to receive ixe Q4W, Q12W or placebo (PBO) in Maintenance (MAIN) \[Primary Population (Pop)\]. In MAIN, non-responders (Non-Resp, sPGA \>1) in IND received ixe Q4W, PBO Resp in IND received PBO (Secondary Pop). Ixe or PBO continued to end of study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Placebo administered as 2 SC injections Q2W up to Week 10.
431
Ixe Q4W
160 mg ixe administered as 2 SC injections at Week 0 followed by 80 mg ixe as 1 SC injection Q4W.
432
Ixe Q2W
160 mg ixe administered as 2 SC injections at Week 0 followed by 80 mg ixe as 1 SC injection Q2W up to Week 10.
433
Total1,296

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006FG007FG008FG009FG010FG011FG012FG013FG014FG015FG016FG017
Induction PeriodAdverse Event61010000000000000000
Induction PeriodLack of Efficacy710000000000000000
Induction PeriodLost to Follow-up102000000000000000
Induction PeriodProtocol Violation360000000000000000
Induction PeriodSponsor Decision111000000000000000
Induction PeriodWithdrawal by Subject665000000000000000
Long-Term Extension PeriodAdverse Event00000000000157580000
Long-Term Extension PeriodClinical Relapse000000000000990000
Long-Term Extension PeriodDeath000000000000990000
Long-Term Extension PeriodLack of Efficacy00000000000124250000
Long-Term Extension PeriodLost to Follow-up00000000000025250000
Long-Term Extension PeriodParent/Caregiver Decision000000000000110000
Long-Term Extension PeriodPhysician Decision00000000000021210000
Long-Term Extension PeriodProtocol Violation000000000000550000
Long-Term Extension PeriodSponsor Decision000000000000660000
Long-Term Extension PeriodSwitched From PBO to Ixe0000000000021000000
Long-Term Extension PeriodWithdrawal by Subject00000000000361610000
Maintenance PeriodAdverse Event0004270191300000000
Maintenance PeriodClinical Relapse000100000000000000
Maintenance PeriodDeath000002000000000000
Maintenance PeriodLack of Efficacy000100011111200000000
Maintenance PeriodLost to Follow-up000330021100000000
Maintenance PeriodPhysician Decision000001020000000000
Maintenance PeriodProtocol Violation000100010100000000
Maintenance PeriodRelapsed (sPGA ≥3)00018611139900000000000
Maintenance PeriodTreated but Discontinued in Induction000010000000000000
Maintenance PeriodWithdrawal by Subject000623163100000000
Post-Treatment Follow-UpAdverse Event00000000000000825811
Post-Treatment Follow-UpClinical Relapse000000000000000062
Post-Treatment Follow-UpDeath000000000000000010
Post-Treatment Follow-UpLack of Efficacy0000000000000032313
Post-Treatment Follow-UpLost to Follow-up0000000000000000127
Post-Treatment Follow-UpParent/Caregiver Decision000000000000001001
Post-Treatment Follow-UpPhysician Decision000000000000000045
Post-Treatment Follow-UpProtocol Violation000000000000002240
Post-Treatment Follow-UpSponsor Decision000000000000001040
Post-Treatment Follow-UpWithdrawal by Subject00000000000000323617

