Skip to content

Efficacy of LCQ908 on Cardiovascular Risk

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy of LCQ908 on Cardiovascular Risk

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01474434
Enrollment
41
Registered
2011-11-18
Start date
2011-12-31
Completion date
2014-06-30
Last updated
2016-04-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease, Hypertriglyceridemia

Keywords

coronary artery disease,, LCQ908,, hyperlipidemia,, hypertriglyceridemia,, pradigastat

Brief summary

This is a study designed to evaluate the potential for the pradigastat (LCQ908) to impact cardiovascular risk.

Detailed description

This study had 2 parts. Part A was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, non-confirmatory crossover study assessing response to a high-fat meal challenge in the setting of pradigastat versus placebo. Part A had 2 cohorts i.e. Cohort 1 patients with stable coronary artery disease and hypertriglyceridemia and Cohort 2 patients with asymptomatic non-obstructive coronary artery disease or elevated coronary heart disease risk and hypertriglyceridemia. Part B was a double blinded phase designed to assess response to three months of chronic treatment with pradigastat versus placebo on a normal diet. The trial was terminated after the interim analysis of Part A, Cohort 1. The interim analysis results indicated that the high-fat meal challenge did not induce any impairment on either myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRi) or exercise treadmill performance. Part B was never started.

Interventions

DRUGpradigastat (LCQ908)

pradigastat tablets were supplied to the investigators at dose strengths of 10 mg and 20 mg as individual patient packs.

DRUGPlacebo

matching placebo tablets

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* History of coronary artery disease * Elevated triglycerides * On medication to help lower cholesterol

Exclusion criteria

* Poorly controlled diabetic patients and/or change in diabetic medication within 12 weeks of screening * History of myocardial infarction (heart attack) within 6 months of screening * History of a procedure to open a blocked coronary artery within 12 months of enrollment * History of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) surgery * History of congestive heart failure * History of significant heart valve disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Myocardial Perfusion Reserve Index (MPRi) Overall Mean (Part A, Cohort 1)Baseline, and on day 5 of each of the two treatment periodsMPRi (myocardial perfusion reserve index) is a measure of coronary microvascular function. Myocardial perfusion scans using 0.05 mmol/kg of gadolinium contrast were acquired at rest and under stress (pharmacological stress induced with adenosine 140 μg/kg/min for three minutes). An independent central reader performed the cardiac image analysis of all time points including the calculation of the myocardial perfusion reserve index from the ratio of the global stress myocardial blood flow divided by the resting blood flow values. Higher/increased index indicates improved flow/better outcome. This primary endpoint was only for Part A, Cohort 1 patients.
Change From Baseline in Total Exercise Duration (Part A, Cohort 1)Baseline and on day 5 of each of the two treatment periodsTotal exercise duration was the elapsed time between the start of exercise and termination of exercise for severe angina, dyspnea or extreme fatigue. This primary endpoint was only for Part A, Cohort 1 patients.
Time to Onset of Angina (Part A, Cohort 1)Baseline and on day 5 of each of the two treatment periodsTime to onset of angina was defined as the elapsed time between the start of exercise and the onset of anginal chest pain as reported by the patient and recorded by the performing investigator.
Time to Onset of Exercise-induced Ischemia(Part A, Cohort 1)Baseline and on day 5 of each of the two treatment periodsExercise-induced ischemia was defined as the new development of horizontal or down-sloping ST-segment depression (≥ 1mm at 60 milliseconds after the J point) versus baseline tracings.
Aortic Plaque Inflammation (Part B)Baseline and on treatment day 85 +/- 3 daysThis endpoint was palnned for analysis on Part B patients which was never started becasue study got terminated on Part A interim analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Other Related Lipid Parameters (Part A)Baseline, day 4 and day 5 of each treatment period
Adiponectin Level ( Part B)Part B; Baseline, day 15, day 43 and day 85
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Part A, Cohort 1)approximately 40 days
C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level (Part A)Baseline, day 4 and day 5, of each treatment period
Interleukin-6 (IL-6) Level (Part A)Baseline, day 4 and day 5, of each treatment period
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Part A, Cohort 2)approximately 40 days
Postprandial Triglycerides (Part A, Cohort 1)0 hour (before breakfast), 2 and 4 hours post high-fat breakfast on day 5For both each treatment period, postprandial triglycerides were measured on Day 5 i.e. on 0 hour(before breakfast), two hours and four hours post high-fat breakfast. Results are from an ANCOVA model on change from baseline in the log domain with log(baseline), treatment, sequence and period as fixed effects. Baseline is the Day -1 value within period. The data reported is ratio of geometric mean between post-treatment and baseline data.
Postprandial Triglycerides (Part A, Cohort 2)0 hour (before breakfast), 2 and 4 hours post high-fat breakfast on day 5For both each treatment period, postprandial triglycerides were measured on Day 5 i.e. on 0 hour (before breakfast), two hours and four hours post high-fat breakfast. Results are from an ANCOVA model on change from baseline in the log domain with log(baseline), treatment, sequence and period as fixed effects. Baseline is the Day -1 value within period. The data reported is ratio of geometric mean between post-treatment and baseline data.
Pharmacokinetics of Pradigastat (LCQ908): Plasma Concentration (Part A)Part A: Day 4 and day 5 of each treatment period