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboIxe Q4WIxe Q2WTotal
Age, Continuous46.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
45.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.95
45.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4
45.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.93
Dermatology-Specific Quality of Life Index (DLQI) Score12.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.11
13.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.02
13.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.02
13.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.05
Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)7.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.58
7.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5
7.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.39
7.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.49
Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF36) Physical component (PCS) and Mental Component (MCS)
MCS
48.77 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.182
47.46 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.655
47.94 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.535
48.05 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.463
Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF36) Physical component (PCS) and Mental Component (MCS)
PCS
46.92 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.769
47.34 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.169
46.58 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.146
46.95 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.363
Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI)26.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.492
24.12 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.243
24.64 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.916
24.95 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.238
Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Severity (PatGA)4.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.95
4.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.88
4.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.94
4.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.92
Percent of Body Surface Area (BSA) involvement of Ps27.4 percent of body surface
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.77
27.4 percent of body surface
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.2
28.2 percent of body surface
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.83
27.7 percent of body surface
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.27
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)20.32 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.641
20.03 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.304
20.09 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.992
20.15 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.992
Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index (PSSI)21.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.7
19.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.83
21.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.69
20.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.08
Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Reported 16 Items (QIDS-SR16)4.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.34
5.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.34
4.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.09
4.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.26
Region of Enrollment
Australia
19 Participants15 Participants8 Participants42 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
77 Participants69 Participants66 Participants212 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Denmark
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants16 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
88 Participants106 Participants93 Participants287 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
23 Participants17 Participants26 Participants66 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
3 Participants2 Participants1 Participants6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
13 Participants12 Participants8 Participants33 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
43 Participants41 Participants55 Participants139 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Romania
8 Participants3 Participants2 Participants13 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
7 Participants7 Participants7 Participants21 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
146 Participants156 Participants159 Participants461 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
128 Participants143 Participants142 Participants413 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
303 Participants289 Participants291 Participants883 Participants
Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA)
sPGA=3
204 Participants197 Participants231 Participants632 Participants
Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA)
sPGA=4, 5
227 Participants235 Participants202 Participants664 Participants
Work Productivity Activity Impairment Questionnaire-Psoriasis (WPAI-PSO)
Absenteeism
4.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.07
4.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.26
5.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.41
4.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.63
Work Productivity Activity Impairment Questionnaire-Psoriasis (WPAI-PSO)
Activity Impairment
31.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.29
34.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.83
34.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.99
33.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.05
Work Productivity Activity Impairment Questionnaire-Psoriasis (WPAI-PSO)
Presenteeism
22.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.85
25.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.22
22.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.46
23.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.53
Work Productivity Activity Impairment Questionnaire-Psoriasis (WPAI-PSO)
Work Productively Loss
24.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.9
27.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.9
24.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.77
25.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.18

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
EG008
affected / at risk
EG009
affected / at risk
EG010
affected / at risk
EG011
affected / at risk
EG012
affected / at risk
EG013
affected / at risk
EG014
affected / at risk
EG015
affected / at risk
EG016
affected / at risk
EG017
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
128 / 431159 / 432170 / 43383 / 226122 / 227115 / 2298 / 16211 / 39155 / 7834 / 62114 / 3488 / 26414 / 1,054414 / 1,0753 / 182 / 2533 / 70015 / 285
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 43112 / 4327 / 4337 / 22611 / 22714 / 2290 / 1624 / 3918 / 783 / 6211 / 3481 / 26134 / 1,054134 / 1,0752 / 180 / 2513 / 7006 / 285

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥75% Improvement in Ps Area and Severity Index (PASI75) (Efficacy of Ixekizumab in Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis Measure: PASI)

The PASI combines the extent of body surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, trunk, arms, and legs). For each region the percent area of skin involved was estimated from 0 (0%) to 6 (90%-100%) and severity was estimated by clinical signs of erythema, induration and scaling with a scores range from 0 (no involvement) to 4 (severe involvement). Each area is scored separately and the scores then combined for the final PASI. Final PASI calculated as: sum of severity parameters for each region \* area score \* weighing factor \[head (0.1), upper limbs (0.2), trunk (0.3), lower limbs (0.4)\]. Overall scores range from 0 (no Ps) to 72 (the most severe disease). Participants achieving PASI75 were defined as having an improvement of ≥75% in the PASI score compared to baseline.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT Population: all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment to which they were assigned. Participants who did not meet the clinical response criteria or had missing data at Week 12 were considered non-responders for NRI analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving ≥75% Improvement in Ps Area and Severity Index (PASI75) (Efficacy of Ixekizumab in Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis Measure: PASI)3.9 percentage of participants
Ixe Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving ≥75% Improvement in Ps Area and Severity Index (PASI75) (Efficacy of Ixekizumab in Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis Measure: PASI)82.6 percentage of participants
Ixe Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving ≥75% Improvement in Ps Area and Severity Index (PASI75) (Efficacy of Ixekizumab in Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis Measure: PASI)89.1 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) of 0 or 1 (Efficacy of Ixekizumab in Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Ps Measure: sPGA)

The sPGA is the physician's determination of the participant's Ps lesions overall at a given time point. Lesions were categorized by descriptions for induration, erythema, and scaling. Participants Ps were assessed as 0 (clear), 1 (minimal), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (severe), or 5 (very severe). An sPGA responder was defined as having a post-baseline sPGA score of 0 or 1 with at least a 2-point improvement from baseline.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) Population: all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment to which they were assigned. Participants who did not meet the clinical response criteria or had missing data at Week 12 were considered non-responders for Non-Responder Imputation (NRI) analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) of 0 or 1 (Efficacy of Ixekizumab in Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Ps Measure: sPGA)3.2 percentage of participants
Ixe Q4WPercentage of Participants With Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) of 0 or 1 (Efficacy of Ixekizumab in Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Ps Measure: sPGA)76.4 percentage of participants
Ixe Q2WPercentage of Participants With Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) of 0 or 1 (Efficacy of Ixekizumab in Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Ps Measure: sPGA)81.8 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Change From Baseline in All Scores of the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Questionnaire-Psoriasis (WPAI-PSO) Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments. Measures: Participant Reported Outcomes (PRO)

WPAI-PSO is a participant administered, 6-item instrument used to assess the impact of Ps on the productivity impairment within the past 7 days. WPAI-PSO has 4 domains: absenteeism, presenteeism (reduced productivity while at work), an overall work impairment score, and impairment in daily activities performed outside of work. Four scores are derived as percentages: absenteeism, presenteeism (reduced productivity while at work), overall work impairment (absenteeism and presenteeism), and impairment in activities performed outside of work. Percentage is calculated as: each score \* 100 with greater scores indicating greater impairment. LS mean change from baseline was calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: ITT Population: all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment to which they are assigned, and had results at specified time points, last observation carried forward (LOCF).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in All Scores of the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Questionnaire-Psoriasis (WPAI-PSO) Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments. Measures: Participant Reported Outcomes (PRO)Absenteeism0.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.88
PlaceboChange From Baseline in All Scores of the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Questionnaire-Psoriasis (WPAI-PSO) Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments. Measures: Participant Reported Outcomes (PRO)Activity Impairment0.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.18
PlaceboChange From Baseline in All Scores of the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Questionnaire-Psoriasis (WPAI-PSO) Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments. Measures: Participant Reported Outcomes (PRO)Presenteeism0.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in All Scores of the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Questionnaire-Psoriasis (WPAI-PSO) Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments. Measures: Participant Reported Outcomes (PRO)Work Productivity Loss-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.4
Ixe Q4WChange From Baseline in All Scores of the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Questionnaire-Psoriasis (WPAI-PSO) Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments. Measures: Participant Reported Outcomes (PRO)Work Productivity Loss-20.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.38
Ixe Q4WChange From Baseline in All Scores of the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Questionnaire-Psoriasis (WPAI-PSO) Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments. Measures: Participant Reported Outcomes (PRO)Absenteeism-3.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.87
Ixe Q4WChange From Baseline in All Scores of the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Questionnaire-Psoriasis (WPAI-PSO) Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments. Measures: Participant Reported Outcomes (PRO)Presenteeism-18.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.28
Ixe Q4WChange From Baseline in All Scores of the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Questionnaire-Psoriasis (WPAI-PSO) Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments. Measures: Participant Reported Outcomes (PRO)Activity Impairment-24.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.18
Ixe Q2WChange From Baseline in All Scores of the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Questionnaire-Psoriasis (WPAI-PSO) Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments. Measures: Participant Reported Outcomes (PRO)Work Productivity Loss-19.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.33
Ixe Q2WChange From Baseline in All Scores of the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Questionnaire-Psoriasis (WPAI-PSO) Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments. Measures: Participant Reported Outcomes (PRO)Activity Impairment-25.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.15
Ixe Q2WChange From Baseline in All Scores of the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Questionnaire-Psoriasis (WPAI-PSO) Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments. Measures: Participant Reported Outcomes (PRO)Presenteeism-18.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.24
Ixe Q2WChange From Baseline in All Scores of the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Questionnaire-Psoriasis (WPAI-PSO) Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments. Measures: Participant Reported Outcomes (PRO)Absenteeism-2.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.84
p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
p-value: 0.003ANCOVA
p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Dermatology-Specific Quality of Life Index (DLQI) Score