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Study was terminated upon Part A interim analysis. Total 41 patients randomized to Part A i.e.17 patients in cohort 1 and 24 patients in Cohort 2.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Part A, Cohort 1: Pradigastat (LCQ908) Followed by Placebo
Cohort 1 consisted of patients with evidence of stable symptomatic or obstructive coronary artery disease and mild to moderate hypertriglyceridemia. All patients who randomized to this sequence received pradigastat 80 mg (4 x 20-mg tablets) loading dose daily for three days followed by pradigastat 20 mg (2 x 10-mg tablets) daily for two days followed by a 30-day washout period in between followed by 5-day placebo treatment
8
Part A, Cohort 1: Placebo Followed by Pradigastat (LCQ908)
Cohort 1 consisted of patients with evidence of stable symptomatic or obstructive coronary artery disease and mild to moderate hypertriglyceridemia. All patients who randomized to this sequence received Placebo (5-day treatment period) followed by a 30-day washout period followed by pradigastat 80 mg (4 x 20-mg tablets) loading dose daily for three days followed by 20 mg (2 x 10-mg tablets) daily for two days
9
Part A, Cohort 2: Pradigastat (LCQ908) Followed by Placebo
Cohort 2 consisted of patients with stable asymptomatic non-obstructive coronary artery disease or coronary heart disease risk equivalents and mild to moderate hypertriglyceridemia.. All patients who randomized to this sequence received pradigastat 80 mg (4 x 20-mg tablets) loading dose daily for three days followed by pradigastat 20 mg (2 x 10-mg tablets) daily for two days followed by a 30-day washout period in between followed by 5-day placebo treatment
11
Part A, Cohort 2: Placebo Followed by Pradigastat (LCQ908)
Cohort 2 consisted of patients with stable asymptomatic non-obstructive coronary artery disease or coronary heart disease risk equivalents and mild to moderate hypertriglyceridemia. All patients who randomized to this sequence received Placebo (5-day treatment period) followed by a 30-day washout period followed by pradigastat 80 mg (4 x 20-mg tablets) loading dose daily for three days followed by 20 mg (2 x 10-mg tablets) daily for two days
13
Total41

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Treatment Period 1 (5 Days [Day 1 - 5])Adverse Event0011
Treatment Period 1 (5 Days [Day 1 - 5])Protocol deviation1000
Treatment Period 1 (5 Days [Day 1 - 5])Withdrawal by Subject0001

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPart A, Cohort 1: Pradigastat (LCQ908) Followed by PlaceboPart A, Cohort 1: Placebo Followed by Pradigastat (LCQ908)Part A, Cohort 2: Pradigastat (LCQ908) Followed by PlaceboPart A, Cohort 2: Placebo Followed by Pradigastat (LCQ908)Total
Age, Continuous59.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.67
58.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.79
56.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.79
56.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.85
57.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants4 Participants4 Participants6 Participants16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants5 Participants7 Participants7 Participants25 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
16 / 176 / 1722 / 2413 / 24
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 170 / 170 / 241 / 24

Outcome results

Primary

Aortic Plaque Inflammation (Part B)

This endpoint was palnned for analysis on Part B patients which was never started becasue study got terminated on Part A interim analysis.

Time frame: Baseline and on treatment day 85 +/- 3 days

Population: The study was terminated based on the interim analysis after patients completed Part A. Part B of the study was never started.

Primary

Change From Baseline in Myocardial Perfusion Reserve Index (MPRi) Overall Mean (Part A, Cohort 1)

MPRi (myocardial perfusion reserve index) is a measure of coronary microvascular function. Myocardial perfusion scans using 0.05 mmol/kg of gadolinium contrast were acquired at rest and under stress (pharmacological stress induced with adenosine 140 μg/kg/min for three minutes). An independent central reader performed the cardiac image analysis of all time points including the calculation of the myocardial perfusion reserve index from the ratio of the global stress myocardial blood flow divided by the resting blood flow values. Higher/increased index indicates improved flow/better outcome. This primary endpoint was only for Part A, Cohort 1 patients.