DLQI is a participant-administered, 10-question, validated, quality-of-life questionnaire that covers 6 domains, including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work and school, personal relationships, and treatment. Response categories include 0 (not at all), 1 (a little), 2 (a lot), and 3 (very much) and unanswered (not relevant) responses were scored as 0. Total scores range from 0 to 30, with higher score indicating greater quality of life is impairment. A 5-point change from baseline is considered clinically relevant. Least squares (LS) mean change from baseline was calculated using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: ITT Population: all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment to which they are assigned; and who had at least 1 post-baseline DLQI measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Dermatology-Specific Quality of Life Index (DLQI) Score-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.27
Ixe Q4WChange From Baseline in Dermatology-Specific Quality of Life Index (DLQI) Score-10.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.27
Ixe Q2WChange From Baseline in Dermatology-Specific Quality of Life Index (DLQI) Score-11.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
p-value: <0.001Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: <0.001Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)

The SF-36 is a self-reported instrument that measures the participant's health status during the previous 7 days. It comprises 36-items covering 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, role emotional, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and general health. Items are answered on Likert scales of varying lengths. The 8 domains are regrouped in the PCS and MCS scores. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of function and/or better health. LS mean change from baseline was calculated using ANCOVA.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: ITT Population: all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment to which they are assigned; and with results at the specified time points, LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)PCS-0.1747 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.4012
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)MCS0.8729 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.4638
Ixe Q4WChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)PCS4.3081 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.399
Ixe Q4WChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)MCS3.7386 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.4633
Ixe Q2WChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)PCS4.3159 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3878
Ixe Q2WChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)MCS4.1293 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.448
p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI)

The NAPSI is a numeric, reproducible, objective tool for evaluation of fingernail Ps. This scale is used to evaluate the severity of fingernail bed Ps and fingernail matrix Ps by area of involvement in the fingernail unit. The fingernail is divided with imaginary horizontal and longitudinal lines into quadrants. Each fingernail is given a score for fingernail bed Ps 0 (none) to 4 (Ps in 4 quadrants of the fingernail) and fingernail matrix Ps 0 (none) to 4 (Ps in 4 quadrants of the matrix), depending on the presence (score of 1) or absence (score of 0) of any of the features of fingernail bed or matrix Ps in each quadrant. The NAPSI score of a fingernail is the sum of scores in fingernail bed and fingernail matrix from each quadrant (maximum of 8). Each fingernail is evaluated, then the sum of all fingernails equals the total NAPSI score with a range from 0 to 80 with higher scores indicating more severe psoriasis. LS mean change from baseline was calculated using MMRM.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: ITT Population: all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment to which they are assigned; and had fingernail Ps at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI)2.17 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.672
Ixe Q4WChange From Baseline in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI)-7.19 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.671
Ixe Q2WChange From Baseline in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI)-7.24 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.657
p-value: <0.001Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: <0.001Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Severity (PatGA)

The PatGA is a single-item self-reported instrument asking the participant to rate the severity of their psoriasis today by circling a number on the numeric rating scale from 0 (Clear = no psoriasis) to 5 (Severe = the worst their psoriasis has ever been). LS mean change from baseline calculated using MMRM.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: ITT Population: all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment to which they are assigned; and with at least 1 post-baseline PatGA measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Severity (PatGA)-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Ixe Q4WChange From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Severity (PatGA)-3.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Ixe Q2WChange From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Severity (PatGA)-3.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
p-value: <0.001Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: <0.001Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index (PSSI)

The PSSI is a physician assessment of erythema, induration and desquamation and percent of scalp that is covered with a scores range from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe). The composite score is derived from the sum of scores for erythema, induration, and desquamation multiplied by the score recorded for the extent of the scalp area involved, 1 (\<10%) to 6 (90%-100%) with a total scores range from 0 to 72, with lower scores indicating less severity. LS mean change from baseline was calculated using MMRM.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: ITT Population: all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment to which they are assigned; and had scalp Ps at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index (PSSI)-1.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.53
Ixe Q4WChange From Baseline in Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index (PSSI)-18.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.52
Ixe Q2WChange From Baseline in Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index (PSSI)-19.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.52
p-value: <0.001Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: <0.001Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Reported 16 Items (QIDS-SR16)

QIDS-SR16 is a participant-administered, 16-item instrument intended to assess the existence and severity of symptoms of depression. A participant is asked to consider each statement as it relates to the way they have felt for the past 7 days and rate each on a 4-point scale: 0 (best) to 3 (worst). The sum of the 16 items corresponding to 9 depression domains \[sad mood, concentration, self-criticism, suicidal ideation, interest, energy/fatigue, sleep disturbance (initial, middle and late insomnia or hypersomnia), decrease/increase in appetite/weight, and psychomotor agitation/retardation\] to give a single total scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. LS mean change from baseline was calculated using ANCOVA.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: ITT Population: all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment to which they are assigned, and had results at the specified time points, LOCF.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Reported 16 Items (QIDS-SR16)-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
Ixe Q4WChange From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Reported 16 Items (QIDS-SR16)-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
Ixe Q2WChange From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Reported 16 Items (QIDS-SR16)-1.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving an sPGA of 0 (Efficacy of Ixekizumab in Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Ps Measure: sPGA)

The sPGA is the physician's determination of the participant's Ps lesions overall at a given time point. Lesions were categorized by descriptions for induration, erythema, and scaling. Participants Ps were assessed as 0 (clear), 1 (minimal), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (severe), or 5 (very severe).

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT Population: all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment to which they are assigned. Participants who did not meet the clinical response criteria or had missing data at Week 12 were considered non-responders for NRI analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving an sPGA of 0 (Efficacy of Ixekizumab in Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Ps Measure: sPGA)0.0 percentage of participants
Ixe Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving an sPGA of 0 (Efficacy of Ixekizumab in Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Ps Measure: sPGA)34.5 percentage of participants
Ixe Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving an sPGA of 0 (Efficacy of Ixekizumab in Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Ps Measure: sPGA)37.0 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Palmoplantar PASI (PPASI) of ≥50% (PPASI50), ≥75% (PPASI75), or 100% (PPASI100) Improvement