Time frame: Baseline, and on day 5 of each of the two treatment periods

Population: Efficacy analysis set - Patients who took \> 80% of study drug as assessed by drug accountability, had no major protocol deviations, and had a valid assessment of MPRi at both baseline and post-treatment visits. Patients who had no baseline or post-treatment MPRi data in 1 of 2 periods were excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Part A, Cohort 1: Pradigastat (LCQ908)Change From Baseline in Myocardial Perfusion Reserve Index (MPRi) Overall Mean (Part A, Cohort 1)-0.22 myocardial perfusion reserve indexStandard Error 0.24
Part A, Cohort 1: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Myocardial Perfusion Reserve Index (MPRi) Overall Mean (Part A, Cohort 1)0.32 myocardial perfusion reserve indexStandard Error 0.24
Primary

Change From Baseline in Total Exercise Duration (Part A, Cohort 1)

Total exercise duration was the elapsed time between the start of exercise and termination of exercise for severe angina, dyspnea or extreme fatigue. This primary endpoint was only for Part A, Cohort 1 patients.

Time frame: Baseline and on day 5 of each of the two treatment periods

Population: Efficacy analysis set- Patients who took \> 80% of study drug as assessed by drug accountability, had no major protocol deviations, and had a valid assessment of total exercise duration at both baseline and post-treatment visits. Patients who had no baseline or post-treatment exercise duration data in 1 of 2 periods were excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Part A, Cohort 1: Pradigastat (LCQ908)Change From Baseline in Total Exercise Duration (Part A, Cohort 1)-1.52 minuteStandard Error 0.46
Part A, Cohort 1: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Exercise Duration (Part A, Cohort 1)-1.00 minuteStandard Error 0.4
Primary

Time to Onset of Angina (Part A, Cohort 1)

Time to onset of angina was defined as the elapsed time between the start of exercise and the onset of anginal chest pain as reported by the patient and recorded by the performing investigator.

Time frame: Baseline and on day 5 of each of the two treatment periods

Population: The study was terminated based on the interim analysis after patients completed Part A. This outcome measure was not part of interim analysis; hence it is not done. .

Primary

Time to Onset of Exercise-induced Ischemia(Part A, Cohort 1)

Exercise-induced ischemia was defined as the new development of horizontal or down-sloping ST-segment depression (≥ 1mm at 60 milliseconds after the J point) versus baseline tracings.

Time frame: Baseline and on day 5 of each of the two treatment periods

Population: The study was terminated based on the interim analysis after patients completed Part A. This outcome measure was not part of interim analysis; hence it is not done. .

Secondary

Adiponectin Level ( Part B)

Time frame: Part B; Baseline, day 15, day 43 and day 85

Population: The study was terminated based on the interim analysis on Part A, cohort 1 after patients completed Part A. Part B of the study was not commenced.

Secondary

C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level (Part A)

Time frame: Baseline, day 4 and day 5, of each treatment period

Population: The study was terminated based on the interim analysis on Part A, Cohort 1 after patients completed Part A. The analysis of this assessment was not part of interim analysis; hence it is not done.

Secondary

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) Level (Part A)

Time frame: Baseline, day 4 and day 5, of each treatment period

Population: The study was terminated based on the interim analysis on Part A, Cohort 1 after patients completed Part A. The analysis of this assessment was not part of interim analysis; hence it is not done.

Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Part A, Cohort 1)

Time frame: approximately 40 days

Population: The safety analysis set included all patients who received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Part A, Cohort 1: Pradigastat (LCQ908)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Part A, Cohort 1)Any Adverse Events16 Participants
Part A, Cohort 1: Pradigastat (LCQ908)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Part A, Cohort 1)Serious Adverse Events0 Participants
Part A, Cohort 1: Pradigastat (LCQ908)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Part A, Cohort 1)Death0 Participants
Part A, Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (Part A, Cohort 1)Any Adverse Events6 Participants
Part A, Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (Part A, Cohort 1)Serious Adverse Events0 Participants
Part A, Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (Part A, Cohort 1)Death0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Part A, Cohort 2)

Time frame: approximately 40 days

Population: The safety analysis set included all patients who received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Part A, Cohort 1: Pradigastat (LCQ908)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Part A, Cohort 2)Any Adverse Events22 Participants
Part A, Cohort 1: Pradigastat (LCQ908)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Part A, Cohort 2)Serious Adverse Events0 Participants
Part A, Cohort 1: Pradigastat (LCQ908)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Part A, Cohort 2)Death0 Participants
Part A, Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (Part A, Cohort 2)Any Adverse Events15 Participants
Part A, Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (Part A, Cohort 2)Serious Adverse Events1 Participants
Part A, Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (Part A, Cohort 2)Death0 Participants
Secondary

Other Related Lipid Parameters (Part A)

Time frame: Baseline, day 4 and day 5 of each treatment period

Population: The study was terminated based on the interim analysis on Part A, Cohort 1 after patients completed Part A. The analysis of this assessment was not part of interim analysis; hence it is not done.