The Palmoplantar PASI is a composite score derived from the sum of scores for erythema, induration, and desquamation \[scores range from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) for each\] multiplied by the score for the extent of palm and sole area involvement \[scores range from 0 (0%) to 6 (90 to100%)\], with a total scores range from 0 to 72. Participants achieving PPASI50, PPASI75 or PASI100 were defined as having an improvement of at least 50%, 90%, or of 100%, respectively, in the PPASI scores compared to baseline.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT Population: all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment to which they are assigned; and who had palmoplantar Ps at baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Palmoplantar PASI (PPASI) of ≥50% (PPASI50), ≥75% (PPASI75), or 100% (PPASI100) ImprovementPPASI10020.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Palmoplantar PASI (PPASI) of ≥50% (PPASI50), ≥75% (PPASI75), or 100% (PPASI100) ImprovementPPASI5035.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Palmoplantar PASI (PPASI) of ≥50% (PPASI50), ≥75% (PPASI75), or 100% (PPASI100) ImprovementPPASI7526.3 percentage of participants
Ixe Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving Palmoplantar PASI (PPASI) of ≥50% (PPASI50), ≥75% (PPASI75), or 100% (PPASI100) ImprovementPPASI7574.8 percentage of participants
Ixe Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving Palmoplantar PASI (PPASI) of ≥50% (PPASI50), ≥75% (PPASI75), or 100% (PPASI100) ImprovementPPASI10065.6 percentage of participants
Ixe Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving Palmoplantar PASI (PPASI) of ≥50% (PPASI50), ≥75% (PPASI75), or 100% (PPASI100) ImprovementPPASI5084.0 percentage of participants
Ixe Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving Palmoplantar PASI (PPASI) of ≥50% (PPASI50), ≥75% (PPASI75), or 100% (PPASI100) ImprovementPPASI5082.9 percentage of participants
Ixe Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving Palmoplantar PASI (PPASI) of ≥50% (PPASI50), ≥75% (PPASI75), or 100% (PPASI100) ImprovementPPASI10070.0 percentage of participants
Ixe Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving Palmoplantar PASI (PPASI) of ≥50% (PPASI50), ≥75% (PPASI75), or 100% (PPASI100) ImprovementPPASI7577.1 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI 90% (PASI90) or 100% (PASI100) (Efficacy of Ixekizumab in Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Ps Measure: PASI)

The PASI combines the extent of body surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, trunk, arms, and legs). For each region the percent area of skin involved was estimated from 0 (0%) to 6 (90%-100%) and severity was estimated by clinical signs of erythema, induration and scaling with a scores range from 0 (no involvement) to 4 (severe involvement). Each area is scored by itself and the scores were then combined for the final PASI. Final PASI calculated as: sum of severity parameters for each region \* area score \* weighing factor \[head (0.1), upper limbs (0.2), trunk (0.3), lower limbs (0.4)\]. Overall scores range from 0 (no Ps) to 72 (the most severe disease). Participants achieving PASI90 or PASI100 were defined as having an improvement of ≥90% or of 100% respectively in PASI scores compared to baseline.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT Population: all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment to which they are assigned. Participants who did not meet the clinical response criteria or had missing data at Week 12 were considered non-responders for NRI analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving PASI 90% (PASI90) or 100% (PASI100) (Efficacy of Ixekizumab in Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Ps Measure: PASI)PASI900.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving PASI 90% (PASI90) or 100% (PASI100) (Efficacy of Ixekizumab in Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Ps Measure: PASI)PASI1000.0 percentage of participants
Ixe Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving PASI 90% (PASI90) or 100% (PASI100) (Efficacy of Ixekizumab in Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Ps Measure: PASI)PASI9064.6 percentage of participants
Ixe Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving PASI 90% (PASI90) or 100% (PASI100) (Efficacy of Ixekizumab in Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Ps Measure: PASI)PASI10033.6 percentage of participants
Ixe Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving PASI 90% (PASI90) or 100% (PASI100) (Efficacy of Ixekizumab in Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Ps Measure: PASI)PASI9070.9 percentage of participants
Ixe Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving PASI 90% (PASI90) or 100% (PASI100) (Efficacy of Ixekizumab in Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Ps Measure: PASI)PASI10035.3 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Maintaining sPGA 0 or 1 After Re-Randomization at Start of Maintenance Dosing Period

The sPGA is the physician's determination of the participant's Ps lesions overall at a given time point. Lesions were categorized by descriptions for induration, erythema, and scaling. Participants Ps were assessed as 0 (clear), 1 (minimal), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (severe), or 5 (very severe).