Secondary

Pharmacokinetics of Pradigastat (LCQ908): Plasma Concentration (Part A)

Time frame: Part A: Day 4 and day 5 of each treatment period

Population: The study was terminated based on the interim analysis on Part A, Cohort 1 after patients completed Part A. The analysis of this assessment was not part of interim analysis; hence it is not done.

Secondary

Postprandial Triglycerides (Part A, Cohort 1)

For both each treatment period, postprandial triglycerides were measured on Day 5 i.e. on 0 hour(before breakfast), two hours and four hours post high-fat breakfast. Results are from an ANCOVA model on change from baseline in the log domain with log(baseline), treatment, sequence and period as fixed effects. Baseline is the Day -1 value within period. The data reported is ratio of geometric mean between post-treatment and baseline data.

Time frame: 0 hour (before breakfast), 2 and 4 hours post high-fat breakfast on day 5

Population: The efficacy analysis set included all patients who took more than 80% of study medication as assessed by drug accountability, had no major protocol deviations, and had a valid assessment of the primary efficacy variables at both baseline and post treatment visits.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Part A, Cohort 1: Pradigastat (LCQ908)Postprandial Triglycerides (Part A, Cohort 1)Day 5 Hr 41.29 ratioStandard Error 1.09
Part A, Cohort 1: Pradigastat (LCQ908)Postprandial Triglycerides (Part A, Cohort 1)Day 5 Hr 01.15 ratioStandard Error 1.08
Part A, Cohort 1: Pradigastat (LCQ908)Postprandial Triglycerides (Part A, Cohort 1)Day 5 Hr 21.21 ratioStandard Error 1.08
Part A, Cohort 1: PlaceboPostprandial Triglycerides (Part A, Cohort 1)Day 5 Hr 21.40 ratioStandard Error 1.07
Part A, Cohort 1: PlaceboPostprandial Triglycerides (Part A, Cohort 1)Day 5 Hr 00.97 ratioStandard Error 1.08
Part A, Cohort 1: PlaceboPostprandial Triglycerides (Part A, Cohort 1)Day 5 Hr 41.71 ratioStandard Error 1.08
Secondary

Postprandial Triglycerides (Part A, Cohort 2)

For both each treatment period, postprandial triglycerides were measured on Day 5 i.e. on 0 hour (before breakfast), two hours and four hours post high-fat breakfast. Results are from an ANCOVA model on change from baseline in the log domain with log(baseline), treatment, sequence and period as fixed effects. Baseline is the Day -1 value within period. The data reported is ratio of geometric mean between post-treatment and baseline data.

Time frame: 0 hour (before breakfast), 2 and 4 hours post high-fat breakfast on day 5

Population: The efficacy analysis set included all patients who took more than 80% of study medication as assessed by drug accountability, had no major protocol deviations, and had a valid assessment of the primary efficacy variables at both baseline and post treatment visits.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Part A, Cohort 1: Pradigastat (LCQ908)Postprandial Triglycerides (Part A, Cohort 2)Day 5 Hr 01.16 ratioStandard Error 1.08
Part A, Cohort 1: Pradigastat (LCQ908)Postprandial Triglycerides (Part A, Cohort 2)Day 5 Hr 21.15 ratioStandard Error 1.07
Part A, Cohort 1: Pradigastat (LCQ908)Postprandial Triglycerides (Part A, Cohort 2)Day 5 Hr 41.14 ratioStandard Error 1.08
Part A, Cohort 1: PlaceboPostprandial Triglycerides (Part A, Cohort 2)Day 5 Hr 01.09 ratioStandard Error 1.08
Part A, Cohort 1: PlaceboPostprandial Triglycerides (Part A, Cohort 2)Day 5 Hr 21.38 ratioStandard Error 1.07
Part A, Cohort 1: PlaceboPostprandial Triglycerides (Part A, Cohort 2)Day 5 Hr 41.56 ratioStandard Error 1.08

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026