Time frame: Week 60

Population: Maintenance Period Primary Population (MPPP): all randomized participants from Period 2 who achieved sPGA (0, 1), were re-randomized at Week 12 and who received at least 1 dose of study treatment Period 3. Participants did not meet the clinical response criteria or had missing data at Week 12 were considered non-responders for NRI analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining sPGA 0 or 1 After Re-Randomization at Start of Maintenance Dosing Period7.5 percentage of participants
Ixe Q4WPercentage of Participants Maintaining sPGA 0 or 1 After Re-Randomization at Start of Maintenance Dosing Period37.4 percentage of participants
Ixe Q2WPercentage of Participants Maintaining sPGA 0 or 1 After Re-Randomization at Start of Maintenance Dosing Period72.9 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Anti-ixekizumab Antibodies

Percentage of participants with treatment-emergent positive anti-ixekizumab antibodies was summarized by treatment group. Percentage was calculated based on the number of evaluable participants and was calculated by number of participants with treatment-emergent positive anti-ixekizumab antibodies / number of evaluable participants \* 100%.

Time frame: Baseline through Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had evaluable data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Anti-ixekizumab Antibodies0.5 percentage of participants
Ixe Q4WPercentage of Participants With Anti-ixekizumab Antibodies12.5 percentage of participants
Ixe Q2WPercentage of Participants With Anti-ixekizumab Antibodies10.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Itch Numeric Rating Scale (Itch NRS) Score ≥4 Point Reduction From Baseline

The Itch NRS is a participant-administered, 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 (no itch) and 10 (worst itch imaginable). Overall severity of a participant's itching from Ps is indicated by circling the number that best describes the worst level of itching in the past 24 hours.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: ITT Population: all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment to which they are assigned; and had an Itch NRS score ≥4 at baseline. Participants who did not meet the clinical response criteria or had missing data at Week 12 were considered non-responders for NRI analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Itch Numeric Rating Scale (Itch NRS) Score ≥4 Point Reduction From Baseline15.5 percentage of participants
Ixe Q4WPercentage of Participants With Itch Numeric Rating Scale (Itch NRS) Score ≥4 Point Reduction From Baseline80.5 percentage of participants
Ixe Q2WPercentage of Participants With Itch Numeric Rating Scale (Itch NRS) Score ≥4 Point Reduction From Baseline85.9 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percent of Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement of Ps

BSA is a physician rating of the percentage of involvement of Ps for each participant. BSA is assessed on a continuous scale from 0% (no involvement) to 100% (full involvement), where 1% corresponds to the size of the participants hand (includes the palm, fingers and thumb). Total BSA is the sum of handprints from the affected areas. LS mean change from baseline was calculated using MMRM.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT Population: all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment to which they are assigned; and had at least 1 post-baseline BSA measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent of Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement of Ps1.3 percentage of body surfaceStandard Error 0.67
Ixe Q4WPercent of Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement of Ps-21.4 percentage of body surfaceStandard Error 0.67
Ixe Q2WPercent of Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement of Ps-22.4 percentage of body surfaceStandard Error 0.66
p-value: <0.001Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: <0.001Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss)

Time frame: Weeks 12: Day 84 and Week 24: Day 168

Population: ITT Population: all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment to which they are assigned; and who had Ctrough ss results at specified time points where the concentration met the definition of being a trough concentration.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss)Week 127.73 micrograms/milliliter (µg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 79
PlaceboPharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss)Week 24NA micrograms/milliliter (µg/mL)
Ixe Q4WPharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss)Week 24NA micrograms/milliliter (µg/mL)
Ixe Q4WPharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss)Week 122.94 micrograms/milliliter (µg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 89
Ixe Q2WPharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss)Week 12NA micrograms/milliliter (µg/mL)
Ixe Q2WPharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss)Week 242.36 micrograms/milliliter (µg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 111
Ixe Q12W - Maintenance PeriodPharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss)Week 12NA micrograms/milliliter (µg/mL)
Ixe Q12W - Maintenance PeriodPharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough ss)Week 240.281 micrograms/milliliter (µg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 175

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026